Jacob Sirmon: "We hate Woodinville"
Comments
-
He's what 16 years old and at worst won't be taking a snap at UW for at least 2.5 years. Start with the measurables and arm strength and then worry about the rest later. I don't care about how shitty his OL or WRs are at the HS level ... he won't be playing with players of that caliber going forward.DeepSeaZ said:
He had plenty of times where he had plenty of time and he did nothing good. Go watch him play a full game then tell me if he has the "it" factor.Tequilla said:
So if he's not getting any blocking and his receivers are getting open ... then you're expecting a lot out of a QB to do a lot that was positive - yes?DeepSeaZ said:
Highlight films are just that. This was a low light film. Kid is big and he has astrong arm but he didn't show anything positive tonight. Zero escapability. No pocket presence. No touch. Bad decision making. No accuracy. To be fair, his receivers were rarely open but I was not impressed at all.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Yeah, he totally sucks. You're right.DeepSeaZ said:Watching Sirmon now. He's complete shit. Every throw is 30-50yds down field. No form. Seems to be a big fan of himself though.
-
Jack Lockner had great measurables and shit but he fucking sucked because he didn't know how to play quarterback.Tequilla said:
He's what 16 years old and at worst won't be taking a snap at UW for at least 2.5 years. Start with the measurables and arm strength and then worry about the rest later. I don't care about how shitty his OL or WRs are at the HS level ... he won't be playing with players of that caliber going forward.DeepSeaZ said:
He had plenty of times where he had plenty of time and he did nothing good. Go watch him play a full game then tell me if he has the "it" factor.Tequilla said:
So if he's not getting any blocking and his receivers are getting open ... then you're expecting a lot out of a QB to do a lot that was positive - yes?DeepSeaZ said:
Highlight films are just that. This was a low light film. Kid is big and he has astrong arm but he didn't show anything positive tonight. Zero escapability. No pocket presence. No touch. Bad decision making. No accuracy. To be fair, his receivers were rarely open but I was not impressed at all.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Yeah, he totally sucks. You're right.DeepSeaZ said:Watching Sirmon now. He's complete shit. Every throw is 30-50yds down field. No form. Seems to be a big fan of himself though.
Same shit, different phenom now. -
And the point is that when you have an option to take a player like Locker you do it every single day of the week and hope that you can develop the player.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Jack Lockner had great measurables and shit but he fucking sucked because he didn't know how to play quarterback.Tequilla said:
He's what 16 years old and at worst won't be taking a snap at UW for at least 2.5 years. Start with the measurables and arm strength and then worry about the rest later. I don't care about how shitty his OL or WRs are at the HS level ... he won't be playing with players of that caliber going forward.DeepSeaZ said:
He had plenty of times where he had plenty of time and he did nothing good. Go watch him play a full game then tell me if he has the "it" factor.Tequilla said:
So if he's not getting any blocking and his receivers are getting open ... then you're expecting a lot out of a QB to do a lot that was positive - yes?DeepSeaZ said:
Highlight films are just that. This was a low light film. Kid is big and he has astrong arm but he didn't show anything positive tonight. Zero escapability. No pocket presence. No touch. Bad decision making. No accuracy. To be fair, his receivers were rarely open but I was not impressed at all.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Yeah, he totally sucks. You're right.DeepSeaZ said:Watching Sirmon now. He's complete shit. Every throw is 30-50yds down field. No form. Seems to be a big fan of himself though.
Same shit, different phenom now. -
I'd rather get a guy with 81% of the measurables who can actually play QB.Tequilla said:
And the point is that when you have an option to take a player like Locker you do it every single day of the week and hope that you can develop the player.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Jack Lockner had great measurables and shit but he fucking sucked because he didn't know how to play quarterback.Tequilla said:
He's what 16 years old and at worst won't be taking a snap at UW for at least 2.5 years. Start with the measurables and arm strength and then worry about the rest later. I don't care about how shitty his OL or WRs are at the HS level ... he won't be playing with players of that caliber going forward.DeepSeaZ said:
He had plenty of times where he had plenty of time and he did nothing good. Go watch him play a full game then tell me if he has the "it" factor.Tequilla said:
So if he's not getting any blocking and his receivers are getting open ... then you're expecting a lot out of a QB to do a lot that was positive - yes?DeepSeaZ said:
Highlight films are just that. This was a low light film. Kid is big and he has astrong arm but he didn't show anything positive tonight. Zero escapability. No pocket presence. No touch. Bad decision making. No accuracy. To be fair, his receivers were rarely open but I was not impressed at all.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Yeah, he totally sucks. You're right.DeepSeaZ said:Watching Sirmon now. He's complete shit. Every throw is 30-50yds down field. No form. Seems to be a big fan of himself though.
Same shit, different phenom now.
If UW gets Sirmon, they need to convert him to WR or TE or waterboy. -
like Browning?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'd rather get a guy with 81% of the measurables who can actually play QB.Tequilla said:
And the point is that when you have an option to take a player like Locker you do it every single day of the week and hope that you can develop the player.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Jack Lockner had great measurables and shit but he fucking sucked because he didn't know how to play quarterback.Tequilla said:
He's what 16 years old and at worst won't be taking a snap at UW for at least 2.5 years. Start with the measurables and arm strength and then worry about the rest later. I don't care about how shitty his OL or WRs are at the HS level ... he won't be playing with players of that caliber going forward.DeepSeaZ said:
He had plenty of times where he had plenty of time and he did nothing good. Go watch him play a full game then tell me if he has the "it" factor.Tequilla said:
So if he's not getting any blocking and his receivers are getting open ... then you're expecting a lot out of a QB to do a lot that was positive - yes?DeepSeaZ said:
Highlight films are just that. This was a low light film. Kid is big and he has astrong arm but he didn't show anything positive tonight. Zero escapability. No pocket presence. No touch. Bad decision making. No accuracy. To be fair, his receivers were rarely open but I was not impressed at all.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Yeah, he totally sucks. You're right.DeepSeaZ said:Watching Sirmon now. He's complete shit. Every throw is 30-50yds down field. No form. Seems to be a big fan of himself though.
Same shit, different phenom now.
If UW gets Sirmon, they need to convert him to WR or TE or waterboy. -
Yes. For all of his Brownsocking issues, I'd rather have him than some fag who talks shit then chokes.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
like Browning?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'd rather get a guy with 81% of the measurables who can actually play QB.Tequilla said:
And the point is that when you have an option to take a player like Locker you do it every single day of the week and hope that you can develop the player.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Jack Lockner had great measurables and shit but he fucking sucked because he didn't know how to play quarterback.Tequilla said:
He's what 16 years old and at worst won't be taking a snap at UW for at least 2.5 years. Start with the measurables and arm strength and then worry about the rest later. I don't care about how shitty his OL or WRs are at the HS level ... he won't be playing with players of that caliber going forward.DeepSeaZ said:
He had plenty of times where he had plenty of time and he did nothing good. Go watch him play a full game then tell me if he has the "it" factor.Tequilla said:
So if he's not getting any blocking and his receivers are getting open ... then you're expecting a lot out of a QB to do a lot that was positive - yes?DeepSeaZ said:
Highlight films are just that. This was a low light film. Kid is big and he has astrong arm but he didn't show anything positive tonight. Zero escapability. No pocket presence. No touch. Bad decision making. No accuracy. To be fair, his receivers were rarely open but I was not impressed at all.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Yeah, he totally sucks. You're right.DeepSeaZ said:Watching Sirmon now. He's complete shit. Every throw is 30-50yds down field. No form. Seems to be a big fan of himself though.
Same shit, different phenom now.
If UW gets Sirmon, they need to convert him to WR or TE or waterboy. -
Also, @DerekJohnson you better put your avatar back to the Tennessee helmet.
-
This is all so hopeless
-
It's why some of us have a podcast that talks a lot of recruiting and others don'tCokeGreaterThanPepsi said:This is all so hopeless
-
After they become startersTierbsHsotBoobs said:
We like hating quarterbacks*HuskyJW said:
Seems to me young Sirmon would fit in here.DerekJohnson said:


