Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Scoreboard bitches

2

Comments

  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,695 Standard Supporter
    Hondo'd common sense:
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    Hondo'd common sense:

    He's getting laid. Like you hero Trump does. What's your point?
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    edited July 2016
    ?
    2001400ex said:

    Keep changing the basis...it's still bad for Cali. Look at the credit market. Kansas has a better credit rating than California. It's that simple.

    God you are effing stupid.

    Lol you keep finding a metric to make your point. Because we all know credit ratings are reliable. 2008 ring a bell?
    You were on here a few days ago sucking off Moody's... Remember?
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    ?

    2001400ex said:

    Keep changing the basis...it's still bad for Cali. Look at the credit market. Kansas has a better credit rating than California. It's that simple.

    God you are effing stupid.

    Lol you keep finding a metric to make your point. Because we all know credit ratings are reliable. 2008 ring a bell?
    You were on here a few days ago sucking off Moody's... Remember?
    Komo4 buttfucker.
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    All we are is dust in the wind.
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    PurpleJ said:

    All we are is dust in the wind.

    image
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,999
    2001400ex said:

    Keep changing the basis...it's still bad for Cali. Look at the credit market. Kansas has a better credit rating than California. It's that simple.

    God you are effing stupid.

    Lol you keep finding a metric to make your point. Because we all know credit ratings are reliable. 2008 ring a bell?
    I didn't realize linking to a Yahoo news article quoting Bill Maher is now a "metric", and a better one than credit ratings or even the SF Chronical talking about Cali's massive unfunded liabilities.

    Your IQ < modern speed limits...
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    Keep changing the basis...it's still bad for Cali. Look at the credit market. Kansas has a better credit rating than California. It's that simple.

    God you are effing stupid.

    Lol you keep finding a metric to make your point. Because we all know credit ratings are reliable. 2008 ring a bell?
    I didn't realize linking to a Yahoo news article quoting Bill Maher is now a "metric", and a better one than credit ratings or even the SF Chronical talking about Cali's massive unfunded liabilities.

    Your IQ < modern speed limits...
    It's 80 mph now in Montana.
  • HuskyInAZ
    HuskyInAZ Member Posts: 1,732
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Keep changing the basis...it's still bad for Cali. Look at the credit market. Kansas has a better credit rating than California. It's that simple.

    God you are effing stupid.

    Lol you keep finding a metric to make your point. Because we all know credit ratings are reliable. 2008 ring a bell?
    I didn't realize linking to a Yahoo news article quoting Bill Maher is now a "metric", and a better one than credit ratings or even the SF Chronical talking about Cali's massive unfunded liabilities.

    Your IQ < modern speed limits...
    It's 80 mph now in Montana.
    Montana is modern?
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    HuskyInAZ said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Keep changing the basis...it's still bad for Cali. Look at the credit market. Kansas has a better credit rating than California. It's that simple.

    God you are effing stupid.

    Lol you keep finding a metric to make your point. Because we all know credit ratings are reliable. 2008 ring a bell?
    I didn't realize linking to a Yahoo news article quoting Bill Maher is now a "metric", and a better one than credit ratings or even the SF Chronical talking about Cali's massive unfunded liabilities.

    Your IQ < modern speed limits...
    It's 80 mph now in Montana.
    Montana is modern?
    No and that's the awesome part of Montana.
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    ...and the sheep don't tell
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,028
    2001400ex said:

    HuskyInAZ said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Keep changing the basis...it's still bad for Cali. Look at the credit market. Kansas has a better credit rating than California. It's that simple.

    God you are effing stupid.

    Lol you keep finding a metric to make your point. Because we all know credit ratings are reliable. 2008 ring a bell?
    I didn't realize linking to a Yahoo news article quoting Bill Maher is now a "metric", and a better one than credit ratings or even the SF Chronical talking about Cali's massive unfunded liabilities.

    Your IQ < modern speed limits...
    It's 80 mph now in Montana.
    Montana is modern?
    No and that's the awesome part of Montana.
    Bozeman and surrounding, you may as well be in Orange or Marin County. Bunch of wannabes.

  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    HuskyInAZ said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Keep changing the basis...it's still bad for Cali. Look at the credit market. Kansas has a better credit rating than California. It's that simple.

    God you are effing stupid.

    Lol you keep finding a metric to make your point. Because we all know credit ratings are reliable. 2008 ring a bell?
    I didn't realize linking to a Yahoo news article quoting Bill Maher is now a "metric", and a better one than credit ratings or even the SF Chronical talking about Cali's massive unfunded liabilities.

    Your IQ < modern speed limits...
    It's 80 mph now in Montana.
    Montana is modern?
    No and that's the awesome part of Montana.
    Bozeman and surrounding, you may as well be in Orange or Marin County. Bunch of wannabes.

    For the most part that's true. Some cool people there still but getting overrun.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,035 Standard Supporter
    HuskyInAZ said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Keep changing the basis...it's still bad for Cali. Look at the credit market. Kansas has a better credit rating than California. It's that simple.

    God you are effing stupid.

    Lol you keep finding a metric to make your point. Because we all know credit ratings are reliable. 2008 ring a bell?
    I didn't realize linking to a Yahoo news article quoting Bill Maher is now a "metric", and a better one than credit ratings or even the SF Chronical talking about Cali's massive unfunded liabilities.

    Your IQ < modern speed limits...
    It's 80 mph now in Montana.
    Montana is modern?
    If you're bashing the most recent state to have no speed limits AND allow open containers, I'm out.

    Those were the fucking days.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    HuskyInAZ said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Keep changing the basis...it's still bad for Cali. Look at the credit market. Kansas has a better credit rating than California. It's that simple.

    God you are effing stupid.

    Lol you keep finding a metric to make your point. Because we all know credit ratings are reliable. 2008 ring a bell?
    I didn't realize linking to a Yahoo news article quoting Bill Maher is now a "metric", and a better one than credit ratings or even the SF Chronical talking about Cali's massive unfunded liabilities.

    Your IQ < modern speed limits...
    It's 80 mph now in Montana.
    Montana is modern?
    If you're bashing the most recent state to have no speed limits AND allow open containers, I'm out.

    Those were the fucking days.
    You can still get go cups from the bar at 2 in the morning.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,035 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    HuskyInAZ said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Keep changing the basis...it's still bad for Cali. Look at the credit market. Kansas has a better credit rating than California. It's that simple.

    God you are effing stupid.

    Lol you keep finding a metric to make your point. Because we all know credit ratings are reliable. 2008 ring a bell?
    I didn't realize linking to a Yahoo news article quoting Bill Maher is now a "metric", and a better one than credit ratings or even the SF Chronical talking about Cali's massive unfunded liabilities.

    Your IQ < modern speed limits...
    It's 80 mph now in Montana.
    Montana is modern?
    If you're bashing the most recent state to have no speed limits AND allow open containers, I'm out.

    Those were the fucking days.
    You can still get go cups from the bar at 2 in the morning.
    The withering flame of freedom still burns in MT.
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390

    Keep changing the basis...it's still bad for Cali. Look at the credit market.
    Kansas has a better credit rating than California. It's that simple.

    God you are effing stupid.

    Kansas and California have the same credit rating. AA- / stable for both. S&P downgraded Kansas this week.

    It's been priced into the credit markets for months now.

    God you are effing stupid. It's that simple. WTGWT.

  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390

    Two dum too funk shun

    Ironic

    S&P Global Ratings lowered its issuer credit rating (ICR) on the State of Kansas to 'AA-' from 'AA' and removed it from
    CreditWatch where it was placed with negative implications April 25, 2016. The rating on the state's appropriation
    secured debt has also been lowered to 'A+' from 'AA-' and removed from CreditWatch. The outlook on both ratings is
    now stable.
    The downgrade reflects what we believe to be structural budget pressures, as reflected by drawdowns in reserve levels
    to what we consider very low levels during a period of national economic expansion, despite four rounds of midyear
    adjustments in fiscal 2016. The state estimates fiscal 2016 ended with a general fund balance equal to $41.2 million, or
    0.7% of expenditures, which incorporates a recent $76.2 million shortfall in May and June tax receipts against budget.
    Included within midfiscal 2016 budget adjustments were $97 million of state pension contribution deferrals. We also
    view a substantial increase in transfers from Kansas' transportation fund to pay general fund operations in recent years
    as an additional sign of budgetary stress. The transfers from the transportation fund could potentially continue;
    however, the transfers have resulted in the halting or delay of previously planned transportation capital projects.
    We believe fiscal 2017 could also be pressured, as evidenced by the May and June tax receipt shortfalls and the
    relatively low $95.8 million budgeted ending balance for fiscal year-end 2017, or 1.5% of budgeted expenditures.
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,598 Standard Supporter

    HuskyInAZ said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Keep changing the basis...it's still bad for Cali. Look at the credit market. Kansas has a better credit rating than California. It's that simple.

    God you are effing stupid.

    Lol you keep finding a metric to make your point. Because we all know credit ratings are reliable. 2008 ring a bell?
    I didn't realize linking to a Yahoo news article quoting Bill Maher is now a "metric", and a better one than credit ratings or even the SF Chronical talking about Cali's massive unfunded liabilities.

    Your IQ < modern speed limits...
    It's 80 mph now in Montana.
    Montana is modern?
    If you're bashing the most recent state to have no speed limits AND allow open containers, I'm out.

    Those were the fucking days.
    Word. You could also pay the officer who gave issued the ticket and it was $10 or something. Kids are allowed in bars too. I went into my grandma's bar (and others) at four years old.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,128

    2001400ex said:

    HuskyInAZ said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Keep changing the basis...it's still bad for Cali. Look at the credit market. Kansas has a better credit rating than California. It's that simple.

    God you are effing stupid.

    Lol you keep finding a metric to make your point. Because we all know credit ratings are reliable. 2008 ring a bell?
    I didn't realize linking to a Yahoo news article quoting Bill Maher is now a "metric", and a better one than credit ratings or even the SF Chronical talking about Cali's massive unfunded liabilities.

    Your IQ < modern speed limits...
    It's 80 mph now in Montana.
    Montana is modern?
    No and that's the awesome part of Montana.
    Bozeman and surrounding, you may as well be in Orange or Marin County. Bunch of wannabes.

    The South is the only area of the US with worse white people than the OC.
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    edited July 2016
    ...Then for the next two hours, they ranted about their grand plans for the future. They raved about the top ratings they were still getting from S&P, Moody’s, and A.M. Best. They even talked about how they could “help” Weiss build its own business.


    http://www.moneyandmarkets.com/the-greatest-scam-of-all-8832

    Moody's and S&P are central to financial corruption and have been for quite some time.

    http://www.city-journal.org/html/pension-fund-ate-california-13528.html

    Calpers announced on Monday that it returned just 0.61% during the fiscal year that ended June 30th, falling well short of it’s goal of a 7.5%, meaning that the fund will lose ground in its efforts to earn enough to make good on its promises to retirees. Right now, the fund has 68 cents in assets for every dollar in liabilities, assuming that it continues to earn returns of 7.5% per year, though it has failed to do that for two years in a row.

    http://fortune.com/2016/07/19/pension-underfunded/

    Fuck off
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208

    HuskyInAZ said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Keep changing the basis...it's still bad for Cali. Look at the credit market. Kansas has a better credit rating than California. It's that simple.

    God you are effing stupid.

    Lol you keep finding a metric to make your point. Because we all know credit ratings are reliable. 2008 ring a bell?
    I didn't realize linking to a Yahoo news article quoting Bill Maher is now a "metric", and a better one than credit ratings or even the SF Chronical talking about Cali's massive unfunded liabilities.

    Your IQ < modern speed limits...
    It's 80 mph now in Montana.
    Montana is modern?
    If you're bashing the most recent state to have no speed limits AND allow open containers, I'm out.

    Those were the fucking days.
    Word. You could also pay the officer who gave issued the ticket and it was $10 or something. Kids are allowed in bars too. I went into my grandma's bar (and others) at four years old.
    Just got tagged a month ago. 88 in an 80 (actually 95) paid $40 on the side of I-90 with a Visa 30 miles east of Missoula
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,999

    Keep changing the basis...it's still bad for Cali. Look at the credit market.
    Kansas has a better credit rating than California. It's that simple.

    God you are effing stupid.

    Kansas and California have the same credit rating. AA- / stable for both. S&P downgraded Kansas this week.

    It's been priced into the credit markets for months now.

    God you are effing stupid. It's that simple. WTGWT.

    So they now have the same credit rating, yet one is a "failure" and the other is a "success". That makes sense...

    You really aren't good at this.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    Keep changing the basis...it's still bad for Cali. Look at the credit market.
    Kansas has a better credit rating than California. It's that simple.

    God you are effing stupid.

    Kansas and California have the same credit rating. AA- / stable for both. S&P downgraded Kansas this week.

    It's been priced into the credit markets for months now.

    God you are effing stupid. It's that simple. WTGWT.

    So they now have the same credit rating, yet one is a "failure" and the other is a "success". That makes sense...

    You really aren't good at this.
    Actually you were arguing that Kansas was not a failure because the credit rating was better than California's. Which is fucktarded. Kansas fucked up and is now robbing the pension fund to balance the budget. I smell a bailout in a few years.
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,346 Founders Club

    HuskyInAZ said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Keep changing the basis...it's still bad for Cali. Look at the credit market. Kansas has a better credit rating than California. It's that simple.

    God you are effing stupid.

    Lol you keep finding a metric to make your point. Because we all know credit ratings are reliable. 2008 ring a bell?
    I didn't realize linking to a Yahoo news article quoting Bill Maher is now a "metric", and a better one than credit ratings or even the SF Chronical talking about Cali's massive unfunded liabilities.

    Your IQ < modern speed limits...
    It's 80 mph now in Montana.
    Montana is modern?
    If you're bashing the most recent state to have no speed limits AND allow open containers, I'm out.

    Those were the fucking days.
    Word. You could also pay the officer who gave issued the ticket and it was $10 or something. Kids are allowed in bars too. I went into my grandma's bar (and others) at four years old.
    Last time it affected me, it was 5 bucks, but that was awhile ago. It was implemented only after Carter implemented the brown sweater "energy saving" 55 MPH national speed limit. Montana complied to get federal dollars for its highways. Their fuck you to DC was to make violating the 55 MPH speed limit a non-moving violation and instead package it as a conservation of energy violation. I used to keep 5's in my ashtray when rolling through there back in the day.

    Prior to that there were no daytime speed limits, and no shit, you'd occasionally see grannies rolling on two lane highways in big cubic inch full sized cars at speeds approaching, and sometimes exceeding, 100 MPH. They tried the "no posted speed limit" ("drive at safe speed") thing again after the national 55 MPH speed limit was lifted, but confusion over what driving at "safe speed" means led them to implementing speed limits again.

    Montana is sparsely populated, and a lot of their small town inhabitants look like offspring from "The Hills Have Eyes", but I've always respected their independent thinking. Places like Kalispell, Missoula and Bozeman are fun to visit if you have family or friends there, but get boring pretty quickly if you're used to living in large metropolitan areas. Lots to do outdoors. Skiing, hunting, fishing, hiking, boating, etc, and some absolutely stunning national parks. The state certainly has it's appeal, but it gets friggin cold in the winter and parts have similar, though less lengthy, overcast and gray weather patterns to those in Puget Sound.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    2001400ex said:

    HuskyInAZ said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Keep changing the basis...it's still bad for Cali. Look at the credit market. Kansas has a better credit rating than California. It's that simple.

    God you are effing stupid.

    Lol you keep finding a metric to make your point. Because we all know credit ratings are reliable. 2008 ring a bell?
    I didn't realize linking to a Yahoo news article quoting Bill Maher is now a "metric", and a better one than credit ratings or even the SF Chronical talking about Cali's massive unfunded liabilities.

    Your IQ < modern speed limits...
    It's 80 mph now in Montana.
    Montana is modern?
    No and that's the awesome part of Montana.
    Bozeman and surrounding, you may as well be in Orange or Marin County. Bunch of wannabes.

    The South is the only area of the US with worse white people than Seattle
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,739 Founders Club

    HuskyInAZ said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Keep changing the basis...it's still bad for Cali. Look at the credit market. Kansas has a better credit rating than California. It's that simple.

    God you are effing stupid.

    Lol you keep finding a metric to make your point. Because we all know credit ratings are reliable. 2008 ring a bell?
    I didn't realize linking to a Yahoo news article quoting Bill Maher is now a "metric", and a better one than credit ratings or even the SF Chronical talking about Cali's massive unfunded liabilities.

    Your IQ < modern speed limits...
    It's 80 mph now in Montana.
    Montana is modern?
    If you're bashing the most recent state to have no speed limits AND allow open containers, I'm out.

    Those were the fucking days.
    Word. You could also pay the officer who gave issued the ticket and it was $10 or something. Kids are allowed in bars too. I went into my grandma's bar (and others) at four years old.
    Last time it affected me, it was 5 bucks, but that was awhile ago. It was implemented only after Carter implemented the brown sweater "energy saving" 55 MPH national speed limit. Montana complied to get federal dollars for its highways. Their fuck you to DC was to make violating the 55 MPH speed limit a non-moving violation and instead package it as a conservation of energy violation. I used to keep 5's in my ashtray when rolling through there back in the day.

    Prior to that there were no daytime speed limits, and no shit, you'd occasionally see grannies rolling on two lane highways in big cubic inch full sized cars at speeds approaching, and sometimes exceeding, 100 MPH. They tried the "no posted speed limit" ("drive at safe speed") thing again after the national 55 MPH speed limit was lifted, but confusion over what driving at "safe speed" means led them to implementing speed limits again.

    Montana is sparsely populated, and a lot of their small town inhabitants look like offspring from "The Hills Have Eyes", but I've always respected their independent thinking. Places like Kalispell, Missoula and Bozeman are fun to visit if you have family or friends there, but get boring pretty quickly if you're used to living in large metropolitan areas. Lots to do outdoors. Skiing, hunting, fishing, hiking, boating, etc, and some absolutely stunning national parks. The state certainly has it's appeal, but it gets friggin cold in the winter and parts have similar, though less lengthy, overcast and gray weather patterns to those in Puget Sound.
    Not much to add except that one of the hottest chicks I ever smashed occurred in Whitefish. I was there for fly fishing in the late 90's, and they had a cool little Great Northern train museum, and a pretty good local brew pub. Can't even recall the name of that place. Anyway, hot ass blonde working in the brewery wanted some Injun in her and I obliged. Fishing kicked ass as well. I have fond memories of Montana.

    No pics because smart phones didn't exist then so fuck off.
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,346 Founders Club

    2001400ex said:

    HuskyInAZ said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Keep changing the basis...it's still bad for Cali. Look at the credit market. Kansas has a better credit rating than California. It's that simple.

    God you are effing stupid.

    Lol you keep finding a metric to make your point. Because we all know credit ratings are reliable. 2008 ring a bell?
    I didn't realize linking to a Yahoo news article quoting Bill Maher is now a "metric", and a better one than credit ratings or even the SF Chronical talking about Cali's massive unfunded liabilities.

    Your IQ < modern speed limits...
    It's 80 mph now in Montana.
    Montana is modern?
    No and that's the awesome part of Montana.
    Bozeman and surrounding, you may as well be in Orange or Marin County. Bunch of wannabes.

    The South is the only area of the US with worse white people than Seattle
    Depends on what you consider "worse", what you consider "Seattle" and what you consider the "South".

    Both regions have plenty of white trash. The booger eating inhabitants of Oso, Concrete, Darrington, Monroe, Gold Bar, etc, could be transplanted without notice to the Okefenokee Swamp in Georgia or anywhere along I-10 from Mobile to New Orleans, or Slidell to Lake Charles.

    Capitol Hill inhabitants would blend in quite well from South Beach Miami to Key West, after tanning of course, or anywhere in Midtown Atlanta, and many places in between, particularly coastal areas.

    The diaper wearing passive aggressive left wing nut jobs Seattle is so famous for would be a bit harder to find places for. They would be tolerated in most areas, but could find themselves tolerated at the end of a constitutionally protected 5.56 mm barrel. It's a matter of perspective as to which is worse.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    2001400ex said:

    HuskyInAZ said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Keep changing the basis...it's still bad for Cali. Look at the credit market. Kansas has a better credit rating than California. It's that simple.

    God you are effing stupid.

    Lol you keep finding a metric to make your point. Because we all know credit ratings are reliable. 2008 ring a bell?
    I didn't realize linking to a Yahoo news article quoting Bill Maher is now a "metric", and a better one than credit ratings or even the SF Chronical talking about Cali's massive unfunded liabilities.

    Your IQ < modern speed limits...
    It's 80 mph now in Montana.
    Montana is modern?
    No and that's the awesome part of Montana.
    Bozeman and surrounding, you may as well be in Orange or Marin County. Bunch of wannabes.

    The South is the only area of the US with worse white people than Seattle
    Depends on what you consider "worse", what you consider "Seattle" and what you consider the "South".

    Both regions have plenty of white trash. The booger eating inhabitants of Oso, Concrete, Darrington, Monroe, Gold Bar, etc, could be transplanted without notice to the Okefenokee Swamp in Georgia or anywhere along I-10 from Mobile to New Orleans, or Slidell to Lake Charles.

    Capitol Hill inhabitants would blend in quite well from South Beach Miami to Key West, after tanning of course, or anywhere in Midtown Atlanta, and many places in between, particularly coastal areas.

    The diaper wearing passive aggressive left wing nut jobs Seattle is so famous for would be a bit harder to find places for. They would be tolerated in most areas, but could find themselves tolerated at the end of a constitutionally protected 5.56 mm barrel. It's a matter of perspective as to which is worse.
    Fuck off @Tequilla