Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Rip the democratic party
Comments
-
Why do a lot of people keep harping on Hillary's experience and resume? Sanders has been in Congress and a senator since the 80s right? She never even ran for office until 2002? 2004? It seems ridiculous to give her some massive edge.
-
Jesus Christ you're an idiot.2001400ex said:
Trump doesn't have the temperament to be President. How do you think it'll go over with the world when he gets pissed and starts calling other worlds leaders names. It's actually quite comical how he shits on everyone then whines when they shit on him back. That won't fly as president.topdawgnc said:
I'm a Kasich supporter, and I am far from a democrat or an independent.dhdawg said:
kasich supporters are mostly dems or independents, they either vote hillary or stay home and hope bloomberg throws his hat inallpurpleallgold said:
Everyone says so but I'm interested to see it. Maybe Kasich voters stay home. And Bush supporters, I mean they're obviously complete fucktards, who knows what they'll do.dnc said:
I think that's the poont, totally different states, so if they agree on a candidate, that candidate is strong.PurpleJ said:
What an odd couple of states to even be in the same sentence.RaceBannon said:Wow. Just heard that no GOP has won both New Hampshire and South Carolina and lost the nomination
Trump2016
But Bush leaving is going to give Rubio a bump, and Kasich's inevitable dropout in the next couple weeks will give him another one.
It ain't over yet.
If Kasich was not on the ballot I would have voted for Trump.
Why?
Those are the only two guys who get shit done.
Both are fiscally conservative and socially liberal (American dream).
I know ... big guy on campus ... but I meet with C Suite and their direct reports of large hospital IDN's on a pretty regular basis. When we discuss the Affordable Healthcare Act they all say the same thing ... either you do it or some variation ... or there will be dead bodies in the streets.
What's Trump say ... there will be people dying in the streets.
What's Kasich say ... you have to do it to help the poor.
Make fun of Trump, but that was my bullshit barometer. He clearly is educated on the issues and not afraid to say what needs to be done.
Kasich has a long history of getting shit done.
Kasich isn't bad, if I had to vote for one Republican, that's who it would be. But his problem is, he isn't engaging or passionate enough to stand out.
Of course the Democrats are as big of a clusterfuck. Bernie is just awful to listen to. Hillary has the best resume (only one with actually foreign policy experience, and according to Republicans, she was the one who ran the white house in the 90s). But she's got a vagina and too many people dislike her. Given the Clinton machine, she can win, but will be the most polarizing president (well Trump will be more polarizing).
-
Agree to an extent. Even though Bernie has had much more time in elected office, Hillary has a lot of experience in the public service -- just not elected -- but instead as the first lady or her appointment.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Why do a lot of people keep harping on Hillary's experience and resume? Sanders has been in Congress and a senator since the 80s right? She never even ran for office until 2002? 2004? It seems ridiculous to give her some massive edge.
-
Majorly disagree about Trump being honest. He IS basically THE ANTICHRIST. WORST.HUMAN.EVERdnc said:
Majorly disagree about Trump being honest. How many boycotts has Trump called for since he started running for president? Like he really GAF about what Starbuck's has on their red holiday cups. He's nothing close to honest.dhdawg said:
It's been thrown out there that Rubio should promise Cruz a SCOTUS seat in exchange for his dropout. may be the only way.HeretoBeatmyChest said:The Cruz/Rubio fight to be #2 and the anti-trump vote could prevent either one from beating Trump.
Just applying the percentages from Trump as the second choice for Carson,Bush and Kasich voters would get him another 5% bump to 40% nationally. Don't think Cruz or Rubio can catch him. If its 34-21-16 right now and Trump get to 40% there is no way they can catch him. They will split and hurt it each other.
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/who-gains-the-most-when-the-gop-field-shrinks
I'd actually prefer trump to rubio, at least he's honest and not a total puppet
-
Can't wait for the Hillary v. Trump Debate...
TRUMP: "Hillary, why aren't you already in jail?" Whitewater ??? Vince Foster ??? Benghazi ??? 1,800 Classified Emails ??? Taking bribes from foreign countries through the phony "Clinton Foundation" ??? Selling our uranium to the Russians ??? Renting out the Lincoln Bedroom to the Red Chinese ??? Stealing half the furniture in the White House ??? Taking $680,000 bribes from Goldman Sachs ???
... and I haven't started talking about Bubba's crimes yet. (Serial Rapist.)
-
Nice analysis as always.topdawgnc said:
Jesus Christ you're an idiot.2001400ex said:
Trump doesn't have the temperament to be President. How do you think it'll go over with the world when he gets pissed and starts calling other worlds leaders names. It's actually quite comical how he shits on everyone then whines when they shit on him back. That won't fly as president.topdawgnc said:
I'm a Kasich supporter, and I am far from a democrat or an independent.dhdawg said:
kasich supporters are mostly dems or independents, they either vote hillary or stay home and hope bloomberg throws his hat inallpurpleallgold said:
Everyone says so but I'm interested to see it. Maybe Kasich voters stay home. And Bush supporters, I mean they're obviously complete fucktards, who knows what they'll do.dnc said:
I think that's the poont, totally different states, so if they agree on a candidate, that candidate is strong.PurpleJ said:
What an odd couple of states to even be in the same sentence.RaceBannon said:Wow. Just heard that no GOP has won both New Hampshire and South Carolina and lost the nomination
Trump2016
But Bush leaving is going to give Rubio a bump, and Kasich's inevitable dropout in the next couple weeks will give him another one.
It ain't over yet.
If Kasich was not on the ballot I would have voted for Trump.
Why?
Those are the only two guys who get shit done.
Both are fiscally conservative and socially liberal (American dream).
I know ... big guy on campus ... but I meet with C Suite and their direct reports of large hospital IDN's on a pretty regular basis. When we discuss the Affordable Healthcare Act they all say the same thing ... either you do it or some variation ... or there will be dead bodies in the streets.
What's Trump say ... there will be people dying in the streets.
What's Kasich say ... you have to do it to help the poor.
Make fun of Trump, but that was my bullshit barometer. He clearly is educated on the issues and not afraid to say what needs to be done.
Kasich has a long history of getting shit done.
Kasich isn't bad, if I had to vote for one Republican, that's who it would be. But his problem is, he isn't engaging or passionate enough to stand out.
Of course the Democrats are as big of a clusterfuck. Bernie is just awful to listen to. Hillary has the best resume (only one with actually foreign policy experience, and according to Republicans, she was the one who ran the white house in the 90s). But she's got a vagina and too many people dislike her. Given the Clinton machine, she can win, but will be the most polarizing president (well Trump will be more polarizing).
Speaking of, read death's post. That's classic. -
Outside of Trump, who is an absolute wildcard, how would any of the presidential candidates in the field, R or D, make a material impact on your life?OZONE said:
If the election comes down to Hillary against whomever wins the (R) nomination, I'm going to seriously consider moving to New Zealand. It's a lot like Denmark, but with better weather, and fewer 6' 8" woman walking around making me feel short.allpurpleallgold said:Hillary is going to take Nevada
-
Do a little research on his tax and spending plan for me one time. It's batshit nuts and the opposite of what a fiscal conservative would do. Trump is going to increase the deficit just like Bernie would. And it's pretty easy to make a billion when your daddy starts you off with a few hundred million of it. Trump is a fucking blowhard neo-conservative just like Bush, maybe even more so. Of course you love him. You and all the other dumbfucks that have taken over the Republican party.topdawgnc said:
Prove it.PurpleJ said:Trump is not a fiscal conservative.
Seems to me a guy who makes a billion dollars plus in his life is pretty fiscally conservative. -
The economist ran a analysis this week that said if Donald took all of daddy's money and parked it day1 in the S&P500 he'd be worth 3x what he is actually worth today.PurpleJ said:
Do a little research on his tax and spending plan for me one time. It's batshit nuts and the opposite of what a fiscal conservative would do. Trump is going to increase the deficit just like Bernie would. And it's pretty easy to make a billion when your daddy starts you off with a few hundred million of it. Trump is a fucking blowhard neo-conservative just like Bush, maybe even more so. Of course you love him. You and all the other dumbfucks that have taken over the Republican party.topdawgnc said:
Prove it.PurpleJ said:Trump is not a fiscal conservative.
Seems to me a guy who makes a billion dollars plus in his life is pretty fiscally conservative. -
MaybePurpleJ said:
Do a little research on his tax and spending plan for me one time. It's batshit nuts and the opposite of what a fiscal conservative would do. Trump is going to increase the deficit just like Bernie would. And it's pretty easy to make a billion when your daddy starts you off with a few hundred million of it. Trump is a fucking blowhard neo-conservative just like Bush, maybe even more so. Of course you love him. You and all the other dumbfucks that have taken over the Republican party.topdawgnc said:
Prove it.PurpleJ said:Trump is not a fiscal conservative.
Seems to me a guy who makes a billion dollars plus in his life is pretty fiscally conservative.
Or Hilary.. A lying blowhard.
-
You say that like Trump is honest.PurpleThrobber said:
MaybePurpleJ said:
Do a little research on his tax and spending plan for me one time. It's batshit nuts and the opposite of what a fiscal conservative would do. Trump is going to increase the deficit just like Bernie would. And it's pretty easy to make a billion when your daddy starts you off with a few hundred million of it. Trump is a fucking blowhard neo-conservative just like Bush, maybe even more so. Of course you love him. You and all the other dumbfucks that have taken over the Republican party.topdawgnc said:
Prove it.PurpleJ said:Trump is not a fiscal conservative.
Seems to me a guy who makes a billion dollars plus in his life is pretty fiscally conservative.
Or Hilary.. A lying blowhard. -
As opposed to a candidate that young people think is really cool but don't have the wisdom to know that most of his platform is chock full of nonstarters. This assumes that he would reach November before the exhaustion stroke hits him, of course.allpurpleallgold said:Hillary is going to take Nevada, thanks to Las Vegas (da fuq) and old people (just die already).
So they're going to run a presidential candidate that nobody likes and nobody trusts to continue policies that nobody actually likes and could be indicted during the election. Great plan.
All hail president Trump.
Or the Rubiobot3000. Either way. -
I like to call a guy with multiple bankruptcies to his name fiscally conservative. It's what I like to do.topdawgnc said:
I'm a Kasich supporter, and I am far from a democrat or an independent.dhdawg said:
kasich supporters are mostly dems or independents, they either vote hillary or stay home and hope bloomberg throws his hat inallpurpleallgold said:
Everyone says so but I'm interested to see it. Maybe Kasich voters stay home. And Bush supporters, I mean they're obviously complete fucktards, who knows what they'll do.dnc said:
I think that's the poont, totally different states, so if they agree on a candidate, that candidate is strong.PurpleJ said:
What an odd couple of states to even be in the same sentence.RaceBannon said:Wow. Just heard that no GOP has won both New Hampshire and South Carolina and lost the nomination
Trump2016
But Bush leaving is going to give Rubio a bump, and Kasich's inevitable dropout in the next couple weeks will give him another one.
It ain't over yet.
If Kasich was not on the ballot I would have voted for Trump.
Why?
Those are the only two guys who get shit done.
Both are fiscally conservative and socially liberal (American dream).
I know ... big guy on campus ... but I meet with C Suite and their direct reports of large hospital IDN's on a pretty regular basis. When we discuss the Affordable Healthcare Act they all say the same thing ... either you do it or some variation ... or there will be dead bodies in the streets.
What's Trump say ... there will be people dying in the streets.
What's Kasich say ... you have to do it to help the poor.
Make fun of Trump, but that was my bullshit barometer. He clearly is educated on the issues and not afraid to say what needs to be done.
Kasich has a long history of getting shit done. -
His platform is chock full of things that are supported by the majority of Americans. I like to call the will of the people a non starter. I like to do that.salemcoog said:
As opposed to a candidate that young people think is really cool but don't have the wisdom to know that most of his platform is chock full of nonstarters. This assumes that he would reach November before the exhaustion stroke hits him, of course.allpurpleallgold said:Hillary is going to take Nevada, thanks to Las Vegas (da fuq) and old people (just die already).
So they're going to run a presidential candidate that nobody likes and nobody trusts to continue policies that nobody actually likes and could be indicted during the election. Great plan.
All hail president Trump.
Or the Rubiobot3000. Either way. -
Supported by the majority of Americans does not always mean realistic.allpurpleallgold said:
His platform is chock full of things that are supported by the majority of Americans. I like to call the will of the people a non starter. I like to do that.salemcoog said:
As opposed to a candidate that young people think is really cool but don't have the wisdom to know that most of his platform is chock full of nonstarters. This assumes that he would reach November before the exhaustion stroke hits him, of course.allpurpleallgold said:Hillary is going to take Nevada, thanks to Las Vegas (da fuq) and old people (just die already).
So they're going to run a presidential candidate that nobody likes and nobody trusts to continue policies that nobody actually likes and could be indicted during the election. Great plan.
All hail president Trump.
Or the Rubiobot3000. Either way.
The United states was not created as a democracy, and that was for a reason
-
I'm sure the way the establishment is running things is exactly what the creators of this country had in mind.dhdawg said:
Supported by the majority of Americans does not always mean realistic.allpurpleallgold said:
His platform is chock full of things that are supported by the majority of Americans. I like to call the will of the people a non starter. I like to do that.salemcoog said:
As opposed to a candidate that young people think is really cool but don't have the wisdom to know that most of his platform is chock full of nonstarters. This assumes that he would reach November before the exhaustion stroke hits him, of course.allpurpleallgold said:Hillary is going to take Nevada, thanks to Las Vegas (da fuq) and old people (just die already).
So they're going to run a presidential candidate that nobody likes and nobody trusts to continue policies that nobody actually likes and could be indicted during the election. Great plan.
All hail president Trump.
Or the Rubiobot3000. Either way.
The United states was not created as a democracy, and that was for a reason -
Except that the majority of Americans are idiots...allpurpleallgold said:
His platform is chock full of things that are supported by the majority of Americans. I like to call the will of the people a non starter. I like to do that.salemcoog said:
As opposed to a candidate that young people think is really cool but don't have the wisdom to know that most of his platform is chock full of nonstarters. This assumes that he would reach November before the exhaustion stroke hits him, of course.allpurpleallgold said:Hillary is going to take Nevada, thanks to Las Vegas (da fuq) and old people (just die already).
So they're going to run a presidential candidate that nobody likes and nobody trusts to continue policies that nobody actually likes and could be indicted during the election. Great plan.
All hail president Trump.
Or the Rubiobot3000. Either way. -
Sounds pretty smart to me.salemcoog said:
I like to call a guy with multiple bankruptcies to his name fiscally conservative. It's what I like to do.topdawgnc said:
I'm a Kasich supporter, and I am far from a democrat or an independent.dhdawg said:
kasich supporters are mostly dems or independents, they either vote hillary or stay home and hope bloomberg throws his hat inallpurpleallgold said:
Everyone says so but I'm interested to see it. Maybe Kasich voters stay home. And Bush supporters, I mean they're obviously complete fucktards, who knows what they'll do.dnc said:
I think that's the poont, totally different states, so if they agree on a candidate, that candidate is strong.PurpleJ said:
What an odd couple of states to even be in the same sentence.RaceBannon said:Wow. Just heard that no GOP has won both New Hampshire and South Carolina and lost the nomination
Trump2016
But Bush leaving is going to give Rubio a bump, and Kasich's inevitable dropout in the next couple weeks will give him another one.
It ain't over yet.
If Kasich was not on the ballot I would have voted for Trump.
Why?
Those are the only two guys who get shit done.
Both are fiscally conservative and socially liberal (American dream).
I know ... big guy on campus ... but I meet with C Suite and their direct reports of large hospital IDN's on a pretty regular basis. When we discuss the Affordable Healthcare Act they all say the same thing ... either you do it or some variation ... or there will be dead bodies in the streets.
What's Trump say ... there will be people dying in the streets.
What's Kasich say ... you have to do it to help the poor.
Make fun of Trump, but that was my bullshit barometer. He clearly is educated on the issues and not afraid to say what needs to be done.
Kasich has a long history of getting shit done. -
pressingtopdawgnc said:
Sounds pretty smart to me.salemcoog said:
I like to call a guy with multiple bankruptcies to his name fiscally conservative. It's what I like to do.topdawgnc said:
I'm a Kasich supporter, and I am far from a democrat or an independent.dhdawg said:
kasich supporters are mostly dems or independents, they either vote hillary or stay home and hope bloomberg throws his hat inallpurpleallgold said:
Everyone says so but I'm interested to see it. Maybe Kasich voters stay home. And Bush supporters, I mean they're obviously complete fucktards, who knows what they'll do.dnc said:
I think that's the poont, totally different states, so if they agree on a candidate, that candidate is strong.PurpleJ said:
What an odd couple of states to even be in the same sentence.RaceBannon said:Wow. Just heard that no GOP has won both New Hampshire and South Carolina and lost the nomination
Trump2016
But Bush leaving is going to give Rubio a bump, and Kasich's inevitable dropout in the next couple weeks will give him another one.
It ain't over yet.
If Kasich was not on the ballot I would have voted for Trump.
Why?
Those are the only two guys who get shit done.
Both are fiscally conservative and socially liberal (American dream).
I know ... big guy on campus ... but I meet with C Suite and their direct reports of large hospital IDN's on a pretty regular basis. When we discuss the Affordable Healthcare Act they all say the same thing ... either you do it or some variation ... or there will be dead bodies in the streets.
What's Trump say ... there will be people dying in the streets.
What's Kasich say ... you have to do it to help the poor.
Make fun of Trump, but that was my bullshit barometer. He clearly is educated on the issues and not afraid to say what needs to be done.
Kasich has a long history of getting shit done. -
no argument thereallpurpleallgold said:
I'm sure the way the establishment is running things is exactly what the creators of this country had in mind.dhdawg said:
Supported by the majority of Americans does not always mean realistic.allpurpleallgold said:
His platform is chock full of things that are supported by the majority of Americans. I like to call the will of the people a non starter. I like to do that.salemcoog said:
As opposed to a candidate that young people think is really cool but don't have the wisdom to know that most of his platform is chock full of nonstarters. This assumes that he would reach November before the exhaustion stroke hits him, of course.allpurpleallgold said:Hillary is going to take Nevada, thanks to Las Vegas (da fuq) and old people (just die already).
So they're going to run a presidential candidate that nobody likes and nobody trusts to continue policies that nobody actually likes and could be indicted during the election. Great plan.
All hail president Trump.
Or the Rubiobot3000. Either way.
The United states was not created as a democracy, and that was for a reason
