Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

No offense but....

I like the current defensive commits - assuming they all sign and qualify. The recruits on the offensive side of the ball appear weak. No?
«1

Comments

  • CokeGreaterThanPepsi
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646
    Mcgrew is awesome, so is Wattenberg, I like Gadd.... The rest, yeah.
  • Mcgrew is awesome, so is Wattenberg, I like Gadd.... The rest, yeah.

    this gives me life
  • AIRWOLF
    AIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840
    How about we just admit we have no real clue.

    People harped on Dissly, and it turned out he can play.

    Ben Burr-Kirven was a punchline, until he looked like Pat Tillman as a freshman.

    Oh, those guys are defensive players...umm, carry on...
  • NeGgaPlEaSe
    NeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 5,757
    Baseman said:

    I like the current defensive commits - assuming they all sign and qualify. The recruits on the offensive side of the ball appear weak. No?

    And what's the problem?
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,739 Founders Club

    devildawg said:

    Dissly can play? Where? The kid got passed by and now splitting time at TE going into his JR. year

    Good chance he never starts at UW

    Gadd was a reach
    Chin and Fuller....need I say more?
    Kizer is a slug he's years away from just a blocking TE
    Mcgrew is Chico 2.0 nice role guy who will have a few higlight reel plays but not a feature tailback...if he was he wouldn't have gotten out of So Cal without a fight
    I Like Wattenburg the other kid is another reach

    The D is stacked,well coached with more on the way
    The weakness of this team is offense and they brought in nothing that helps them next year

    Oh and they whiffed on Eason

    Take a look at the pic of Chin with the Bush and Smiff and ask yourself if that kid and those two coaches are upper echelon power 5 players/coaches?

    Pease was fired hopefully Pete shit cans Smiff after his 10-11 win D ends up with 8-9 wins next year and that's IF nobody gets hurt

    I'm surprised at the amount of doogery here about our offensive class. It sucks dick. We have two players that anyone else wanted. Two.

    On defense, pretty much everyone was highly recruited.

    So, not only does our offensive coaching suck, our offensive recruiting sucks.

    My standards are Rose Bowls. Do we think this class is good enough to win a Rose Bowl on O? Fuck to the fuck no.
    This.
  • Baseman
    Baseman Member Posts: 12,369

    Baseman said:

    I like the current defensive commits - assuming they all sign and qualify. The recruits on the offensive side of the ball appear weak. No?

    And what's the problem?
    7-6
    4-5
  • Baseman
    Baseman Member Posts: 12,369

    Baseman said:

    Baseman said:

    I like the current defensive commits - assuming they all sign and qualify. The recruits on the offensive side of the ball appear weak. No?

    And what's the problem?
    7-6
    4-5
    I guess I missed the point were this years defensive recruiting affects last years record
    No specific point - just wondering how this team ever climbs out of perpetual mediocrity.

    On paper, this year's class looks like

    Defense: 10+ wins
    Offense: 5 wins
  • AIRWOLF
    AIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840
    edited January 2016
    devildawg said:

    Dissly can play? Where? The kid got passed by and now splitting time at TE going into his JR. year

    Good chance he never starts at UW

    Ha. I should have said he can play some. I just meant that by not being buried in the depth his first two years he exceeded expectations.

    My point, which you clearly missed, is that even the "extreme reaches" on the defensive side have been shown to be guys with some real ability. Not so on offense.

    Clearly the defensive recruiting has been far better than on the offensive side of the ball.

    But in terms of position groups, only WR stands out on the downside.

    QB: B+
    RB: B+
    OL: B-
    TE: C-
    WR: F

    It all blends to like a C overall, which is nowhere near the defensive side of the ball. Nor is it close to good enough.

  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,035 Standard Supporter
    @AIRWOLF: TE will never get above a C when we only target them 2-3x a game. We chronically under-use them. They disappeared altogether under Willingham, and haven't been properly used ever since. Even ASJ was chronically underutilized.
  • Baseman
    Baseman Member Posts: 12,369
    AIRWOLF said:

    devildawg said:

    Dissly can play? Where? The kid got passed by and now splitting time at TE going into his JR. year

    Good chance he never starts at UW

    Ha. I should have said he can play some. I just meant that by not being buried in the depth his first two years he exceeded expectations.

    My point, which you clearly missed, is that even the "extreme reaches" on the defensive side have been shown to be guys with some real ability. Not so on offense.

    Clearly the defensive recruiting has been far better than on the offensive side of the ball.

    But in terms of position groups, only WR stands out on the downside.

    QB: B
    RB: B+
    OL: C-
    TE: C-
    WR: F

    It all blends to like a C overall, which is nowhere near the defensive side of the ball. Nor is it close to good enough.

    Doogs doog
  • Baseman
    Baseman Member Posts: 12,369

    Mcgrew is awesome, so is Wattenberg, I like Gadd.... The rest, yeah.

    this gives me life
    image

    DJ gave you death
  • FremontTroll
    FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744

    @AIRWOLF: TE will never get above a C when we only target them 2-3x a game. We chronically under-use them. They disappeared altogether under Willingham, and haven't been properly used ever since. Even ASJ was chronically underutilized.

    Then apparently everyone chronically underutilized the TE.

    ASJ led the PAC in receptions for a TE in 2011, led the nation 2012, 2nd in PAC 2013 despite being a lazy POS.

    Perkins led the PAC in receiving yards for a TE this year while Daniels was 6th.
  • NEsnake12
    NEsnake12 Member Posts: 3,795

    @AIRWOLF: TE will never get above a C when we only target them 2-3x a game. We chronically under-use them. They disappeared altogether under Willingham, and haven't been properly used ever since. Even ASJ was chronically underutilized.

    Then apparently everyone chronically underutilized the TE.

    ASJ led the PAC in receptions for a TE in 2011, led the nation 2012, 2nd in PAC 2013 despite being a lazy POS.

    Perkins led the PAC in receiving yards for a TE this year while Daniels was 6th.
    Yeah you can't say we underutilize the TE when the best one in the nation (OJ Howard) had less than 400 yards receiving and 0 TDs before the title game. He basically won Bama that game when they got him the ball.
  • Dennis_DeYoung
    Dennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    NEsnake12 said:

    @AIRWOLF: TE will never get above a C when we only target them 2-3x a game. We chronically under-use them. They disappeared altogether under Willingham, and haven't been properly used ever since. Even ASJ was chronically underutilized.

    Then apparently everyone chronically underutilized the TE.

    ASJ led the PAC in receptions for a TE in 2011, led the nation 2012, 2nd in PAC 2013 despite being a lazy POS.

    Perkins led the PAC in receiving yards for a TE this year while Daniels was 6th.
    Yeah you can't say we underutilize the TE when the best one in the nation (OJ Howard) had less than 400 yards receiving and 0 TDs before the title game. He basically won Bama that game when they got him the ball.
    image
  • devildawg
    devildawg Member Posts: 67

    devildawg said:


    Mcgrew is Chico 2.0 nice role guy who will have a few higlight reel plays but not a feature tailback...if he was he wouldn't have gotten out of So Cal without a fight

    You clearly haven't watched more than 5 seconds of McGrew's tape.

    devildawg said:


    Mcgrew is Chico 2.0 nice role guy who will have a few higlight reel plays but not a feature tailback...if he was he wouldn't have gotten out of So Cal without a fight

    You clearly haven't watched more than 5 seconds of McGrew's tape.

    devildawg said:


    Mcgrew is Chico 2.0 nice role guy who will have a few higlight reel plays but not a feature tailback...if he was he wouldn't have gotten out of So Cal without a fight

    You clearly haven't watched more than 5 seconds of McGrew's tape.

    devildawg said:


    Mcgrew is Chico 2.0 nice role guy who will have a few higlight reel plays but not a feature tailback...if he was he wouldn't have gotten out of So Cal without a fight

    You clearly haven't watched more than 5 seconds of McGrew's tape.

    devildawg said:


    Mcgrew is Chico 2.0 nice role guy who will have a few higlight reel plays but not a feature tailback...if he was he wouldn't have gotten out of So Cal without a fight

    You clearly haven't watched more than 5 seconds of McGrew's tape.

    devildawg said:


    Mcgrew is Chico 2.0 nice role guy who will have a few higlight reel plays but not a feature tailback...if he was he wouldn't have gotten out of So Cal without a fight

    You clearly haven't watched more than 5 seconds of McGrew's tape.

    devildawg said:


    Mcgrew is Chico 2.0 nice role guy who will have a few higlight reel plays but not a feature tailback...if he was he wouldn't have gotten out of So Cal without a fight

    You clearly haven't watched more than 5 seconds of McGrew's tape.

    devildawg said:


    Mcgrew is Chico 2.0 nice role guy who will have a few higlight reel plays but not a feature tailback...if he was he wouldn't have gotten out of So Cal without a fight

    You clearly haven't watched more than 5 seconds of McGrew's tape.

    devildawg said:


    Mcgrew is Chico 2.0 nice role guy who will have a few higlight reel plays but not a feature tailback...if he was he wouldn't have gotten out of So Cal without a fight

    You clearly haven't watched more than 5 seconds of McGrew's tape.

    devildawg said:


    Mcgrew is Chico 2.0 nice role guy who will have a few higlight reel plays but not a feature tailback...if he was he wouldn't have gotten out of So Cal without a fight

    You clearly haven't watched more than 5 seconds of McGrew's tape.
    I watched the kid play all summer in the 7-7 tournaments

    I talked to the kid while he watched our Wa team play in Vegas..he was very interested in watching Eason throw the ball! Like I Said he's going to be a weapon but hes 5-6 160lbs he's not a feature tailback...at least not the next few years.I just don't see a big enough frame for the kid to carry more than 180-185lbs which is fine just not at tailback

    They needed to pick up a top flight ball carrier in this class IMO

  • Baseman
    Baseman Member Posts: 12,369
    devildawg said:

    devildawg said:


    Mcgrew is Chico 2.0 nice role guy who will have a few higlight reel plays but not a feature tailback...if he was he wouldn't have gotten out of So Cal without a fight

    You clearly haven't watched more than 5 seconds of McGrew's tape.

    devildawg said:


    Mcgrew is Chico 2.0 nice role guy who will have a few higlight reel plays but not a feature tailback...if he was he wouldn't have gotten out of So Cal without a fight

    You clearly haven't watched more than 5 seconds of McGrew's tape.

    devildawg said:


    Mcgrew is Chico 2.0 nice role guy who will have a few higlight reel plays but not a feature tailback...if he was he wouldn't have gotten out of So Cal without a fight

    You clearly haven't watched more than 5 seconds of McGrew's tape.

    devildawg said:


    Mcgrew is Chico 2.0 nice role guy who will have a few higlight reel plays but not a feature tailback...if he was he wouldn't have gotten out of So Cal without a fight

    You clearly haven't watched more than 5 seconds of McGrew's tape.

    devildawg said:


    Mcgrew is Chico 2.0 nice role guy who will have a few higlight reel plays but not a feature tailback...if he was he wouldn't have gotten out of So Cal without a fight

    You clearly haven't watched more than 5 seconds of McGrew's tape.

    devildawg said:


    Mcgrew is Chico 2.0 nice role guy who will have a few higlight reel plays but not a feature tailback...if he was he wouldn't have gotten out of So Cal without a fight

    You clearly haven't watched more than 5 seconds of McGrew's tape.

    devildawg said:


    Mcgrew is Chico 2.0 nice role guy who will have a few higlight reel plays but not a feature tailback...if he was he wouldn't have gotten out of So Cal without a fight

    You clearly haven't watched more than 5 seconds of McGrew's tape.

    devildawg said:


    Mcgrew is Chico 2.0 nice role guy who will have a few higlight reel plays but not a feature tailback...if he was he wouldn't have gotten out of So Cal without a fight

    You clearly haven't watched more than 5 seconds of McGrew's tape.

    devildawg said:


    Mcgrew is Chico 2.0 nice role guy who will have a few higlight reel plays but not a feature tailback...if he was he wouldn't have gotten out of So Cal without a fight

    You clearly haven't watched more than 5 seconds of McGrew's tape.

    devildawg said:


    Mcgrew is Chico 2.0 nice role guy who will have a few higlight reel plays but not a feature tailback...if he was he wouldn't have gotten out of So Cal without a fight

    You clearly haven't watched more than 5 seconds of McGrew's tape.
    I watched the kid play all summer in the 7-7 tournaments

    I talked to the kid while he watched our Wa team play in Vegas..he was very interested in watching Eason throw the ball! Like I Said he's going to be a weapon but hes 5-6 160lbs he's not a feature tailback...at least not the next few years.I just don't see a big enough frame for the kid to carry more than 180-185lbs which is fine just not at tailback

    They needed to pick up a top flight ball carrier in this class IMO

    Is this your clever way of saying you watched almost 50 seconds of Mcgrews tape?
  • FremontTroll
    FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744
    devildawg said:

    devildawg said:


    Mcgrew is Chico 2.0 nice role guy who will have a few higlight reel plays but not a feature tailback...if he was he wouldn't have gotten out of So Cal without a fight

    You clearly haven't watched more than 5 seconds of McGrew's tape.

    devildawg said:


    Mcgrew is Chico 2.0 nice role guy who will have a few higlight reel plays but not a feature tailback...if he was he wouldn't have gotten out of So Cal without a fight

    You clearly haven't watched more than 5 seconds of McGrew's tape.

    devildawg said:


    Mcgrew is Chico 2.0 nice role guy who will have a few higlight reel plays but not a feature tailback...if he was he wouldn't have gotten out of So Cal without a fight

    You clearly haven't watched more than 5 seconds of McGrew's tape.

    devildawg said:


    Mcgrew is Chico 2.0 nice role guy who will have a few higlight reel plays but not a feature tailback...if he was he wouldn't have gotten out of So Cal without a fight

    You clearly haven't watched more than 5 seconds of McGrew's tape.

    devildawg said:


    Mcgrew is Chico 2.0 nice role guy who will have a few higlight reel plays but not a feature tailback...if he was he wouldn't have gotten out of So Cal without a fight

    You clearly haven't watched more than 5 seconds of McGrew's tape.

    devildawg said:


    Mcgrew is Chico 2.0 nice role guy who will have a few higlight reel plays but not a feature tailback...if he was he wouldn't have gotten out of So Cal without a fight

    You clearly haven't watched more than 5 seconds of McGrew's tape.

    devildawg said:


    Mcgrew is Chico 2.0 nice role guy who will have a few higlight reel plays but not a feature tailback...if he was he wouldn't have gotten out of So Cal without a fight

    You clearly haven't watched more than 5 seconds of McGrew's tape.

    devildawg said:


    Mcgrew is Chico 2.0 nice role guy who will have a few higlight reel plays but not a feature tailback...if he was he wouldn't have gotten out of So Cal without a fight

    You clearly haven't watched more than 5 seconds of McGrew's tape.

    devildawg said:


    Mcgrew is Chico 2.0 nice role guy who will have a few higlight reel plays but not a feature tailback...if he was he wouldn't have gotten out of So Cal without a fight

    You clearly haven't watched more than 5 seconds of McGrew's tape.

    devildawg said:


    Mcgrew is Chico 2.0 nice role guy who will have a few higlight reel plays but not a feature tailback...if he was he wouldn't have gotten out of So Cal without a fight

    You clearly haven't watched more than 5 seconds of McGrew's tape.
    I watched the kid play all summer in the 7-7 tournaments

    I talked to the kid while he watched our Wa team play in Vegas..he was very interested in watching Eason throw the ball! Like I Said he's going to be a weapon but hes 5-6 160lbs he's not a feature tailback...at least not the next few years.I just don't see a big enough frame for the kid to carry more than 180-185lbs which is fine just not at tailback

    They needed to pick up a top flight ball carrier in this class IMO

    LOL.

    GreenRiverGatorz you've obviously never heard of the devildawg. This is his MO:

    1. Trash UW recruits and coaches with poorly reasoned and emotional arguments.

    2. When rebutted with facts appeal to his own authority as a high school assistant coach and vague stories about recent recruiting happenings

    3. Refuse to actually put his name behind his assertions despite the fact that he just cited to his supposed connections and inside knowledge in an attempt to bolster his weak argument.

    Good luck and have fun!
  • SilkyJohnston
    SilkyJohnston Member Posts: 67
    Napoleon Kaufman was 5-7 and like 150 pounds as a high school senior. He rushed for over 1,000 yards his sophomore year at 135 pounds. He played at 180 pounds in the NFL so that weight is, in fact, fine for a tailback. McGrew is going to be a stud.
  • devildawg
    devildawg Member Posts: 67
    Agree Dennis!

    Lotta coaches are fucking idiots! I've always chuckled with the Trolls obsession over my supposed "insider" status or my claim of superior knowledge becuase I coach high school football?

    Self employed business owner who donates my time for free to help out coaching 15-18 year old stoners....nothing fucking glamoures about it.

    Mcgrew is a midget he's also fast,with great feet he's going to make some plays I just don't think it will be with 15-20 carries a game at tailback and don't bring up Nip that's just retarded he was a once a decade back and one of the best high school players in the country! Mcgrew just a little guy who slipped out of LA becuase both schools have stacks of guys with his speed that all stand over 6 ft

    Now if UW joins a 7-7 conferecne look out! Between Mcgrew and the smurf crew WRs and Smiffs ability to dial up 60 passes a game we just might break .500
  • FremontTroll
    FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744
    edited January 2016
    devildawg said:

    Agree Dennis!

    Lotta coaches are fucking idiots! I've always chuckled with the Trolls obsession over my supposed "insider" status or my claim of superior knowledge becuase I coach high school football?

    Self employed business owner who donates my time for free to help out coaching 15-18 year old stoners....nothing fucking glamoures about it.

    Mcgrew is a midget he's also fast,with great feet he's going to make some plays I just don't think it will be with 15-20 carries a game at tailback and don't bring up Nip that's just retarded he was a once a decade back and one of the best high school players in the country! Mcgrew just a little guy who slipped out of LA becuase both schools have stacks of guys with his speed that all stand over 6 ft

    Now if UW joins a 7-7 conferecne look out! Between Mcgrew and the smurf crew WRs and Smiffs ability to dial up 60 passes a game we just might break .500

    Stop citing to your position and connections in every argument as if it makes you an expert and I will end my "obsession."
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320

    When Petersen talks about the defense he uses words and phrases like effort, being physical, playing hard... His quotes on offense are mostly about scheme, philosophy, details... It's always been kind of irritating Fuck guys, it's just so irritating. Most of the players on defense are dawgs with feces in their throats. They play with emotion and fire. Most of the players on offense are nice kids.

    Thankfully, the offense should be a lot better. I was encouraged by the end of the year. It's still a concern though. I still remember the pass happy bullshit and when even the doogliest doogs on this board wanted Smith fired.

    I'm a fan of McGrew and think he will be good, but you can't guarantee a guy 5'6" 160 can play RB because Napolean Kaufman and Jaquizz Rodgers were also small. There aren't many good RB's that small. McGrew's speed and lateral quickness are incredible, but he's going to need to be properly utilized and he might not be a RB.

    I'm still in lipo mode on his size. Darren Sproles is probably a better comparison for El Blanco, and look what he did in college:

    Collegiate statistics
    Year Team Games Attempts Yards YPA TDs Long
    2001 Kansas State 6 28 210 7.5 1 38
    2002 Kansas State 13 237 1,465 6.2 17 80
    2003 Kansas State 15 306 1,986 6.5 16 73
    2004 Kansas State 11 244 1,318 5.4 11 74
    Career 45 815 4,979 6.1 45 80

    Not saying he will--don't twist--but if he has the quickness and speed then I can't see why he wouldn't be able to take 150-225 carries by the time he's a junior.
  • devildawg
    devildawg Member Posts: 67

    devildawg said:

    Agree Dennis!

    Lotta coaches are fucking idiots! I've always chuckled with the Trolls obsession over my supposed "insider" status or my claim of superior knowledge becuase I coach high school football?

    Self employed business owner who donates my time for free to help out coaching 15-18 year old stoners....nothing fucking glamoures about it.

    Mcgrew is a midget he's also fast,with great feet he's going to make some plays I just don't think it will be with 15-20 carries a game at tailback and don't bring up Nip that's just retarded he was a once a decade back and one of the best high school players in the country! Mcgrew just a little guy who slipped out of LA becuase both schools have stacks of guys with his speed that all stand over 6 ft

    Now if UW joins a 7-7 conferecne look out! Between Mcgrew and the smurf crew WRs and Smiffs ability to dial up 60 passes a game we just might break .500

    Stop citing to your position and connections in every argument as if it makes you an expert and I will end my "obsession."
    What the fuck are you arguing troll? I said Mcgrew is a little dude! I've stood right next to the kid are you arguing that he's big? There is no argument here it's just a conversation that you want to turn into an argument...your name suits you troll! Really just ignore my post or shut the fuck up!

    Told ha before PM me! At this point I'd love to see you after practice come on out troll wtf?