Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

UW OL -- reason for optimism?

245

Comments

  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,234
    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    We fucking suck.

    Go back to drinking your 15 minutes to make cocktails that nobody has ever heard of
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AEB
    AEB Member Posts: 3,023
    I'm as optimistic on next year as the next Doog, but when I put the Molly down I realize the OL is still too young. If they're top 3, great. However, nothing last year would suggest they're top 3 in '16. Put another way, the DL had their way in the Spring.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    PurpleJ said:

    How many Top 5 draft picks??

    The O/U is 5
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    AEB said:

    I'm as optimistic on next year as the next Doog, but when I put the Molly down I realize the OL is still too young. If they're top 3, great. However, nothing last year would suggest they're top 3 in '16. Put another way, the DL had their way in the Spring.

    For the 15th year in a row
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,234
    AEB said:

    I'm as optimistic on next year as the next Doog, but when I put the Molly down I realize the OL is still too young. If they're top 3, great. However, nothing last year would suggest they're top 3 in '16. Put another way, the DL had their way in the Spring.

    DL will arguably be the best in the conference ... it will help to build up the OL on a daily basis.

    The OL doesn't have to be the best in the conference or really even Top 3. The offense doesn't need to be that either. It needs to be upper half and then everything upwards from that is gravy.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    edited July 2016
    Tequilla said:

    sarktastic said:

    Not a single one of those guys made all conference OR honorable mention even though plenty of game tape exists. This is a concern with a young QB and RB

    So the standard now for 3 OL that were in one form or another freshman last year that since they didn't make the all conference team (or honorable mention) that hey must not be very good?

    Some are looking for anything possible to discredit this team heading into the year.
    Step back from the ledge, man!

    Don't twist.

    5 guys with game tape + 3 years (+) in the program x zero in the top 20 in the conference = a concern... an unknown... a space where doogism can grow like mold if left unchecked... Not, the end the the world.

    I'm doogin for 1st place PacN... or did you forget?

    BTW, Leach had 2 "young" OL Pac HM ... that apparently, are not too young... One of them from Kennedy Catholic. Peterman fucked that one up. Even at BSU he should have had that kid in his sights.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaccoonHarry
    RaccoonHarry Member Posts: 2,161
    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    We fucking suck.

    No, they're just another year away. Like always.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter