Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Now SCOTUS is weighing in on elections
topdawgnc
Member Posts: 7,839
in Tug Tavern
Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.
https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html
https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html
Comments
-
looks like Trump might get a twofer if he wins
-
Where have you been the last 100 years?topdawgnc said:Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.
https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html -
Sincerely,topdawgnc said:Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.
https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html
Bush v. Gore -
700 votesTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Sincerely,topdawgnc said:Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.
https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html
Bush v. Gore
Anyway you count
5 SCJ were right
4 were wrong -
I'm not disputing the outcome.topdawgnc said:
700 votesTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Sincerely,topdawgnc said:Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.
https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html
Bush v. Gore
Anyway you count
5 SCJ were right
4 were wrong
I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is. -
Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm not disputing the outcome.topdawgnc said:
700 votesTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Sincerely,topdawgnc said:Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.
https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html
Bush v. Gore
Anyway you count
5 SCJ were right
4 were wrong
I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.
This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.
The fix is in. -
You think I clicked that shit?topdawgnc said:
Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm not disputing the outcome.topdawgnc said:
700 votesTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Sincerely,topdawgnc said:Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.
https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html
Bush v. Gore
Anyway you count
5 SCJ were right
4 were wrong
I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.
This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.
The fix is in. -
Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.topdawgnc said:
Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm not disputing the outcome.topdawgnc said:
700 votesTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Sincerely,topdawgnc said:Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.
https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html
Bush v. Gore
Anyway you count
5 SCJ were right
4 were wrong
I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.
This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.
It isn't really surprising that mainstream thought leaders from both parties are against Trump. -
-
Umm. This year. Democratic party.OZONE said:
Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.topdawgnc said:
Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm not disputing the outcome.topdawgnc said:
700 votesTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Sincerely,topdawgnc said:Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.
https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html
Bush v. Gore
Anyway you count
5 SCJ were right
4 were wrong
I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.
This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.
. -
Really? How many prominent democrats are urging people to vote for Trump?Alexis said:
Umm. This year. Democratic party.OZONE said:
Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.topdawgnc said:
Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm not disputing the outcome.topdawgnc said:
700 votesTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Sincerely,topdawgnc said:Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.
https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html
Bush v. Gore
Anyway you count
5 SCJ were right
4 were wrong
I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.
This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.
.
Because the number of prominent republicans urging people to vote for Clinton is growing. -
2008 Barack Obama.OZONE said:
Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.topdawgnc said:
Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm not disputing the outcome.topdawgnc said:
700 votesTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Sincerely,topdawgnc said:Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.
https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html
Bush v. Gore
Anyway you count
5 SCJ were right
4 were wrong
I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.
This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.
It isn't really surprising that mainstream thought leaders from both parties are against Trump. -
The GOP needs Clinton.OZONE said:
Really? How many prominent democrats are urging people to vote for Trump?Alexis said:
Umm. This year. Democratic party.OZONE said:
Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.topdawgnc said:
Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm not disputing the outcome.topdawgnc said:
700 votesTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Sincerely,topdawgnc said:Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.
https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html
Bush v. Gore
Anyway you count
5 SCJ were right
4 were wrong
I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.
This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.
.
Because the number of prominent republicans urging people to vote for Clinton is growing.
They need her to continue to raise cash, and they need her as a boogey man.
Since the USSR died the GOP has nothing to scare American's into voting for them on.
You're better than this. -
topdawgnc said:
2008 Barack Obama.OZONE said:
Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.topdawgnc said:
Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm not disputing the outcome.topdawgnc said:
700 votesTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Sincerely,topdawgnc said:Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.
https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html
Bush v. Gore
Anyway you count
5 SCJ were right
4 were wrong
I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.
This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.
It isn't really surprising that mainstream thought leaders from both parties are against Trump.
Hopefully you're not this stupid.topdawgnc said:
2008 Barack Obama.OZONE said:
Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.topdawgnc said:
Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm not disputing the outcome.topdawgnc said:
700 votesTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Sincerely,topdawgnc said:Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.
https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html
Bush v. Gore
Anyway you count
5 SCJ were right
4 were wrong
I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.
This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.
It isn't really surprising that mainstream thought leaders from both parties are against Trump. -
A four year Junior Senator is qualified?doogsinparadise said:topdawgnc said:
2008 Barack Obama.OZONE said:
Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.topdawgnc said:
Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm not disputing the outcome.topdawgnc said:
700 votesTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Sincerely,topdawgnc said:Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.
https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html
Bush v. Gore
Anyway you count
5 SCJ were right
4 were wrong
I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.
This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.
It isn't really surprising that mainstream thought leaders from both parties are against Trump.
Hopefully you're not this stupid.topdawgnc said:
2008 Barack Obama.OZONE said:
Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.topdawgnc said:
Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm not disputing the outcome.topdawgnc said:
700 votesTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Sincerely,topdawgnc said:Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.
https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html
Bush v. Gore
Anyway you count
5 SCJ were right
4 were wrong
I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.
This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.
It isn't really surprising that mainstream thought leaders from both parties are against Trump.
I'm as serious as a heart attack.
Hopefully you're not too stupid to believe he was more qualified than Trump. And the least qualified candidate for President since ... Jesus has there ever been a less qualified candidate? -
Being a community organizer is hard.topdawgnc said:
A four year Junior Senator is qualified?doogsinparadise said:topdawgnc said:
2008 Barack Obama.OZONE said:
Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.topdawgnc said:
Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm not disputing the outcome.topdawgnc said:
700 votesTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Sincerely,topdawgnc said:Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.
https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html
Bush v. Gore
Anyway you count
5 SCJ were right
4 were wrong
I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.
This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.
It isn't really surprising that mainstream thought leaders from both parties are against Trump.
Hopefully you're not this stupid.topdawgnc said:
2008 Barack Obama.OZONE said:
Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.topdawgnc said:
Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm not disputing the outcome.topdawgnc said:
700 votesTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Sincerely,topdawgnc said:Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.
https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html
Bush v. Gore
Anyway you count
5 SCJ were right
4 were wrong
I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.
This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.
It isn't really surprising that mainstream thought leaders from both parties are against Trump.
I'm as serious as a heart attack.
Hopefully you're not too stupid to believe he was more qualified than Trump. And the least qualified candidate for President since ... Jesus has there ever been a less qualified candidate? -
So unqualified that prominent members of his party, and a former 1st lady from his party, said they would vote for the other party?topdawgnc said:
A four year Junior Senator is qualified?doogsinparadise said:topdawgnc said:
2008 Barack Obama.OZONE said:
Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.topdawgnc said:
Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm not disputing the outcome.topdawgnc said:
700 votesTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Sincerely,topdawgnc said:Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.
https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html
Bush v. Gore
Anyway you count
5 SCJ were right
4 were wrong
I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.
This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.
It isn't really surprising that mainstream thought leaders from both parties are against Trump.
Hopefully you're not this stupid.topdawgnc said:
2008 Barack Obama.OZONE said:
Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.topdawgnc said:
Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm not disputing the outcome.topdawgnc said:
700 votesTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Sincerely,topdawgnc said:Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.
https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html
Bush v. Gore
Anyway you count
5 SCJ were right
4 were wrong
I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.
This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.
It isn't really surprising that mainstream thought leaders from both parties are against Trump.
I'm as serious as a heart attack.
Hopefully you're not too stupid to believe he was more qualified than Trump. And the least qualified candidate for President since ... Jesus has there ever been a less qualified candidate?
The dislike of Trump by thought leaders of both major parties, is unprecedented. And there is a good reason. He is an ignorant racist fucktard. -
Barack ObamaOZONE said:
Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.topdawgnc said:
Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm not disputing the outcome.topdawgnc said:
700 votesTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Sincerely,topdawgnc said:Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.
https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html
Bush v. Gore
Anyway you count
5 SCJ were right
4 were wrong
I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.
This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected. -
Barack Obama
-
Barack Hussein Obama
-
Brian Kelly
-
Brian Kelly
-
BHO
-
“A few years ago, this guy would have been getting us coffee,” Clinton is quoted as sayingOZONE said:
So unqualified that prominent members of his party, and a former 1st lady from his party, said they would vote for the other party?topdawgnc said:
A four year Junior Senator is qualified?doogsinparadise said:topdawgnc said:
2008 Barack Obama.OZONE said:
Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.topdawgnc said:
Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm not disputing the outcome.topdawgnc said:
700 votesTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Sincerely,topdawgnc said:Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.
https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html
Bush v. Gore
Anyway you count
5 SCJ were right
4 were wrong
I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.
This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.
It isn't really surprising that mainstream thought leaders from both parties are against Trump.
Hopefully you're not this stupid.topdawgnc said:
2008 Barack Obama.OZONE said:
Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.topdawgnc said:
Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm not disputing the outcome.topdawgnc said:
700 votesTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Sincerely,topdawgnc said:Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.
https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html
Bush v. Gore
Anyway you count
5 SCJ were right
4 were wrong
I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.
This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.
It isn't really surprising that mainstream thought leaders from both parties are against Trump.
I'm as serious as a heart attack.
Hopefully you're not too stupid to believe he was more qualified than Trump. And the least qualified candidate for President since ... Jesus has there ever been a less qualified candidate?
The dislike of Trump by thought leaders of both major parties, is unprecedented. And there is a good reason. He is an ignorant racist fucktard.
“Obama doesn’t know how to be president,” Clinton told friends and political advisers last year, the article added. “He doesn’t know how the world works.” -
I guarantee you she voted for him.
-
Now I want Trump to win just so Ginsburg will go the fuck away.
-
-
You're giving him way too much credit. During his one and only partial US Senate term he spent most of his time campaigning for president.topdawgnc said:
A four year Junior Senator is qualified?doogsinparadise said:topdawgnc said:
2008 Barack Obama.OZONE said:
Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.topdawgnc said:
Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm not disputing the outcome.topdawgnc said:
700 votesTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Sincerely,topdawgnc said:Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.
https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html
Bush v. Gore
Anyway you count
5 SCJ were right
4 were wrong
I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.
This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.
It isn't really surprising that mainstream thought leaders from both parties are against Trump.
Hopefully you're not this stupid.topdawgnc said:
2008 Barack Obama.OZONE said:
Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.topdawgnc said:
Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm not disputing the outcome.topdawgnc said:
700 votesTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Sincerely,topdawgnc said:Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.
https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html
Bush v. Gore
Anyway you count
5 SCJ were right
4 were wrong
I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.
This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.
It isn't really surprising that mainstream thought leaders from both parties are against Trump.
I'm as serious as a heart attack.
Hopefully you're not too stupid to believe he was more qualified than Trump. And the least qualified candidate for President since ... Jesus has there ever been a less qualified candidate? -
If your gonna ignore the Leadership by BHO when he led that bi-partisan effort to craft and pass perhaps... the most important legislation of our time... I can't help you
-
It was a former President who made those racist claims.OZONE said:I guarantee you she voted for him.
And I guarantee you the GOP will vote for Trump.
