Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

TSIO Podcast #14: Losers Lose to Stanford?

2»

Comments

  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,739 Founders Club
    Oh one other thing....on TBS'ing...next time you guys say you think we will take 4-7 more dudes, could you take guesses on who they will be. Make sure 3 of them are top shelf OL even if you don't believe that. This pod convinced me Strausser should be napalmed.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsi
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646
    Swaye said:

    I hate to admit this, but the podcast is actually getting really good. I still hate you all.

    Our podcast is shit and you're all fags.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Passion
    Passion Member Posts: 4,622
    edited September 2016
    The lead-in is too long and you guys take frequent steam baths with jonathan smith.

    Anyway, completely agree with your bitching and moaning about babushka, but I think you took it too easy on brownshorts. That guy has missed wide open receivers in clutch situations...consistently. A couple would've put us up by 2 scores against arizona.

    Also, you were spot on with your thoughts on smith not doing things we're good at.

    Kill strausser.

    Lastly, can you guys start a countdown clock to p-salm's last game?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Mad_Son
    Mad_Son Member Posts: 10,194
    edited September 2016
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

    Swaye said:

    I hate to admit this, but the podcast is actually getting really good. I still hate you all.

    Are podcast is shit and your all fags.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogville
    doogville Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,229 Swaye's Wigwam
    Good pod, but gotta go with a disagree on the idea that a competent OC should only try to score 17 pts and play the field position game. 17 pts is a joke in 2016 college football, even for a good defense like Stanford.

    7 teams scored 22+ on Stanford last year. Juggernauts like UCLA and the Trojans scored 30+. It's very doable even if if you are a mediocre offense.

    http://www.fbschedules.com/ncaa-15/pac-10/2015-stanford-cardinal-football-schedule.php

    If we only score 17, we will lose.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Dennis_DeYoung
    Dennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    So @Passion - we go pretty hard on Brownsocks on the AZ review. I think we get to the source of it to some extent.

    In terms of scoring 17, I don't know about that... but I think field goals are important in terms of going up by two scores and depleting opponents' will. Keeping momentum on our side is important.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    It isn't that we need to get only 17 ... the point was that a good OC worries about field position and getting scores even if FGs
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,035 Standard Supporter
    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    So @Passion - we go pretty hard on Brownsocks on the AZ review. I think we get to the source of it to some extent.

    In terms of scoring 17, I don't know about that... but I think field goals are important in terms of going up by two scores and depleting opponents' will. Keeping momentum on our side is important.

    Who doesn't think Jake would improve immediately if we got rid of that bitch girlfriend of his, i.e., Smiff? It's a classic, co-dependent, dysfunctional relationship, where the whole produces far less than the sum of it's parts. So, part that bitch out.

    With any luck, Tedford's giving him swirlies right now and wiping his own ass with Smiff's playbook.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    CirrhosisDawg said:


    Tequilla said:

    TurdBuffer said:

    Tequilla said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    DeepSeaZ said:

    DDY, you keep building games up and then you drop me back down to earth, hard. The fuck? And did someone make popcorn during the podcast? What was that popping sound?

    Teq's earphones. Apologies.

    Actually it was me shuffling paper and because I have a mic that picks up all noises that's what you're getting.
    Then get a new mic, Tequila, and don't be a cheap ass!

    That's a real annoyance to an otherwise decent listening experience.
    It was a new mic you fucktard ...

    I was a tad worried going into the podcast with how sensitive the sound pickup was from the mic knowing that I had my notes on a legal pad. I tried to do my page turning away from the microphone but being that this was pod #1 with the microphone you never know until you hear and get the audio feedback.

    Needless to say lesson was learned and I'll be prepping slightly different for podcasts going forward.

    Quite frankly, you know you are better podcaster than the score showed. Just some things to clean up this week in practice.
    Agree
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter