Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Consider

1…456810

Comments

  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    Uh Bill, man made climate change is a farse . #ipcclies
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    #7/10of1°in116years
    #tempdecreasinglast14years
    #precession
    #glaciersgrowing@southpole
    #shouldicontinue
    #idontusegoogle
    #hurryliberalstoyourgoogleengine
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    And to all you libs, fossil fuels, deisel trucks, coal-fired power doesnt equate to climate change. Good luck building husky stadium with bicycles, oxin and draft horses.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsi
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646
    I just. I can't. This thread.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    You could service the workin men after a hard days' work Tometta:)...after waterin the oxin and horse stock of course
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Ice_Holmvik
    Ice_Holmvik Member Posts: 2,912
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

    If Petersen can't win in year three with the talent he has brought in he is not the guy. Straight up.

    I praise him because I believe he has done a great job of building up the talent. Just look at the thread that was bumped the other day that Passion started before the 2013 season saying the depth chart is a thing of beauty (the 2016 depth chart compared to the 2013 depth chart is a night and day difference). Petersen has done a great job at building our depth up and shit. I doog hard for him because of that and his philosophy on culture and all that.

    But he needs to fucking win this year. And he needs to win because he has built up the talent to do it right fucking now.

    10-2.

    So Petersen should win in his third year because all of the talent he has brought in. In that scenario you are counting on no seniors and a majority of underclassmen to win in the Pac-12.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,680
    Only made it to midway through page 2.

    This thread sucks
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,773
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    You millenials expect immediate results on everything. College football isnt a cell phone microwave popcorn. You cant just google your way to 10 wins. Takes 4-5 years to build a program. That will never change

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsi
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646
    Ice_Holmvik said:

    CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

    If Petersen can't win in year three with the talent he has brought in he is not the guy. Straight up.

    I praise him because I believe he has done a great job of building up the talent. Just look at the thread that was bumped the other day that Passion started before the 2013 season saying the depth chart is a thing of beauty (the 2016 depth chart compared to the 2013 depth chart is a night and day difference). Petersen has done a great job at building our depth up and shit. I doog hard for him because of that and his philosophy on culture and all that.

    But he needs to fucking win this year. And he needs to win because he has built up the talent to do it right fucking now.

    10-2.

    So Petersen should win in his third year because all of the talent he has brought in. In that scenario you are counting on no seniors and a majority of underclassmen to win in the Pac-12.
    I guarantee you if you ask Petersen, in a private moment... by his fireplace... with a nice merlot, if he can win ten games with this team he would tell you yes.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter