Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
I want to see more Coleman 100+ yard rushing games
Comments
-
It might be a career night, but ill take 70-80% of it all damn day.RoadDawg55 said:
I must have imagined Dotson being the #2 back on the depth chart to start the year. Nobody expected Coleman to rush for 180 on 11 carries. The coaches obviously didn't either or he would have been playing a lot more.Tequilla said:
That performance from Coleman wouldn't have happened last year ... if you can't see the difference between Coleman last year and this I can't help youRoadDawg55 said:"We can't give Gaskin 25+ carries because we have no other RB's." Remember that retarded shit from Tequilla and others last year?
Coleman has always been serviceable. He's flashed at times before, just not like last night. I always suspected Coop was decent too.
The point was he always could have handled 5-10 carries. I suspect last night will be a career game for Coleman. He's not a great RB, but he's flashed before and was capable of a bigger role. -
A TUFF team like Stanford would have lined up with a heavy package and ran a dive. We? still make playcalls scared.PurpleTickler said:
That counter play on 4th down pissed me off so much.Tequilla said:Running from under center is our best plan of attack ... hopefully somebody else has noticed that.
http://gfycat.com/DelectableUniformCaudata -
Coleman wont find running room so easy vs Stanford. 2 words: mo shaw We need Gaskin to beat Stanford.
-
Actually we need greg lewis and Nipper to beat Stanford, and Reggie and Breuner!
-
Washington lost 10 in a row to Stanford from 67 through Don James first two years. Then won 20 out of 22. And now on a 9 out of 11 losing string
-
Couldn't help it, could you?RaceBannon said:Washington lost 10 in a row to Stanford from 67 through Don James first two years. Then won 20 out of 22. And now on a 9 out of 11 losing string



