Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

We've got a WOOF!

12346»

Comments

  • AIRWOLF
    AIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

    He said that 17-20 is ideal in terms of it meaning that your players that you are recruiting are sticking around and developing well and you aren't needing to load up on players.

    I think he was talking more in the context of it reflecting that they are targeting the right players if they are in the 17-20 range, more than anything.

    Could be. I was only half listening. It just struck me that what I considered a bit on the small side for class size, he considered "ideal".
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HUSKYFANATIC
    HUSKYFANATIC Member Posts: 1,651
    IrishDawg22 said:

    Wedington is a superb athlete with great hips....for a white guy.

    He is 50% white!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NeGgaPlEaSe
    NeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 5,977
    edited February 2016
    HUSKYFANATIC said:

    IrishDawg22 said:

    Wedington is a superb athlete with great hips....for a white guy.

    He is 50% white!
    Most black Americans are, at least according to HLA testing
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FremontTroll
    FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744
    NeGgaPlEaSe said:

    HUSKYFANATIC said:

    IrishDawg22 said:

    Wedington is a superb athlete with great hips....for a white guy.

    He is 50% white!
    Most black Americans are, at least according to HLA testing
    So then Wellington is 75% white.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    Pass
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,576
    According to Eklund, Weddington is visiting Cal this weekend. Somebody else said he was just offered by Stanford.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,919
    Vegasdawg said:

    why the racist comments? Do you believe it is necessary in order to discuss college recruiting?

    It depends on whether recruits kids are reading the site or not.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,919
    EwaDawg said:

    FremontTroll said:

    AIRWOLF said:

    FremontTroll said:

    AIRWOLF said:

    AEB said:

    The need is two RBs in this class. Weddington and Ahmed? That'd be great.

    I'm assuming 17-18 in this class:

    3 DB
    2 LB
    2 DT/NT
    1 DE
    4 OL
    1 QB
    2 RB
    3 WR/TE

    Would need a bunch of early entries or some very un-Petersen like attrition to get to that number. Not saying it is impossible, but it seems a little high as a baseline estimate.
    Attrition of 7-8 over the next 18 months isn't that high. Some schools need 7 guys to LEAVE in the next 6 months just to fit in their 2015 signees.

    Especially considering there has been low attrition the last year or two there are a number of guys in the 2014 and 2015 classes that could leave for greener pastures elsewhere. CP may be a great molder of men but he can't play more than 11 guys at a time. Also SMFJ should go pro and there are a few other guys who could be early entrants with big 2016 seasons.

    I would guess 17 right now but wouldn't be surprised if it ends up at 18 or 19.
    I'd probably project 15-16, but I can't argue with your logic.

    Petersen has actually said that he thinks 17-18 is the ideal class size.
    That is interesting I didn't know he was that specific.
    Peterman just did simple math. 85 schollies divided by five years (everyone redshirts). Seventeen is ideal with no attrition.

    He knows this is not an ideal world.

    Except that there is always attrition. If you have 15 kids make it to year 4 or 5 out of a class, that's a good one.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter