Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Another victory for the conservative media

2»

Comments

  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208

    I shouldn't. But I will. Just to make the point that this thread sucks fucking ass.

    'lil-hondo
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 28,144
    Wiped the servers? Lime with a cloth?


    If some people get years in prison for having a dime bag on them in this country, Hillary needs to spend the left of her life behind bars
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 26,378 Standard Supporter
    Wall Street knows Hillary is their friend and Bernard isn't...nothing of significance will happen to her
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,842

    Even if it was a felony, she would never get charged. There's too much on the line in the democratic party to see that happen.

    One thing to watch for though: If you see a sudden rush of early retirees from the Fed's there will be more to the story, but hushed...

    My position with Hillary isn't about felony or misdemeanor charges, it was more or less about her incompetence as President. Being an idiot, and using a home server for military emails while Secretary of State is just one component added to Benghazi, covering for Bill, sleazy real estate deals, looting the White House, having an aid who's connected to the Muslim Brotherhood, and the list goes on...

    The Clinton's political power and connections would get them out of ANYTHING. They could be involved with murder, and there's no chance you're getting them. The Clinton's have more power and connections in underground activity than most mob affiliations.

    Vince Foster approves this poast
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    topdawgnc said:

    Even if it was a felony, she would never get charged. There's too much on the line in the democratic party to see that happen.

    One thing to watch for though: If you see a sudden rush of early retirees from the Fed's there will be more to the story, but hushed...

    My position with Hillary isn't about felony or misdemeanor charges, it was more or less about her incompetence as President. Being an idiot, and using a home server for military emails while Secretary of State is just one component added to Benghazi, covering for Bill, sleazy real estate deals, looting the White House, having an aid who's connected to the Muslim Brotherhood, and the list goes on...

    The Clinton's political power and connections would get them out of ANYTHING. They could be involved with murder, and there's no chance you're getting them. The Clinton's have more power and connections in underground activity than most mob affiliations.

    Vince Foster approves this poast
    too soon
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,573
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Even if it was a felony, she would never get charged. There's too much on the line in the democratic party to see that happen.

    One thing to watch for though: If you see a sudden rush of early retirees from the Fed's there will be more to the story, but hushed...

    My position with Hillary isn't about felony or misdemeanor charges, it was more or less about her incompetence as President. Being an idiot, and using a home server for military emails while Secretary of State is just one component added to Benghazi, covering for Bill, sleazy real estate deals, looting the White House, having an aid who's connected to the Muslim Brotherhood, and the list goes on...

    The Clinton's political power and connections would get them out of ANYTHING. They could be involved with murder, and there's no chance you're getting them. The Clinton's have more power and connections in underground activity than most mob affiliations.

    I'm with you for not liking the Clinton's. But at least be factual with your bashing. Otherwise you sound like an uneducated blowhard.

    http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/oct/01/viral-image/viral-image-wrongly-accuses-clinton-stealing/

    You might want to read the article not just the headline. The article debates what is technically stealing and what's considered a misunderstanding.

    Instead of $200,000 the actual amount was $48,000 is what the article also argues. But the article with out a doubt talks about them taking things that weren't their's to take.

    The Reagan's apparently took $25,000 in gowns and jewelry that was loaned to them. they also received a house, but paid the donors back.

    Either way, they still looted.

    You might want to read articles before you link them, because it makes you sound like an uneducated blowhard.

    Clearly you only read what you wanted to in the article.
    Ok...

    Next time I won't read the whole thing.
  • Alexis
    Alexis Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 3,480 Founders Club
    topdawgnc said:

    Even if it was a felony, she would never get charged. There's too much on the line in the democratic party to see that happen.

    One thing to watch for though: If you see a sudden rush of early retirees from the Fed's there will be more to the story, but hushed...

    My position with Hillary isn't about felony or misdemeanor charges, it was more or less about her incompetence as President. Being an idiot, and using a home server for military emails while Secretary of State is just one component added to Benghazi, covering for Bill, sleazy real estate deals, looting the White House, having an aid who's connected to the Muslim Brotherhood, and the list goes on...

    The Clinton's political power and connections would get them out of ANYTHING. They could be involved with murder, and there's no chance you're getting them. The Clinton's have more power and connections in underground activity than most mob affiliations.

    Vince Foster approves this poast
    Plagiarism. My shit.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 39,052 Standard Supporter
    Jail's too good for that bitch!