Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Obama nominates Merrick Garland for SCOTUS

135

Comments

  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    EwaDawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    I'm pretty sure no one cares now or will remember after the Trump landslide

    The Donald is going to visit OSO? Fuckin' great. He deserves it.
    #TrumpStrong
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    Diversionary nominee, get ready for Obama in the court.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    doogsinparadise said:

    Diversionary nominee, get ready for Obama in the court.

    Yep, Obama is daring them not to confirm him.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,749 Standard Supporter
    dnc said:

    The Democrat nominates a center right judge and the GOP is going to stonewall him so Trump or Hillary can appoint someone far more liberal.

    Fucking idiots on both sides.

    Left wing judge. Doesn't think you should be able to own a gun. If he has a problem with the first ten of the bill of rights he's out in lefty field. God given inalienable rights. He and Obingo can kiss my ass! Tilts the whole court left, no balance and no right would be safe.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,749 Standard Supporter
    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    Hippopeteamus said:

    PurpleJ said:

    dnc said:

    The Democrat nominates a center right judge and the GOP is going to stonewall him so Trump or Hillary can appoint someone far more liberal.

    Fucking idiots on both sides.

    And idiots everywhere will tell congress to "do their job", when their job indicates that they have no obligation to confirm his nominee. EverybodyFS.
    If people really think that republicans are violating their role to advise and consent on a nomination according to the constitution, they should bring a case to the supreme court.
    I don't think anyone's arguing that what McDonnell and his gaggle of faggots are doing is unconstitutional. It's just bad politics symbolic of the shit that has given people like Trump so much support in the first place. Never before in our history has a nomination been stalled until a new president takes office.
    Hasn't been a supreme court justice appointed in a lame duck year in over 80 years. Obozo himself filibustered Alito. Dem's didn't want a Bush appointee with 2 years left in his term. Commie's always want you to do as they say not as they do!

    You read funny. They have taken action. They said hell no we ain't gonna do it! It's constitutional.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,749 Standard Supporter
    allpurpleallgold said:

    Sledog is the republican Hondo. I was going to say "your" republican Hondo but then I remembered that I too am a republican now.

    What happened you get mugged?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    allpurpleallgold said:

    Sledog is the republican Hondo. I was going to say "your" republican Hondo but then I remembered that I too am a republican now.

    Sledog is like 15 levels of fucktardedness higher than me.

    HTH
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam
    dnc said:

    sarktastic said:

    Remember Robert Bork!


    ... precedent

    And also no. Bork is precedent for rejecting a nominee. He's not precedent for holding the spot hostage until a new president comes in. The Senate confirmed Kennedy after rejecting Bork.

    Try again.
    Don't ask her to try again or you'll just get more stupid bullshit to read.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter