TSIO Podcast #14: Losers Lose to Stanford?
It will be on iTunes when it fucking shows up on iTunes. Fuck off @SpoonieLuv.
I hate all of you and hope you enjoy it.
traffic.libsyn.com/tsiopodcast/TSIO_-_Losers_Lose_to_Stanford.m4a
Comments
-
Hi I usually can get your program on the computer in the wife's sewing room but I think the grandkids got a "virus" on it. Can you please tell me how to get your show on my TV? I hear TVs are "smart" now? It's a Zenith. Please check on this soon. Email me at gonegolffin@netzero.net.
-
I just need your credit card number, social security number, date of birth, and mother's maiden name. You can email me at: eatadick17@gofuckyouself.govGrundleStiltzkin said:Hi I usually can get your program on the computer in the wife's sewing room but I think the grandkids got a "virus" on it. Can you please tell me how to get your show on my TV? I hear TVs are "smart" now? It's a Zenith. Please check on this soon. Email me at gonegolffin@netzero.net.
-
Hi, I was told this was included in my Sports Washington subscription.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
I just need your credit card number, social security number, date of birth, and mother's maiden name. You can email me at: eatadick17@gofuckyouself.govGrundleStiltzkin said:Hi I usually can get your program on the computer in the wife's sewing room but I think the grandkids got a "virus" on it. Can you please tell me how to get your show on my TV? I hear TVs are "smart" now? It's a Zenith. Please check on this soon. Email me at gonegolffin@netzero.net.
-
Totally, totally obvious that Smiff sucks and literally designs and calls plays that go away from our talent and skill, instead of embracing and working with what we have. This is THE SOURCE of the offensive sputtering and misfiring we describe as a shit-show.
Yes, Peterman is to blame for not firing his ass, but the silver lining is that Smiff should be gone after this season, regardless of our record. The four games I've seen have not demonstrated a competent, talented Pac12 offense, despite plenty of talent and a highly-recruited QB.
It's extremely telling that the majority of this pod is the discussion about how to win the Stanford game, DESPITE the offense. -
DDY, you keep building games up and then you drop me back down to earth, hard. The fuck? And did someone make popcorn during the podcast? What was that popping sound?
-
Teq's earphones. Apologies.DeepSeaZ said:DDY, you keep building games up and then you drop me back down to earth, hard. The fuck? And did someone make popcorn during the podcast? What was that popping sound?
-
"Spit-roasting John Ross"
-
Actually it was me shuffling paper and because I have a mic that picks up all noises that's what you're getting.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Teq's earphones. Apologies.DeepSeaZ said:DDY, you keep building games up and then you drop me back down to earth, hard. The fuck? And did someone make popcorn during the podcast? What was that popping sound?
-
Then get a new mic, Tequila, and don't be a cheap ass!Tequilla said:
Actually it was me shuffling paper and because I have a mic that picks up all noises that's what you're getting.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Teq's earphones. Apologies.DeepSeaZ said:DDY, you keep building games up and then you drop me back down to earth, hard. The fuck? And did someone make popcorn during the podcast? What was that popping sound?
That's a real annoyance to an otherwise decent listening experience. -
It was a new mic you fucktard ...TurdBuffer said:
Then get a new mic, Tequila, and don't be a cheap ass!Tequilla said:
Actually it was me shuffling paper and because I have a mic that picks up all noises that's what you're getting.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Teq's earphones. Apologies.DeepSeaZ said:DDY, you keep building games up and then you drop me back down to earth, hard. The fuck? And did someone make popcorn during the podcast? What was that popping sound?
That's a real annoyance to an otherwise decent listening experience.
I was a tad worried going into the podcast with how sensitive the sound pickup was from the mic knowing that I had my notes on a legal pad. I tried to do my page turning away from the microphone but being that this was pod #1 with the microphone you never know until you hear and get the audio feedback.
Needless to say lesson was learned and I'll be prepping slightly different for podcasts going forward.
-
MERRIAM WEBSTER: Simple Definition of concise: using few words : not including extra or unnecessary informationTequilla said:
It was a new mic you fucktard ...TurdBuffer said:
Then get a new mic, Tequila, and don't be a cheap ass!Tequilla said:
Actually it was me shuffling paper and because I have a mic that picks up all noises that's what you're getting.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Teq's earphones. Apologies.DeepSeaZ said:DDY, you keep building games up and then you drop me back down to earth, hard. The fuck? And did someone make popcorn during the podcast? What was that popping sound?
That's a real annoyance to an otherwise decent listening experience.
I was a tad worried going into the podcast with how sensitive the sound pickup was from the mic knowing that I had my notes on 367 legal pads. I tried to do my page turning away ...
Needless to say lesson was learned and I'll be prepping slightly different for podcasts going forward. -
how many season ending injuries do we get on Friday?
-
Meek said:
how many season ending injuries do we get on Friday?
-
Hopefully they forfeit.
-
What has stopped Petersen from firing Smith to this point? Nothing. So I don't see how we can assume Smith will be gone at season's end.TurdBuffer said:Totally, totally obvious that Smiff sucks and literally designs and calls plays that go away from our talent and skill, instead of embracing and working with what we have. This is THE SOURCE of the offensive sputtering and misfiring we describe as a shit-show.
Yes, Peterman is to blame for not firing his ass, but the silver lining is that Smiff should be gone after this season, regardless of our record. The four games I've seen have not demonstrated a competent, talented Pac12 offense, despite plenty of talent and a highly-recruited QB.
It's extremely telling that the majority of this pod is the discussion about how to win the Stanford game, DESPITE the offense. -
I tend to agree, but to be fair, he did give him a one-year contract renewal, so it's not like there's been zero movement.DerekJohnson said:
What has stopped Petersen from firing Smith to this point? Nothing. So I don't see how we can assume Smith will be gone at season's end.TurdBuffer said:Totally, totally obvious that Smiff sucks and literally designs and calls plays that go away from our talent and skill, instead of embracing and working with what we have. This is THE SOURCE of the offensive sputtering and misfiring we describe as a shit-show.
Yes, Peterman is to blame for not firing his ass, but the silver lining is that Smiff should be gone after this season, regardless of our record. The four games I've seen have not demonstrated a competent, talented Pac12 offense, despite plenty of talent and a highly-recruited QB.
It's extremely telling that the majority of this pod is the discussion about how to win the Stanford game, DESPITE the offense.
I'm not saying it's the move I wanted. But I don't think it's preposterous to think that Babushka gets canned given that fact.
I'd heard last year he was real close to the chopping block. -
It's not preposterous, especially with the Tedford thing. I'm just saying we can't assume he'll be gone.Dennis_DeYoung said:
I tend to agree, but to be fair, he did give him a one-year contract renewal, so it's not like there's been zero movement.DerekJohnson said:
What has stopped Petersen from firing Smith to this point? Nothing. So I don't see how we can assume Smith will be gone at season's end.TurdBuffer said:Totally, totally obvious that Smiff sucks and literally designs and calls plays that go away from our talent and skill, instead of embracing and working with what we have. This is THE SOURCE of the offensive sputtering and misfiring we describe as a shit-show.
Yes, Peterman is to blame for not firing his ass, but the silver lining is that Smiff should be gone after this season, regardless of our record. The four games I've seen have not demonstrated a competent, talented Pac12 offense, despite plenty of talent and a highly-recruited QB.
It's extremely telling that the majority of this pod is the discussion about how to win the Stanford game, DESPITE the offense.
I'm not saying it's the move I wanted. But I don't think it's preposterous to think that Babushka gets canned given that fact.
I'd heard last year he was real close to the chopping block. -
If Pete knew it was a problem and didn't at least reassign Smith (if his sense of loyalty prevented him from firing him), then that's a failure of leadership.
-
Smith is also a young coordinator that was provided an experienced mentor to help him through the year and see what kind of growth could be made ...DerekJohnson said:If Pete knew it was a problem and didn't at least reassign Smith (if his sense of loyalty prevented him from firing him), then that's a failure of leadership.
While you want to cite failure of leadership because of not immediately firing Smith after last year, there's another side where by firing it's not just Pete admitting that he got the hire wrong but that he also failed to develop him as a coach (bigger issue IMO preventing him from firing him) ...
If the offense shits itself and the team doesn't reach its goals you can be assured that Smith is the designated fall guy -
I see you've been hanging around with @Pitchfork51Dennis_DeYoung said:Hopefully they forfeit.
-
Forfeit and McCaffrey's MCL being less robust than expected are our? two main hopes.Mad_Son said: -
Drumheller Fountain of YouthTequilla said:
Smith is also a young coordinator that was provided an experienced mentor to help him through the year and see what kind of growth could be made ...DerekJohnson said:If Pete knew it was a problem and didn't at least reassign Smith (if his sense of loyalty prevented him from firing him), then that's a failure of leadership.
While you want to cite failure of leadership because of not immediately firing Smith after last year, there's another side where by firing it's not just Pete admitting that he got the hire wrong but that he also failed to develop him as a coach (bigger issue IMO preventing him from firing him) ...
If the offense shits itself and the team doesn't reach its goals you can be assured that Smith is the designated fall guy -
Do you even have a question?TurdBuffer said:Totally, totally obvious that Smiff sucks and literally designs and calls plays that go away from our talent and skill, instead of embracing and working with what we have. This is THE SOURCE of the offensive sputtering and misfiring we describe as a shit-show.
Yes, Peterman is to blame for not firing his ass, but the silver lining is that Smiff should be gone after this season, regardless of our record. The four games I've seen have not demonstrated a competent, talented Pac12 offense, despite plenty of talent and a highly-recruited QB.
It's extremely telling that the majority of this pod is the discussion about how to win the Stanford game, DESPITE the offense. -
Unless I missed it, his contract is up at the end of this season. Also, it is patently obvious that our play calling is over complicated and dysfunctional, causing the O to shoot itself in the foot. And, perhaps the biggest revelation is the poor decisions Jake is making, and he spends a shit-ton of time at Smiff's side, watching film and preparing.DerekJohnson said:
What has stopped Petersen from firing Smith to this point? Nothing. So I don't see how we can assume Smith will be gone at season's end.TurdBuffer said:Totally, totally obvious that Smiff sucks and literally designs and calls plays that go away from our talent and skill, instead of embracing and working with what we have. This is THE SOURCE of the offensive sputtering and misfiring we describe as a shit-show.
Yes, Peterman is to blame for not firing his ass, but the silver lining is that Smiff should be gone after this season, regardless of our record. The four games I've seen have not demonstrated a competent, talented Pac12 offense, despite plenty of talent and a highly-recruited QB.
It's extremely telling that the majority of this pod is the discussion about how to win the Stanford game, DESPITE the offense.
So, it's obvious that the Smiff-Browning relationship is not yielding acceptable results, and I believe that relationship is the main reason Pete kept Smiff on staff this year. If things change tomorrow night, great. But I doubt it does, and expect we'll all be revising our predictions downward if we fuck away the game tomorrow night.
If UW loses tomorrow, we already know how it will happen. If that happens, tomorrow, it will happen again later in the season, and Peterson will be forced to throw him under the bus.
Goddamn, I hope I'm wrong, but I'll bet many stomachs feel the same way right now. -
TurdBuffer said:
If UW loses tomorrow, we already know how it will happen. If that happens, tomorrow, it will happen again later in the season, and Peterson should be fired on the 50 and Babushka should be dumped off the 520 bridgeDerekJohnson said:
What has stopped Petersen from firing Smith to this point? Nothing. So I don't see how we can assume Smith will be gone at season's end.TurdBuffer said:Totally, totally obvious that Smiff sucks and literally designs and calls plays that go away from our talent and skill, instead of embracing and working with what we have. This is THE SOURCE of the offensive sputtering and misfiring we describe as a shit-show.
Yes, Peterman is to blame for not firing his ass, but the silver lining is that Smiff should be gone after this season, regardless of our record. The four games I've seen have not demonstrated a competent, talented Pac12 offense, despite plenty of talent and a highly-recruited QB.
It's extremely telling that the majority of this pod is the discussion about how to win the Stanford game, DESPITE the offense. -
Why are you such a dick?doogsinparadise said:
Do you even have a question?TurdBuffer said:Totally, totally obvious that Smiff sucks and literally designs and calls plays that go away from our talent and skill, instead of embracing and working with what we have. This is THE SOURCE of the offensive sputtering and misfiring we describe as a shit-show.
Yes, Peterman is to blame for not firing his ass, but the silver lining is that Smiff should be gone after this season, regardless of our record. The four games I've seen have not demonstrated a competent, talented Pac12 offense, despite plenty of talent and a highly-recruited QB.
It's extremely telling that the majority of this pod is the discussion about how to win the Stanford game, DESPITE the offense. -
2 dads: 2 much testosterone.TurdBuffer said:
Why are you such a dick?doogsinparadise said:
Do you even have a question?TurdBuffer said:Totally, totally obvious that Smiff sucks and literally designs and calls plays that go away from our talent and skill, instead of embracing and working with what we have. This is THE SOURCE of the offensive sputtering and misfiring we describe as a shit-show.
Yes, Peterman is to blame for not firing his ass, but the silver lining is that Smiff should be gone after this season, regardless of our record. The four games I've seen have not demonstrated a competent, talented Pac12 offense, despite plenty of talent and a highly-recruited QB.
It's extremely telling that the majority of this pod is the discussion about how to win the Stanford game, DESPITE the offense. -
I enjoyed the discussion about Haka fag. What's sad is, as you describe it, we basically have to manage our defense and scheme to "hide" Haka. But, the coaches don't have anyone else they think is better? We have NFL players all over that defense and yet we have one loser so bad he wouldn't play in the Big Sky, and there is nobody anywhere better than him to replace him with?
UW Football: Where Dreams Go To Die -
I think ice cube starred in that one iircDennis_DeYoung said:
2 dads: 2 much testosterone.TurdBuffer said:
Why are you such a dick?doogsinparadise said:
Do you even have a question?TurdBuffer said:Totally, totally obvious that Smiff sucks and literally designs and calls plays that go away from our talent and skill, instead of embracing and working with what we have. This is THE SOURCE of the offensive sputtering and misfiring we describe as a shit-show.
Yes, Peterman is to blame for not firing his ass, but the silver lining is that Smiff should be gone after this season, regardless of our record. The four games I've seen have not demonstrated a competent, talented Pac12 offense, despite plenty of talent and a highly-recruited QB.
It's extremely telling that the majority of this pod is the discussion about how to win the Stanford game, DESPITE the offense. -
I hate to admit this, but the podcast is actually getting really good. I still hate you all.
