Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

DerekJohnson stumbled onto an interesting topic

with his prediction of a 2013 Honorable Mention for Mickens. So interesting I thought it worthy of a separate topic/question.

Namely, what other Huskies are legitimate candidates for vaunted Honorable Mention status in 2013? I think Price is a lock - anybody else?

Comments

  • Mad_SonMad_Son Member Posts: 10,180
    Sankey for sure.

    KW, Parker, Shaq, Shelton have a good shot

    ASJ is first team lock unless he fucks up again
  • HillsboroDuckHillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186
    Mad_Son said:

    Sankey for sure.

    KW, Parker, Shaq, Shelton have a good shot

    ASJ is first team lock unless he fucks up again

    Not the case. Matmik hath declared that Colt Lyeria is better. Rob Gronkowski 2.0. "#advancedstats"

  • HillsboroDuckHillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186
    I'd throw a healthy Feeney onto the Honorable Mention citrus pile
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    I'd throw a healthy Feeney onto the Honorable Mention citrus pile

    So you're saying Feeney, baring injury?
  • HillsboroDuckHillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186

    I'd throw a healthy Feeney onto the Honorable Mention citrus pile

    So you're saying Feeney, baring injury?
    I don't know why you give me that question

  • HuskyJWHuskyJW Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 14,516 Swaye's Wigwam
    With the amount of coke that Lyerla puts down....I always thought he was better suited for defense.
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    edited March 2013
    1st Team- ASJ, Sean Parker
    2nd Team- Bishop Sankey, Shaq, Shirley (I think he gets 10 sacks)

    Honorable Mention- Shelton, KW, Feeney, Peters

    Have a shot- Price, Timu
  • RaccoonHarryRaccoonHarry Member Posts: 2,161
    Wow, I was just axing for Honorable Mentions. It seems there are Huskies with a shot at 1st or 2nd Team! Maybe 2013 really WILL turn out to be special...
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123

    Wow, I was just axing for Honorable Mentions. It seems there are Huskies with a shot at 1st or 2nd Team! Maybe 2013 really WILL turn out to be special...

    I know you are being sarcastic, but we do have some good players. The problem is we also have a lot of flaws. Bad OL, average QB, poor depth at DT, weak pass rush, potential problems at FS and CB, pretty bad special teams. Not to mention the real reason we will be mediocre.... Our head coach. So while I do think we will have a couple of guys on the 1st and 2nd team, we will still end up 7-5.
  • RaccoonHarryRaccoonHarry Member Posts: 2,161

    Wow, I was just axing for Honorable Mentions. It seems there are Huskies with a shot at 1st or 2nd Team! Maybe 2013 really WILL turn out to be special...

    I know you are being sarcastic, but we do have some good players. The problem is we also have a lot of flaws. Bad OL, average QB, poor depth at DT, weak pass rush, potential problems at FS and CB, pretty bad special teams. Not to mention the real reason we will be mediocre.... Our head coach. So while I do think we will have a couple of guys on the 1st and 2nd team, we will still end up 7-5.
    Agree, 7-5 sounds about right. Sark would be a decent coach at a Big Sky level school but not in the Pac-12. Of course if 7-5 is seen as real improvement he buys himself at least another year.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Wow, I was just axing for Honorable Mentions. It seems there are Huskies with a shot at 1st or 2nd Team! Maybe 2013 really WILL turn out to be special...

    I know you are being sarcastic, but we do have some good players. The problem is we also have a lot of flaws. Bad OL, average QB, poor depth at DT, weak pass rush, potential problems at FS and CB, pretty bad special teams. Not to mention the real reason we will be mediocre.... Our head coach. So while I do think we will have a couple of guys on the 1st and 2nd team, we will still end up 7-5.
    Agree, 7-5 sounds about right. Sark would be a decent coach at a Big Sky level school but not in the Pac-12. Of course if 7-5 is seen as real improvement he buys himself at least another year.
    7-6 > 7-6 > 7-6 > 7-6
  • CFetters_Nacho_LoverCFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,395 Founders Club

    Wow, I was just axing for Honorable Mentions. It seems there are Huskies with a shot at 1st or 2nd Team! Maybe 2013 really WILL turn out to be special...

    I know you are being sarcastic, but we do have some good players. The problem is we also have a lot of flaws. Bad OL, average QB, poor depth at DT, weak pass rush, potential problems at FS and CB, pretty bad special teams. Not to mention the real reason we will be mediocre.... Our head coach. So while I do think we will have a couple of guys on the 1st and 2nd team, we will still end up 7-5.
    Agree, 7-5 sounds about right. Sark would be a decent coach at a Big Sky level school but not in the Pac-12. Of course if 7-5 is seen as real improvement he buys himself at least another year.
    7-6 > 7-6 > 7-6 > 7-6
    This incremental progress pleases Scott Woodward.
  • HillsboroDuckHillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186

    Wow, I was just axing for Honorable Mentions. It seems there are Huskies with a shot at 1st or 2nd Team! Maybe 2013 really WILL turn out to be special...

    I know you are being sarcastic, but we do have some good players. The problem is we also have a lot of flaws. Bad OL, average QB, poor depth at DT, weak pass rush, potential problems at FS and CB, pretty bad special teams. Not to mention the real reason we will be mediocre.... Our head coach. So while I do think we will have a couple of guys on the 1st and 2nd team, we will still end up 7-5.
    Agree, 7-5 sounds about right. Sark would be a decent coach at a Big Sky level school but not in the Pac-12. Of course if 7-5 is seen as real improvement he buys himself at least another year.
    7-6 > 7-6 > 7-6 > 7-6
    We're back bitches!!!

  • DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 63,539 Founders Club

    Wow, I was just axing for Honorable Mentions. It seems there are Huskies with a shot at 1st or 2nd Team! Maybe 2013 really WILL turn out to be special...

    I know you are being sarcastic, but we do have some good players. The problem is we also have a lot of flaws. Bad OL, average QB, poor depth at DT, weak pass rush, potential problems at FS and CB, pretty bad special teams. Not to mention the real reason we will be mediocre.... Our head coach. So while I do think we will have a couple of guys on the 1st and 2nd team, we will still end up 7-5.
    Agree, 7-5 sounds about right. Sark would be a decent coach at a Big Sky level school but not in the Pac-12. Of course if 7-5 is seen as real improvement he buys himself at least another year.
    7-6 > 7-6 > 7-6 > 7-6
    Four new entries into Sarkisian's Championship Website Gallery
Sign In or Register to comment.