Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Might as well not even play the elections then
GrundleStiltzkin
Member Posts: 61,516 
in Tug Tavern
Comments
-
Southparkblowncum.jpg
-
Isn't that the same guy who gave Trump a 5% chance to land the Republican nomination?
-
Ektard's gonna Ektard
-
Silver's no Ektard, he's been right about a shit ton of stuff. He's just not exactly dialed in when it comes to Trump.greenblood said:Ektard's gonna Ektard
Honestly I'm surprised he's giving Trump that much chance at the election. -
If he wanted to be right, he'd pick Trump to win... But it wouldn't bode well for receiving future paychecks from his current employer
-
CHRIST.sarktastic said:If he wanted to be right, he'd pick Trump to win... But it wouldn't bode well for receiving future paychecks from his current employer
He's working with data but Trump doesn't fit conventional data. -
So your saying he just isn't very good at his job?
-
I get that, but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to know data is flawed when it comes to Trump. So why continue to make predictions on Trump based on the data?dnc said:
Silver's no Ektard, he's been right about a shit ton of stuff. He's just not exactly dialed in when it comes to Trump.greenblood said:Ektard's gonna Ektard
Honestly I'm surprised he's giving Trump that much chance at the election. -
Because that's his job. His job is to tell us what the data says. Our? job is to determine whether that matters. In this case, I'm with you, the data is close to worthless. But I think that's the exception not the rule.greenblood said:
I get that, but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to know data is flawed when it comes to Trump. So why continue to make predictions on Trump based on the data?dnc said:
Silver's no Ektard, he's been right about a shit ton of stuff. He's just not exactly dialed in when it comes to Trump.greenblood said:Ektard's gonna Ektard
Honestly I'm surprised he's giving Trump that much chance at the election.
