Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Shades of Sark

12346»

Comments

  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,388 Standard Supporter
    Why are you guys pretending this was David vs Goliath? It wasn't. Clemson was undefeated and ranked #1 for a reason. They are good and have the best QB in the country. They lost because they were severely out coached.

    I don't know how you couldn't be furious if you were a Clemson fan. I just don't see Saban or Meyer's teams blowing coverages that badly and being so ill prepared on special teams. That is typically something average and shitty teams do, not ones in the title game. But by all means, keep giving Dabo back slaps and orange slices for a good effort.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lOL2h8F3aA
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    Dude, take your pills and relax, it's over.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,388 Standard Supporter
    doogsinparadise said:

    Dude, take your pills and relax, it's over.

    I'm jacked up bruh
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,919
    RoadDawg55 said:

    doogsinparadise said:

    Soft?

    Didn't make plays when it mattered.
    Kreist. Go back to 'hooking.



    It suits you better.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,388 Standard Supporter
    salemcoog said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    doogsinparadise said:

    Soft?

    Didn't make plays when it mattered.
    Kreist. Go back to 'hooking.



    It suits you better.
    I will on Sunday. My hooks are winners.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,919
    dnc said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    dnc said:

    Doogles said:

    I don't think Clemson played soft, but I had the thought that Dabo's general heart on the slave antics were Sarkish. He was bitching and whining the whole game. His players believe in him, which is more than I can say for Sark, but there is a lot of sizzle with Dabo.

    He would never do better than 7-6 at Washington.

    Surely you don't think Clemson is a job where a 7 win coach at UW can win 13 games?

    Dabo might not win a title here but he could win double digits rather easily. He's not a great coach but he doesn't suck.
    lulz at the idea that Clemson isn't an ACC Washington. The team history is basically exactly the same. They've had ONE natty team ('81) and have gone up/down the rungs of good mediocrity sometimes having runs where they are consistently in the top 25.

    I'm not a big Dabo guy, but what he's done is undeniable IMO. He took a program that was being run by a Sark-like guy (Tommy B.) and built this shit into a space where we were in a Natty and are poised to be really fucking good next year.
    Exactly. Very similar program profiles.
    'cept for the trajectory and 25 year difference.


    Spot on.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,495 Founders Club
    I'm ruling in favor of Road on this one. Is it harsh to say Dabo sucked while he had his unbeaten squad contend valiantly for the title? Yes it is but some of you need to check what bored you are on. Just about every team and coach sucks.

    If that had been our DAWGS we would have been pissed. Old half brain law - special teams are on the head coach. We got that from James. So did Saban. So that is on Dabo and he got worked hard on special teams. Announcers said they had issues all year.

    We would hate our secondary too. Anyone remember the Holiday Bowl against Texas? At least our guys were in the same area code when they got burnt to a crisp.

    Dawgman would be saying how proud they are of our DAWGS for the fight. Hardcore Husky would want Petersen fired.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter