Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Consider
Comments
-
Need I bring up Pete Carroll or Don James again? Just dont get it baabs. Last time ill respond. You'll crawl back, cant wait;)TierbsHsotBoobs said:
8-10 in a sorry ass Pac-12 though.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Difference nacho, Pete can coach. Silly argumentCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Did you use the same arguments to defend, Gilby, Ty and Sark you fucking Doig?
-
Yes, that's the next logical step in defending a coach who has thus far underperformed*. Its I your Doog playbook.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Need I bring up Pete Carroll or Don James again? Just dont get it baabs. Last time ill respond. You'll crawl back, cant wait;)TierbsHsotBoobs said:
8-10 in a sorry ass Pac-12 though.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Difference nacho, Pete can coach. Silly argumentCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Did you use the same arguments to defend, Gilby, Ty and Sark you fucking Doig?
*I still think Peterman makes a huge improvement with the results in 2016. Insert doogitup.gif -
Both of those coaches won the Rose Bowl and popped off in year three. Hell, Pete Carroll won the Orange Bowl and popped off in year two.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Need I bring up Pete Carroll or Don James again? Just dont get it baabs. Last time ill respond. You'll crawl back, cant wait;)TierbsHsotBoobs said:
8-10 in a sorry ass Pac-12 though.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Difference nacho, Pete can coach. Silly argumentCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Did you use the same arguments to defend, Gilby, Ty and Sark you fucking Doig?
Do you expect Peterman to match them this year? -
Yes.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Both of those coaches won the Rose Bowl and popped off in year three. Hell, Pete Carroll won the Orange Bowl and popped off in year two.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Need I bring up Pete Carroll or Don James again? Just dont get it baabs. Last time ill respond. You'll crawl back, cant wait;)TierbsHsotBoobs said:
8-10 in a sorry ass Pac-12 though.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Difference nacho, Pete can coach. Silly argumentCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Did you use the same arguments to defend, Gilby, Ty and Sark you fucking Doig?
Do you expect Peterman to match them this year? -
What scbool was carrol coaching at?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Both of those coaches won the Rose Bowl and popped off in year three. Hell, Pete Carroll won the Orange Bowl and popped off in year two.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Need I bring up Pete Carroll or Don James again? Just dont get it baabs. Last time ill respond. You'll crawl back, cant wait;)TierbsHsotBoobs said:
8-10 in a sorry ass Pac-12 though.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Difference nacho, Pete can coach. Silly argumentCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Did you use the same arguments to defend, Gilby, Ty and Sark you fucking Doig?
Do you expect Peterman to match them this year? -
Did james and Carroll coach completely depleted teams, without a qb, WR or offensive lineman on the roster? Apples and orange bowls
-
A formerly great football scbool that was coming off of five years of self-imposed sanctions from shitty coaching.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
What scbool was carrol coaching at?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Both of those coaches won the Rose Bowl and popped off in year three. Hell, Pete Carroll won the Orange Bowl and popped off in year two.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Need I bring up Pete Carroll or Don James again? Just dont get it baabs. Last time ill respond. You'll crawl back, cant wait;)TierbsHsotBoobs said:
8-10 in a sorry ass Pac-12 though.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Difference nacho, Pete can coach. Silly argumentCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Did you use the same arguments to defend, Gilby, Ty and Sark you fucking Doig?
Do you expect Peterman to match them this year?
Sound familiar?
EDIT: Pete Carroll actually inherited a worse situation than Peterman did.
1996 John Robinson 6–6 3–5 T-5th
1997 John Robinson 6–5 4–4 T-5th
1998 Paul Hackett 8–5 5–3 T-3rd L Sun
1999 Paul Hackett 6–6 3–5 T-6th
2000 Paul Hackett 5–7 2–6 T-8th -
Im hearing Sark was fired at half time at which point Pete took over and inspired a spirited second half comeback.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Didnt hate Damone. He just found pup offensive and threatening to his cred. We both went way back. Some reason he didnt want to get along. I respected the guy, similar to Race. Race has paid the dues, but is such a whiney cunt sometimes. Pup dont let people spew bullshit about my dawgs without backing it up with realistic arguments. Tired of the "pete had 3 1st round draft picks on defense" bullshit or ""he should have won 10 games last year" bullshit or "pete cant run a 2-minute offense" bullshit.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Dude, I'm your biggest supporter, but you hated Damone.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Actually Damone was well respected here. Paid dues, been around for a few decades, Not a bad dude, . You? Uh, mmm, well...262 posts? Get in back of the line, when you ripen ill address you missy.Baseman said:
Bouncing Damone is like beating Sac Statepuppylove_sugarsteel said:
Base, lurk! Put in a few posts, see what kind of response you get, think a little and try again. Someday puppy might respond to you in a positive and constructive way. Ive bounced many like you in the past. Be carefulBaseman said:If it takes more than a paragraph, three or four sentences, to describe how good a coach is, you've got the wrong coach.
Very few if any get why things are the way they are. Pete can only do so much with a guy like Cyrus, and lindquist as a backup. Few can grasp that. If Pete had a viable backup in the Cactus bowl he would have yanked Cyrus He didnt!!!!! Thats Sark's fault not Petersen's. . Its like that AT EVERY FUCKING POSITION DUMBASSES!!!!!!!!!!!!!Gather a fucking intelligent argument before bashing the best coach UW could HAVE EVER got given the circumstances. This place might as well be "open season". Same ignorant and dipshitted personalities.
Cy Miles agreed : "We were just too relaxed. Too relaxed, We were kind of back on our heels, going with the flow, kind of like it was practice. It was all of us. I’m not singling nobody out; all of us were too relaxed in the first half and as you can see, we can’t do that.” -
Just imagine what Mike Reilly could have done at USC!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
A formerly great football scbool that was coming off of five years of self-imposed sanctions from shitty coaching.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
What scbool was carrol coaching at?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Both of those coaches won the Rose Bowl and popped off in year three. Hell, Pete Carroll won the Orange Bowl and popped off in year two.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Need I bring up Pete Carroll or Don James again? Just dont get it baabs. Last time ill respond. You'll crawl back, cant wait;)TierbsHsotBoobs said:
8-10 in a sorry ass Pac-12 though.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Difference nacho, Pete can coach. Silly argumentCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Did you use the same arguments to defend, Gilby, Ty and Sark you fucking Doig?
Do you expect Peterman to match them this year?
Sound familiar?
EDIT: Pete Carroll actually inherited a worse situation than Peterman did.
1996 John Robinson 6–6 3–5 T-5th
1997 John Robinson 6–5 4–4 T-5th
1998 Paul Hackett 8–5 5–3 T-3rd L Sun
1999 Paul Hackett 6–6 3–5 T-6th
2000 Paul Hackett 5–7 2–6 T-8th -
Carroll gets his pick of best athletes in country at SC. And the rosters werent close. That is a rediculous assertion. Records have little do with it. Its why carroll was hired dumb dumb. Robinson hackett couldnt win with 5star talentdnc said:
Just imagine what Mike Reilly could have done at USC!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
A formerly great football scbool that was coming off of five years of self-imposed sanctions from shitty coaching.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
What scbool was carrol coaching at?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Both of those coaches won the Rose Bowl and popped off in year three. Hell, Pete Carroll won the Orange Bowl and popped off in year two.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Need I bring up Pete Carroll or Don James again? Just dont get it baabs. Last time ill respond. You'll crawl back, cant wait;)TierbsHsotBoobs said:
8-10 in a sorry ass Pac-12 though.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Difference nacho, Pete can coach. Silly argumentCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Did you use the same arguments to defend, Gilby, Ty and Sark you fucking Doig?
Do you expect Peterman to match them this year?
Sound familiar?
EDIT: Pete Carroll actually inherited a worse situation than Peterman did.
1996 John Robinson 6–6 3–5 T-5th
1997 John Robinson 6–5 4–4 T-5th
1998 Paul Hackett 8–5 5–3 T-3rd L Sun
1999 Paul Hackett 6–6 3–5 T-6th
2000 Paul Hackett 5–7 2–6 T-8th -
Im hearing the 2000 Trojans were like the 1999 Huskies - loaded with talent, crippled by sanctions, and victims of several heart breaking last minute defeats.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
A formerly great football scbool that was coming off of five years of self-imposed sanctions from shitty coaching.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
What scbool was carrol coaching at?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Both of those coaches won the Rose Bowl and popped off in year three. Hell, Pete Carroll won the Orange Bowl and popped off in year two.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Need I bring up Pete Carroll or Don James again? Just dont get it baabs. Last time ill respond. You'll crawl back, cant wait;)TierbsHsotBoobs said:
8-10 in a sorry ass Pac-12 though.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Difference nacho, Pete can coach. Silly argumentCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Did you use the same arguments to defend, Gilby, Ty and Sark you fucking Doig?
Do you expect Peterman to match them this year?
Sound familiar?
EDIT: Pete Carroll actually inherited a worse situation than Peterman did.
1996 John Robinson 6–6 3–5 T-5th
1997 John Robinson 6–5 4–4 T-5th
1998 Paul Hackett 8–5 5–3 T-3rd L Sun
1999 Paul Hackett 6–6 3–5 T-6th
2000 Paul Hackett 5–7 2–6 T-8th
-
You're starting to get it.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Carroll gets his pick of best athletes in country at SC. And the rosters werent close. That is a rediculous assertion. Records have little do with it. Its why carroll was hired dumb dumb. Robinson hackett couldnt win with 5star talentdnc said:
Just imagine what Mike Reilly could have done at USC!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
A formerly great football scbool that was coming off of five years of self-imposed sanctions from shitty coaching.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
What scbool was carrol coaching at?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Both of those coaches won the Rose Bowl and popped off in year three. Hell, Pete Carroll won the Orange Bowl and popped off in year two.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Need I bring up Pete Carroll or Don James again? Just dont get it baabs. Last time ill respond. You'll crawl back, cant wait;)TierbsHsotBoobs said:
8-10 in a sorry ass Pac-12 though.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Difference nacho, Pete can coach. Silly argumentCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Did you use the same arguments to defend, Gilby, Ty and Sark you fucking Doig?
Do you expect Peterman to match them this year?
Sound familiar?
EDIT: Pete Carroll actually inherited a worse situation than Peterman did.
1996 John Robinson 6–6 3–5 T-5th
1997 John Robinson 6–5 4–4 T-5th
1998 Paul Hackett 8–5 5–3 T-3rd L Sun
1999 Paul Hackett 6–6 3–5 T-6th
2000 Paul Hackett 5–7 2–6 T-8th
Coaching matters and the great coaches proves themselves in 3 years or less.
Tick, tick, tick... -
OK if you wanna play that game, why can't Peterman win with the same 3-4 star talent Sark had here?puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Carroll gets his pick of best athletes in country at SC. And the rosters werent close. That is a rediculous assertion. Records have little do with it. Its why carroll was hired dumb dumb. Robinson hackett couldnt win with 5star talentdnc said:
Just imagine what Mike Reilly could have done at USC!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
A formerly great football scbool that was coming off of five years of self-imposed sanctions from shitty coaching.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
What scbool was carrol coaching at?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Both of those coaches won the Rose Bowl and popped off in year three. Hell, Pete Carroll won the Orange Bowl and popped off in year two.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Need I bring up Pete Carroll or Don James again? Just dont get it baabs. Last time ill respond. You'll crawl back, cant wait;)TierbsHsotBoobs said:
8-10 in a sorry ass Pac-12 though.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Difference nacho, Pete can coach. Silly argumentCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Did you use the same arguments to defend, Gilby, Ty and Sark you fucking Doig?
Do you expect Peterman to match them this year?
Sound familiar?
EDIT: Pete Carroll actually inherited a worse situation than Peterman did.
1996 John Robinson 6–6 3–5 T-5th
1997 John Robinson 6–5 4–4 T-5th
1998 Paul Hackett 8–5 5–3 T-3rd L Sun
1999 Paul Hackett 6–6 3–5 T-6th
2000 Paul Hackett 5–7 2–6 T-8th -
I'm starting to learn W-L records have nothing to do with how good a team really is.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Carroll gets his pick of best athletes in country at SC. And the rosters werent close. That is a rediculous assertion. Records have little do with it. Its why carroll was hired dumb dumb. Lambo couldnt win with 5star talentdnc said:
Just imagine what Mike Reilly could have done at USC!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
A formerly great football scbool that was coming off of five years of self-imposed sanctions from shitty coaching.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
What scbool was carrol coaching at?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Both of those coaches won the Rose Bowl and popped off in year three. Hell, Pete Carroll won the Orange Bowl and popped off in year two.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Need I bring up Pete Carroll or Don James again? Just dont get it baabs. Last time ill respond. You'll crawl back, cant wait;)TierbsHsotBoobs said:
8-10 in a sorry ass Pac-12 though.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Difference nacho, Pete can coach. Silly argumentCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Did you use the same arguments to defend, Gilby, Ty and Sark you fucking Doig?
Do you expect Peterman to match them this year?
Sound familiar?
EDIT: Pete Carroll actually inherited a worse situation than Peterman did.
1996 John Robinson 6–6 3–5 T-5th
1997 John Robinson 6–5 4–4 T-5th
1998 Paul Hackett 8–5 5–3 T-3rd L Sun
1999 Paul Hackett 6–6 3–5 T-6th
2000 Paul Hackett 5–7 2–6 T-8th -
If i may blaspheme for a moment - Jesus Fucking Christ puppy is a fucking doog.
He compares Petermen to Carroll and James and when you say fine, then Petermen needs to win this year he claims you can't compare.
-
@HeretoBeatmyChest! True?Baseman said:
I'm starting to learn W-L records have nothing to do with how good a team really is.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Carroll gets his pick of best athletes in country at SC. And the rosters werent close. That is a rediculous assertion. Records have little do with it. Its why carroll was hired dumb dumb. Lambo couldnt win with 5star talentdnc said:
Just imagine what Mike Reilly could have done at USC!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
A formerly great football scbool that was coming off of five years of self-imposed sanctions from shitty coaching.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
What scbool was carrol coaching at?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Both of those coaches won the Rose Bowl and popped off in year three. Hell, Pete Carroll won the Orange Bowl and popped off in year two.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Need I bring up Pete Carroll or Don James again? Just dont get it baabs. Last time ill respond. You'll crawl back, cant wait;)TierbsHsotBoobs said:
8-10 in a sorry ass Pac-12 though.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Difference nacho, Pete can coach. Silly argumentCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Did you use the same arguments to defend, Gilby, Ty and Sark you fucking Doig?
Do you expect Peterman to match them this year?
Sound familiar?
EDIT: Pete Carroll actually inherited a worse situation than Peterman did.
1996 John Robinson 6–6 3–5 T-5th
1997 John Robinson 6–5 4–4 T-5th
1998 Paul Hackett 8–5 5–3 T-3rd L Sun
1999 Paul Hackett 6–6 3–5 T-6th
2000 Paul Hackett 5–7 2–6 T-8th -
Doogs hate winning.RaceBannon said:If i may blaspheme for a moment - Jesus Fucking Christ puppy is a fucking doog.
He compares Petermen to Carroll and James and when you say fine, then Petermen needs to win this year he claims you can't compare. -
5 years baabs...5 years. Which is a lot of ticks. You show your ignorance with every post.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
You're starting to get it.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Carroll gets his pick of best athletes in country at SC. And the rosters werent close. That is a rediculous assertion. Records have little do with it. Its why carroll was hired dumb dumb. Robinson hackett couldnt win with 5star talentdnc said:
Just imagine what Mike Reilly could have done at USC!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
A formerly great football scbool that was coming off of five years of self-imposed sanctions from shitty coaching.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
What scbool was carrol coaching at?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Both of those coaches won the Rose Bowl and popped off in year three. Hell, Pete Carroll won the Orange Bowl and popped off in year two.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Need I bring up Pete Carroll or Don James again? Just dont get it baabs. Last time ill respond. You'll crawl back, cant wait;)TierbsHsotBoobs said:
8-10 in a sorry ass Pac-12 though.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Difference nacho, Pete can coach. Silly argumentCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Did you use the same arguments to defend, Gilby, Ty and Sark you fucking Doig?
Do you expect Peterman to match them this year?
Sound familiar?
EDIT: Pete Carroll actually inherited a worse situation than Peterman did.
1996 John Robinson 6–6 3–5 T-5th
1997 John Robinson 6–5 4–4 T-5th
1998 Paul Hackett 8–5 5–3 T-3rd L Sun
1999 Paul Hackett 6–6 3–5 T-6th
2000 Paul Hackett 5–7 2–6 T-8th
Coaching matters and the great coaches proves themselves in 3 years or less.
Tick, tick, tick... -
There has been comprehensive research with actual data and shit proving the win in three years or get the fuck out standard.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
5 years baabs...5 years. Which is a lot of ticks. You show your ignorance with every post.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
You're starting to get it.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Carroll gets his pick of best athletes in country at SC. And the rosters werent close. That is a rediculous assertion. Records have little do with it. Its why carroll was hired dumb dumb. Robinson hackett couldnt win with 5star talentdnc said:
Just imagine what Mike Reilly could have done at USC!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
A formerly great football scbool that was coming off of five years of self-imposed sanctions from shitty coaching.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
What scbool was carrol coaching at?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Both of those coaches won the Rose Bowl and popped off in year three. Hell, Pete Carroll won the Orange Bowl and popped off in year two.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Need I bring up Pete Carroll or Don James again? Just dont get it baabs. Last time ill respond. You'll crawl back, cant wait;)TierbsHsotBoobs said:
8-10 in a sorry ass Pac-12 though.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Difference nacho, Pete can coach. Silly argumentCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Did you use the same arguments to defend, Gilby, Ty and Sark you fucking Doig?
Do you expect Peterman to match them this year?
Sound familiar?
EDIT: Pete Carroll actually inherited a worse situation than Peterman did.
1996 John Robinson 6–6 3–5 T-5th
1997 John Robinson 6–5 4–4 T-5th
1998 Paul Hackett 8–5 5–3 T-3rd L Sun
1999 Paul Hackett 6–6 3–5 T-6th
2000 Paul Hackett 5–7 2–6 T-8th
Coaching matters and the great coaches proves themselves in 3 years or less.
Tick, tick, tick...
I would repeat it for you but Doogs hate facts so why bother? -
Sorry baabs you are wrong. The SEC and maybe Texas is on the 3-year plan. Qualified pundits, coaches all agree it takes 5 years, 4 in a perfect scenario to "build" a program. UW was a rebuilding job and any experts like pup would agree (you and your little ignant armchair klan are the only little minority who doesnt).TierbsHsotBoobs said:
There has been comprehensive research with actual data and shit proving the win in three years or get the fuck out standard.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
5 years baabs...5 years. Which is a lot of ticks. You show your ignorance with every post.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
You're starting to get it.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Carroll gets his pick of best athletes in country at SC. And the rosters werent close. That is a rediculous assertion. Records have little do with it. Its why carroll was hired dumb dumb. Robinson hackett couldnt win with 5star talentdnc said:
Just imagine what Mike Reilly could have done at USC!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
A formerly great football scbool that was coming off of five years of self-imposed sanctions from shitty coaching.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
What scbool was carrol coaching at?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Both of those coaches won the Rose Bowl and popped off in year three. Hell, Pete Carroll won the Orange Bowl and popped off in year two.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Need I bring up Pete Carroll or Don James again? Just dont get it baabs. Last time ill respond. You'll crawl back, cant wait;)TierbsHsotBoobs said:
8-10 in a sorry ass Pac-12 though.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Difference nacho, Pete can coach. Silly argumentCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Did you use the same arguments to defend, Gilby, Ty and Sark you fucking Doig?
Do you expect Peterman to match them this year?
Sound familiar?
EDIT: Pete Carroll actually inherited a worse situation than Peterman did.
1996 John Robinson 6–6 3–5 T-5th
1997 John Robinson 6–5 4–4 T-5th
1998 Paul Hackett 8–5 5–3 T-3rd L Sun
1999 Paul Hackett 6–6 3–5 T-6th
2000 Paul Hackett 5–7 2–6 T-8th
Coaching matters and the great coaches proves themselves in 3 years or less.
Tick, tick, tick...
I would repeat it for you but Doogs hate facts so why bother?
3 years at E-FUCKING-STABLISHED programs like oregon and Ohio St is understandable. Nobody disagrees there. Learn what it is the difference, what we are talking about before you pop your cunt off. Jesus Tommy could prolly comprehend that. -
Pundits and coaches are too lazy to do research.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Sorry baabs you are wrong. The SEC and maybe Texas is on the 3-year plan. Qualified pundits, coaches all agree it takes 5 years, 4 in a perfect scenario to "build" a program. UW was a rebuilding job and any experts like pup would agree (you and your little ignant armchair klan are the only little minority who doesnt).TierbsHsotBoobs said:
There has been comprehensive research with actual data and shit proving the win in three years or get the fuck out standard.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
5 years baabs...5 years. Which is a lot of ticks. You show your ignorance with every post.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
You're starting to get it.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Carroll gets his pick of best athletes in country at SC. And the rosters werent close. That is a rediculous assertion. Records have little do with it. Its why carroll was hired dumb dumb. Robinson hackett couldnt win with 5star talentdnc said:
Just imagine what Mike Reilly could have done at USC!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
A formerly great football scbool that was coming off of five years of self-imposed sanctions from shitty coaching.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
What scbool was carrol coaching at?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Both of those coaches won the Rose Bowl and popped off in year three. Hell, Pete Carroll won the Orange Bowl and popped off in year two.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Need I bring up Pete Carroll or Don James again? Just dont get it baabs. Last time ill respond. You'll crawl back, cant wait;)TierbsHsotBoobs said:
8-10 in a sorry ass Pac-12 though.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Difference nacho, Pete can coach. Silly argumentCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Did you use the same arguments to defend, Gilby, Ty and Sark you fucking Doig?
Do you expect Peterman to match them this year?
Sound familiar?
EDIT: Pete Carroll actually inherited a worse situation than Peterman did.
1996 John Robinson 6–6 3–5 T-5th
1997 John Robinson 6–5 4–4 T-5th
1998 Paul Hackett 8–5 5–3 T-3rd L Sun
1999 Paul Hackett 6–6 3–5 T-6th
2000 Paul Hackett 5–7 2–6 T-8th
Coaching matters and the great coaches proves themselves in 3 years or less.
Tick, tick, tick...
I would repeat it for you but Doogs hate facts so why bother?
3 years at E-FUCKING-STABLISHED programs like oregon and Ohio St is understandable. Nobody disagrees there. Learn what it is the difference, what we are talking about before you pop your cunt off. Jesus Tommy could prolly comprehend that.
Thanks for proving the poont, Doog. -
If Petersen can't win in year three with the talent he has brought in he is not the guy. Straight up.
I praise him because I believe he has done a great job of building up the talent. Just look at the thread that was bumped the other day that Passion started before the 2013 season saying the depth chart is a thing of beauty (the 2016 depth chart compared to the 2013 depth chart is a night and day difference). Petersen has done a great job at building our depth up and shit. I doog hard for him because of that and his philosophy on culture and all that.
But he needs to fucking win this year. And he needs to win because he has built up the talent to do it right fucking now.
10-2. -
This. If you can't win with that defense and a sophomore phenom RB, you suck balls.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:If Petersen can't win in year three with the talent he has brought in he is not the guy. Straight up.
I praise him because I believe he has done a great job of building up the talent. Just look at the thread that was bumped the other day that Passion started before the 2013 season saying the depth chart is a thing of beauty (the 2016 depth chart compared to the 2013 depth chart is a night and day difference). Petersen has done a great job at building our depth up and shit. I doog hard for him because of that and his philosophy on culture and all that.
But he needs to fucking win this year. And he needs to win because he has built up the talent to do it right fucking now.
10-2. -
Oh poopsie thats not how it works. The freshmen all over yhe roster need time. You win with jr"s and seniors. See puppy learned from don james and dick baird. You hapless fucks learned from kim grinolds. At least Ice gets it.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:If Petersen can't win in year three with the talent he has brought in he is not the guy. Straight up.
I praise him because I believe he has done a great job of building up the talent. Just look at the thread that was bumped the other day that Passion started before the 2013 season saying the depth chart is a thing of beauty (the 2016 depth chart compared to the 2013 depth chart is a night and day difference). Petersen has done a great job at building our depth up and shit. I doog hard for him because of that and his philosophy on culture and all that.
But he needs to fucking win this year. And he needs to win because he has built up the talent to do it right fucking now.
10-2. -
Hi. Seniors who are any good now LEAVE for the NFL before their senior year.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Oh poopsie thats not how it works. The freshmen all over yhe roster need time. You win with jr"s and seniors. See puppy learned from don james and dick baird. You hapless fucks learned from kim grinolds. At least Ice gets it.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:If Petersen can't win in year three with the talent he has brought in he is not the guy. Straight up.
I praise him because I believe he has done a great job of building up the talent. Just look at the thread that was bumped the other day that Passion started before the 2013 season saying the depth chart is a thing of beauty (the 2016 depth chart compared to the 2013 depth chart is a night and day difference). Petersen has done a great job at building our depth up and shit. I doog hard for him because of that and his philosophy on culture and all that.
But he needs to fucking win this year. And he needs to win because he has built up the talent to do it right fucking now.
10-2.
Evolve or die. -
Oregon took 17 years under Brooks, 12 under Bellotti and 1 under Chippuppylove_sugarsteel said:
Sorry baabs you are wrong. The SEC and maybe Texas is on the 3-year plan. Qualified pundits, coaches all agree it takes 5 years, 4 in a perfect scenario to "build" a program. UW was a rebuilding job and any experts like pup would agree (you and your little ignant armchair klan are the only little minority who doesnt).TierbsHsotBoobs said:
There has been comprehensive research with actual data and shit proving the win in three years or get the fuck out standard.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
5 years baabs...5 years. Which is a lot of ticks. You show your ignorance with every post.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
You're starting to get it.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Carroll gets his pick of best athletes in country at SC. And the rosters werent close. That is a rediculous assertion. Records have little do with it. Its why carroll was hired dumb dumb. Robinson hackett couldnt win with 5star talentdnc said:
Just imagine what Mike Reilly could have done at USC!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
A formerly great football scbool that was coming off of five years of self-imposed sanctions from shitty coaching.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
What scbool was carrol coaching at?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Both of those coaches won the Rose Bowl and popped off in year three. Hell, Pete Carroll won the Orange Bowl and popped off in year two.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Need I bring up Pete Carroll or Don James again? Just dont get it baabs. Last time ill respond. You'll crawl back, cant wait;)TierbsHsotBoobs said:
8-10 in a sorry ass Pac-12 though.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Difference nacho, Pete can coach. Silly argumentCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Did you use the same arguments to defend, Gilby, Ty and Sark you fucking Doig?
Do you expect Peterman to match them this year?
Sound familiar?
EDIT: Pete Carroll actually inherited a worse situation than Peterman did.
1996 John Robinson 6–6 3–5 T-5th
1997 John Robinson 6–5 4–4 T-5th
1998 Paul Hackett 8–5 5–3 T-3rd L Sun
1999 Paul Hackett 6–6 3–5 T-6th
2000 Paul Hackett 5–7 2–6 T-8th
Coaching matters and the great coaches proves themselves in 3 years or less.
Tick, tick, tick...
I would repeat it for you but Doogs hate facts so why bother?
3 years at E-FUCKING-STABLISHED programs like oregon and Ohio St is understandable. Nobody disagrees there. Learn what it is the difference, what we are talking about before you pop your cunt off. Jesus Tommy could prolly comprehend that.
UW is a three year plan school. Like James, the example you gave you fucking doog. Jim Owens left a steaming pile of shit -
Fuck Dick Bairdpuppylove_sugarsteel said:
Oh poopsie thats not how it works. The freshmen all over yhe roster need time. You win with jr"s and seniors. See puppy learned from don james and dick baird. You hapless fucks learned from kim grinolds. At least Ice gets it.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:If Petersen can't win in year three with the talent he has brought in he is not the guy. Straight up.
I praise him because I believe he has done a great job of building up the talent. Just look at the thread that was bumped the other day that Passion started before the 2013 season saying the depth chart is a thing of beauty (the 2016 depth chart compared to the 2013 depth chart is a night and day difference). Petersen has done a great job at building our depth up and shit. I doog hard for him because of that and his philosophy on culture and all that.
But he needs to fucking win this year. And he needs to win because he has built up the talent to do it right fucking now.
10-2. -
You get four or five years at total salvage jobs like Kansas, K State, Wisconsin, and VT in the late 80s. Or for our millenials, Stanfraud in the late 2000s under douchebag Harbaugh. Stanfraud was a mess under Walt Harris and Teevens.
Washington had holes but it wasn't a salvage job. -
Starting to wonder if @puppylove_sugarsteel is real or really an ISIS troll account.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Sorry baabs you are wrong. The SEC and maybe Texas is on the 3-year plan. Qualified pundits, coaches all agree it takes 5 years, 4 in a perfect scenario to "build" a program. UW was a rebuilding job and any experts like pup would agree (you and your little ignant armchair klan are the only little minority who doesnt).TierbsHsotBoobs said:
There has been comprehensive research with actual data and shit proving the win in three years or get the fuck out standard.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
5 years baabs...5 years. Which is a lot of ticks. You show your ignorance with every post.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
You're starting to get it.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Carroll gets his pick of best athletes in country at SC. And the rosters werent close. That is a rediculous assertion. Records have little do with it. Its why carroll was hired dumb dumb. Robinson hackett couldnt win with 5star talentdnc said:
Just imagine what Mike Reilly could have done at USC!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
A formerly great football scbool that was coming off of five years of self-imposed sanctions from shitty coaching.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
What scbool was carrol coaching at?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Both of those coaches won the Rose Bowl and popped off in year three. Hell, Pete Carroll won the Orange Bowl and popped off in year two.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Need I bring up Pete Carroll or Don James again? Just dont get it baabs. Last time ill respond. You'll crawl back, cant wait;)TierbsHsotBoobs said:
8-10 in a sorry ass Pac-12 though.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Difference nacho, Pete can coach. Silly argumentCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Did you use the same arguments to defend, Gilby, Ty and Sark you fucking Doig?
Do you expect Peterman to match them this year?
Sound familiar?
EDIT: Pete Carroll actually inherited a worse situation than Peterman did.
1996 John Robinson 6–6 3–5 T-5th
1997 John Robinson 6–5 4–4 T-5th
1998 Paul Hackett 8–5 5–3 T-3rd L Sun
1999 Paul Hackett 6–6 3–5 T-6th
2000 Paul Hackett 5–7 2–6 T-8th
Coaching matters and the great coaches proves themselves in 3 years or less.
Tick, tick, tick...
I would repeat it for you but Doogs hate facts so why bother?
3 years at E-FUCKING-STABLISHED programs like oregon and Ohio St is understandable. Nobody disagrees there. Learn what it is the difference, what we are talking about before you pop your cunt off. Jesus Tommy could prolly comprehend that. -
How many years did Hoke get? Is michigan a salvage job? Al golden? Is miami a salvage job?Fire_Marshall_Bill said:You get four or five years at total salvage jobs like Kansas, K State, Wisconsin, and VT in the late 80s. Or for our millenials, Stanfraud in the late 2000s under douchebag Harbaugh. Stanfraud was a mess under Walt Harris and Teevens.
Washington had holes but it wasn't a salvage job.
