No offense but....
Comments
-
Be a better poster.devildawg said:
What the fuck are you arguing troll? I said Mcgrew is a little dude! I've stood right next to the kid are you arguing that he's big? There is no argument here it's just a conversation that you want to turn into an argument...your name suits you troll! Really just ignore my post or shut the fuck up!FremontTroll said:
Stop citing to your position and connections in every argument as if it makes you an expert and I will end my "obsession."devildawg said:Agree Dennis!
Lotta coaches are fucking idiots! I've always chuckled with the Trolls obsession over my supposed "insider" status or my claim of superior knowledge becuase I coach high school football?
Self employed business owner who donates my time for free to help out coaching 15-18 year old stoners....nothing fucking glamoures about it.
Mcgrew is a midget he's also fast,with great feet he's going to make some plays I just don't think it will be with 15-20 carries a game at tailback and don't bring up Nip that's just retarded he was a once a decade back and one of the best high school players in the country! Mcgrew just a little guy who slipped out of LA becuase both schools have stacks of guys with his speed that all stand over 6 ft
Now if UW joins a 7-7 conferecne look out! Between Mcgrew and the smurf crew WRs and Smiffs ability to dial up 60 passes a game we just might break .500
Told ha before PM me! At this point I'd love to see you after practice come on out troll wtf? -
I obviously love poasting about UW/college football
I've been participating since they invented this shit...occasionally I post a few things I've seen or heard along the way,ive been involved with coaching,personel training,7-7 and the now shut down high school arena football leauge for the last 7-8 years
I've had this dip stick Troll on two web sights now stalking every post...asking for name,number,school,fucking SSN, facebook account? Ima bout to give it to him just to shut his fucking mouth! -
I recommend meeting him at the 7-11 on Aurora in the U-District. It's where we settle things.devildawg said:I obviously love poasting about UW/college football
I've been participating since they invented this shit...occasionally I post a few things I've seen or heard along the way,ive been involved with coaching,personel training,7-7 and the now shut down high school arena football leauge for the last 7-8 years
I've had this dip stick Troll on two web sights now stalking every post...asking for name,number,school,fucking SSN, facebook account? Ima bout to give it to him just to shut his fucking mouth! -
I know we're at our quota for "high school coaches" on this site but any chance we can get kickercoach or jaxng to join this bored. I really want to get some analysis on VanHalen Soderberg and the Oregon high school baseball recruiting scene
-
Keep up the good work, @FremontTroll.
-
Sproles is the comparison I was going to make too.doogsinparadise said:
I'm still in lipo mode on his size. Darren Sproles is probably a better comparison for El Blanco, and look what he did in college:RoadDawg55 said:When Petersen talks about the defense he uses words and phrases like effort, being physical, playing hard... His quotes on offense are mostly about scheme, philosophy, details...
It's always been kind of irritatingFuck guys, it's just so irritating. Most of the players on defense are dawgs with feces in their throats. They play with emotion and fire. Most of the players on offense are nice kids.
Thankfully, the offense should be a lot better. I was encouraged by the end of the year. It's still a concern though. I still remember the pass happy bullshit and when even the doogliest doogs on this board wanted Smith fired.
I'm a fan of McGrew and think he will be good, but you can't guarantee a guy 5'6" 160 can play RB because Napolean Kaufman and Jaquizz Rodgers were also small. There aren't many good RB's that small. McGrew's speed and lateral quickness are incredible, but he's going to need to be properly utilized and he might not be a RB.
Collegiate statistics
Year Team Games Attempts Yards YPA TDs Long
2001 Kansas State 6 28 210 7.5 1 38
2002 Kansas State 13 237 1,465 6.2 17 80
2003 Kansas State 15 306 1,986 6.5 16 73
2004 Kansas State 11 244 1,318 5.4 11 74
Career 45 815 4,979 6.1 45 80
Not saying he will--don't twist--but if he has the quickness and speed then I can't see why he wouldn't be able to take 150-225 carries by the time he's a junior.
His 2003 Big 12 championship game performance (KSU 35, #1 OU 7) was amazing. One of my favorite football players ever. -
And his NFL weight was only 190#. If McGrew bombs it'll be because he doesn't have the proper quickness, gets injured, or has instincts like DWash, not because of his size.whlinder said:
Sproles is the comparison I was going to make too.doogsinparadise said:
I'm still in lipo mode on his size. Darren Sproles is probably a better comparison for El Blanco, and look what he did in college:RoadDawg55 said:When Petersen talks about the defense he uses words and phrases like effort, being physical, playing hard... His quotes on offense are mostly about scheme, philosophy, details...
It's always been kind of irritatingFuck guys, it's just so irritating. Most of the players on defense are dawgs with feces in their throats. They play with emotion and fire. Most of the players on offense are nice kids.
Thankfully, the offense should be a lot better. I was encouraged by the end of the year. It's still a concern though. I still remember the pass happy bullshit and when even the doogliest doogs on this board wanted Smith fired.
I'm a fan of McGrew and think he will be good, but you can't guarantee a guy 5'6" 160 can play RB because Napolean Kaufman and Jaquizz Rodgers were also small. There aren't many good RB's that small. McGrew's speed and lateral quickness are incredible, but he's going to need to be properly utilized and he might not be a RB.
Collegiate statistics
Year Team Games Attempts Yards YPA TDs Long
2001 Kansas State 6 28 210 7.5 1 38
2002 Kansas State 13 237 1,465 6.2 17 80
2003 Kansas State 15 306 1,986 6.5 16 73
2004 Kansas State 11 244 1,318 5.4 11 74
Career 45 815 4,979 6.1 45 80
Not saying he will--don't twist--but if he has the quickness and speed then I can't see why he wouldn't be able to take 150-225 carries by the time he's a junior.
His 2003 Big 12 championship game performance (KSU 35, #1 OU 7) was amazing. One of my favorite football players ever. -
McGrew is probably bigger than DeAnthony Thomas and he was a fucking terror when he got the ball for the Ducks. Jesus Christ if Smith can dial up an ounce of creativity in his playcalling and get the kid in space he's going to be a nightmare for defenses. I hope to see him and Gaskins in the backfield together at times running counters. They will fucking be very tough to handle if used right. Go study some damn Oregon game tape Smith.
-
All due respect to @BeelzebubDawg, watching tape of McGrew in real ball, not lingerie league 7on7 bullshit, he's player. I don't how else to say it. He's superior athletically, competitive, and has that innate on-field understanding. And he is ridiculously fast. I'm surprised that I'm surprised McGrew's leaving early and giving up a very good chance to be California 100m champion, no small feat for such small feet.
-
devildawg said:
I obviously love poasting about UW/college football
I've been participating since they invented this shit...occasionally I post a few things I've seen or heard along the way,ive been involved with coaching,personel training,7-7 and the now shut down high school arena football leauge for the last 7-8 years
I've had this dip stick Troll on two web sights now stalking every post...asking for name,number,school,fucking SSN, facebook account? Ima bout to give it to him just to shut his fucking mouth!
Nuff said -
I don't believe there is any question Mcgrew is a talent and a great weapon
The point was,its unlikely he ends up a feature tailback at this level...if he is thats great,outside of Gaskin there isn't another one on the roster.
You can minimize the 7-7 play all you want vs the highlight reel you watched on your phone...coaches from across the country get a ton of info off these passing leagues...you know UW actually holds one of their own so they can meet,greet and actually evaluate these kids for free!
I actually attended the last 2.......3 2 1....come on troll say it LOL
-
For fuck sake! That guys a jock sniffing tool!Baseman said:devildawg said:I obviously love poasting about UW/college football
I've been participating since they invented this shit...occasionally I post a few things I've seen or heard along the way,ive been involved with coaching,personel training,7-7 and the now shut down high school arena football leauge for the last 7-8 years
I've had this dip stick Troll on two web sights now stalking every post...asking for name,number,school,fucking SSN, facebook account? Ima bout to give it to him just to shut his fucking mouth!
Nuff said
His rep with some of the real boosters is a running joke! -
Calling anyone a jock sniffing tool is rich.
-
I saw him a few times down here and McGrew is a solid runner with lots of strength. I like the Sproles comparison. I think he'll be perfect to replace gaskin in 2 years as a feature back getting the rock 20+ times a game.
-
Do telldevildawg said:
For fuck sake! That guys a jock sniffing tool!Baseman said:devildawg said:I obviously love poasting about UW/college football
I've been participating since they invented this shit...occasionally I post a few things I've seen or heard along the way,ive been involved with coaching,personel training,7-7 and the now shut down high school arena football leauge for the last 7-8 years
I've had this dip stick Troll on two web sights now stalking every post...asking for name,number,school,fucking SSN, facebook account? Ima bout to give it to him just to shut his fucking mouth!
Nuff said
His rep with some of the real boosters is a running joke! -
People would be WAY more pumped about McGrew, despite his Liliputian stature, if he weren't pigmentationally challenged.
-
Okay, I was going to post this earlier, but didn't get a chance to...devildawg said:Agree Dennis!
Lotta coaches are fucking idiots! I've always chuckled with the Trolls obsession over my supposed "insider" status or my claim of superior knowledge becuase I coach high school football?
Self employed business owner who donates my time for free to help out coaching 15-18 year old stoners....nothing fucking glamoures about it.
Mcgrew is a midget he's also fast,with great feet he's going to make some plays I just don't think it will be with 15-20 carries a game at tailback and don't bring up Nip that's just retarded he was a once a decade back and one of the best high school players in the country! Mcgrew just a little guy who slipped out of LA becuase both schools have stacks of guys with his speed that all stand over 6 ft
Now if UW joins a 7-7 conferecne look out! Between Mcgrew and the smurf crew WRs and Smiffs ability to dial up 60 passes a game we just might break .500
In general I agree with you, but you're not helping yourself with this one.
For the last two years (which shouldn't really be different than any other years) height of running backs is normally distributed around a mean of 5-10.22 and a SD of ± 1.72.
Assuming no correlation between quality and height (this is favorable to your argument), this means that about 68% of the best running backs should be between 5-8.5 and 6-0. And that only about 15% should be above 6-0 and below 5-8.5; Importantly it says that only .1% of the best backs should be below 5-7 and above 6-3.
Now, if you assume that the RBs that play correspond to the RBs recruited in height (again, favorable toward your argument), that means that the Pac-12s all time rushing leaders should be distributed evenly through those buckets.
It turns out that about 15% of the players on the top 50 list are below 5-9; and 4% (2 players) are below 5-7. This is all while there's only 1 player above 6-3 on the list.
All of this is to say that what you find is that there doesn't seem to be any particular relationship between height and top-end performance once kids get scholarships. So, McGrew's being 5-7 (or whatever he is) shouldn't concern you any more than getting a kid 6-3.5 should.
Now... this is just opinion, but... I'd like to go one step further. My guess is that many people are biased against short people for playing time, etc. and they don't get the opportunity to play unless they are particularly good.
In the end, here's the rub... there's no evidence that says that, given he was offered a scholarship by many power 5 schools, that he will be any worse than anyone else. -
If McGrew puts up numbers similar to Jacquizz Rodgers, I'll be happy
-
Dennis_DeYoung said:
Okay, I was going to post this earlier, but didn't get a chance to...devildawg said:Agree Dennis!
Lotta coaches are fucking idiots! I've always chuckled with the Trolls obsession over my supposed "insider" status or my claim of superior knowledge becuase I coach high school football?
Self employed business owner who donates my time for free to help out coaching 15-18 year old stoners....nothing fucking glamoures about it.
Mcgrew is a midget he's also fast,with great feet he's going to make some plays I just don't think it will be with 15-20 carries a game at tailback and don't bring up Nip that's just retarded he was a once a decade back and one of the best high school players in the country! Mcgrew just a little guy who slipped out of LA becuase both schools have stacks of guys with his speed that all stand over 6 ft
Now if UW joins a 7-7 conferecne look out! Between Mcgrew and the smurf crew WRs and Smiffs ability to dial up 60 passes a game we just might break .500
In general I agree with you, but you're not helping yourself with this one.
For the last two years (which shouldn't really be different than any other years) height of running backs is normally distributed around a mean of 5-10.22 and a SD of ± 1.72.
Assuming no correlation between quality and height (this is favorable to your argument), this means that about 68% of the best running backs should be between 5-8.5 and 6-0. And that only about 15% should be above 6-0 and below 5-8.5; Importantly it says that only .1% of the best backs should be below 5-7 and above 6-3.
Now, if you assume that the RBs that play correspond to the RBs recruited in height (again, favorable toward your argument), that means that the Pac-12s all time rushing leaders should be distributed evenly through those buckets.
It turns out that about 15% of the players on the top 50 list are below 5-9; and 4% (2 players) are below 5-7. This is all while there's only 1 player above 6-3 on the list.
All of this is to say that what you find is that there doesn't seem to be any particular relationship between height and top-end performance once kids get scholarships. So, McGrew's being 5-7 (or whatever he is) shouldn't concern you any more than getting a kid 6-3.5 should.
Now... this is just opinion, but... I'd like to go one step further. My guess is that many people are biased against short people for playing time, etc. and they don't get the opportunity to play unless they are particularly good.
In the end, here's the rub... there's no evidence that says that, given he was offered a scholarship by many power 5 schools, that he will be any worse than anyone else.
-
All you fucking fleenor types evaluating our offense seem to forget that Myles fucking Gaskin is returning next season
-
Yeah if McGrew gets 10 touches a game i'm good. Gaskin is too fucking good and proven to not ride all year. Sprinkle in some Pablo aka find a few ways to let him touch it in space and see what happens.PostGameOrangeSlices said:All you fucking fleenor types evaluating our offense seem to forget that Myles fucking Gaskin is returning next season
I have no faith in Smith to figure it out, but the lack of weapons excuse is not going to fly in year 3.
The OL will be better. The QB will be better. The receivers only lost Mickens and Hall (gain Ross, will be better). TE has Daniels who is on pace to earn the Marcel Reece Future Pro Bowler with Zero Collegiate Impact Award. And you have the best RB not named Freeman in the Pac.
To simplify, I see experienced beef in the trenches, a cerebral QB under center, and speed speed speed at the skill positions.
The OC in year 3 @ Washington needs to be better than average with what WE have, let alone LAST like it's been 2 years in a row. -
I'm not worried about how tall a running back is as long as he's fucking good. McGrew is fucking good. That said, the one question with him is how does Smiff carve a role for him in an offense that already has Gaskin and Chico McClatcher.
McGrew won't be as good as Gaskin between the tackles, but he's faster and a better receiving option. But then he also won't be as good as a receiving option as Chico, and probably won't be the preferred option on the jet sweeps due to Chico having a lot more lateral quickness and elusiveness.
So it's really up to our autistic OC to figure out how to work him into the offense without sacrificing touches that would be better given to Gaskin/Chico. We'll see how that goes... -
You seem to be forgetting that our offensive f coordinator is coming back as well and that we had Gaskin this year.PostGameOrangeSlices said:All you fucking fleenor types evaluating our offense seem to forget that Myles fucking Gaskin is returning next season
-
Everyone coming back should be getting better.Dennis_DeYoung said:
You seem to be forgetting that our offensive f coordinator is coming back as well and that we had Gaskin this year.PostGameOrangeSlices said:All you fucking fleenor types evaluating our offense seem to forget that Myles fucking Gaskin is returning next season
And you seem to forgot every fucking offensive play call Smith makes goes through Pete. So if you want to blame anyone, blame him. Our offense sucked mostly because we started a freshman qb with mediocre receivers.
There were some coaching staff failures (wild swede), but things got better as the year went on. I think our o-line, running game, and defense is going to be so dominant next year we could win 10 games with fucking Lundy or magna.
