Rip the democratic party
So they're going to run a presidential candidate that nobody likes and nobody trusts to continue policies that nobody actually likes and could be indicted during the election. Great plan.
All hail president Trump.
Or the Rubiobot3000. Either way.
Comments
-
Hillary was never going to lose the nomination to Bernie.
He's going to get destroyed March 1 ...
If the dems feel the heat with her DOJ will indict her and Warren will get the nomination in brokered convention.
Don't believe everything the press tells you.
It will be a Hillary v. Cruz contest. -
Whether you like Hillary or not. To think she's going to get indicted is truly FS.allpurpleallgold said:Hillary is going to take Nevada, thanks to Las Vegas (da fuq) and old people (just die already).
So they're going to run a presidential candidate that nobody likes and nobody trusts to continue policies that nobody actually likes and could be indicted during the election. Great plan.
All hail president Trump.
Or the Rubiobot3000. Either way. -
Hopefully you enjoy the next four years of a republican president. I know I will.2001400ex said:
Whether you like Hillary or not. To think she's going to get indicted is truly FS.allpurpleallgold said:Hillary is going to take Nevada, thanks to Las Vegas (da fuq) and old people (just die already).
So they're going to run a presidential candidate that nobody likes and nobody trusts to continue policies that nobody actually likes and could be indicted during the election. Great plan.
All hail president Trump.
Or the Rubiobot3000. Either way. -
disagreetopdawgnc said:Hillary was never going to lose the nomination to Bernie.
He's going to get destroyed March 1 ...
If the dems feel the heat with her DOJ will indict her and Warren will get the nomination in brokered convention.
Don't believe everything the press tells you.
It will be a Hillary v. Cruz contest. -
A GOP president revives the anti war movementallpurpleallgold said:
Hopefully you enjoy the next four years of a republican president. I know I will.2001400ex said:
Whether you like Hillary or not. To think she's going to get indicted is truly FS.allpurpleallgold said:Hillary is going to take Nevada, thanks to Las Vegas (da fuq) and old people (just die already).
So they're going to run a presidential candidate that nobody likes and nobody trusts to continue policies that nobody actually likes and could be indicted during the election. Great plan.
All hail president Trump.
Or the Rubiobot3000. Either way. -
If the election comes down to Hillary against whomever wins the (R) nomination, I'm going to seriously consider moving to New Zealand. It's a lot like Denmark, but with better weather, and fewer 6' 8" woman walking around making me feel short.allpurpleallgold said:Hillary is going to take Nevada
-
allpurpleallgold said:
Hopefully you enjoy the next eight years of a republican president. I know I will.2001400ex said:
Whether you like Hillary or not. To think she's going to get indicted is truly FS.allpurpleallgold said:Hillary is going to take Nevada, thanks to Las Vegas (da fuq) and old people (just die already).
So they're going to run a presidential candidate that nobody likes and nobody trusts to continue policies that nobody actually likes and could be indicted during the election. Great plan.
All hail president Trump.
Or the Rubiobot3000. Either way. -
Wow. Just heard that no GOP has won both New Hampshire and South Carolina and lost the nomination
Trump2016 -
And miss the chance to rub Hillarys electability in the democrats face?OZONE said:
If the election comes down to Hillary against whomever wins the (R) nomination, I'm going to seriously consider moving to New Zealand. It's a lot like Denmark, but with better weather, and fewer 6' 8" woman walking around making me feel short.allpurpleallgold said:Hillary is going to take Nevada
-
What an odd couple of states to even be in the same sentence.RaceBannon said:Wow. Just heard that no GOP has won both New Hampshire and South Carolina and lost the nomination
Trump2016 -
I think that's the poont, totally different states, so if they agree on a candidate, that candidate is strong.PurpleJ said:
What an odd couple of states to even be in the same sentence.RaceBannon said:Wow. Just heard that no GOP has won both New Hampshire and South Carolina and lost the nomination
Trump2016
But Bush leaving is going to give Rubio a bump, and Kasich's inevitable dropout in the next couple weeks will give him another one.
It ain't over yet. -
Jeb! Wins. He received over $100 million in campaign donations.dnc said:
I think that's the poont, totally different states, so if they agree on a candidate, that candidate is strong.PurpleJ said:
What an odd couple of states to even be in the same sentence.RaceBannon said:Wow. Just heard that no GOP has won both New Hampshire and South Carolina and lost the nomination
Trump2016
But Bush leaving is going to give Rubio a bump, and Kasich's inevitable dropout in the next couple weeks will give him another one.
It ain't over yet. -
Everyone says so but I'm interested to see it. Maybe Kasich voters stay home. And Bush supporters, I mean they're obviously complete fucktards, who knows what they'll do.dnc said:
I think that's the poont, totally different states, so if they agree on a candidate, that candidate is strong.PurpleJ said:
What an odd couple of states to even be in the same sentence.RaceBannon said:Wow. Just heard that no GOP has won both New Hampshire and South Carolina and lost the nomination
Trump2016
But Bush leaving is going to give Rubio a bump, and Kasich's inevitable dropout in the next couple weeks will give him another one.
It ain't over yet. -
I'm ready to call it. No one beats Trump or Hillary. Those are the two. Time to move to Canada.dnc said:
I think that's the poont, totally different states, so if they agree on a candidate, that candidate is strong.PurpleJ said:
What an odd couple of states to even be in the same sentence.RaceBannon said:Wow. Just heard that no GOP has won both New Hampshire and South Carolina and lost the nomination
Trump2016
But Bush leaving is going to give Rubio a bump, and Kasich's inevitable dropout in the next couple weeks will give him another one.
It ain't over yet.
-
The Cruz/Rubio fight to be #2 and the anti-trump vote could prevent either one from beating Trump.
Just applying the percentages from Trump as the second choice for Carson,Bush and Kasich voters would get him another 5% bump to 40% nationally. Don't think Cruz or Rubio can catch him. If its 34-21-16 right now and Trump get to 40% there is no way they can catch him. They will split and hurt it each other.
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/who-gains-the-most-when-the-gop-field-shrinks
-
Somebody better write this day on the calendar. HFS is correct, and I agree 100%2001400ex said:
Whether you like Hillary or not. To think she's going to get indicted is truly FS.allpurpleallgold said:Hillary is going to take Nevada, thanks to Las Vegas (da fuq) and old people (just die already).
So they're going to run a presidential candidate that nobody likes and nobody trusts to continue policies that nobody actually likes and could be indicted during the election. Great plan.
All hail president Trump.
Or the Rubiobot3000. Either way.
FMFYFE -
Hope this helps.PurpleJ said:
I'm ready to call it. No one beats Trump or Hillary. Those are the two. Time to move todnc said:
I think that's the poont, totally different states, so if they agree on a candidate, that candidate is strong.PurpleJ said:
What an odd couple of states to even be in the same sentence.RaceBannon said:Wow. Just heard that no GOP has won both New Hampshire and South Carolina and lost the nomination
Trump2016
But Bush leaving is going to give Rubio a bump, and Kasich's inevitable dropout in the next couple weeks will give him another one.
It ain't over yet.CanadaThailand. -
kasich supporters are mostly dems or independents, they either vote hillary or stay home and hope bloomberg throws his hat inallpurpleallgold said:
Everyone says so but I'm interested to see it. Maybe Kasich voters stay home. And Bush supporters, I mean they're obviously complete fucktards, who knows what they'll do.dnc said:
I think that's the poont, totally different states, so if they agree on a candidate, that candidate is strong.PurpleJ said:
What an odd couple of states to even be in the same sentence.RaceBannon said:Wow. Just heard that no GOP has won both New Hampshire and South Carolina and lost the nomination
Trump2016
But Bush leaving is going to give Rubio a bump, and Kasich's inevitable dropout in the next couple weeks will give him another one.
It ain't over yet. -
It's been thrown out there that Rubio should promise Cruz a SCOTUS seat in exchange for his dropout. may be the only way.HeretoBeatmyChest said:The Cruz/Rubio fight to be #2 and the anti-trump vote could prevent either one from beating Trump.
Just applying the percentages from Trump as the second choice for Carson,Bush and Kasich voters would get him another 5% bump to 40% nationally. Don't think Cruz or Rubio can catch him. If its 34-21-16 right now and Trump get to 40% there is no way they can catch him. They will split and hurt it each other.
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/who-gains-the-most-when-the-gop-field-shrinks
I'd actually prefer trump to rubio, at least he's honest and not a total puppet -
Majorly disagree about Trump being honest. How many boycotts has Trump called for since he started running for president? Like he really GAF about what Starbuck's has on their red holiday cups. He's nothing close to honest.dhdawg said:
It's been thrown out there that Rubio should promise Cruz a SCOTUS seat in exchange for his dropout. may be the only way.HeretoBeatmyChest said:The Cruz/Rubio fight to be #2 and the anti-trump vote could prevent either one from beating Trump.
Just applying the percentages from Trump as the second choice for Carson,Bush and Kasich voters would get him another 5% bump to 40% nationally. Don't think Cruz or Rubio can catch him. If its 34-21-16 right now and Trump get to 40% there is no way they can catch him. They will split and hurt it each other.
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/who-gains-the-most-when-the-gop-field-shrinks
I'd actually prefer trump to rubio, at least he's honest and not a total puppet -
I think honesty is easily confused with being a blowhard, which is what Trump and Bernie are.
-
Nobody is ever going to confuse Hilary and honesty.PurpleJ said:I think honesty is easily confused with being a blowhard, which is what Trump and Bernie are.
-
I can help you packOZONE said:
If the election comes down to Hillary against whomever wins the (R) nomination, I'm going to seriously consider moving to New Zealand. It's a lot like Denmark, but with better weather, and fewer 6' 8" woman walking around making me feel short.allpurpleallgold said:Hillary is going to take Nevada
-
There's a first time for everything. This is a very fragmented primary and a majority of republicans view Trump unfavorably. Cruz or Rubio are more likely to win the GOP nomination and Hillary is a Super Tuesday away from knocking the self described socialist out of the race. It's going to be a very rich old corrupt establishment white woman running against a much younger first generation Cuban American in the general election.RaceBannon said:Wow. Just heard that no GOP has won both New Hampshire and South Carolina and lost the nomination
Trump2016 -
I'm a Kasich supporter, and I am far from a democrat or an independent.dhdawg said:
kasich supporters are mostly dems or independents, they either vote hillary or stay home and hope bloomberg throws his hat inallpurpleallgold said:
Everyone says so but I'm interested to see it. Maybe Kasich voters stay home. And Bush supporters, I mean they're obviously complete fucktards, who knows what they'll do.dnc said:
I think that's the poont, totally different states, so if they agree on a candidate, that candidate is strong.PurpleJ said:
What an odd couple of states to even be in the same sentence.RaceBannon said:Wow. Just heard that no GOP has won both New Hampshire and South Carolina and lost the nomination
Trump2016
But Bush leaving is going to give Rubio a bump, and Kasich's inevitable dropout in the next couple weeks will give him another one.
It ain't over yet.
If Kasich was not on the ballot I would have voted for Trump.
Why?
Those are the only two guys who get shit done.
Both are fiscally conservative and socially liberal (American dream).
I know ... big guy on campus ... but I meet with C Suite and their direct reports of large hospital IDN's on a pretty regular basis. When we discuss the Affordable Healthcare Act they all say the same thing ... either you do it or some variation ... or there will be dead bodies in the streets.
What's Trump say ... there will be people dying in the streets.
What's Kasich say ... you have to do it to help the poor.
Make fun of Trump, but that was my bullshit barometer. He clearly is educated on the issues and not afraid to say what needs to be done.
Kasich has a long history of getting shit done. -
Trump is not a fiscal conservative.
-
Trump's issue is the voters won't elect him to be president in the general and republicans know it. That's why you see him "getting" 38% in the polls b4 the day of the vote, and then him getting 5% or more less on voting day. In essence there is a third of the people so pissed at the political system they will vote for any non-established candidate, but after that votes become very very hard for him to find.HeretoBeatmyChest said:The Cruz/Rubio fight to be #2 and the anti-trump vote could prevent either one from beating Trump.
Just applying the percentages from Trump as the second choice for Carson,Bush and Kasich voters would get him another 5% bump to 40% nationally. Don't think Cruz or Rubio can catch him. If its 34-21-16 right now and Trump get to 40% there is no way they can catch him. They will split and hurt it each other.
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/who-gains-the-most-when-the-gop-field-shrinks
As I see it, either at the convention you will have a brokered deal where Cruz/Rubio will pool their delegates to defeat Trump, or imo the more likely scenario is the RNP will look at the current delegates and who is more electable between Cruz and Rubio after Super Tuesday I and throw all their support behind him, why encouraging the other candidate to take one for the team with the understanding in 4/8 years you will have all the support/resources you need.
Can you imagine having to choose between Hilliary and Trump to be the next potus? Talk about having to hold you nose, close you eyes and make a shitty choice. It would be like watching the ducks and cougs in the Nat. Championship and having to root for one. Sadly if your a republican in this state, your vote won't make any difference as Wash/Oregon/Cal make us the communist left coast base for the dem's. -
You shouldn't believe everything the media tells you to believe.godawgst said:
Trump's issue is the voters won't elect him to be president in the general and republicans know it. That's why you see him "getting" 38% in the polls b4 the day of the vote, and then him getting 5% or more less on voting day. In essence there is a third of the people so pissed at the political system they will vote for any non-established candidate, but after that votes become very very hard for him to find.HeretoBeatmyChest said:The Cruz/Rubio fight to be #2 and the anti-trump vote could prevent either one from beating Trump.
Just applying the percentages from Trump as the second choice for Carson,Bush and Kasich voters would get him another 5% bump to 40% nationally. Don't think Cruz or Rubio can catch him. If its 34-21-16 right now and Trump get to 40% there is no way they can catch him. They will split and hurt it each other.
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/who-gains-the-most-when-the-gop-field-shrinks
As I see it, either at the convention you will have a brokered deal where Cruz/Rubio will pool their delegates to defeat Trump, or imo the more likely scenario is the RNP will look at the current delegates and who is more electable between Cruz and Rubio after Super Tuesday I and throw all their support behind him, why encouraging the other candidate to take one for the team with the understanding in 4/8 years you will have all the support/resources you need.
Can you imagine having to choose between Hilliary and Trump to be the next potus? Talk about having to hold you nose, close you eyes and make a shitty choice. It would be like watching the ducks and cougs in the Nat. Championship and having to root for one. Sadly if your a republican in this state, your vote won't make any difference as Wash/Oregon/Cal make us the communist left coast base for the dem's.
The reality is if Bush, Rubio, or Cruz received 33% of the SC vote, after destroying the NH primary, and finishing a strong 2nd in Iowa they would declare this thing signed sealed and delivered for those candidates.
Trump can win a general election. And there will be no brokered convention. If Trump reaches 1237 delegates he will go forward as the nominee. And if he gets fucked out of it he will run 3rd party and the GOP knows it.
He may lose 5% of the vote but he still beats the closest competitor by 60,000 votes.
He'll bare knuckle it against Hillary. She won't know how to respond to his accusations of email issues, and Wall Street connections. He will make it about her, and how a vote for him will make you feel good again. He's a populist and he is striking a cord with the Nixon and Reagan coalition.
The dude has broke every rule in the book and still kicks everyone's ass. -
Prove it.PurpleJ said:Trump is not a fiscal conservative.
Seems to me a guy who makes a billion dollars plus in his life is pretty fiscally conservative. -
Trump doesn't have the temperament to be President. How do you think it'll go over with the world when he gets pissed and starts calling other worlds leaders names. It's actually quite comical how he shits on everyone then whines when they shit on him back. That won't fly as president.topdawgnc said:
I'm a Kasich supporter, and I am far from a democrat or an independent.dhdawg said:
kasich supporters are mostly dems or independents, they either vote hillary or stay home and hope bloomberg throws his hat inallpurpleallgold said:
Everyone says so but I'm interested to see it. Maybe Kasich voters stay home. And Bush supporters, I mean they're obviously complete fucktards, who knows what they'll do.dnc said:
I think that's the poont, totally different states, so if they agree on a candidate, that candidate is strong.PurpleJ said:
What an odd couple of states to even be in the same sentence.RaceBannon said:Wow. Just heard that no GOP has won both New Hampshire and South Carolina and lost the nomination
Trump2016
But Bush leaving is going to give Rubio a bump, and Kasich's inevitable dropout in the next couple weeks will give him another one.
It ain't over yet.
If Kasich was not on the ballot I would have voted for Trump.
Why?
Those are the only two guys who get shit done.
Both are fiscally conservative and socially liberal (American dream).
I know ... big guy on campus ... but I meet with C Suite and their direct reports of large hospital IDN's on a pretty regular basis. When we discuss the Affordable Healthcare Act they all say the same thing ... either you do it or some variation ... or there will be dead bodies in the streets.
What's Trump say ... there will be people dying in the streets.
What's Kasich say ... you have to do it to help the poor.
Make fun of Trump, but that was my bullshit barometer. He clearly is educated on the issues and not afraid to say what needs to be done.
Kasich has a long history of getting shit done.
Kasich isn't bad, if I had to vote for one Republican, that's who it would be. But his problem is, he isn't engaging or passionate enough to stand out.
Of course the Democrats are as big of a clusterfuck. Bernie is just awful to listen to. Hillary has the best resume (only one with actually foreign policy experience, and according to Republicans, she was the one who ran the white house in the 90s). But she's got a vagina and too many people dislike her. Given the Clinton machine, she can win, but will be the most polarizing president (well Trump will be more polarizing).
