If it takes more than a paragraph, three or four sentences, to describe how good a coach is, you've got the wrong coach.
Base, lurk! Put in a few posts, see what kind of response you get, think a little and try again. Someday puppy might respond to you in a positive and constructive way. Ive bounced many like you in the past. Be careful
Bouncing Damone is like beating Sac State
Actually Damone was well respected here. Paid dues, been around for a few decades, Not a bad dude, . You? Uh, mmm, well...262 posts? Get in back of the line, when you ripen ill address you missy.
Dude, I'm your biggest supporter, but you hated being plunger raped by Damone.
If it takes more than a paragraph, three or four sentences, to describe how good a coach is, you've got the wrong coach.
Base, lurk! Put in a few posts, see what kind of response you get, think a little and try again. Someday puppy might respond to you in a positive and constructive way. Ive bounced many like you in the past. Be careful
Bouncing Damone is like beating Sac State
Actually Damone was well respected here. Paid dues, been around for a few decades, Not a bad dude, . You? Uh, mmm, well...262 posts? Get in back of the line, when you ripen ill address you missy.
If it takes more than a paragraph, three or four sentences, to describe how good a coach is, you've got the wrong coach.
Base, lurk! Put in a few posts, see what kind of response you get, think a little and try again. Someday puppy might respond to you in a positive and constructive way. Ive bounced many like you in the past. Be careful
Self-awareness gene is lacking in Maltby.
Careful, pup already shredded you and your bullshit once. Been pretty quiet since Aunty.
If it takes more than a paragraph, three or four sentences, to describe how good a coach is, you've got the wrong coach.
Base, lurk! Put in a few posts, see what kind of response you get, think a little and try again. Someday puppy might respond to you in a positive and constructive way. Ive bounced many like you in the past. Be careful
Bouncing Damone is like beating Sac State
Actually Damone was well respected here. Paid dues, been around for a few decades, Not a bad dude, . You? Uh, mmm, well...262 posts? Get in back of the line, when you ripen ill address you missy.
Dude, I'm your biggest supporter, but you hated Damone.
Didnt hate Damone. He just found pup offensive and threatening to his cred. We both went way back. Some reason he didnt want to get along. I respected the guy, similar to Race. Race has paid the dues, but is such a whiney cunt sometimes. Pup dont let people spew bullshit about my dawgs without backing it up with realistic arguments. Tired of the "pete had 3 1st round draft picks on defense" bullshit or ""he should have won 10 games last year" bullshit or "pete cant run a 2-minute offense" bullshit.
Very few if any get why things are the way they are. Pete can only do so much with a guy like Cyrus, and lindquist as a backup. Few can grasp that. If Pete had a viable backup in the Cactus bowl he would have yanked Cyrus. He didnt!!!!! Thats Sark's fault not Petersen's. Its like that AT EVERY FUCKING POSITION DUMBASSES!!!!!!!!!!!!!Gather a fucking intelligent argument before bashing the best coach UW could HAVE EVER got given the circumstances. This place might as well be "open season". Same ignorant and dipshitted personalities.
If it takes more than a paragraph, three or four sentences, to describe how good a coach is, you've got the wrong coach.
Base, lurk! Put in a few posts, see what kind of response you get, think a little and try again. Someday puppy might respond to you in a positive and constructive way. Ive bounced many like you in the past. Be careful
Bouncing Damone is like beating Sac State
Actually Damone was well respected here. Paid dues, been around for a few decades, Not a bad dude, . You? Uh, mmm, well...262 posts? Get in back of the line, when you ripen ill address you missy.
Dude, I'm your biggest supporter, but you hated Damone.
Didnt hate Damone. He just found pup offensive and threatening to his cred. We both went way back. Some reason he didnt want to get along. I respected the guy, similar to Race. Race has paid the dues, but is such a whiney cunt sometimes. Pup dont let people spew bullshit about my dawgs without backing it up with realistic arguments. Tired of the "pete had 3 1st round draft picks on defense" bullshit or ""he should have won 10 games last year" bullshit or "pete cant run a 2-minute offense" bullshit.
Very few if any get why things are the way they are. Pete can only do so much with a guy like Cyrus, and lindquist as a backup. Few can grasp that. If Pete had a viable backup in the Cactus bowl he would have yanked Cyrus. He didnt!!!!! Thats Sark's fault not Petersen's. Its like that AT EVERY FUCKING POSITION DUMBASSES!!!!!!!!!!!!!Gather a fucking intelligent argument before bashing the best coach UW could HAVE EVER got given the circumstances. This place might as well be "open season". Same ignorant and dipshitted personalities.
If it takes more than a paragraph, three or four sentences, to describe how good a coach is, you've got the wrong coach.
Base, lurk! Put in a few posts, see what kind of response you get, think a little and try again. Someday puppy might respond to you in a positive and constructive way. Ive bounced many like you in the past. Be careful
Bouncing Damone is like beating Sac State
Actually Damone was well respected here. Paid dues, been around for a few decades, Not a bad dude, . You? Uh, mmm, well...262 posts? Get in back of the line, when you ripen ill address you missy.
If it takes more than a paragraph, three or four sentences, to describe how good a coach is, you've got the wrong coach.
Base, lurk! Put in a few posts, see what kind of response you get, think a little and try again. Someday puppy might respond to you in a positive and constructive way. Ive bounced many like you in the past. Be careful
Bouncing Damone is like beating Sac State
Actually Damone was well respected here. Paid dues, been around for a few decades, Not a bad dude, . You? Uh, mmm, well...262 posts? Get in back of the line, when you ripen ill address you missy.
Dude, I'm your biggest supporter, but you hated Damone.
Did you use the same arguments to defend, Gilby, Ty and Sark you fucking Doig?
Difference nacho, Pete can coach. Silly argument
8-10 in a sorry ass Pac-12 though.
Need I bring up Pete Carroll or Don James again? Just dont get it baabs. Last time ill respond. You'll crawl back, cant wait;)
Both of those coaches won the Rose Bowl and popped off in year three. Hell, Pete Carroll won the Orange Bowl and popped off in year two.
Do you expect Peterman to match them this year?
What scbool was carrol coaching at?
A formerly great football scbool that was coming off of five years of self-imposed sanctions from shitty coaching.
Sound familiar?
EDIT: Pete Carroll actually inherited a worse situation than Peterman did.
1996 John Robinson 6–6 3–5 T-5th 1997 John Robinson 6–5 4–4 T-5th 1998 Paul Hackett 8–5 5–3 T-3rd L Sun 1999 Paul Hackett 6–6 3–5 T-6th 2000 Paul Hackett 5–7 2–6 T-8th
If it takes more than a paragraph, three or four sentences, to describe how good a coach is, you've got the wrong coach.
Base, lurk! Put in a few posts, see what kind of response you get, think a little and try again. Someday puppy might respond to you in a positive and constructive way. Ive bounced many like you in the past. Be careful
Bouncing Damone is like beating Sac State
Actually Damone was well respected here. Paid dues, been around for a few decades, Not a bad dude, . You? Uh, mmm, well...262 posts? Get in back of the line, when you ripen ill address you missy.
Dude, I'm your biggest supporter, but you hated Damone.
Didnt hate Damone. He just found pup offensive and threatening to his cred. We both went way back. Some reason he didnt want to get along. I respected the guy, similar to Race. Race has paid the dues, but is such a whiney cunt sometimes. Pup dont let people spew bullshit about my dawgs without backing it up with realistic arguments. Tired of the "pete had 3 1st round draft picks on defense" bullshit or ""he should have won 10 games last year" bullshit or "pete cant run a 2-minute offense" bullshit.
Very few if any get why things are the way they are. Pete can only do so much with a guy like Cyrus, and lindquist as a backup. Few can grasp that. If Pete had a viable backup in the Cactus bowl he would have yanked Cyrus He didnt!!!!! Thats Sark's fault not Petersen's. . Its like that AT EVERY FUCKING POSITION DUMBASSES!!!!!!!!!!!!!Gather a fucking intelligent argument before bashing the best coach UW could HAVE EVER got given the circumstances. This place might as well be "open season". Same ignorant and dipshitted personalities.
Im hearing Sark was fired at half time at which point Pete took over and inspired a spirited second half comeback.
Cy Miles agreed : "We were just too relaxed. Too relaxed, We were kind of back on our heels, going with the flow, kind of like it was practice. It was all of us. I’m not singling nobody out; all of us were too relaxed in the first half and as you can see, we can’t do that.”
Did you use the same arguments to defend, Gilby, Ty and Sark you fucking Doig?
Difference nacho, Pete can coach. Silly argument
8-10 in a sorry ass Pac-12 though.
Need I bring up Pete Carroll or Don James again? Just dont get it baabs. Last time ill respond. You'll crawl back, cant wait;)
Both of those coaches won the Rose Bowl and popped off in year three. Hell, Pete Carroll won the Orange Bowl and popped off in year two.
Do you expect Peterman to match them this year?
What scbool was carrol coaching at?
A formerly great football scbool that was coming off of five years of self-imposed sanctions from shitty coaching.
Sound familiar?
EDIT: Pete Carroll actually inherited a worse situation than Peterman did.
1996 John Robinson 6–6 3–5 T-5th 1997 John Robinson 6–5 4–4 T-5th 1998 Paul Hackett 8–5 5–3 T-3rd L Sun 1999 Paul Hackett 6–6 3–5 T-6th 2000 Paul Hackett 5–7 2–6 T-8th
Just imagine what Mike Reilly could have done at USC!
Did you use the same arguments to defend, Gilby, Ty and Sark you fucking Doig?
Difference nacho, Pete can coach. Silly argument
8-10 in a sorry ass Pac-12 though.
Need I bring up Pete Carroll or Don James again? Just dont get it baabs. Last time ill respond. You'll crawl back, cant wait;)
Both of those coaches won the Rose Bowl and popped off in year three. Hell, Pete Carroll won the Orange Bowl and popped off in year two.
Do you expect Peterman to match them this year?
What scbool was carrol coaching at?
A formerly great football scbool that was coming off of five years of self-imposed sanctions from shitty coaching.
Sound familiar?
EDIT: Pete Carroll actually inherited a worse situation than Peterman did.
1996 John Robinson 6–6 3–5 T-5th 1997 John Robinson 6–5 4–4 T-5th 1998 Paul Hackett 8–5 5–3 T-3rd L Sun 1999 Paul Hackett 6–6 3–5 T-6th 2000 Paul Hackett 5–7 2–6 T-8th
Just imagine what Mike Reilly could have done at USC!
Carroll gets his pick of best athletes in country at SC. And the rosters werent close. That is a rediculous assertion. Records have little do with it. Its why carroll was hired dumb dumb. Robinson hackett couldnt win with 5star talent
Comments
Very few if any get why things are the way they are. Pete can only do so much with a guy like Cyrus, and lindquist as a backup. Few can grasp that. If Pete had a viable backup in the Cactus bowl he would have yanked Cyrus. He didnt!!!!! Thats Sark's fault not Petersen's. Its like that AT EVERY FUCKING POSITION DUMBASSES!!!!!!!!!!!!!Gather a fucking intelligent argument before bashing the best coach UW could HAVE EVER got given the circumstances. This place might as well be "open season". Same ignorant and dipshitted personalities.
*I still think Peterman makes a huge improvement with the results in 2016. Insert doogitup.gif
Do you expect Peterman to match them this year?
Sound familiar?
EDIT: Pete Carroll actually inherited a worse situation than Peterman did.
1996 John Robinson 6–6 3–5 T-5th
1997 John Robinson 6–5 4–4 T-5th
1998 Paul Hackett 8–5 5–3 T-3rd L Sun
1999 Paul Hackett 6–6 3–5 T-6th
2000 Paul Hackett 5–7 2–6 T-8th
Cy Miles agreed : "We were just too relaxed. Too relaxed, We were kind of back on our heels, going with the flow, kind of like it was practice. It was all of us. I’m not singling nobody out; all of us were too relaxed in the first half and as you can see, we can’t do that.”