Consider

Baseman said:

show previous quotes

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

#7/10of1°in116years
#tempdecreasinglast14years
#precession
#glaciersgrowing@southpole
#shouldicontinue
#idontusegoogle
#hurryliberalstoyourgoogleengine

TrickleDown Dumbfuck

#climatechangehappensincycles
#baseatypical20yearoldignorantactivist
#trump

CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

show previous quotes

Ice_Holmvik said:

CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

If Petersen can't win in year three with the talent he has brought in he is not the guy. Straight up.

I praise him because I believe he has done a great job of building up the talent. Just look at the thread that was bumped the other day that Passion started before the 2013 season saying the depth chart is a thing of beauty (the 2016 depth chart compared to the 2013 depth chart is a night and day difference). Petersen has done a great job at building our depth up and shit. I doog hard for him because of that and his philosophy on culture and all that.

But he needs to fucking win this year. And he needs to win because he has built up the talent to do it right fucking now.

10-2.

So Petersen should win in his third year because all of the talent he has brought in. In that scenario you are counting on no seniors and a majority of underclassmen to win in the Pac-12.

I guarantee you if you ask Petersen, in a private moment... by his fireplace... with a nice merlot, if he can win ten games with this team he would tell you yes.

Have you heard a fucking thing Pete has been saying the last 2 years about how strong the pac12 is? Like saying Vandy is going to just roll off 10 wins in the SEC. Vandy was in better shape than UW when Pete took over. Thats the only thing Pete would say to get through to you dipsticks.

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

Only made it to midway through page 2.

This thread sucks

Do you know how many times I've said that in my head? Or sometimes it's page 1

RoadDawg55 said:

show previous quotes

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

Ice_Holmvik said:

CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

If Petersen can't win in year three with the talent he has brought in he is not the guy. Straight up.

I praise him because I believe he has done a great job of building up the talent. Just look at the thread that was bumped the other day that Passion started before the 2013 season saying the depth chart is a thing of beauty (the 2016 depth chart compared to the 2013 depth chart is a night and day difference). Petersen has done a great job at building our depth up and shit. I doog hard for him because of that and his philosophy on culture and all that.

But he needs to fucking win this year. And he needs to win because he has built up the talent to do it right fucking now.

10-2.

So Petersen should win in his third year because all of the talent he has brought in. In that scenario you are counting on no seniors and a majority of underclassmen to win in the Pac-12.

#icegetsit

Here at HH we smoke hash. We don't hashtag.

Pup hashtag only to make fun of people who hashtag!. Pup dont twatter.