A bunch of California municipalities are a mess, and higher paid workers and businesses are still leaving the state in droves. And this is with a stock market bubble caused by the fed which is subsidizing the states income (they get a bunch off of capital gains...not a good sign when stock market multiples are as high as they are).
Keep gurgling...
You need to be a subscriber to the San Fransisco chronicle. Go fuck yourself.
A bunch of California municipalities are a mess, and higher paid workers and businesses are still leaving the state in droves. And this is with a stock market bubble caused by the fed which is subsidizing the states income (they get a bunch off of capital gains...not a good sign when stock market multiples are as high as they are).
Keep gurgling...
You need to be a subscriber to the San Fransisco chronicle. Go fuck yourself.
Only if you are a moron. So yes, you specifically need to be a subscriber. The rest of us (or a least a portion of us) can read it no problem without being one. Here is a tidbit from it though:
Good bond ratings are a sign of a strong budget and financial management and allow states to pay lower interest rates when selling bonds.
“Compared to other states, though, California has one of the lower ratings,” Petek said.
And the reason is clear, he said. It’s California’s debt and liabilities that are concerning financial analysts, particularly the state’s rapidly growing unfunded retiree health care costs, which grew more than 80 percent over the past decade.
A bunch of California municipalities are a mess, and higher paid workers and businesses are still leaving the state in droves. And this is with a stock market bubble caused by the fed which is subsidizing the states income (they get a bunch off of capital gains...not a good sign when stock market multiples are as high as they are).
Keep gurgling...
You need to be a subscriber to the San Fransisco chronicle. Go fuck yourself.
Only if you are a moron. So yes, you specifically need to be a subscriber. The rest of us (or a least a portion of us) can read it no problem without being one. Here is a tidbit from it though:
Good bond ratings are a sign of a strong budget and financial management and allow states to pay lower interest rates when selling bonds.
“Compared to other states, though, California has one of the lower ratings,” Petek said.
And the reason is clear, he said. It’s California’s debt and liabilities that are concerning financial analysts, particularly the state’s rapidly growing unfunded retiree health care costs, which grew more than 80 percent over the past decade.
Keep changing the basis...it's still bad for Cali. Look at the credit market. Kansas has a better credit rating than California. It's that simple.
God you are effing stupid.
Lol you keep finding a metric to make your point. Because we all know credit ratings are reliable. 2008 ring a bell?
I didn't realize linking to a Yahoo news article quoting Bill Maher is now a "metric", and a better one than credit ratings or even the SF Chronical talking about Cali's massive unfunded liabilities.
Keep changing the basis...it's still bad for Cali. Look at the credit market. Kansas has a better credit rating than California. It's that simple.
God you are effing stupid.
Lol you keep finding a metric to make your point. Because we all know credit ratings are reliable. 2008 ring a bell?
I didn't realize linking to a Yahoo news article quoting Bill Maher is now a "metric", and a better one than credit ratings or even the SF Chronical talking about Cali's massive unfunded liabilities.
Keep changing the basis...it's still bad for Cali. Look at the credit market. Kansas has a better credit rating than California. It's that simple.
God you are effing stupid.
Lol you keep finding a metric to make your point. Because we all know credit ratings are reliable. 2008 ring a bell?
I didn't realize linking to a Yahoo news article quoting Bill Maher is now a "metric", and a better one than credit ratings or even the SF Chronical talking about Cali's massive unfunded liabilities.
Keep changing the basis...it's still bad for Cali. Look at the credit market. Kansas has a better credit rating than California. It's that simple.
God you are effing stupid.
Lol you keep finding a metric to make your point. Because we all know credit ratings are reliable. 2008 ring a bell?
I didn't realize linking to a Yahoo news article quoting Bill Maher is now a "metric", and a better one than credit ratings or even the SF Chronical talking about Cali's massive unfunded liabilities.
Comments
Good bond ratings are a sign of a strong budget and financial management and allow states to pay lower interest rates when selling bonds.
“Compared to other states, though, California has one of the lower ratings,” Petek said.
And the reason is clear, he said. It’s California’s debt and liabilities that are concerning financial analysts, particularly the state’s rapidly growing unfunded retiree health care costs, which grew more than 80 percent over the past decade.
http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/spending_chart_2014_2018CAp_H0c
God you are effing stupid.
You know you can always give more of your money. I just won't let you give more of mine!
I hear Venezuela is beautiful this time of year you should visit and see how this BS all works out.
Your IQ < modern speed limits...