eSECpn in late-$eason form...
Espn sees the pac as only conference who can threaten their golden boy. Pretty obvious.
Comments
-
*Dreck12™ -
why do you still not realize that ESPN is in the bidness of making money and they make shit tons of it off the SEC while nobody makes money off the Pac12 except maybe some beer vendors at a stadium in Australia.
-
Meek said:
why do you still not realize that ESPN is in the bidness of making money and they make shit tons of it off the SEC while nobody makes money off the Pac12 except maybe some beer vendors at a stadium in Australia.
-
Nailed it pup. Good chit.
-
Already calling for no Pac 12 team to go to the playoffs is FS. If Stanford, or even UW loses one game, they should be in the running. I don't think that will happen, but if it does, why shouldn't they go? I know Boobs will point out UW's non conference schedule, but a lot of teams play shit schedules.
That said, the Pac 12 kind of sucks. Than again, every other conference does too except for a couple of teams. It's really no different than it's ever been. -
There's a difference between "calling for" and predicting. I didn't see the segment in question, but I'm guessing someone made a prediction and someone else agreed.RoadDawg55 said:Already calling for no Pac 12 team to go to the playoffs is FS. If Stanford, or even UW loses one game, they should be in the running. I don't think that will happen, but if it does, why shouldn't they go? I know Boobs will point out UW's non conference schedule, but a lot of teams play shit schedules.
That said, the Pac 12 kind of sucks. Than again, every other conference does too except for a couple of teams. It's really no different than it's ever been.
There are just too many possible scenarios to make absolute declarations about much at this point. I think we can confidently say a one loss Stanford gets in. A one loss UW would need a lot of help, thanks to the dreck non conference schedule you referenced. UW chose to schedule three scrimmages. It could cost them.
LIFPO. -
I don't believe for a second that UW only loses one game. I was playing in hypotheticals. I know that most would realize that, but I want to clear that up.dnc said:
There's a difference between "calling for" and predicting. I didn't see the segment in question, but I'm guessing someone made a prediction and someone else agreed.RoadDawg55 said:Already calling for no Pac 12 team to go to the playoffs is FS. If Stanford, or even UW loses one game, they should be in the running. I don't think that will happen, but if it does, why shouldn't they go? I know Boobs will point out UW's non conference schedule, but a lot of teams play shit schedules.
That said, the Pac 12 kind of sucks. Than again, every other conference does too except for a couple of teams. It's really no different than it's ever been.
There are just too many possible scenarios to make absolute declarations about much at this point. I think we can confidently say a one loss Stanford gets in. A one loss UW would need a lot of help, thanks to the dreck non conference schedule you referenced. UW chose to schedule three scrimmages. It could cost them.
LIFPO. -
Good thinking . Lot of twisters out here.RoadDawg55 said:
I don't believe for a second that UW only loses one game. I was playing in hypotheticals. I know that most would realize that, but I want to clear that up.dnc said:
There's a difference between "calling for" and predicting. I didn't see the segment in question, but I'm guessing someone made a prediction and someone else agreed.RoadDawg55 said:Already calling for no Pac 12 team to go to the playoffs is FS. If Stanford, or even UW loses one game, they should be in the running. I don't think that will happen, but if it does, why shouldn't they go? I know Boobs will point out UW's non conference schedule, but a lot of teams play shit schedules.
That said, the Pac 12 kind of sucks. Than again, every other conference does too except for a couple of teams. It's really no different than it's ever been.
There are just too many possible scenarios to make absolute declarations about much at this point. I think we can confidently say a one loss Stanford gets in. A one loss UW would need a lot of help, thanks to the dreck non conference schedule you referenced. UW chose to schedule three scrimmages. It could cost them.
LIFPO. -
Multiple bingo poast. Well done.dnc said:
There's a difference between "calling for" and predicting. I didn't see the segment in question, but I'm guessing someone made a prediction and someone else agreed.RoadDawg55 said:Already calling for no Pac 12 team to go to the playoffs is FS. If Stanford, or even UW loses one game, they should be in the running. I don't think that will happen, but if it does, why shouldn't they go? I know Boobs will point out UW's non conference schedule, but a lot of teams play shit schedules.
That said, the Pac 12 kind of sucks. Than again, every other conference does too except for a couple of teams. It's really no different than it's ever been.
There are just too many possible scenarios to make absolute declarations about much at this point. I think we can confidently say a one loss Stanford gets in. A one loss UW would need a lot of help, thanks to the dreck non conference schedule you referenced. UW chose to schedule three scrimmages. It could cost them.
LIFPO. -
Unbeaten Washington gets left out for a one loss SEC champ would be the dream scenario. Mayhem and hilarity ensue. Maybe UW upgrades the schedule. Maybe not. Either way will be interesting.
If UW is Stanford's only loss that would be about the only shot they have a a good opponent. Beating USC would pale next to 52-6. We don't play UCLA and they suck anyway. Oregon has lost their luster for some reason.
But we'll be 7-6 anyway
