Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

DerekJohnson stumbled onto an interesting topic

RaccoonHarryRaccoonHarry Member Posts: 2,160
First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes Name Dropper
in Hardcore Husky Board
with his prediction of a 2013 Honorable Mention for Mickens. So interesting I thought it worthy of a separate topic/question.

Namely, what other Huskies are legitimate candidates for vaunted Honorable Mention status in 2013? I think Price is a lock - anybody else?
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • Options
    Mad_SonMad_Son Member Posts: 10,099
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    Sankey for sure.

    KW, Parker, Shaq, Shelton have a good shot

    ASJ is first team lock unless he fucks up again
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    HillsboroDuckHillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes Combo Breaker
    Mad_Son said:

    Sankey for sure.

    KW, Parker, Shaq, Shelton have a good shot

    ASJ is first team lock unless he fucks up again

    Not the case. Matmik hath declared that Colt Lyeria is better. Rob Gronkowski 2.0. "#advancedstats"

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    HillsboroDuckHillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes Combo Breaker
    I'd throw a healthy Feeney onto the Honorable Mention citrus pile
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,781
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    HillsboroDuck said:

    I'd throw a healthy Feeney onto the Honorable Mention citrus pile

    So you're saying Feeney, baring injury?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    HillsboroDuckHillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes Combo Breaker
    MikeDamone said:

    HillsboroDuck said:

    I'd throw a healthy Feeney onto the Honorable Mention citrus pile

    So you're saying Feeney, baring injury?
    I don't know why you give me that question

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    HuskyJWHuskyJW Guest, Member Posts: 14,188
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    With the amount of coke that Lyerla puts down....I always thought he was better suited for defense.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,123
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    Swaye's Wigwam
    edited March 2013
    1st Team- ASJ, Sean Parker
    2nd Team- Bishop Sankey, Shaq, Shirley (I think he gets 10 sacks)

    Honorable Mention- Shelton, KW, Feeney, Peters

    Have a shot- Price, Timu
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    RaccoonHarryRaccoonHarry Member Posts: 2,160
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes Name Dropper
    Wow, I was just axing for Honorable Mentions. It seems there are Huskies with a shot at 1st or 2nd Team! Maybe 2013 really WILL turn out to be special...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,123
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    Swaye's Wigwam
    RaccoonHarry said:

    Wow, I was just axing for Honorable Mentions. It seems there are Huskies with a shot at 1st or 2nd Team! Maybe 2013 really WILL turn out to be special...

    I know you are being sarcastic, but we do have some good players. The problem is we also have a lot of flaws. Bad OL, average QB, poor depth at DT, weak pass rush, potential problems at FS and CB, pretty bad special teams. Not to mention the real reason we will be mediocre.... Our head coach. So while I do think we will have a couple of guys on the 1st and 2nd team, we will still end up 7-5.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    RaccoonHarryRaccoonHarry Member Posts: 2,160
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes Name Dropper
    RoadDawg55 said:

    RaccoonHarry said:

    Wow, I was just axing for Honorable Mentions. It seems there are Huskies with a shot at 1st or 2nd Team! Maybe 2013 really WILL turn out to be special...

    I know you are being sarcastic, but we do have some good players. The problem is we also have a lot of flaws. Bad OL, average QB, poor depth at DT, weak pass rush, potential problems at FS and CB, pretty bad special teams. Not to mention the real reason we will be mediocre.... Our head coach. So while I do think we will have a couple of guys on the 1st and 2nd team, we will still end up 7-5.
    Agree, 7-5 sounds about right. Sark would be a decent coach at a Big Sky level school but not in the Pac-12. Of course if 7-5 is seen as real improvement he buys himself at least another year.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Combo Breaker 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary
    RaccoonHarry said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    RaccoonHarry said:

    Wow, I was just axing for Honorable Mentions. It seems there are Huskies with a shot at 1st or 2nd Team! Maybe 2013 really WILL turn out to be special...

    I know you are being sarcastic, but we do have some good players. The problem is we also have a lot of flaws. Bad OL, average QB, poor depth at DT, weak pass rush, potential problems at FS and CB, pretty bad special teams. Not to mention the real reason we will be mediocre.... Our head coach. So while I do think we will have a couple of guys on the 1st and 2nd team, we will still end up 7-5.
    Agree, 7-5 sounds about right. Sark would be a decent coach at a Big Sky level school but not in the Pac-12. Of course if 7-5 is seen as real improvement he buys himself at least another year.
    7-6 > 7-6 > 7-6 > 7-6
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    CFetters_Nacho_LoverCFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 29,005
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    Founders Club
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    RaccoonHarry said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    RaccoonHarry said:

    Wow, I was just axing for Honorable Mentions. It seems there are Huskies with a shot at 1st or 2nd Team! Maybe 2013 really WILL turn out to be special...

    I know you are being sarcastic, but we do have some good players. The problem is we also have a lot of flaws. Bad OL, average QB, poor depth at DT, weak pass rush, potential problems at FS and CB, pretty bad special teams. Not to mention the real reason we will be mediocre.... Our head coach. So while I do think we will have a couple of guys on the 1st and 2nd team, we will still end up 7-5.
    Agree, 7-5 sounds about right. Sark would be a decent coach at a Big Sky level school but not in the Pac-12. Of course if 7-5 is seen as real improvement he buys himself at least another year.
    7-6 > 7-6 > 7-6 > 7-6
    This incremental progress pleases Scott Woodward.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    HillsboroDuckHillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes Combo Breaker
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    RaccoonHarry said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    RaccoonHarry said:

    Wow, I was just axing for Honorable Mentions. It seems there are Huskies with a shot at 1st or 2nd Team! Maybe 2013 really WILL turn out to be special...

    I know you are being sarcastic, but we do have some good players. The problem is we also have a lot of flaws. Bad OL, average QB, poor depth at DT, weak pass rush, potential problems at FS and CB, pretty bad special teams. Not to mention the real reason we will be mediocre.... Our head coach. So while I do think we will have a couple of guys on the 1st and 2nd team, we will still end up 7-5.
    Agree, 7-5 sounds about right. Sark would be a decent coach at a Big Sky level school but not in the Pac-12. Of course if 7-5 is seen as real improvement he buys himself at least another year.
    7-6 > 7-6 > 7-6 > 7-6
    We're back bitches!!!

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 60,249
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Founders Club
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    RaccoonHarry said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    RaccoonHarry said:

    Wow, I was just axing for Honorable Mentions. It seems there are Huskies with a shot at 1st or 2nd Team! Maybe 2013 really WILL turn out to be special...

    I know you are being sarcastic, but we do have some good players. The problem is we also have a lot of flaws. Bad OL, average QB, poor depth at DT, weak pass rush, potential problems at FS and CB, pretty bad special teams. Not to mention the real reason we will be mediocre.... Our head coach. So while I do think we will have a couple of guys on the 1st and 2nd team, we will still end up 7-5.
    Agree, 7-5 sounds about right. Sark would be a decent coach at a Big Sky level school but not in the Pac-12. Of course if 7-5 is seen as real improvement he buys himself at least another year.
    7-6 > 7-6 > 7-6 > 7-6
    Four new entries into Sarkisian's Championship Website Gallery
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.