Consider
Comments
-
You millenials expect immediate results on everything. College football isnt a cell phone. You cant just google your way to 10 wins. Takes 4-5 years to build a program. That will never change
-
puppylove_sugarsteel said:
You millenials expect immediate results on everything. College football isnt a cell phone. You cant just google your way to 10 wins. Takes 14-25 years to build a program.
-
They both should have been fired after year 3.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
How many years did Hoke get? Is michigan a salvage job? Al golden? Is miami a salvage job?Fire_Marshall_Bill said:You get four or five years at total salvage jobs like Kansas, K State, Wisconsin, and VT in the late 80s. Or for our millenials, Stanfraud in the late 2000s under douchebag Harbaugh. Stanfraud was a mess under Walt Harris and Teevens.
Washington had holes but it wasn't a salvage job. -
Great microwave popcorn Ty speak as always.puppylove_sugarsteel said:You millenials expect immediate results on everything. College football isnt a cell phone. You cant just google your way to 10 wins. Takes 4-5 years to build a program. That will never change
-
Too bad youre missing point baabs. Most coaches get 5 years, puppy citing examples of how thats still true. Lets go back to beginning when you said coaches only get 3 years unless theyre at rebuild jobs like k-state. Puppy, in his infinite college football knowledge just proved you wrong, again. Coulda, shoulda, woulda doesnt apply. Now sit down and STFU baabs, class in session bitch!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
They both should have been fired after year 3.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
How many years did Hoke get? Is michigan a salvage job? Al golden? Is miami a salvage job?Fire_Marshall_Bill said:You get four or five years at total salvage jobs like Kansas, K State, Wisconsin, and VT in the late 80s. Or for our millenials, Stanfraud in the late 2000s under douchebag Harbaugh. Stanfraud was a mess under Walt Harris and Teevens.
Washington had holes but it wasn't a salvage job. -
3 and nopuppylove_sugarsteel said:
How many years did Hoke get? Is michigan a salvage job? Al golden? Is miami a salvage job?Fire_Marshall_Bill said:You get four or five years at total salvage jobs like Kansas, K State, Wisconsin, and VT in the late 80s. Or for our millenials, Stanfraud in the late 2000s under douchebag Harbaugh. Stanfraud was a mess under Walt Harris and Teevens.
Washington had holes but it wasn't a salvage job.
5 and no
Michigan always has top 20 talent. There's really no excuse for them to be as bad as they were from 2008 through 2014. -
I remember hearing former Seahawk back-up QB Kelly Stouffer defend Ty in 2008 when they were 0-7 or something. He thought Ty needed more time to get his players in there.... So by that logic, he should have gotten a fifth year. Sometimes it's obvious it isn't working.
Petersen is white so the liberal faggots (I'm liberal, but not a guilty type) and NAACP and Jerry Brewer types can't save him. There won't be politics involved, just apathy and some 275 lb. woman a.d. who probably doesn't get it. -
It was rhetorical Billy, jesus. peppered with a dash of sarcasm.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
3 and nopuppylove_sugarsteel said:
How many years did Hoke get? Is michigan a salvage job? Al golden? Is miami a salvage job?Fire_Marshall_Bill said:You get four or five years at total salvage jobs like Kansas, K State, Wisconsin, and VT in the late 80s. Or for our millenials, Stanfraud in the late 2000s under douchebag Harbaugh. Stanfraud was a mess under Walt Harris and Teevens.
Washington had holes but it wasn't a salvage job.
5 and no
Michigan always has top 20 talent. There's really no excuse for them to be as bad as they were from 2008 through 2014. -
youre liberal? Oh I couldnt tell (sarcasm billy). Youre the only liberal I even speak to. Only cause its a message board.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:I remember hearing former Seahawk back-up QB Kelly Stouffer defend Ty in 2008 when they were 0-7 or something. He thought Ty needed more time to get his players in there.... So by that logic, he should have gotten a fifth year. Sometimes it's obvious it isn't working.
Petersen is white so the liberal faggots (I'm liberal, but not a guilty type) and NAACP and Jerry Brewer types can't save him. There won't be politics involved, just apathy and some 275 lb. woman a.d. who probably doesn't get it. -
I'm honored?puppylove_sugarsteel said:
youre liberal? Oh I couldnt tell (sarcasm billy). Youre the only liberal I even speak to. Only cause its a message board.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:I remember hearing former Seahawk back-up QB Kelly Stouffer defend Ty in 2008 when they were 0-7 or something. He thought Ty needed more time to get his players in there.... So by that logic, he should have gotten a fifth year. Sometimes it's obvious it isn't working.
Petersen is white so the liberal faggots (I'm liberal, but not a guilty type) and NAACP and Jerry Brewer types can't save him. There won't be politics involved, just apathy and some 275 lb. woman a.d. who probably doesn't get it.
Minimum wage, rebuild middle class, unions aren't inherently evil, CEO's shouldn't get millions, Exxon climate science isn't real science. Social issues are usually for women and fags. -
Uh Bill, man made climate change is a farse . #ipcclies
-
#7/10of1°in116years
#tempdecreasinglast14years
#precession
#glaciersgrowing@southpole
#shouldicontinue
#idontusegoogle
#hurryliberalstoyourgoogleengine -
And to all you libs, fossil fuels, deisel trucks, coal-fired power doesnt equate to climate change. Good luck building husky stadium with bicycles, oxin and draft horses.
-
I just. I can't. This thread.
-
We should tear down HS and build a p-patch on the land.puppylove_sugarsteel said:And to all you libs, fossil fuels, deisel trucks, coal-fired power doesnt equate to climate change. Good luck building husky stadium with bicycles, oxin and draft horses.
-
You could service the workin men after a hard days' work Tometta:)...after waterin the oxin and horse stock of course
-
So Petersen should win in his third year because all of the talent he has brought in. In that scenario you are counting on no seniors and a majority of underclassmen to win in the Pac-12.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:If Petersen can't win in year three with the talent he has brought in he is not the guy. Straight up.
I praise him because I believe he has done a great job of building up the talent. Just look at the thread that was bumped the other day that Passion started before the 2013 season saying the depth chart is a thing of beauty (the 2016 depth chart compared to the 2013 depth chart is a night and day difference). Petersen has done a great job at building our depth up and shit. I doog hard for him because of that and his philosophy on culture and all that.
But he needs to fucking win this year. And he needs to win because he has built up the talent to do it right fucking now.
10-2. -
Only made it to midway through page 2.
This thread sucks -
puppylove_sugarsteel said:
You millenials expect immediate results on everything. College football isnt a
cell phonemicrowave popcorn. You cant just google your way to 10 wins. Takes 4-5 years to build a program. That will never change -
I guarantee you if you ask Petersen, in a private moment... by his fireplace... with a nice merlot, if he can win ten games with this team he would tell you yes.Ice_Holmvik said:
So Petersen should win in his third year because all of the talent he has brought in. In that scenario you are counting on no seniors and a majority of underclassmen to win in the Pac-12.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:If Petersen can't win in year three with the talent he has brought in he is not the guy. Straight up.
I praise him because I believe he has done a great job of building up the talent. Just look at the thread that was bumped the other day that Passion started before the 2013 season saying the depth chart is a thing of beauty (the 2016 depth chart compared to the 2013 depth chart is a night and day difference). Petersen has done a great job at building our depth up and shit. I doog hard for him because of that and his philosophy on culture and all that.
But he needs to fucking win this year. And he needs to win because he has built up the talent to do it right fucking now.
10-2. -
Puppy gonna puppyPostGameOrangeSlices said:Only made it to midway through page 2.
This thread sucks -
TrickleDown Dumbfuckpuppylove_sugarsteel said:#7/10of1°in116years
#tempdecreasinglast14years
#precession
#glaciersgrowing@southpole
#shouldicontinue
#idontusegoogle
#hurryliberalstoyourgoogleengine -
#nosteelheadpuppylove_sugarsteel said:#7/10of1°in116years
#tempdecreasinglast14years
#precession
#glaciersgrowing@southpole
#shouldicontinue
#idontusegoogle
#hurryliberalstoyourgoogleengine -
#climatechangehappensincyclesBaseman said:
TrickleDown Dumbfuckpuppylove_sugarsteel said:#7/10of1°in116years
#tempdecreasinglast14years
#precession
#glaciersgrowing@southpole
#shouldicontinue
#idontusegoogle
#hurryliberalstoyourgoogleengine
#baseatypical20yearoldignorantactivist
#trump -
#icegetsitIce_Holmvik said:
So Petersen should win in his third year because all of the talent he has brought in. In that scenario you are counting on no seniors and a majority of underclassmen to win in the Pac-12.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:If Petersen can't win in year three with the talent he has brought in he is not the guy. Straight up.
I praise him because I believe he has done a great job of building up the talent. Just look at the thread that was bumped the other day that Passion started before the 2013 season saying the depth chart is a thing of beauty (the 2016 depth chart compared to the 2013 depth chart is a night and day difference). Petersen has done a great job at building our depth up and shit. I doog hard for him because of that and his philosophy on culture and all that.
But he needs to fucking win this year. And he needs to win because he has built up the talent to do it right fucking now.
10-2. -
Have you heard a fucking thing Pete has been saying the last 2 years about how strong the pac12 is? Like saying Vandy is going to just roll off 10 wins in the SEC. Vandy was in better shape than UW when Pete took over. Thats the only thing Pete would say to get through to you dipsticks.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
I guarantee you if you ask Petersen, in a private moment... by his fireplace... with a nice merlot, if he can win ten games with this team he would tell you yes.Ice_Holmvik said:
So Petersen should win in his third year because all of the talent he has brought in. In that scenario you are counting on no seniors and a majority of underclassmen to win in the Pac-12.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:If Petersen can't win in year three with the talent he has brought in he is not the guy. Straight up.
I praise him because I believe he has done a great job of building up the talent. Just look at the thread that was bumped the other day that Passion started before the 2013 season saying the depth chart is a thing of beauty (the 2016 depth chart compared to the 2013 depth chart is a night and day difference). Petersen has done a great job at building our depth up and shit. I doog hard for him because of that and his philosophy on culture and all that.
But he needs to fucking win this year. And he needs to win because he has built up the talent to do it right fucking now.
10-2. -
Here at HH we smoke hash. We don't hashtag.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
#icegetsitIce_Holmvik said:
So Petersen should win in his third year because all of the talent he has brought in. In that scenario you are counting on no seniors and a majority of underclassmen to win in the Pac-12.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:If Petersen can't win in year three with the talent he has brought in he is not the guy. Straight up.
I praise him because I believe he has done a great job of building up the talent. Just look at the thread that was bumped the other day that Passion started before the 2013 season saying the depth chart is a thing of beauty (the 2016 depth chart compared to the 2013 depth chart is a night and day difference). Petersen has done a great job at building our depth up and shit. I doog hard for him because of that and his philosophy on culture and all that.
But he needs to fucking win this year. And he needs to win because he has built up the talent to do it right fucking now.
10-2. -
Do you know how many times I've said that in my head? Or sometimes it's page 1PostGameOrangeSlices said:Only made it to midway through page 2.
This thread sucks -
Pete is selling that shit because it covers up his failures.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Have you heard a fucking thing Pete has been saying the last 2 years about how strong the pac12 is? Like saying Vandy is going to just roll off 10 wins in the SEC. Vandy was in better shape than UW when Pete took over. Thats the only thing Pete would say to get through to you dipsticks.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
I guarantee you if you ask Petersen, in a private moment... by his fireplace... with a nice merlot, if he can win ten games with this team he would tell you yes.Ice_Holmvik said:
So Petersen should win in his third year because all of the talent he has brought in. In that scenario you are counting on no seniors and a majority of underclassmen to win in the Pac-12.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:If Petersen can't win in year three with the talent he has brought in he is not the guy. Straight up.
I praise him because I believe he has done a great job of building up the talent. Just look at the thread that was bumped the other day that Passion started before the 2013 season saying the depth chart is a thing of beauty (the 2016 depth chart compared to the 2013 depth chart is a night and day difference). Petersen has done a great job at building our depth up and shit. I doog hard for him because of that and his philosophy on culture and all that.
But he needs to fucking win this year. And he needs to win because he has built up the talent to do it right fucking now.
10-2.
The Pac-12 is actually bad at football. -
Pup hashtag only to make fun of people who hashtag!. Pup dont twatter.RoadDawg55 said:
Here at HH we smoke hash. We don't hashtag.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
#icegetsitIce_Holmvik said:
So Petersen should win in his third year because all of the talent he has brought in. In that scenario you are counting on no seniors and a majority of underclassmen to win in the Pac-12.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:If Petersen can't win in year three with the talent he has brought in he is not the guy. Straight up.
I praise him because I believe he has done a great job of building up the talent. Just look at the thread that was bumped the other day that Passion started before the 2013 season saying the depth chart is a thing of beauty (the 2016 depth chart compared to the 2013 depth chart is a night and day difference). Petersen has done a great job at building our depth up and shit. I doog hard for him because of that and his philosophy on culture and all that.
But he needs to fucking win this year. And he needs to win because he has built up the talent to do it right fucking now.
10-2.
