Less Famous Puppyism on Sark
After Kessler, A future 1st rounder in Max Browning steps in for '16, with 18 returning starters. SC is only going up. We are too, just at a slower pace. Like beating a dead horse with some of you. The QB situation is FUCKING DIRE. No way to sugarcoat it. Last year we had the WORST stable of QB'S in the cuntry.
Here's an experiment for the nerdy types like thomas who have nothing to add here. Do some research for the good of the group; find a team, 1 out of 126 remaing teams, who had a shittier stable of QB's than UW last year? Fast forward to '15....find another. Come on Thomas, show us your stuff.
Save this post ballbag then. Put your money where your cunt is. USC 42-UW 6 (21 was tongue-in-cheek)
Difference between what? 21-28 points? Game will be out of reach in 1st quarter. Nothing to do with Peetamus as a coach,or UW as a program, just way less talented (starting 22), much less experience and its on the road. Open your fucking eyes.
Give me one area UW will be better than SC besides kicking ? ONE besides "head" coaching? Listen, it will get very ugly, very quickly.
Roadie, maybe Fire Marshall (the only 2 guys with any football sense here) might be objective enough to see the reality, on a that soon-to-be frightful night in Cali .
Comments
-
What is this about Lindy starting? Didn't Pumpy declare Browning the starter in 2015 as soon as Jake signed his LOI?
-
FREE PUB!!!
-
Puppy terrible at everything!
-
puppylove_sugarsteve strikes again
-
-
We need the original thread for this.whatshouldicareabout said:Sark will beat Petes meat by 21pts next year. And if Lindy is the qb in '16, the same will happen at home. Motivation is all good, but talent is the great equalizer.
After Kessler, A future 1st rounder in Max Browning steps in for '16, with 18 returning starters. SC is only going up. We are too, just at a slower pace. Like beating a dead horse with some of you. The QB situation is FUCKING DIRE. No way to sugarcoat it. Last year we had the WORST stable of QB'S in the cuntry.
Here's an experiment for the nerdy types like thomas who have nothing to add here. Do some research for the good of the group; find a team, 1 out of 126 remaing teams, who had a shittier stable of QB's than UW last year? Fast forward to '15....find another. Come on Thomas, show us your stuff.
Save this post ballbag then. Put your money where your cunt is. USC 42-UW 6 (21 was tongue-in-cheek)
Difference between what? 21-28 points? Game will be out of reach in 1st quarter. Nothing to do with Peetamus as a coach,or UW as a program, just way less talented (starting 22), much less experience and its on the road. Open your fucking eyes.
Give me one area UW will be better than SC besides kicking ? ONE besides "head" coaching? Listen, it will get very ugly, very quickly.
Roadie, maybe Fire Marshall (the only 2 guys with any football sense here) might be objective enough to see the reality, on a that soon-to-be frightful night in Cali . -
-
We?CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
We need the original thread for this.whatshouldicareabout said:Sark will beat Petes meat by 21pts next year. And if Lindy is the qb in '16, the same will happen at home. Motivation is all good, but talent is the great equalizer.
After Kessler, A future 1st rounder in Max Browning steps in for '16, with 18 returning starters. SC is only going up. We are too, just at a slower pace. Like beating a dead horse with some of you. The QB situation is FUCKING DIRE. No way to sugarcoat it. Last year we had the WORST stable of QB'S in the cuntry.
Here's an experiment for the nerdy types like thomas who have nothing to add here. Do some research for the good of the group; find a team, 1 out of 126 remaing teams, who had a shittier stable of QB's than UW last year? Fast forward to '15....find another. Come on Thomas, show us your stuff.
Save this post ballbag then. Put your money where your cunt is. USC 42-UW 6 (21 was tongue-in-cheek)
Difference between what? 21-28 points? Game will be out of reach in 1st quarter. Nothing to do with Peetamus as a coach,or UW as a program, just way less talented (starting 22), much less experience and its on the road. Open your fucking eyes.
Give me one area UW will be better than SC besides kicking ? ONE besides "head" coaching? Listen, it will get very ugly, very quickly.
Roadie, maybe Fire Marshall (the only 2 guys with any football sense here) might be objective enough to see the reality, on a that soon-to-be frightful night in Cali . -
FREE PUB!!1!
-
@puppylove_sugarsteel how are you planning on dodging this one?
-
Ok!whatshouldicareabout said:Sark will beat Petes meat by 21pts next year. And if Lindy is the qb in '16, the same will happen at home. Motivation is all good, but talent is the great equalizer.
After Kessler, A future 1st rounder in Max Browning steps in for '16, with 18 returning starters. SC is only going up. We are too, just at a slower pace. Like beating a dead horse with some of you. The QB situation is FUCKING DIRE. No way to sugarcoat it. Last year we had the WORST stable of QB'S in the cuntry.
Here's an experiment for the nerdy types like thomas who have nothing to add here. Do some research for the good of the group; find a team, 1 out of 126 remaing teams, who had a shittier stable of QB's than UW last year? Fast forward to '15....find another. Come on Thomas, show us your stuff.
Save this post ballbag then. Put your money where your cunt is. USC 42-UW 6 (21 was tongue-in-cheek)
Difference between what? 21-28 points? Game will be out of reach in 1st quarter. Nothing to do with Peetamus as a coach,or UW as a program, just way less talented (starting 22), much less experience and its on the road. Open your fucking eyes.
Give me one area UW will be better than SC besides kicking ? ONE besides "head" coaching? Listen, it will get very ugly, very quickly.
Roadie, maybe Fire Marshall (the only 2 guys with any football sense here) might be objective enough to see the reality, on a that soon-to-be frightful night in Cali . -
He doesn't dodge. He swallows. HTH.Doogles said:@puppylove_sugarsteel how are you planning on dodging this one?
-
I said "if Lindy starts we are dead meat". Clearly he didnt thus we didnt. Browning (who i clearly called to be the starter) got the nod and we won. Good thing pete listened to the email I sent him during spring ballPurpleBaze said:What is this about Lindy starting? Didn't Pumpy declare Browning the starter in 2015 as soon as Jake signed his LOI?
-
El Oh Fucking El!!puppylove_sugarsteel said:
I said "if Lindy starts we are dead meat". Clearly he didnt thus we didnt. Browning (who i clearly called to be the starter) got the nod and we won. Good thing pete listened to the email I sent him during spring ballPurpleBaze said:What is this about Lindy starting? Didn't Pumpy declare Browning the starter in 2015 as soon as Jake signed his LOI?
-
puppylove_sugarsteel said:
I said "if Lindy starts we are dead meat". Clearly he didnt thus we didnt. Browning (who i clearly called to be the starter) got the nod and we won. Good thing pete listened to the email I sent him during spring ballPurpleBaze said:What is this about Lindy starting? Didn't Pumpy declare Browning the starter in 2015 as soon as Jake signed his LOI?
-
puppylove_sugarsteel said:
I said "if Lindy starts we are dead meat". Clearly he didnt thus we didnt. Browning (who i clearly called to be the starter) got the nod and we won. Good thing pete listened to the email I sent him during spring ballPurpleBaze said:What is this about Lindy starting? Didn't Pumpy declare Browning the starter in 2015 as soon as Jake signed his LOI?
-
Pumpy's silence in this thread speaks volumes.PurpleJ said:
He doesn't dodge. He swallows. HTH.Doogles said:@puppylove_sugarsteel how are you planning on dodging this one?
-
*gargle*AlCzervik said:
Pumpy's silence in this thread speaks volumes.PurpleJ said:
He doesn't dodge. He swallows. HTH.Doogles said:@puppylove_sugarsteel how are you planning on dodging this one?
-
Can you read new fish?AlCzervik said:
Pumpy's silence in this thread speaks volumes.PurpleJ said:
He doesn't dodge. He swallows. HTH.Doogles said:@puppylove_sugarsteel how are you planning on dodging this one?
-
That wasn't Puppy. That was steelheader2.
-
There's a difference?HeretoBeatmyChest said:That wasn't Puppy. That was steelheader2.
-
Pumpy, Steel2, FRANNY, Anna, and The Fire Marshall
The fab 5 -
Ummm.... Your QB play did suck. He wasn't all that far off.
-
-
No, it was mediocre play by a true freshman.salemcoog said:Ummm.... Your QB play did suck. He wasn't all that far off.
See Bender for an example of a bad QB, who you Coogs were sucking off prior to the AC -
FRANNY and Anna can't walk for a while after the Fire Marshall is finshed with emPostGameOrangeSlices said:Pumpy, Steel2, FRANNY, Anna, and The Fire Marshall
The fab 5
-
< btw butthuffers, if Sark stuck to the running g
Awesomed Baze. Feek thats 2 awesomes in a s many days. The fab 6PurpleBaze said: -
Sark probably woke up today with pussy juice caked on face, blow on nostrils. Called up Stephanie and tried to make up and take her out. Got denied and went face down in the candy again, took 18 shots of Patron and rolled over the dead hooker for another round.
-
puppylove_sugarsteel said:
< btw butthuffers, if Sark stuck to the running g
Awesomed Baze. Feek thats 2 awesomes in a s many days. The fab 6PurpleBaze said:
The running g? -
Dont J. Hurts my ears and makes my eyes bleed when you try. Stick to #2 pencils, a few crayons and construction paper.PurpleJ said:Sark probably woke up today with pussy juice caked on face, blow on nostrils. Called up Stephanie and tried to make up and take her out. Got denied and went face down in the candy again, took 18 shots of Patron and rolled over the dead hooker for another round.
