eSECpn in late-$eason form...

puppylove_sugarsteel

Criticizing the pac12, calling for no playoffs for Pac and big12, after 2 fucking weeks?. Planting the SEC early in the voters, media and committees brains is their objective. Aside from WSU, did 1 other pac12 team lose or struggle BADLY with Nichols? Or the 5 other fcs foes through 2 weeks? Its laughable.

Espn sees the pac as only conference who can threaten their golden boy. Pretty obvious.

Southerndawg

*Dreck12™

Meek

why do you still not realize that ESPN is in the bidness of making money and they make shit tons of it off the SEC while nobody makes money off the Pac12 except maybe some beer vendors at a stadium in Australia.

RaceBannon

Meek said:

why do you still not realize that ESPN is in the bidness of making money and they make shit tons of it off the SEC while nobody makes money off the Pac12 except maybe some beer vendors at a stadium in Australia.

BallSacked

Nailed it pup. Good chit.

RoadDawg55

Already calling for no Pac 12 team to go to the playoffs is FS. If Stanford, or even UW loses one game, they should be in the running. I don't think that will happen, but if it does, why shouldn't they go? I know Boobs will point out UW's non conference schedule, but a lot of teams play shit schedules.

That said, the Pac 12 kind of sucks. Than again, every other conference does too except for a couple of teams. It's really no different than it's ever been.

dnc

RoadDawg55 said:

Already calling for no Pac 12 team to go to the playoffs is FS. If Stanford, or even UW loses one game, they should be in the running. I don't think that will happen, but if it does, why shouldn't they go? I know Boobs will point out UW's non conference schedule, but a lot of teams play shit schedules.

That said, the Pac 12 kind of sucks. Than again, every other conference does too except for a couple of teams. It's really no different than it's ever been.

There's a difference between "calling for" and predicting. I didn't see the segment in question, but I'm guessing someone made a prediction and someone else agreed.

There are just too many possible scenarios to make absolute declarations about much at this point. I think we can confidently say a one loss Stanford gets in. A one loss UW would need a lot of help, thanks to the dreck non conference schedule you referenced. UW chose to schedule three scrimmages. It could cost them.

LIFPO.

RoadDawg55

dnc said:

RoadDawg55 said:

Already calling for no Pac 12 team to go to the playoffs is FS. If Stanford, or even UW loses one game, they should be in the running. I don't think that will happen, but if it does, why shouldn't they go? I know Boobs will point out UW's non conference schedule, but a lot of teams play shit schedules.

That said, the Pac 12 kind of sucks. Than again, every other conference does too except for a couple of teams. It's really no different than it's ever been.

There's a difference between "calling for" and predicting. I didn't see the segment in question, but I'm guessing someone made a prediction and someone else agreed.

There are just too many possible scenarios to make absolute declarations about much at this point. I think we can confidently say a one loss Stanford gets in. A one loss UW would need a lot of help, thanks to the dreck non conference schedule you referenced. UW chose to schedule three scrimmages. It could cost them.

LIFPO.

I don't believe for a second that UW only loses one game. I was playing in hypotheticals. I know that most would realize that, but I want to clear that up.

dnc

RoadDawg55 said:

dnc said:

RoadDawg55 said:

Already calling for no Pac 12 team to go to the playoffs is FS. If Stanford, or even UW loses one game, they should be in the running. I don't think that will happen, but if it does, why shouldn't they go? I know Boobs will point out UW's non conference schedule, but a lot of teams play shit schedules.

That said, the Pac 12 kind of sucks. Than again, every other conference does too except for a couple of teams. It's really no different than it's ever been.

There's a difference between "calling for" and predicting. I didn't see the segment in question, but I'm guessing someone made a prediction and someone else agreed.

There are just too many possible scenarios to make absolute declarations about much at this point. I think we can confidently say a one loss Stanford gets in. A one loss UW would need a lot of help, thanks to the dreck non conference schedule you referenced. UW chose to schedule three scrimmages. It could cost them.

LIFPO.

I don't believe for a second that UW only loses one game. I was playing in hypotheticals. I know that most would realize that, but I want to clear that up.

Good thinking . Lot of twisters out here.

Southerndawg

dnc said:

RoadDawg55 said:

Already calling for no Pac 12 team to go to the playoffs is FS. If Stanford, or even UW loses one game, they should be in the running. I don't think that will happen, but if it does, why shouldn't they go? I know Boobs will point out UW's non conference schedule, but a lot of teams play shit schedules.

That said, the Pac 12 kind of sucks. Than again, every other conference does too except for a couple of teams. It's really no different than it's ever been.

There's a difference between "calling for" and predicting. I didn't see the segment in question, but I'm guessing someone made a prediction and someone else agreed.

There are just too many possible scenarios to make absolute declarations about much at this point. I think we can confidently say a one loss Stanford gets in. A one loss UW would need a lot of help, thanks to the dreck non conference schedule you referenced. UW chose to schedule three scrimmages. It could cost them.

LIFPO.

Multiple bingo poast. Well done.

RaceBannon

Unbeaten Washington gets left out for a one loss SEC champ would be the dream scenario. Mayhem and hilarity ensue. Maybe UW upgrades the schedule. Maybe not. Either way will be interesting.

If UW is Stanford's only loss that would be about the only shot they have a a good opponent. Beating USC would pale next to 52-6. We don't play UCLA and they suck anyway. Oregon has lost their luster for some reason.

But we'll be 7-6 anyway

Dardanus

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

Criticizing the pac12, calling for no playoffs for Pac and big12, after 2 fucking weeks?. Planting the SEC early in the voters, media and committees brains is their objective. Aside from WSU, did 1 other pac12 team lose or struggle BADLY with Nichols? Or the 5 other fcs foes through 2 weeks? Its laughable.

Espn sees the pac as only conference who can threaten their golden boy. Pretty obvious.

Says the author of a bloated and incoherent article on the SEC's weakness after one fucking week.

Fire_Marshall_Bill

Meek said:

why do you still not realize that ESPN is in the bidness of making money and they make shit tons of it off the SEC while nobody makes money off the Pac12 except maybe some beer vendors at a stadium in Australia.

Someone gets it.

RaceBannon

Dardanus said:

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

Criticizing the pac12, calling for no playoffs for Pac and big12, after 2 fucking weeks?. Planting the SEC early in the voters, media and committees brains is their objective. Aside from WSU, did 1 other pac12 team lose or struggle BADLY with Nichols? Or the 5 other fcs foes through 2 weeks? Its laughable.

Espn sees the pac as only conference who can threaten their golden boy. Pretty obvious.

Says the author of a bloated and incoherent article on the SEC's weakness after one fucking week.

But still

TierbsHsotBoobs

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

Meek said:

why do you still not realize that ESPN is in the bidness of making money and they make shit tons of it off the SEC while nobody makes money off the Pac12 except maybe some beer vendors at a stadium in Australia.

Someone gets it.

Americans like winners

Baseman

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

Meek said:

why do you still not realize that ESPN is in the bidness of making money and they make shit tons of it off the SEC while nobody makes money off the Pac12 except maybe some beer vendors at a stadium in Australia.

Someone gets it.

Americans like winners

Are you saying Doogs aren't American?

TierbsHsotBoobs

Baseman said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

Meek said:

why do you still not realize that ESPN is in the bidness of making money and they make shit tons of it off the SEC while nobody makes money off the Pac12 except maybe some beer vendors at a stadium in Australia.

Someone gets it.

Americans like winners

Are you saying Doogs aren't American?

Yes.

In Trump's America, we're going to deport all of the Doogs to Armenia and we're going to make Sark pay for it.

PostGameOrangeSlices

Steel2, bates, thoughts?

Baseman

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Baseman said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

Meek said:

why do you still not realize that ESPN is in the bidness of making money and they make shit tons of it off the SEC while nobody makes money off the Pac12 except maybe some beer vendors at a stadium in Australia.

Someone gets it.

Americans like winners

Are you saying Doogs aren't American?

Yes.

In Trump's America, we're going to deport all of the Doogs to Armenia and we're going to make Sark pay for it.

House money.

steelheader2

To quote Clark Griswold about cousin Eddie, "Puppy's heart(with Pac 12) is bigger than his brains" Hence he is $25 poorer to Steel2. At this point everyone should just say everyone looks terrible because even if you beat teams badly then it's just "well you should, you play crap teams" This site works because that is the HH motto "everyone sucks, we suck" etc.

Baseman

steelheader2 said:

To quote Clark Griswold about cousin Eddie, "Puppy's heart(with Pac 12) is bigger than his brains" - and dwarfs his flaccid penis Hence he is $25 poorer to Steel2. At this point everyone should just say everyone looks terrible because even if you beat teams badly then it's just "well you should, you play crap teams" This site works because that is the HH motto "everyone sucks, we suck" etc.