Melania ...
Comments
-
Even msnbc is borderline centrist, maybe center left. As they are basically the voice of the hillary wing of the dems.
They all lean towards the money 1st though -
It's not about need.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
You were already Nebraska classy in your concession. You don't need to suck my dick too.Southerndawg said:
Explains the outrage by Sven and his other handlesPurpleThrobber said:Trump is playing the media like The Truman Show.
Their outrage will play well with women, miniroties and illegal immigrants voting for dead people. -
Gloves are off.Tequilla said:
I've read them fucktard ... far better than listening to them.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Watch the side by side speeches Doog.Tequilla said:
When you're talking about very generic things about how you grew up, your values, etc. there's a lot of these comments that would be very similar from person to person.Peterman said:
"Very generic" my asshole, one part was 22 out of 26 words exactly the same in exactly the same place. Obvious plagiarismTequilla said:
What's strange is that the parts that are being cited for plagiarizing are words that I would say you could hear in similar discussions on this type of topic.TierbsHsotBoobs said:My apologies. It appears Melania is excellent at plagiarism shit:
http://gawker.com/melania-trump-apparently-plagiarized-a-section-of-miche-1783889522
Another thing that I've learned over the years is that depending on where you are in the world, the topic of plagiarism, stretching the truth, etc. is completely different than our standards.
I also think a lot of times people view plagiarism as full blown source stealing whereas this would clearly be at best a couple of lines that are very, very generic.
I'm sure that there are things any of us have said in the past that could be cited for plagiarism. I know personally, I've said things that people have claimed I've taken straight from somebody else and I've never even seen what those people have said.
1st paragraph that is being cited is similar but definitely not word for word ... the values contained within are very common amongst many people and definitely not unique.
2nd paragraph that is cited is definitely the more direct example of plagiarism. Again, I'd argue that what was said in there definitely wasn't anything overly unique or special which does start clouding the plagiarism argument a bit.
If I was a betting man, I'd bet that these paragraphs were dropped in a prior edition as an example subject to revision/update. The 1st paragraph was slightly updated ... the 2nd paragraph probably just proofread and somehow the need to revise somehow slipped through the cracks.
Does this deserve an explanation from Melania and the Trump campaign ... absolutely.
Does this deserve the rhetoric that is coming from the left right now ... absolutely not. -
CNN is neutral? Lol I have heard it all.dhdawg said:
CNN leans left? Bullshit. They always try to be neutral over objective which isn't journalism. Even then they probably do criticize republicans more than democrats because the Republican party, or at least a large part of it is just that retarded and crazyTequilla said:
They definitely lean left ... there's no question on that.Southerndawg said:
Disagree on CNN. They're very partisan and doing exactly what I would expect them to. Your last sentence is spot on.
Trump's campaign talks about fragments in Melania's speech yet everybody now is saying that they aren't saying anything ... people see what they want to see. The reality is that we don't know the story yet ... everything else is speculation at this point. -
Jesus you're fucking stupid. This is way more than a "distraction." This dumb (but very hot) bitch is a direct reflection of the mutual disasters that are Trump's campaign and the GOP. Any competent campaign team would have been all over that shit and never - NEVER - have let Trump's wife embarrass herself and her husband to this extent ... at the fucking convention no less.Southerndawg said:NOC Tequila. CNN and MSNBC have one goal. Make damn sure the narrative stays in Hillary Clinton's camp. Melania's speech is a distraction, plain and simple. It's the red meat they were looking for to move the conversation from domestic and foreign security to a tabloid issue.
This clown can't even open a convention and you want him as President? -
dhdawg said:
Even msnbc is borderline centrist, maybe center left. As they are basically the voice of the hillary wing of the dems.
They all lean towards the money 1st though -
-
1. Own itTierbsHsotBoobs said:The RNC damage control fail though
2. Fire the speechwriter
3. Problem goes away
The GOP continues to make the simple look so difficult. When Chris Carter has more common sense than the entire campaign of one of our? two major parties, RIP Merica. -
Why this sudden, uncharacteristic concern about integrity?2001400ex said:@Tequilla holy fuck. That radio person you were listening to bashing the Oregon newspaper. Do you really think that person is fair and balanced? Do you think they don't omit facts to make the conservative argument? Do you actually think fox news is fair and balanced?
The best part is, when fox news and AM radio bash on the "liberal media", but don't consider themselves part of the media. And simpletons like you eat it up.
And you are right, fox news wouldn't spend 2 hours on this if it were Michelle. They'd mention it over and over until the election. -
She's 45. Who cares?
