Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Consider
Comments
-
Im hearing the 2000 Trojans were like the 1999 Huskies - loaded with talent, crippled by sanctions, and victims of several heart breaking last minute defeats.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
A formerly great football scbool that was coming off of five years of self-imposed sanctions from shitty coaching.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
What scbool was carrol coaching at?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Both of those coaches won the Rose Bowl and popped off in year three. Hell, Pete Carroll won the Orange Bowl and popped off in year two.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Need I bring up Pete Carroll or Don James again? Just dont get it baabs. Last time ill respond. You'll crawl back, cant wait;)TierbsHsotBoobs said:
8-10 in a sorry ass Pac-12 though.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Difference nacho, Pete can coach. Silly argumentCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Did you use the same arguments to defend, Gilby, Ty and Sark you fucking Doig?
Do you expect Peterman to match them this year?
Sound familiar?
EDIT: Pete Carroll actually inherited a worse situation than Peterman did.
1996 John Robinson 6–6 3–5 T-5th
1997 John Robinson 6–5 4–4 T-5th
1998 Paul Hackett 8–5 5–3 T-3rd L Sun
1999 Paul Hackett 6–6 3–5 T-6th
2000 Paul Hackett 5–7 2–6 T-8th
-
You're starting to get it.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Carroll gets his pick of best athletes in country at SC. And the rosters werent close. That is a rediculous assertion. Records have little do with it. Its why carroll was hired dumb dumb. Robinson hackett couldnt win with 5star talentdnc said:
Just imagine what Mike Reilly could have done at USC!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
A formerly great football scbool that was coming off of five years of self-imposed sanctions from shitty coaching.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
What scbool was carrol coaching at?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Both of those coaches won the Rose Bowl and popped off in year three. Hell, Pete Carroll won the Orange Bowl and popped off in year two.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Need I bring up Pete Carroll or Don James again? Just dont get it baabs. Last time ill respond. You'll crawl back, cant wait;)TierbsHsotBoobs said:
8-10 in a sorry ass Pac-12 though.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Difference nacho, Pete can coach. Silly argumentCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Did you use the same arguments to defend, Gilby, Ty and Sark you fucking Doig?
Do you expect Peterman to match them this year?
Sound familiar?
EDIT: Pete Carroll actually inherited a worse situation than Peterman did.
1996 John Robinson 6–6 3–5 T-5th
1997 John Robinson 6–5 4–4 T-5th
1998 Paul Hackett 8–5 5–3 T-3rd L Sun
1999 Paul Hackett 6–6 3–5 T-6th
2000 Paul Hackett 5–7 2–6 T-8th
Coaching matters and the great coaches proves themselves in 3 years or less.
Tick, tick, tick... -
OK if you wanna play that game, why can't Peterman win with the same 3-4 star talent Sark had here?puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Carroll gets his pick of best athletes in country at SC. And the rosters werent close. That is a rediculous assertion. Records have little do with it. Its why carroll was hired dumb dumb. Robinson hackett couldnt win with 5star talentdnc said:
Just imagine what Mike Reilly could have done at USC!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
A formerly great football scbool that was coming off of five years of self-imposed sanctions from shitty coaching.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
What scbool was carrol coaching at?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Both of those coaches won the Rose Bowl and popped off in year three. Hell, Pete Carroll won the Orange Bowl and popped off in year two.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Need I bring up Pete Carroll or Don James again? Just dont get it baabs. Last time ill respond. You'll crawl back, cant wait;)TierbsHsotBoobs said:
8-10 in a sorry ass Pac-12 though.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Difference nacho, Pete can coach. Silly argumentCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Did you use the same arguments to defend, Gilby, Ty and Sark you fucking Doig?
Do you expect Peterman to match them this year?
Sound familiar?
EDIT: Pete Carroll actually inherited a worse situation than Peterman did.
1996 John Robinson 6–6 3–5 T-5th
1997 John Robinson 6–5 4–4 T-5th
1998 Paul Hackett 8–5 5–3 T-3rd L Sun
1999 Paul Hackett 6–6 3–5 T-6th
2000 Paul Hackett 5–7 2–6 T-8th -
I'm starting to learn W-L records have nothing to do with how good a team really is.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Carroll gets his pick of best athletes in country at SC. And the rosters werent close. That is a rediculous assertion. Records have little do with it. Its why carroll was hired dumb dumb. Lambo couldnt win with 5star talentdnc said:
Just imagine what Mike Reilly could have done at USC!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
A formerly great football scbool that was coming off of five years of self-imposed sanctions from shitty coaching.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
What scbool was carrol coaching at?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Both of those coaches won the Rose Bowl and popped off in year three. Hell, Pete Carroll won the Orange Bowl and popped off in year two.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Need I bring up Pete Carroll or Don James again? Just dont get it baabs. Last time ill respond. You'll crawl back, cant wait;)TierbsHsotBoobs said:
8-10 in a sorry ass Pac-12 though.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Difference nacho, Pete can coach. Silly argumentCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Did you use the same arguments to defend, Gilby, Ty and Sark you fucking Doig?
Do you expect Peterman to match them this year?
Sound familiar?
EDIT: Pete Carroll actually inherited a worse situation than Peterman did.
1996 John Robinson 6–6 3–5 T-5th
1997 John Robinson 6–5 4–4 T-5th
1998 Paul Hackett 8–5 5–3 T-3rd L Sun
1999 Paul Hackett 6–6 3–5 T-6th
2000 Paul Hackett 5–7 2–6 T-8th -
If i may blaspheme for a moment - Jesus Fucking Christ puppy is a fucking doog.
He compares Petermen to Carroll and James and when you say fine, then Petermen needs to win this year he claims you can't compare.
-
@HeretoBeatmyChest! True?Baseman said:
I'm starting to learn W-L records have nothing to do with how good a team really is.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Carroll gets his pick of best athletes in country at SC. And the rosters werent close. That is a rediculous assertion. Records have little do with it. Its why carroll was hired dumb dumb. Lambo couldnt win with 5star talentdnc said:
Just imagine what Mike Reilly could have done at USC!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
A formerly great football scbool that was coming off of five years of self-imposed sanctions from shitty coaching.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
What scbool was carrol coaching at?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Both of those coaches won the Rose Bowl and popped off in year three. Hell, Pete Carroll won the Orange Bowl and popped off in year two.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Need I bring up Pete Carroll or Don James again? Just dont get it baabs. Last time ill respond. You'll crawl back, cant wait;)TierbsHsotBoobs said:
8-10 in a sorry ass Pac-12 though.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Difference nacho, Pete can coach. Silly argumentCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Did you use the same arguments to defend, Gilby, Ty and Sark you fucking Doig?
Do you expect Peterman to match them this year?
Sound familiar?
EDIT: Pete Carroll actually inherited a worse situation than Peterman did.
1996 John Robinson 6–6 3–5 T-5th
1997 John Robinson 6–5 4–4 T-5th
1998 Paul Hackett 8–5 5–3 T-3rd L Sun
1999 Paul Hackett 6–6 3–5 T-6th
2000 Paul Hackett 5–7 2–6 T-8th -
Doogs hate winning.RaceBannon said:If i may blaspheme for a moment - Jesus Fucking Christ puppy is a fucking doog.
He compares Petermen to Carroll and James and when you say fine, then Petermen needs to win this year he claims you can't compare. -
5 years baabs...5 years. Which is a lot of ticks. You show your ignorance with every post.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
You're starting to get it.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Carroll gets his pick of best athletes in country at SC. And the rosters werent close. That is a rediculous assertion. Records have little do with it. Its why carroll was hired dumb dumb. Robinson hackett couldnt win with 5star talentdnc said:
Just imagine what Mike Reilly could have done at USC!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
A formerly great football scbool that was coming off of five years of self-imposed sanctions from shitty coaching.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
What scbool was carrol coaching at?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Both of those coaches won the Rose Bowl and popped off in year three. Hell, Pete Carroll won the Orange Bowl and popped off in year two.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Need I bring up Pete Carroll or Don James again? Just dont get it baabs. Last time ill respond. You'll crawl back, cant wait;)TierbsHsotBoobs said:
8-10 in a sorry ass Pac-12 though.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Difference nacho, Pete can coach. Silly argumentCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Did you use the same arguments to defend, Gilby, Ty and Sark you fucking Doig?
Do you expect Peterman to match them this year?
Sound familiar?
EDIT: Pete Carroll actually inherited a worse situation than Peterman did.
1996 John Robinson 6–6 3–5 T-5th
1997 John Robinson 6–5 4–4 T-5th
1998 Paul Hackett 8–5 5–3 T-3rd L Sun
1999 Paul Hackett 6–6 3–5 T-6th
2000 Paul Hackett 5–7 2–6 T-8th
Coaching matters and the great coaches proves themselves in 3 years or less.
Tick, tick, tick... -
There has been comprehensive research with actual data and shit proving the win in three years or get the fuck out standard.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
5 years baabs...5 years. Which is a lot of ticks. You show your ignorance with every post.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
You're starting to get it.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Carroll gets his pick of best athletes in country at SC. And the rosters werent close. That is a rediculous assertion. Records have little do with it. Its why carroll was hired dumb dumb. Robinson hackett couldnt win with 5star talentdnc said:
Just imagine what Mike Reilly could have done at USC!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
A formerly great football scbool that was coming off of five years of self-imposed sanctions from shitty coaching.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
What scbool was carrol coaching at?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Both of those coaches won the Rose Bowl and popped off in year three. Hell, Pete Carroll won the Orange Bowl and popped off in year two.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Need I bring up Pete Carroll or Don James again? Just dont get it baabs. Last time ill respond. You'll crawl back, cant wait;)TierbsHsotBoobs said:
8-10 in a sorry ass Pac-12 though.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Difference nacho, Pete can coach. Silly argumentCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Did you use the same arguments to defend, Gilby, Ty and Sark you fucking Doig?
Do you expect Peterman to match them this year?
Sound familiar?
EDIT: Pete Carroll actually inherited a worse situation than Peterman did.
1996 John Robinson 6–6 3–5 T-5th
1997 John Robinson 6–5 4–4 T-5th
1998 Paul Hackett 8–5 5–3 T-3rd L Sun
1999 Paul Hackett 6–6 3–5 T-6th
2000 Paul Hackett 5–7 2–6 T-8th
Coaching matters and the great coaches proves themselves in 3 years or less.
Tick, tick, tick...
I would repeat it for you but Doogs hate facts so why bother? -
Sorry baabs you are wrong. The SEC and maybe Texas is on the 3-year plan. Qualified pundits, coaches all agree it takes 5 years, 4 in a perfect scenario to "build" a program. UW was a rebuilding job and any experts like pup would agree (you and your little ignant armchair klan are the only little minority who doesnt).TierbsHsotBoobs said:
There has been comprehensive research with actual data and shit proving the win in three years or get the fuck out standard.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
5 years baabs...5 years. Which is a lot of ticks. You show your ignorance with every post.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
You're starting to get it.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Carroll gets his pick of best athletes in country at SC. And the rosters werent close. That is a rediculous assertion. Records have little do with it. Its why carroll was hired dumb dumb. Robinson hackett couldnt win with 5star talentdnc said:
Just imagine what Mike Reilly could have done at USC!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
A formerly great football scbool that was coming off of five years of self-imposed sanctions from shitty coaching.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
What scbool was carrol coaching at?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Both of those coaches won the Rose Bowl and popped off in year three. Hell, Pete Carroll won the Orange Bowl and popped off in year two.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Need I bring up Pete Carroll or Don James again? Just dont get it baabs. Last time ill respond. You'll crawl back, cant wait;)TierbsHsotBoobs said:
8-10 in a sorry ass Pac-12 though.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Difference nacho, Pete can coach. Silly argumentCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Did you use the same arguments to defend, Gilby, Ty and Sark you fucking Doig?
Do you expect Peterman to match them this year?
Sound familiar?
EDIT: Pete Carroll actually inherited a worse situation than Peterman did.
1996 John Robinson 6–6 3–5 T-5th
1997 John Robinson 6–5 4–4 T-5th
1998 Paul Hackett 8–5 5–3 T-3rd L Sun
1999 Paul Hackett 6–6 3–5 T-6th
2000 Paul Hackett 5–7 2–6 T-8th
Coaching matters and the great coaches proves themselves in 3 years or less.
Tick, tick, tick...
I would repeat it for you but Doogs hate facts so why bother?
3 years at E-FUCKING-STABLISHED programs like oregon and Ohio St is understandable. Nobody disagrees there. Learn what it is the difference, what we are talking about before you pop your cunt off. Jesus Tommy could prolly comprehend that.
