I hated Petersen until this year, but I can't bitch about an undefeated coach. I swear to God, mental retardation must be contagious and all you motherfuckers in this cesspool have cross-contaminated yourselves.
I hated Petersen until this year, but I can't bitch about an undefeated coach.
So... are getting fozzy bear or not? Why am I paying my $10.95?
This is such a retarded argument by Roadie. Just take whomever. Straußer's and Pete's pecking order doesn't mean hardly anything, probably, right?
I hated Petersen until this year, but I can't bitch about an undefeated coach. I swear to God, mental retardation must be contagious and all you motherfuckers in this cesspool have cross-contaminated yourselves. I hated Petersen until this year, but I can't bitch about an undefeated coach. I swear to God, mental retardation must be contagious and all you motherfuckers in this cesspool have cross-contaminated yourselves. I like UW coaches only when they win. Why would I have liked him before?
The last post I'll make about this for awhile because we obviously aren't going to agree.The difference between the dogman "sky is not falling bullshit" is that we aren't .500 like we always were back then. We are undefeated and favored to win the rest of our games.Our OL has gotten markedly better from last year, which normally means the coach is developing players. That didn't happen under Sark/Cozzetto. It has happened under Strausser and Pete. Coaches that develop their unit into the best in the conference deserve the benefit of the doubt. Simple fact.So the sky isn't really falling, whether we get Sarrell or not. Any 5 star from the state is needed, but we might still have a good OL without Sarrell. That was never going to happen by not getting Garnett and the other guys Sark missed. If you can't see those differences, I can't help you. Things fucking change, and it's okay to admit it when they have. @Gladstone, I followed TBS for years as a teenager and in my early 20's, but it's creepy to follow as a 30, 40 year old man. All is well for Husky Football right now.
@Dennis_DeYoung And @CokeGreaterThanPepsi, the fact that you guys actually make the argument that players matter is what is retarded. No fucking shit players matter. Is water wet too?You want a coach that can recruit and coach? What a fucking novel concept. I want a QB like DeShaun Watson and a RB like Fournette, but I'm not going to complain about Browning and Gaskin.Everyone here wants Sarrell. The retarded part of this is getting mad that we "might" not have a great OL three years from now when we have all the pieces needed to get to the playoffs THIS fucking year. We have the OL to win the conference THIS fucking year. But continue to spaz out over the OL coach because some teenager might not come to UW. I hated Petersen until this year, but I can't bitch about an undefeated coach. I can't bitch about the OL coach of the best OL of the conference because he might not get Sarrell.If we win big the next two years, recruiting will take care of itself. Winning helps. He's not committing for a long time anyways and we have an undefeated team. The future has always been for doogs. You kinda get it, and kinda don't. Wanting to be good in two years AS WELL as this year is like two sides of the same fucking coin. Just because they patched bullshit and chicken wire together into a usable line this year has no bearing on whether they'd be able to do the same next year.
@Dennis_DeYoung And @CokeGreaterThanPepsi, the fact that you guys actually make the argument that players matter is what is retarded. No fucking shit players matter. Is water wet too?You want a coach that can recruit and coach? What a fucking novel concept. I want a QB like DeShaun Watson and a RB like Fournette, but I'm not going to complain about Browning and Gaskin.Everyone here wants Sarrell. The retarded part of this is getting mad that we "might" not have a great OL three years from now when we have all the pieces needed to get to the playoffs THIS fucking year. We have the OL to win the conference THIS fucking year. But continue to spaz out over the OL coach because some teenager might not come to UW. I hated Petersen until this year, but I can't bitch about an undefeated coach. I can't bitch about the OL coach of the best OL of the conference because he might not get Sarrell.If we win big the next two years, recruiting will take care of itself. Winning helps. He's not committing for a long time anyways and we have an undefeated team. The future has always been for doogs.
The last post I'll make about this for awhile because we obviously aren't going to agree.The difference between the dogman "sky is not falling bullshit" is that we aren't .500 like we always were back then. We are undefeated and favored to win the rest of our games.Our OL has gotten markedly better from last year, which normally means the coach is developing players. That didn't happen under Sark/Cozzetto. It has happened under Strausser and Pete. Coaches that develop their unit into the best in the conference deserve the benefit of the doubt. Simple fact.So the sky isn't really falling, whether we get Sarrell or not. Any 5 star from the state is needed, but we might still have a good OL without Sarrell. That was never going to happen by not getting Garnett and the other guys Sark missed. If you can't see those differences, I can't help you. Things fucking change, and it's okay to admit it when they have. @Gladstone, I followed TBS for years as a teenager and in my early 20's, but it's creepy to follow as a 30, 40 year old man. All is well for Husky Football right now. But by the time you realize, "Oh no, our OL sucks again!" it is way too fucking late to fix it via better recruiting.I hated Petersen until this year, but I can't bitch about an undefeated coach. I swear to God, mental retardation must be contagious and all you motherfuckers in this cesspool have cross-contaminated yourselves. I hated Petersen until this year, but I can't bitch about an undefeated coach. I swear to God, mental retardation must be contagious and all you motherfuckers in this cesspool have cross-contaminated yourselves. I like UW coaches only when they win. Why would I have liked him before? Do you not believe the future can in any way be predicted?It must be amazing to live your life. Wake up each day with boundless possibilities.
The last post I'll make about this for awhile because we obviously aren't going to agree.The difference between the dogman "sky is not falling bullshit" is that we aren't .500 like we always were back then. We are undefeated and favored to win the rest of our games.Our OL has gotten markedly better from last year, which normally means the coach is developing players. That didn't happen under Sark/Cozzetto. It has happened under Strausser and Pete. Coaches that develop their unit into the best in the conference deserve the benefit of the doubt. Simple fact.So the sky isn't really falling, whether we get Sarrell or not. Any 5 star from the state is needed, but we might still have a good OL without Sarrell. That was never going to happen by not getting Garnett and the other guys Sark missed. If you can't see those differences, I can't help you. Things fucking change, and it's okay to admit it when they have. @Gladstone, I followed TBS for years as a teenager and in my early 20's, but it's creepy to follow as a 30, 40 year old man. All is well for Husky Football right now. But by the time you realize, "Oh no, our OL sucks again!" it is way too fucking late to fix it via better recruiting.I hated Petersen until this year, but I can't bitch about an undefeated coach. I swear to God, mental retardation must be contagious and all you motherfuckers in this cesspool have cross-contaminated yourselves. I hated Petersen until this year, but I can't bitch about an undefeated coach. I swear to God, mental retardation must be contagious and all you motherfuckers in this cesspool have cross-contaminated yourselves. I like UW coaches only when they win. Why would I have liked him before? Do you not believe the future can in any way be predicted?It must be amazing to live your life. Wake up each day with boundless possibilities. Except for 1 year(the year after Kellen Moore) Boise St has had consistently excellent OLs. I think we can trust his recruiting at the position
I don't even really know how you can really evaluate OLine at a HS level. Most Dtackles in HS are fucking tiny. To me it should be more about getting some big strong fuckers to really coach up.
I don't even really know how you can really evaluate OLine at a HS level. Most Dtackles in HS are fucking tiny. To me it should be more about getting some big strong fuckers to really coach up. ThisIt is Doog 101 but it is also true - O line translates least well to college ballNoted 7 wide out recruiting coach Rick Neuheisel brought in the top ranked class of O linemen one year. People forget that because they were all busts. The best of the bunch never played a down due to injury.I'll take 5 stars any day but if a kid is 6 foot 5 300 pounds with a nasty attitude and a love of HGH we can work with himBama and Ohio State dominate recruiting at the D line, linebacker, running back and wide out categories. I'm all for joining in on that action.You know what the big question mark for Bama this year was? The O line and quarterbackBut Nick coaches them up every year.
Fozzy = Nick Montana. Value is in the hype
I don't even really know how you can really evaluate OLine at a HS level. Most Dtackles in HS are fucking tiny. To me it should be more about getting some big strong fuckers to really coach up. ThisIt is Doog 101 but it is also true - O line translates least well to college ballNoted 7 wide out recruiting coach Rick Neuheisel brought in the top ranked class of O linemen one year. People forget that because they were all busts. The best of the bunch never played a down due to injury.I'll take 5 stars any day but if a kid is 6 foot 5 300 pounds with a nasty attitude and a love of HGH we can work with himBama and Ohio State dominate recruiting at the D line, linebacker, running back and wide out categories. I'm all for joining in on that action.You know what the big question mark for Bama this year was? The O line and quarterbackBut Nick coaches them up every year. That is a pretty hot take.BAMA signed 12 Scout top300 players on the OL in the last five years. Six top100.And it's not even about the stars. It is about signing the guys that CP and Strausser identify as our top targets.If we whiff on our top 5 guys I don't give a flying fuck if the sixth guy is a 4* or a 2*.
I don't even really know how you can really evaluate OLine at a HS level. Most Dtackles in HS are fucking tiny. To me it should be more about getting some big strong fuckers to really coach up. Yeah. It's a total crap shoot. Doesn't matter who you get. The fact that all the top schools offer the same guys probably doesn't mean anything.