The last time we saw John Ross

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

Doogles,

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

Doogles said:

Ross is special. Can't believe he was only a 4 star. When you see that speed, theres no mistaking it.

Every coach in the country would take him. Think and care about that for a moment. Our weakest position group has an upperclassmen that Alabama would play.

Zero excuses for Pete and Smith in 2016.

Zero excuses for Pete? You realize we have sophomores across he Oline? True soph at QB? Browning lost his only downfield target in Perkins, lost our best pass rusher in Feeney? How about our little experienced depth along the oline, at TE, WR, Running back, DE, LB and most importantly FUCKING QB.

You imbeciles just never get it. This team is still 1 F-ING year away from really contending, year 4. Not enough experience and depth at key positions. You buttfucking blinded bastards dont realize that injuries happen. Look at Oregon when Adams missed several games. If Browning gets turf toe in November we might be lucky to make a bowl game.

Enough of the "no excuse" bullshitty, you just dont get the nuances of the game doogles. This team could very well win the north, then again they could go 9-4, which would still be a great accomplishment considering the team left to Peter, and the true sophomores at key positions.

Just enjoy the ride, t h e improvement, the individual performances. Quit setting unrealistic expectations, you have no clue what youre talking about.

This team is being built to get into the playoff. Aint happenin next year most likely. Year 4, year 5? You bet your ass.

Doogles I remember you specifically saying Pete should have won 10 games in his1st year , because of Shelton, Shaq, Peters. You forgot Timu was on that defense. Moreover you neglected to account for the other 17 fcs players you ignorant fuckass. Peter will go as far as his young roster will allow, injuries will allow.

IT WILL HAVE ZERO TO FUCKING DO WITH HIS ABILITY AS A HEAD COACH. Fuckoff and LEAVE bitch. To kims island of misfits, where you cunts can whine about ev e ry loss, jonathan smith, Petersens coaching ability etc..

At HH Bill, Passion, puppy, Steel2, yo bates will be talking about reality on the field, THE ROAD SCHEDULE (vs Oregon, WSU (who I like in the north today Feb 1 2016, but is subject to change), injuries, the pac12 landscape, etc...

Its not a cut-and-dried prediction and expecatation in February. A lot can change, a lot can happen by jan 1 2017. Be realistic or get your little beaver to the gate bitch.

So Passion, you, and me then?

To get serious for a second, expecting the playoff is asking a lot.

Expecting nine wins isn't with the cream puff OOC. They'll be kind of young, but most of those sophomores have enough experience to improve.

9 wins is a given Bad Billy. 10 isnt, but certainly achievable. My only problem is when faggo's like Baze, doogles, Nacho, J EXPECT 10, then inevidably ride Petersen for not doing so, in year 1 or year 3 for that matter..

This team was no different than a team off the death penalty 2 years ago. Im semi- serious about that. After 5 years of Sark (a time when typically a program is at its best) The Offensive line was at its worst in modern husky history (thats all I can attest to, and am prolly being nice) , the QB situation was the worst in husky history, even before the forward pass our QB's had more ability than Miles-Lindy, and that is not debatable.

When has Washington ever had a tailback who couldnt find a hole to save his life, and had nobody better on the bench? When has Washington ever been without a TE who could block or catch? When has Washington ever had a starting inside backer who never hit a ball carrier behind the LOS (Nez Perce Johnny)? Fuckall, Victor (sophomore) had more stops behind the LOS and solo tackles in his 1st pac12 game than Timu had his entire sophomore year!!! Even Tommy or J could notice the play of Victor as opposed to I-cant-get-off-blocks Johnny.

When did Sark ever have a defense that led the pac12 in anything other than penalties? Pete had the best defense in the conference with his freshmen and sophomores, yet were average with Sarks "big-4" the year prior. Still there are queefs here that criticize Peternuts for going 7-6 in year 2? Fresh off the equivilent of horrible sanctions? Then expect 10 wins in year 3, in the best conference in the country?

Clearly kims bedfellows have taken over this joint. Time to turn the gate into the guillotine, ive got the 1st 3 lambs lined up for slaughter. Yes Tommy, ill arrange your last meal gluten free.

ThomasFremont said:

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

Well holy hell Billy, isnt it as clear as I stated above? What did I say that isnt painfully accurate? Sark's running game delivered when it didnt matter. Sure Polk and to a greater degree Sankey ran for over 1000 yards, but when it mattered most, those guys got stuffed. The oline could NOT punch it in on 1st and goal. What yards Sankey got when it mattered were ALL ON HIS OWN. Sark routinely threw on 1st, 2nd and 3rd and goal

Sarks offense could move through the air horizontally but not when it mattered vertically. The statistics were great, but aside from Kearse and Aguilar (ty's recruits), SarK's WR's were meh .

Basically Sark's offense couldnt pass to set up run or run to set up pass...when it fucking mattered especially. Dont get me started on his defenses.

In year 2 of Petersen you're starting to see Gaskin set up play action. Been a long time and I dig it. The oline is going to be nasty . They'll be able to punch it in on 1st and goal, behind tre Adams and a pulling coleman shelton. Dickheads like J just look at win-loss and have no clue the transformation of this team. They will next year when they try and jump on the winning wagon . Puppy will be waiting at the gate.

Nobody was harder on Sark than Puppy.

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

ThomasFremont said:

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

Well holy hell Billy, isnt it as clear as I stated above? What did I say that isnt painfully accurate? Sark's running game delivered when it didnt matter. Sure Polk and to a greater degree Sankey ran for over 1000 yards, but when it mattered most, those guys got stuffed. The oline could NOT punch it in on 1st and goal. What yards Sankey got when it mattered were ALL ON HIS OWN. Sark routinely threw on 1st, 2nd and 3rd and goal

Sarks offense could move through the air horizontally but not when it mattered vertically. The statistics were great, but aside from Kearse and Aguilar (ty's recruits), SarK's WR's were meh .

Basically Sark's offense couldnt pass to set up run or run to set up pass...when it fucking mattered especially. Dont get me started on his defenses.

In year 2 of Petersen you're starting to see Gaskin set up play action. Been a long time and I dig it. The oline is going to be nasty . They'll be able to punch it in on 1st and goal, behind tre Adams and a pulling coleman shelton. Dickheads like J just look at win-loss and have no clue the transformation of this team. They will next year when they try and jump on the winning wagon . Puppy will be waiting at the gate.

Nobody was harder on Sark than Puppy.

Yep, and you finally figured out a football is oblong too. What a day For you tom.