Obama nominates Merrick Garland for SCOTUS
Comments
-
Everybody does it!sarktastic said:Remember Robert Bork!
... precedent -
I can't read, but I feel you made some good points here.Swaye said:I'm all for principled stands, but history says this backfires on the GOP like everything else they try to do and fuck up. What I have read says this guy is as right as you would ever get out of a Democrat president. Roll the dice with what happens in the future. GOP will get fucked. They always do. Idiots.
-
And also no. Bork is precedent for rejecting a nominee. He's not precedent for holding the spot hostage until a new president comes in. The Senate confirmed Kennedy after rejecting Bork.sarktastic said:Remember Robert Bork!
... precedent
Try again. -
I'm pretty sure no one cares now or will remember after the Trump landslide
-
Four Jews and five Catholics walk into a bar...
-
I don't think anyone's arguing that what McDonnell and his gaggle of faggots are doing is unconstitutional. It's just bad politics symbolic of the shit that has given people like Trump so much support in the first place. Never before in our history has a nomination been stalled until a new president takes office.Hippopeteamus said:
If people really think that republicans are violating their role to advise and consent on a nomination according to the constitution, they should bring a case to the supreme court.PurpleJ said:
And idiots everywhere will tell congress to "do their job", when their job indicates that they have no obligation to confirm his nominee. EverybodyFS.dnc said:The Democrat nominates a center right judge and the GOP is going to stonewall him so Trump or Hillary can appoint someone far more liberal.
Fucking idiots on both sides. -
RaceBannon said:
Why a cis white guy?
-
Trump will be nominating the next confirmed SC Justice of the United States... just relax or you're gonna create unnecessary stress for yourself.GreenRiverGatorz said:
I don't think anyone's arguing that what McDonnell and his gaggle of faggots are doing is unconstitutional. It's just bad politics symbolic of the shit that has given people like Trump so much support in the first place. Never before in our history has a nomination been stalled until a new president takes office.Hippopeteamus said:
If people really think that republicans are violating their role to advise and consent on a nomination according to the constitution, they should bring a case to the supreme court.PurpleJ said:
And idiots everywhere will tell congress to "do their job", when their job indicates that they have no obligation to confirm his nominee. EverybodyFS.dnc said:The Democrat nominates a center right judge and the GOP is going to stonewall him so Trump or Hillary can appoint someone far more liberal.
Fucking idiots on both sides. -
I'd take that action.sarktastic said:
Trump will be nominating the next confirmed SC Justice of the United States... just relax or you're gonna create unnecessary stress for yourself.GreenRiverGatorz said:
I don't think anyone's arguing that what McDonnell and his gaggle of faggots are doing is unconstitutional. It's just bad politics symbolic of the shit that has given people like Trump so much support in the first place. Never before in our history has a nomination been stalled until a new president takes office.Hippopeteamus said:
If people really think that republicans are violating their role to advise and consent on a nomination according to the constitution, they should bring a case to the supreme court.PurpleJ said:
And idiots everywhere will tell congress to "do their job", when their job indicates that they have no obligation to confirm his nominee. EverybodyFS.dnc said:The Democrat nominates a center right judge and the GOP is going to stonewall him so Trump or Hillary can appoint someone far more liberal.
Fucking idiots on both sides. -
The Donald is going to visit OSO? Fuckin' great. He deserves it.RaceBannon said:I'm pretty sure no one cares now or will remember after the Trump landslide
