Consider
Comments
-
Pundits and coaches are too lazy to do research.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Sorry baabs you are wrong. The SEC and maybe Texas is on the 3-year plan. Qualified pundits, coaches all agree it takes 5 years, 4 in a perfect scenario to "build" a program. UW was a rebuilding job and any experts like pup would agree (you and your little ignant armchair klan are the only little minority who doesnt).TierbsHsotBoobs said:
There has been comprehensive research with actual data and shit proving the win in three years or get the fuck out standard.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
5 years baabs...5 years. Which is a lot of ticks. You show your ignorance with every post.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
You're starting to get it.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Carroll gets his pick of best athletes in country at SC. And the rosters werent close. That is a rediculous assertion. Records have little do with it. Its why carroll was hired dumb dumb. Robinson hackett couldnt win with 5star talentdnc said:
Just imagine what Mike Reilly could have done at USC!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
A formerly great football scbool that was coming off of five years of self-imposed sanctions from shitty coaching.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
What scbool was carrol coaching at?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Both of those coaches won the Rose Bowl and popped off in year three. Hell, Pete Carroll won the Orange Bowl and popped off in year two.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Need I bring up Pete Carroll or Don James again? Just dont get it baabs. Last time ill respond. You'll crawl back, cant wait;)TierbsHsotBoobs said:
8-10 in a sorry ass Pac-12 though.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Difference nacho, Pete can coach. Silly argumentCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Did you use the same arguments to defend, Gilby, Ty and Sark you fucking Doig?
Do you expect Peterman to match them this year?
Sound familiar?
EDIT: Pete Carroll actually inherited a worse situation than Peterman did.
1996 John Robinson 6–6 3–5 T-5th
1997 John Robinson 6–5 4–4 T-5th
1998 Paul Hackett 8–5 5–3 T-3rd L Sun
1999 Paul Hackett 6–6 3–5 T-6th
2000 Paul Hackett 5–7 2–6 T-8th
Coaching matters and the great coaches proves themselves in 3 years or less.
Tick, tick, tick...
I would repeat it for you but Doogs hate facts so why bother?
3 years at E-FUCKING-STABLISHED programs like oregon and Ohio St is understandable. Nobody disagrees there. Learn what it is the difference, what we are talking about before you pop your cunt off. Jesus Tommy could prolly comprehend that.
Thanks for proving the poont, Doog. -
If Petersen can't win in year three with the talent he has brought in he is not the guy. Straight up.
I praise him because I believe he has done a great job of building up the talent. Just look at the thread that was bumped the other day that Passion started before the 2013 season saying the depth chart is a thing of beauty (the 2016 depth chart compared to the 2013 depth chart is a night and day difference). Petersen has done a great job at building our depth up and shit. I doog hard for him because of that and his philosophy on culture and all that.
But he needs to fucking win this year. And he needs to win because he has built up the talent to do it right fucking now.
10-2. -
This. If you can't win with that defense and a sophomore phenom RB, you suck balls.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:If Petersen can't win in year three with the talent he has brought in he is not the guy. Straight up.
I praise him because I believe he has done a great job of building up the talent. Just look at the thread that was bumped the other day that Passion started before the 2013 season saying the depth chart is a thing of beauty (the 2016 depth chart compared to the 2013 depth chart is a night and day difference). Petersen has done a great job at building our depth up and shit. I doog hard for him because of that and his philosophy on culture and all that.
But he needs to fucking win this year. And he needs to win because he has built up the talent to do it right fucking now.
10-2. -
Oh poopsie thats not how it works. The freshmen all over yhe roster need time. You win with jr"s and seniors. See puppy learned from don james and dick baird. You hapless fucks learned from kim grinolds. At least Ice gets it.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:If Petersen can't win in year three with the talent he has brought in he is not the guy. Straight up.
I praise him because I believe he has done a great job of building up the talent. Just look at the thread that was bumped the other day that Passion started before the 2013 season saying the depth chart is a thing of beauty (the 2016 depth chart compared to the 2013 depth chart is a night and day difference). Petersen has done a great job at building our depth up and shit. I doog hard for him because of that and his philosophy on culture and all that.
But he needs to fucking win this year. And he needs to win because he has built up the talent to do it right fucking now.
10-2. -
Hi. Seniors who are any good now LEAVE for the NFL before their senior year.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Oh poopsie thats not how it works. The freshmen all over yhe roster need time. You win with jr"s and seniors. See puppy learned from don james and dick baird. You hapless fucks learned from kim grinolds. At least Ice gets it.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:If Petersen can't win in year three with the talent he has brought in he is not the guy. Straight up.
I praise him because I believe he has done a great job of building up the talent. Just look at the thread that was bumped the other day that Passion started before the 2013 season saying the depth chart is a thing of beauty (the 2016 depth chart compared to the 2013 depth chart is a night and day difference). Petersen has done a great job at building our depth up and shit. I doog hard for him because of that and his philosophy on culture and all that.
But he needs to fucking win this year. And he needs to win because he has built up the talent to do it right fucking now.
10-2.
Evolve or die. -
Oregon took 17 years under Brooks, 12 under Bellotti and 1 under Chippuppylove_sugarsteel said:
Sorry baabs you are wrong. The SEC and maybe Texas is on the 3-year plan. Qualified pundits, coaches all agree it takes 5 years, 4 in a perfect scenario to "build" a program. UW was a rebuilding job and any experts like pup would agree (you and your little ignant armchair klan are the only little minority who doesnt).TierbsHsotBoobs said:
There has been comprehensive research with actual data and shit proving the win in three years or get the fuck out standard.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
5 years baabs...5 years. Which is a lot of ticks. You show your ignorance with every post.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
You're starting to get it.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Carroll gets his pick of best athletes in country at SC. And the rosters werent close. That is a rediculous assertion. Records have little do with it. Its why carroll was hired dumb dumb. Robinson hackett couldnt win with 5star talentdnc said:
Just imagine what Mike Reilly could have done at USC!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
A formerly great football scbool that was coming off of five years of self-imposed sanctions from shitty coaching.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
What scbool was carrol coaching at?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Both of those coaches won the Rose Bowl and popped off in year three. Hell, Pete Carroll won the Orange Bowl and popped off in year two.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Need I bring up Pete Carroll or Don James again? Just dont get it baabs. Last time ill respond. You'll crawl back, cant wait;)TierbsHsotBoobs said:
8-10 in a sorry ass Pac-12 though.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Difference nacho, Pete can coach. Silly argumentCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Did you use the same arguments to defend, Gilby, Ty and Sark you fucking Doig?
Do you expect Peterman to match them this year?
Sound familiar?
EDIT: Pete Carroll actually inherited a worse situation than Peterman did.
1996 John Robinson 6–6 3–5 T-5th
1997 John Robinson 6–5 4–4 T-5th
1998 Paul Hackett 8–5 5–3 T-3rd L Sun
1999 Paul Hackett 6–6 3–5 T-6th
2000 Paul Hackett 5–7 2–6 T-8th
Coaching matters and the great coaches proves themselves in 3 years or less.
Tick, tick, tick...
I would repeat it for you but Doogs hate facts so why bother?
3 years at E-FUCKING-STABLISHED programs like oregon and Ohio St is understandable. Nobody disagrees there. Learn what it is the difference, what we are talking about before you pop your cunt off. Jesus Tommy could prolly comprehend that.
UW is a three year plan school. Like James, the example you gave you fucking doog. Jim Owens left a steaming pile of shit -
Fuck Dick Bairdpuppylove_sugarsteel said:
Oh poopsie thats not how it works. The freshmen all over yhe roster need time. You win with jr"s and seniors. See puppy learned from don james and dick baird. You hapless fucks learned from kim grinolds. At least Ice gets it.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:If Petersen can't win in year three with the talent he has brought in he is not the guy. Straight up.
I praise him because I believe he has done a great job of building up the talent. Just look at the thread that was bumped the other day that Passion started before the 2013 season saying the depth chart is a thing of beauty (the 2016 depth chart compared to the 2013 depth chart is a night and day difference). Petersen has done a great job at building our depth up and shit. I doog hard for him because of that and his philosophy on culture and all that.
But he needs to fucking win this year. And he needs to win because he has built up the talent to do it right fucking now.
10-2. -
You get four or five years at total salvage jobs like Kansas, K State, Wisconsin, and VT in the late 80s. Or for our millenials, Stanfraud in the late 2000s under douchebag Harbaugh. Stanfraud was a mess under Walt Harris and Teevens.
Washington had holes but it wasn't a salvage job. -
Starting to wonder if @puppylove_sugarsteel is real or really an ISIS troll account.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Sorry baabs you are wrong. The SEC and maybe Texas is on the 3-year plan. Qualified pundits, coaches all agree it takes 5 years, 4 in a perfect scenario to "build" a program. UW was a rebuilding job and any experts like pup would agree (you and your little ignant armchair klan are the only little minority who doesnt).TierbsHsotBoobs said:
There has been comprehensive research with actual data and shit proving the win in three years or get the fuck out standard.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
5 years baabs...5 years. Which is a lot of ticks. You show your ignorance with every post.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
You're starting to get it.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Carroll gets his pick of best athletes in country at SC. And the rosters werent close. That is a rediculous assertion. Records have little do with it. Its why carroll was hired dumb dumb. Robinson hackett couldnt win with 5star talentdnc said:
Just imagine what Mike Reilly could have done at USC!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
A formerly great football scbool that was coming off of five years of self-imposed sanctions from shitty coaching.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
What scbool was carrol coaching at?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Both of those coaches won the Rose Bowl and popped off in year three. Hell, Pete Carroll won the Orange Bowl and popped off in year two.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Need I bring up Pete Carroll or Don James again? Just dont get it baabs. Last time ill respond. You'll crawl back, cant wait;)TierbsHsotBoobs said:
8-10 in a sorry ass Pac-12 though.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Difference nacho, Pete can coach. Silly argumentCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Did you use the same arguments to defend, Gilby, Ty and Sark you fucking Doig?
Do you expect Peterman to match them this year?
Sound familiar?
EDIT: Pete Carroll actually inherited a worse situation than Peterman did.
1996 John Robinson 6–6 3–5 T-5th
1997 John Robinson 6–5 4–4 T-5th
1998 Paul Hackett 8–5 5–3 T-3rd L Sun
1999 Paul Hackett 6–6 3–5 T-6th
2000 Paul Hackett 5–7 2–6 T-8th
Coaching matters and the great coaches proves themselves in 3 years or less.
Tick, tick, tick...
I would repeat it for you but Doogs hate facts so why bother?
3 years at E-FUCKING-STABLISHED programs like oregon and Ohio St is understandable. Nobody disagrees there. Learn what it is the difference, what we are talking about before you pop your cunt off. Jesus Tommy could prolly comprehend that. -
How many years did Hoke get? Is michigan a salvage job? Al golden? Is miami a salvage job?Fire_Marshall_Bill said:You get four or five years at total salvage jobs like Kansas, K State, Wisconsin, and VT in the late 80s. Or for our millenials, Stanfraud in the late 2000s under douchebag Harbaugh. Stanfraud was a mess under Walt Harris and Teevens.
Washington had holes but it wasn't a salvage job.
