Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Another victory for the conservative media

2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
edited March 2016 in Tug Tavern

Comments

  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,484
    edited March 2016
    Even if it was a felony, she would never get charged. There's too much on the line in the democratic party to see that happen.

    One thing to watch for though: If you see a sudden rush of early retirees from the Fed's there will be more to the story, but hushed...

    My position with Hillary isn't about felony or misdemeanor charges, it was more or less about her incompetence as President. Being an idiot, and using a home server for military emails while Secretary of State is just one component added to Benghazi, covering for Bill, sleazy real estate deals, looting the White House, having an aid who's connected to the Muslim Brotherhood, and the list goes on...

    The Clinton's political power and connections would get them out of ANYTHING. They could be involved with murder, and there's no chance you're getting them. The Clinton's have more power and connections in underground activity than most mob affiliations.

  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,804 Founders Club

    Even if it was a felony, she would never get charged. There's too much on the line in the democratic party to see that happen.

    One thing to watch for though: If you see a sudden rush of early retirees from the Fed's there will be more to the story, but hushed...

    My position with Hillary isn't about felony or misdemeanor charges, it was more or less about her incompetence as President. Being an idiot, and using a home server for military emails while Secretary of State is just one component added to Benghazi, covering for Bill, sleazy real estate deals, looting the White House, having an aid who's connected to the Muslim Brotherhood, and the list goes on...

    The Clinton's political power and connections would get them out of ANYTHING. They could be involved with murder, and there's no chance you're getting them. The Clinton's have more power and connections in underground activity than most mob affiliations.

    Most of our lying news outlets agree, she will walk but it will leave a mark unless your HondoFS
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    Even if it was a felony, she would never get charged. There's too much on the line in the democratic party to see that happen.

    One thing to watch for though: If you see a sudden rush of early retirees from the Fed's there will be more to the story, but hushed...

    My position with Hillary isn't about felony or misdemeanor charges, it was more or less about her incompetence as President. Being an idiot, and using a home server for military emails while Secretary of State is just one component added to Benghazi, covering for Bill, sleazy real estate deals, looting the White House, having an aid who's connected to the Muslim Brotherhood, and the list goes on...

    The Clinton's political power and connections would get them out of ANYTHING. They could be involved with murder, and there's no chance you're getting them. The Clinton's have more power and connections in underground activity than most mob affiliations.

    Most of our lying news outlets agree, she will walk but it will leave a mark unless your HondoFS
    If Hillary beats Trump, what mark would be left exactly?
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,804 Founders Club
    I don't deal in hypotheticals
  • AlexisAlexis Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 3,165 Swaye's Wigwam

    Even if it was a felony, she would never get charged. There's too much on the line in the democratic party to see that happen.

    One thing to watch for though: If you see a sudden rush of early retirees from the Fed's there will be more to the story, but hushed...

    My position with Hillary isn't about felony or misdemeanor charges, it was more or less about her incompetence as President. Being an idiot, and using a home server for military emails while Secretary of State is just one component added to Benghazi, covering for Bill, sleazy real estate deals, looting the White House, having an aid who's connected to the Muslim Brotherhood, and the list goes on...

    The Clinton's political power and connections would get them out of ANYTHING. They could be have been involved with murder, and there's no chance you're getting them. The Clinton's have more power and connections in underground activity than most mob affiliations.

    FTFY
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    Even if it was a felony, she would never get charged. There's too much on the line in the democratic party to see that happen.

    One thing to watch for though: If you see a sudden rush of early retirees from the Fed's there will be more to the story, but hushed...

    My position with Hillary isn't about felony or misdemeanor charges, it was more or less about her incompetence as President. Being an idiot, and using a home server for military emails while Secretary of State is just one component added to Benghazi, covering for Bill, sleazy real estate deals, looting the White House, having an aid who's connected to the Muslim Brotherhood, and the list goes on...

    The Clinton's political power and connections would get them out of ANYTHING. They could be involved with murder, and there's no chance you're getting them. The Clinton's have more power and connections in underground activity than most mob affiliations.

    I'm with you for not liking the Clinton's. But at least be factual with your bashing. Otherwise you sound like an uneducated blowhard.

    http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/oct/01/viral-image/viral-image-wrongly-accuses-clinton-stealing/

  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,484
    edited March 2016
    2001400ex said:

    Even if it was a felony, she would never get charged. There's too much on the line in the democratic party to see that happen.

    One thing to watch for though: If you see a sudden rush of early retirees from the Fed's there will be more to the story, but hushed...

    My position with Hillary isn't about felony or misdemeanor charges, it was more or less about her incompetence as President. Being an idiot, and using a home server for military emails while Secretary of State is just one component added to Benghazi, covering for Bill, sleazy real estate deals, looting the White House, having an aid who's connected to the Muslim Brotherhood, and the list goes on...

    The Clinton's political power and connections would get them out of ANYTHING. They could be involved with murder, and there's no chance you're getting them. The Clinton's have more power and connections in underground activity than most mob affiliations.

    I'm with you for not liking the Clinton's. But at least be factual with your bashing. Otherwise you sound like an uneducated blowhard.

    http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/oct/01/viral-image/viral-image-wrongly-accuses-clinton-stealing/

    You might want to read the article not just the headline. The article debates what is technically stealing and what's considered a misunderstanding.

    Instead of $200,000 the actual amount was $48,000 is what the article also argues. But the article with out a doubt talks about them taking things that weren't their's to take.

    The Reagan's apparently took $25,000 in gowns and jewelry that was loaned to them. they also received a house, but paid the donors back.

    Either way, they still looted.

    You might want to read articles before you link them, because it makes you sound like an uneducated blowhard.

  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    Even if it was a felony, she would never get charged. There's too much on the line in the democratic party to see that happen.

    One thing to watch for though: If you see a sudden rush of early retirees from the Fed's there will be more to the story, but hushed...

    My position with Hillary isn't about felony or misdemeanor charges, it was more or less about her incompetence as President. Being an idiot, and using a home server for military emails while Secretary of State is just one component added to Benghazi, covering for Bill, sleazy real estate deals, looting the White House, having an aid who's connected to the Muslim Brotherhood, and the list goes on...

    The Clinton's political power and connections would get them out of ANYTHING. They could be involved with murder, and there's no chance you're getting them. The Clinton's have more power and connections in underground activity than most mob affiliations.

    I'm with you for not liking the Clinton's. But at least be factual with your bashing. Otherwise you sound like an uneducated blowhard.

    http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/oct/01/viral-image/viral-image-wrongly-accuses-clinton-stealing/

    You might want to read the article not just the headline. The article debates what is technically stealing and what's considered a misunderstanding.

    Instead of $200,000 the actual amount was $48,000 is what the article also argues. But the article with out a doubt talks about them taking things that weren't their's to take.

    The Reagan's apparently took $25,000 in gowns and jewelry that was loaned to them. they also received a house, but paid the donors back.

    Either way, they still looted.

    You might want to read articles before you link them, because it makes you sound like an uneducated blowhard.

    Clearly you only read what you wanted to in the article.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,976 Standard Supporter
    I shouldn't. But I will. Just to make the point that this thread sucks fucking ass.
  • sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208

    I shouldn't. But I will. Just to make the point that this thread sucks fucking ass.

    'lil-hondo
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,449 Swaye's Wigwam
    Wiped the servers? Lime with a cloth?


    If some people get years in prison for having a dime bag on them in this country, Hillary needs to spend the left of her life behind bars
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,149 Founders Club
    Wall Street knows Hillary is their friend and Bernard isn't...nothing of significance will happen to her
  • topdawgnctopdawgnc Member Posts: 7,838

    Even if it was a felony, she would never get charged. There's too much on the line in the democratic party to see that happen.

    One thing to watch for though: If you see a sudden rush of early retirees from the Fed's there will be more to the story, but hushed...

    My position with Hillary isn't about felony or misdemeanor charges, it was more or less about her incompetence as President. Being an idiot, and using a home server for military emails while Secretary of State is just one component added to Benghazi, covering for Bill, sleazy real estate deals, looting the White House, having an aid who's connected to the Muslim Brotherhood, and the list goes on...

    The Clinton's political power and connections would get them out of ANYTHING. They could be involved with murder, and there's no chance you're getting them. The Clinton's have more power and connections in underground activity than most mob affiliations.

    Vince Foster approves this poast
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,789
    topdawgnc said:

    Even if it was a felony, she would never get charged. There's too much on the line in the democratic party to see that happen.

    One thing to watch for though: If you see a sudden rush of early retirees from the Fed's there will be more to the story, but hushed...

    My position with Hillary isn't about felony or misdemeanor charges, it was more or less about her incompetence as President. Being an idiot, and using a home server for military emails while Secretary of State is just one component added to Benghazi, covering for Bill, sleazy real estate deals, looting the White House, having an aid who's connected to the Muslim Brotherhood, and the list goes on...

    The Clinton's political power and connections would get them out of ANYTHING. They could be involved with murder, and there's no chance you're getting them. The Clinton's have more power and connections in underground activity than most mob affiliations.

    Vince Foster approves this poast
    too soon
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,484
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Even if it was a felony, she would never get charged. There's too much on the line in the democratic party to see that happen.

    One thing to watch for though: If you see a sudden rush of early retirees from the Fed's there will be more to the story, but hushed...

    My position with Hillary isn't about felony or misdemeanor charges, it was more or less about her incompetence as President. Being an idiot, and using a home server for military emails while Secretary of State is just one component added to Benghazi, covering for Bill, sleazy real estate deals, looting the White House, having an aid who's connected to the Muslim Brotherhood, and the list goes on...

    The Clinton's political power and connections would get them out of ANYTHING. They could be involved with murder, and there's no chance you're getting them. The Clinton's have more power and connections in underground activity than most mob affiliations.

    I'm with you for not liking the Clinton's. But at least be factual with your bashing. Otherwise you sound like an uneducated blowhard.

    http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/oct/01/viral-image/viral-image-wrongly-accuses-clinton-stealing/

    You might want to read the article not just the headline. The article debates what is technically stealing and what's considered a misunderstanding.

    Instead of $200,000 the actual amount was $48,000 is what the article also argues. But the article with out a doubt talks about them taking things that weren't their's to take.

    The Reagan's apparently took $25,000 in gowns and jewelry that was loaned to them. they also received a house, but paid the donors back.

    Either way, they still looted.

    You might want to read articles before you link them, because it makes you sound like an uneducated blowhard.

    Clearly you only read what you wanted to in the article.
    Ok...

    Next time I won't read the whole thing.
  • AlexisAlexis Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 3,165 Swaye's Wigwam
    topdawgnc said:

    Even if it was a felony, she would never get charged. There's too much on the line in the democratic party to see that happen.

    One thing to watch for though: If you see a sudden rush of early retirees from the Fed's there will be more to the story, but hushed...

    My position with Hillary isn't about felony or misdemeanor charges, it was more or less about her incompetence as President. Being an idiot, and using a home server for military emails while Secretary of State is just one component added to Benghazi, covering for Bill, sleazy real estate deals, looting the White House, having an aid who's connected to the Muslim Brotherhood, and the list goes on...

    The Clinton's political power and connections would get them out of ANYTHING. They could be involved with murder, and there's no chance you're getting them. The Clinton's have more power and connections in underground activity than most mob affiliations.

    Vince Foster approves this poast
    Plagiarism. My shit.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,219 Standard Supporter
    Jail's too good for that bitch!
Sign In or Register to comment.