Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Foster Sarell, we got a shot with him?

1222325272841

Comments

  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,386 Standard Supporter
    AIRWOLF said:


    I hated Petersen until this year, but I can't bitch about an undefeated coach.

    I swear to God, mental retardation must be contagious and all you motherfuckers in this cesspool have cross-contaminated yourselves.

    AIRWOLF said:


    I hated Petersen until this year, but I can't bitch about an undefeated coach.

    I swear to God, mental retardation must be contagious and all you motherfuckers in this cesspool have cross-contaminated yourselves.

    I like UW coaches only when they win. Why would I have liked him before?

  • HuskiesADW
    HuskiesADW Member Posts: 141
    doogville said:

    So... are getting fozzy bear or not? Why am I paying my $10.95?

    We are until we are not. A lot of things are going on behind the scenes and I cannot share my information yet. Thanks for the $10.95
  • biak1
    biak1 Member Posts: 4,237

    This is such a retarded argument by Roadie.


    Just take whomever. Straußer's and Pete's pecking order doesn't mean hardly anything, probably, right?

    Upvote for the true spelling of the name.
  • AIRWOLF
    AIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840

    AIRWOLF said:


    I hated Petersen until this year, but I can't bitch about an undefeated coach.

    I swear to God, mental retardation must be contagious and all you motherfuckers in this cesspool have cross-contaminated yourselves.

    AIRWOLF said:


    I hated Petersen until this year, but I can't bitch about an undefeated coach.

    I swear to God, mental retardation must be contagious and all you motherfuckers in this cesspool have cross-contaminated yourselves.

    I like UW coaches only when they win. Why would I have liked him before?

    Like I said. The shit is apparently contagious.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,435 Founders Club

    @Dennis_DeYoung And @CokeGreaterThanPepsi, the fact that you guys actually make the argument that players matter is what is retarded. No fucking shit players matter. Is water wet too?

    You want a coach that can recruit and coach? What a fucking novel concept. I want a QB like DeShaun Watson and a RB like Fournette, but I'm not going to complain about Browning and Gaskin.

    Everyone here wants Sarrell. The retarded part of this is getting mad that we "might" not have a great OL three years from now when we have all the pieces needed to get to the playoffs THIS fucking year. We have the OL to win the conference THIS fucking year. But continue to spaz out over the OL coach because some teenager might not come to UW.

    I hated Petersen until this year, but I can't bitch about an undefeated coach. I can't bitch about the OL coach of the best OL of the conference because he might not get Sarrell.

    If we win big the next two years, recruiting will take care of itself. Winning helps. He's not committing for a long time anyways and we have an undefeated team. The future has always been for doogs.

    You kinda get it, and kinda don't. Wanting to be good in two years AS WELL as this year is like two sides of the same fucking coin. Just because they patched bullshit and chicken wire together into a usable line this year has no bearing on whether they'd be able to do the same next year.
    Oddly enough our last conference champions had the same kind of O line

    Tuff fuckers who "do what it takes"

    If you know what I mean
  • KobeStan
    KobeStan Member Posts: 91

    The last post I'll make about this for awhile because we obviously aren't going to agree.

    The difference between the dogman "sky is not falling bullshit" is that we aren't .500 like we always were back then. We are undefeated and favored to win the rest of our games.

    Our OL has gotten markedly better from last year, which normally means the coach is developing players. That didn't happen under Sark/Cozzetto. It has happened under Strausser and Pete. Coaches that develop their unit into the best in the conference deserve the benefit of the doubt. Simple fact.

    So the sky isn't really falling, whether we get Sarrell or not. Any 5 star from the state is needed, but we might still have a good OL without Sarrell. That was never going to happen by not getting Garnett and the other guys Sark missed. If you can't see those differences, I can't help you. Things fucking change, and it's okay to admit it when they have.

    @Gladstone, I followed TBS for years as a teenager and in my early 20's, but it's creepy to follow as a 30, 40 year old man. All is well for Husky Football right now.

    But by the time you realize, "Oh no, our OL sucks again!" it is way too fucking late to fix it via better recruiting.

    AIRWOLF said:


    I hated Petersen until this year, but I can't bitch about an undefeated coach.

    I swear to God, mental retardation must be contagious and all you motherfuckers in this cesspool have cross-contaminated yourselves.

    AIRWOLF said:


    I hated Petersen until this year, but I can't bitch about an undefeated coach.

    I swear to God, mental retardation must be contagious and all you motherfuckers in this cesspool have cross-contaminated yourselves.

    I like UW coaches only when they win. Why would I have liked him before?

    Do you not believe the future can in any way be predicted?

    It must be amazing to live your life. Wake up each day with boundless possibilities.
    Except for 1 year(the year after Kellen Moore) Boise St has had consistently excellent OLs. I think we can trust his recruiting at the position
  • FremontTroll
    FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744
    KobeStan said:

    The last post I'll make about this for awhile because we obviously aren't going to agree.

    The difference between the dogman "sky is not falling bullshit" is that we aren't .500 like we always were back then. We are undefeated and favored to win the rest of our games.

    Our OL has gotten markedly better from last year, which normally means the coach is developing players. That didn't happen under Sark/Cozzetto. It has happened under Strausser and Pete. Coaches that develop their unit into the best in the conference deserve the benefit of the doubt. Simple fact.

    So the sky isn't really falling, whether we get Sarrell or not. Any 5 star from the state is needed, but we might still have a good OL without Sarrell. That was never going to happen by not getting Garnett and the other guys Sark missed. If you can't see those differences, I can't help you. Things fucking change, and it's okay to admit it when they have.

    @Gladstone, I followed TBS for years as a teenager and in my early 20's, but it's creepy to follow as a 30, 40 year old man. All is well for Husky Football right now.

    But by the time you realize, "Oh no, our OL sucks again!" it is way too fucking late to fix it via better recruiting.

    AIRWOLF said:


    I hated Petersen until this year, but I can't bitch about an undefeated coach.

    I swear to God, mental retardation must be contagious and all you motherfuckers in this cesspool have cross-contaminated yourselves.

    AIRWOLF said:


    I hated Petersen until this year, but I can't bitch about an undefeated coach.

    I swear to God, mental retardation must be contagious and all you motherfuckers in this cesspool have cross-contaminated yourselves.

    I like UW coaches only when they win. Why would I have liked him before?

    Do you not believe the future can in any way be predicted?

    It must be amazing to live your life. Wake up each day with boundless possibilities.
    Except for 1 year(the year after Kellen Moore) Boise St has had consistently excellent OLs. I think we can trust his recruiting at the position
    I do trust CPand Strausser's ability to evaluate talent at the OL position.

    The concern is that, for the second year in a row, it looks like they are going to miss out on nearly all their top targets.

    Once they get to campus I also trust CP and Strausser to get the most out of their players. But I want an OLine that can win national championships not conference championships.
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,500
    I don't even really know how you can really evaluate OLine at a HS level. Most Dtackles in HS are fucking tiny. To me it should be more about getting some big strong fuckers to really coach up.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,435 Founders Club

    I don't even really know how you can really evaluate OLine at a HS level. Most Dtackles in HS are fucking tiny. To me it should be more about getting some big strong fuckers to really coach up.

    This

    It is Doog 101 but it is also true - O line translates least well to college ball

    Noted 7 wide out recruiting coach Rick Neuheisel brought in the top ranked class of O linemen one year. People forget that because they were all busts. The best of the bunch never played a down due to injury.

    I'll take 5 stars any day but if a kid is 6 foot 5 300 pounds with a nasty attitude and a love of HGH we can work with him

    Bama and Ohio State dominate recruiting at the D line, linebacker, running back and wide out categories. I'm all for joining in on that action.

    You know what the big question mark for Bama this year was? The O line and quarterback

    But Nick coaches them up every year.