eSECpn in late-$eason form...
Espn sees the pac as only conference who can threaten their golden boy. Pretty obvious.
Comments
-
*Dreck12™ -
why do you still not realize that ESPN is in the bidness of making money and they make shit tons of it off the SEC while nobody makes money off the Pac12 except maybe some beer vendors at a stadium in Australia.
-
Meek said:
why do you still not realize that ESPN is in the bidness of making money and they make shit tons of it off the SEC while nobody makes money off the Pac12 except maybe some beer vendors at a stadium in Australia.
-
Nailed it pup. Good chit.
-
Already calling for no Pac 12 team to go to the playoffs is FS. If Stanford, or even UW loses one game, they should be in the running. I don't think that will happen, but if it does, why shouldn't they go? I know Boobs will point out UW's non conference schedule, but a lot of teams play shit schedules.
That said, the Pac 12 kind of sucks. Than again, every other conference does too except for a couple of teams. It's really no different than it's ever been. -
There's a difference between "calling for" and predicting. I didn't see the segment in question, but I'm guessing someone made a prediction and someone else agreed.RoadDawg55 said:Already calling for no Pac 12 team to go to the playoffs is FS. If Stanford, or even UW loses one game, they should be in the running. I don't think that will happen, but if it does, why shouldn't they go? I know Boobs will point out UW's non conference schedule, but a lot of teams play shit schedules.
That said, the Pac 12 kind of sucks. Than again, every other conference does too except for a couple of teams. It's really no different than it's ever been.
There are just too many possible scenarios to make absolute declarations about much at this point. I think we can confidently say a one loss Stanford gets in. A one loss UW would need a lot of help, thanks to the dreck non conference schedule you referenced. UW chose to schedule three scrimmages. It could cost them.
LIFPO. -
I don't believe for a second that UW only loses one game. I was playing in hypotheticals. I know that most would realize that, but I want to clear that up.dnc said:
There's a difference between "calling for" and predicting. I didn't see the segment in question, but I'm guessing someone made a prediction and someone else agreed.RoadDawg55 said:Already calling for no Pac 12 team to go to the playoffs is FS. If Stanford, or even UW loses one game, they should be in the running. I don't think that will happen, but if it does, why shouldn't they go? I know Boobs will point out UW's non conference schedule, but a lot of teams play shit schedules.
That said, the Pac 12 kind of sucks. Than again, every other conference does too except for a couple of teams. It's really no different than it's ever been.
There are just too many possible scenarios to make absolute declarations about much at this point. I think we can confidently say a one loss Stanford gets in. A one loss UW would need a lot of help, thanks to the dreck non conference schedule you referenced. UW chose to schedule three scrimmages. It could cost them.
LIFPO. -
Good thinking . Lot of twisters out here.RoadDawg55 said:
I don't believe for a second that UW only loses one game. I was playing in hypotheticals. I know that most would realize that, but I want to clear that up.dnc said:
There's a difference between "calling for" and predicting. I didn't see the segment in question, but I'm guessing someone made a prediction and someone else agreed.RoadDawg55 said:Already calling for no Pac 12 team to go to the playoffs is FS. If Stanford, or even UW loses one game, they should be in the running. I don't think that will happen, but if it does, why shouldn't they go? I know Boobs will point out UW's non conference schedule, but a lot of teams play shit schedules.
That said, the Pac 12 kind of sucks. Than again, every other conference does too except for a couple of teams. It's really no different than it's ever been.
There are just too many possible scenarios to make absolute declarations about much at this point. I think we can confidently say a one loss Stanford gets in. A one loss UW would need a lot of help, thanks to the dreck non conference schedule you referenced. UW chose to schedule three scrimmages. It could cost them.
LIFPO. -
Multiple bingo poast. Well done.dnc said:
There's a difference between "calling for" and predicting. I didn't see the segment in question, but I'm guessing someone made a prediction and someone else agreed.RoadDawg55 said:Already calling for no Pac 12 team to go to the playoffs is FS. If Stanford, or even UW loses one game, they should be in the running. I don't think that will happen, but if it does, why shouldn't they go? I know Boobs will point out UW's non conference schedule, but a lot of teams play shit schedules.
That said, the Pac 12 kind of sucks. Than again, every other conference does too except for a couple of teams. It's really no different than it's ever been.
There are just too many possible scenarios to make absolute declarations about much at this point. I think we can confidently say a one loss Stanford gets in. A one loss UW would need a lot of help, thanks to the dreck non conference schedule you referenced. UW chose to schedule three scrimmages. It could cost them.
LIFPO. -
Unbeaten Washington gets left out for a one loss SEC champ would be the dream scenario. Mayhem and hilarity ensue. Maybe UW upgrades the schedule. Maybe not. Either way will be interesting.
If UW is Stanford's only loss that would be about the only shot they have a a good opponent. Beating USC would pale next to 52-6. We don't play UCLA and they suck anyway. Oregon has lost their luster for some reason.
But we'll be 7-6 anyway -
Says the author of a bloated and incoherent article on the SEC's weakness after one fucking week.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Criticizing the pac12, calling for no playoffs for Pac and big12, after 2 fucking weeks?. Planting the SEC early in the voters, media and committees brains is their objective. Aside from WSU, did 1 other pac12 team lose or struggle BADLY with Nichols? Or the 5 other fcs foes through 2 weeks? Its laughable.
Espn sees the pac as only conference who can threaten their golden boy. Pretty obvious. -
Someone gets it.Meek said:why do you still not realize that ESPN is in the bidness of making money and they make shit tons of it off the SEC while nobody makes money off the Pac12 except maybe some beer vendors at a stadium in Australia.
-
But stillDardanus said:
Says the author of a bloated and incoherent article on the SEC's weakness after one fucking week.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Criticizing the pac12, calling for no playoffs for Pac and big12, after 2 fucking weeks?. Planting the SEC early in the voters, media and committees brains is their objective. Aside from WSU, did 1 other pac12 team lose or struggle BADLY with Nichols? Or the 5 other fcs foes through 2 weeks? Its laughable.
Espn sees the pac as only conference who can threaten their golden boy. Pretty obvious. -
Americans like winnersFire_Marshall_Bill said:
Someone gets it.Meek said:why do you still not realize that ESPN is in the bidness of making money and they make shit tons of it off the SEC while nobody makes money off the Pac12 except maybe some beer vendors at a stadium in Australia.
-
Are you saying Doogs aren't American?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Americans like winnersFire_Marshall_Bill said:
Someone gets it.Meek said:why do you still not realize that ESPN is in the bidness of making money and they make shit tons of it off the SEC while nobody makes money off the Pac12 except maybe some beer vendors at a stadium in Australia.
-
Yes.Baseman said:
Are you saying Doogs aren't American?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Americans like winnersFire_Marshall_Bill said:
Someone gets it.Meek said:why do you still not realize that ESPN is in the bidness of making money and they make shit tons of it off the SEC while nobody makes money off the Pac12 except maybe some beer vendors at a stadium in Australia.
In Trump's America, we're going to deport all of the Doogs to Armenia and we're going to make Sark pay for it. -
Steel2, bates, thoughts?
-
House money.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Yes.Baseman said:
Are you saying Doogs aren't American?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Americans like winnersFire_Marshall_Bill said:
Someone gets it.Meek said:why do you still not realize that ESPN is in the bidness of making money and they make shit tons of it off the SEC while nobody makes money off the Pac12 except maybe some beer vendors at a stadium in Australia.
In Trump's America, we're going to deport all of the Doogs to Armenia and we're going to make Sark pay for it. -
To quote Clark Griswold about cousin Eddie, "Puppy's heart(with Pac 12) is bigger than his brains" Hence he is $25 poorer to Steel2. At this point everyone should just say everyone looks terrible because even if you beat teams badly then it's just "well you should, you play crap teams" This site works because that is the HH motto "everyone sucks, we suck" etc.
-
steelheader2 said:
To quote Clark Griswold about cousin Eddie, "Puppy's heart(with Pac 12) is bigger than his brains" - and dwarfs his flaccid penis Hence he is $25 poorer to Steel2. At this point everyone should just say everyone looks terrible because even if you beat teams badly then it's just "well you should, you play crap teams" This site works because that is the HH motto "everyone sucks, we suck" etc.
-
L O Fucking L. Solid effort.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Yes.Baseman said:
Are you saying Doogs aren't American?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Americans like winnersFire_Marshall_Bill said:
Someone gets it.Meek said:why do you still not realize that ESPN is in the bidness of making money and they make shit tons of it off the SEC while nobody makes money off the Pac12 except maybe some beer vendors at a stadium in Australia.
In Trump's America, we're going to deport all of the Doogs to Armenia and we're going to make Sark pay for it. -
UW scheduled a power-5 team. That was the prereqisite for the playoffSoutherndawg said:
Multiple bingo poast. Well done.dnc said:
There's a difference between "calling for" and predicting. I didn't see the segment in question, but I'm guessing someone made a prediction and someone else agreed.RoadDawg55 said:Already calling for no Pac 12 team to go to the playoffs is FS. If Stanford, or even UW loses one game, they should be in the running. I don't think that will happen, but if it does, why shouldn't they go? I know Boobs will point out UW's non conference schedule, but a lot of teams play shit schedules.
That said, the Pac 12 kind of sucks. Than again, every other conference does too except for a couple of teams. It's really no different than it's ever been.
There are just too many possible scenarios to make absolute declarations about much at this point. I think we can confidently say a one loss Stanford gets in. A one loss UW would need a lot of help, thanks to the dreck non conference schedule you referenced. UW chose to schedule three scrimmages. It could cost them.
LIFPO. -
The p12's elite teams didnt struggle with fcs competition...that is the difference. (Sans WSU, But Eastern isnt an ordinary fcs Opponent either). Remove head from ass Steelersteelheader2 said:To quote Clark Griswold about cousin Eddie, "Puppy's heart(with Pac 12) is bigger than his brains" Hence he is $25 poorer to Steel2. At this point everyone should just say everyone looks terrible because even if you beat teams badly then it's just "well you should, you play crap teams" This site works because that is the HH motto "everyone sucks, we suck" etc.
-
Please stay this time pup. This is great stuff.
I still like my Crimson Tide to repeat this year with a true frosh at QB, but it's still early and FSU and tOSU might beg to differ.
