Question for the people who had written off Petersen...
Comments
-
Doogman might be a better site for you.TurdBuffer said:@Tommy, @Race. I played the game. I seriously doubt either of you did.
I weathered all your bullshit last year on that "Fire Pete, Hire Chip" thread, and said then Pete was the right hire at the right time. So, go read the thread, dredge up your Bama avatars, start writing "winners win" every other post, and suck each other off to your hearts' content.
@Tommy, you have no football acumen. Stick to slamming Romar.
At least Race is funny, but then he says really stupid stuff like "you wanted Ty for 5 years" or "Nobody prays to lose." (Profound). Sure, Race. I watched the 0-12 from my Tyee seats and couldn't wait for another year.
You two shit-talkers are defensive as fuck because you talked endless streams of smack and can't pull it back. Now Pete needs to lose a big game for either of you to maintain a shred of credibility.
You made your beds, enjoy them. It's called comeuppance. -
Hey Boobs: Who was the best team in the Pac10 in 1984 if not UW, as you proudly claimed? You never answered the question. Did you forget?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Doogman might be a better site for you.TurdBuffer said:@Tommy, @Race. I played the game. I seriously doubt either of you did.
I weathered all your bullshit last year on that "Fire Pete, Hire Chip" thread, and said then Pete was the right hire at the right time. So, go read the thread, dredge up your Bama avatars, start writing "winners win" every other post, and suck each other off to your hearts' content.
@Tommy, you have no football acumen. Stick to slamming Romar.
At least Race is funny, but then he says really stupid stuff like "you wanted Ty for 5 years" or "Nobody prays to lose." (Profound). Sure, Race. I watched the 0-12 from my Tyee seats and couldn't wait for another year.
You two shit-talkers are defensive as fuck because you talked endless streams of smack and can't pull it back. Now Pete needs to lose a big game for either of you to maintain a shred of credibility.
You made your beds, enjoy them. It's called comeuppance.
But still... -
USC was. They won the conference after all.TurdBuffer said:
Hey Boobs: Who was the best team in the Pac10 in 1984 if not UW, as you proudly claimed? You never answered the question. Did you forget?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Doogman might be a better site for you.TurdBuffer said:@Tommy, @Race. I played the game. I seriously doubt either of you did.
I weathered all your bullshit last year on that "Fire Pete, Hire Chip" thread, and said then Pete was the right hire at the right time. So, go read the thread, dredge up your Bama avatars, start writing "winners win" every other post, and suck each other off to your hearts' content.
@Tommy, you have no football acumen. Stick to slamming Romar.
At least Race is funny, but then he says really stupid stuff like "you wanted Ty for 5 years" or "Nobody prays to lose." (Profound). Sure, Race. I watched the 0-12 from my Tyee seats and couldn't wait for another year.
You two shit-talkers are defensive as fuck because you talked endless streams of smack and can't pull it back. Now Pete needs to lose a big game for either of you to maintain a shred of credibility.
You made your beds, enjoy them. It's called comeuppance.
But still...
http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/conferences/pac-10/1984.html
Doogs hate facts. -
I'm not defensive. I have happily admitted to being wrong. I've always wanted to be wrong. Sounds like you care more about being right than UW winning. Except you were wrong for 15 years, and we were wrong once.TurdBuffer said:@Tommy, @Race. I played the game. I seriously doubt either of you did.
Doogs hate facts, and prefer baseless assumptions 101.
I weathered all your bullshit last year on that "Fire Pete, Hire Chip" thread, and said then Pete was the right hire at the right time. So, go read the thread, dredge up your Bama avatars, start writing "winners win" every other post, and suck each other off to your hearts' content.
Pumpy minion. No way to go through life.
@Tommy, you have no football acumen. Stick to slamming Romar.
I support Coach Romar
At least Race is funny, but then he says really stupid stuff like "you wanted Ty for 5 years" or "Nobody prays to lose." (Profound). Sure, Race. I watched the 0-12 from my Tyee seats and couldn't wait for another year.
You two shit-talkers are defensive as fuck because you talked endless streams of smack and can't pull it back. Now Pete needs to lose a big game for either of you to maintain a shred of credibility.
You made your beds, enjoy them. It's called comeuppance.
Doog. -
-
Nobody is more defensive than the Ty needed more time crew. I can still smoke out the remnants of that crowd even though they are here under witness protection.
-
You're right, Uncle Race. I didn't doubt Petersen one fucking bit coming into this year. I also wanted Ty to have a lifetime contract with your people.RaceBannon said:
ThisThomasFremont said:
Fuck off.TurdBuffer said:'14 was a scratch. How the fuck do you win with Cyler Miles or Jeff Lindquist at QB? Last year was immature and difficult, mostly because of Smiff's unnecessarily complicated play-calling with a true frosh QB and lazy fucking receivers with stone hands. Firing Pease was the right move. Sark would've kept him another year. Ty? Wouldn't have noticed anything wrong.
Pete was the right hire from day one. His recruiting alone, after mediocre seasons 1 & 2, is fucking amazing by any measure. Anyone who ever accused him of being the "same old shit" as Sark or Ty is a blind fucking idiot who needs an open mouth swirly in an overflowing Honey Bucket, before being torched on the W.
And now we're praising Smiff when Tedford has him on his knee with his hand in his back. Incredible.
Pete had a worse W-L record than Sark. And his whole "built for life" mantra was no better than Ty's "molder of men" as long as they were losing.
Make whatever fucking excuses you want about the QB (doog) or recruiting (NAMBLA doog), but that's the truth.
Claiming you "knew all along" that Pete was the guy is bullshit, as there were no facts to support such a position. Your blind faith was wrong for 15 years.
HTH
We all dooged over the hire but then his first year he fucks up Stanford and blows the Arizona game to put us in CHARTED waters of loserdom once again. Then we sucked again last year.
If you didn't doubt Petersen coming into this year you wanted Ty to have 5 years -
Grampy's mumbling gibberish again.RaceBannon said:Nobody is more defensive than the Ty needed more time crew. I can still smoke out the remnants of that crowd even though they are here under witness protection.
Sorry. I know that's ageist. -
yeah well they can smoke you out tooRaceBannon said:Nobody is more defensive than the Ty needed more time crew. I can still smoke out the remnants of that crowd even though they are here under witness protection.
-
why did seemingly nice and docile posters like turdbuffer, haie and bricksquad turn evil after one of UW's most joyous wins in a long time
