Another victory for the conservative media

Even if it was a felony, she would never get charged. There's too much on the line in the democratic party to see that happen.

One thing to watch for though: If you see a sudden rush of early retirees from the Fed's there will be more to the story, but hushed...

My position with Hillary isn't about felony or misdemeanor charges, it was more or less about her incompetence as President. Being an idiot, and using a home server for military emails while Secretary of State is just one component added to Benghazi, covering for Bill, sleazy real estate deals, looting the White House, having an aid who's connected to the Muslim Brotherhood, and the list goes on...

The Clinton's political power and connections would get them out of ANYTHING. They could be involved with murder, and there's no chance you're getting them. The Clinton's have more power and connections in underground activity than most mob affiliations.

2001400ex said:

greenblood said:

Even if it was a felony, she would never get charged. There's too much on the line in the democratic party to see that happen.

One thing to watch for though: If you see a sudden rush of early retirees from the Fed's there will be more to the story, but hushed...

My position with Hillary isn't about felony or misdemeanor charges, it was more or less about her incompetence as President. Being an idiot, and using a home server for military emails while Secretary of State is just one component added to Benghazi, covering for Bill, sleazy real estate deals, looting the White House, having an aid who's connected to the Muslim Brotherhood, and the list goes on...

The Clinton's political power and connections would get them out of ANYTHING. They could be involved with murder, and there's no chance you're getting them. The Clinton's have more power and connections in underground activity than most mob affiliations.

I'm with you for not liking the Clinton's. But at least be factual with your bashing. Otherwise you sound like an uneducated blowhard.

http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/oct/01/viral-image/viral-image-wrongly-accuses-clinton-stealing/

You might want to read the article not just the headline. The article debates what is technically stealing and what's considered a misunderstanding.

Instead of $200,000 the actual amount was $48,000 is what the article also argues. But the article with out a doubt talks about them taking things that weren't their's to take.

The Reagan's apparently took $25,000 in gowns and jewelry that was loaned to them. they also received a house, but paid the donors back.

Either way, they still looted.

You might want to read articles before you link them, because it makes you sound like an uneducated blowhard.

I shouldn't. But I will. Just to make the point that this thread sucks fucking ass.

greenblood said:

Even if it was a felony, she would never get charged. There's too much on the line in the democratic party to see that happen.

One thing to watch for though: If you see a sudden rush of early retirees from the Fed's there will be more to the story, but hushed...

My position with Hillary isn't about felony or misdemeanor charges, it was more or less about her incompetence as President. Being an idiot, and using a home server for military emails while Secretary of State is just one component added to Benghazi, covering for Bill, sleazy real estate deals, looting the White House, having an aid who's connected to the Muslim Brotherhood, and the list goes on...

The Clinton's political power and connections would get them out of ANYTHING. They could be involved with murder, and there's no chance you're getting them. The Clinton's have more power and connections in underground activity than most mob affiliations.

Vince Foster approves this poast

2001400ex said:

greenblood said:

2001400ex said:

greenblood said:

Even if it was a felony, she would never get charged. There's too much on the line in the democratic party to see that happen.

One thing to watch for though: If you see a sudden rush of early retirees from the Fed's there will be more to the story, but hushed...

My position with Hillary isn't about felony or misdemeanor charges, it was more or less about her incompetence as President. Being an idiot, and using a home server for military emails while Secretary of State is just one component added to Benghazi, covering for Bill, sleazy real estate deals, looting the White House, having an aid who's connected to the Muslim Brotherhood, and the list goes on...

The Clinton's political power and connections would get them out of ANYTHING. They could be involved with murder, and there's no chance you're getting them. The Clinton's have more power and connections in underground activity than most mob affiliations.

I'm with you for not liking the Clinton's. But at least be factual with your bashing. Otherwise you sound like an uneducated blowhard.

http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/oct/01/viral-image/viral-image-wrongly-accuses-clinton-stealing/

You might want to read the article not just the headline. The article debates what is technically stealing and what's considered a misunderstanding.

Instead of $200,000 the actual amount was $48,000 is what the article also argues. But the article with out a doubt talks about them taking things that weren't their's to take.

The Reagan's apparently took $25,000 in gowns and jewelry that was loaned to them. they also received a house, but paid the donors back.

Either way, they still looted.

You might want to read articles before you link them, because it makes you sound like an uneducated blowhard.

Clearly you only read what you wanted to in the article.

Ok...

Next time I won't read the whole thing.

Jail's too good for that bitch!