Questions for fellow TBS'ers
1) Will Kent Love stick with us or flip to USC?
2) Do we really have a shot at Juarez or is he more of a Reuben Foster that we'll lose to 'Bama and great Southern coffee?
3) Who is this OG Hellbus that was committed to Stanford and now we may land him?
4) Any news on the WRs? We need a WR that's at least 6 feet in this class.
5) Any videos to any of them working out with their shirts off? (I kid, I kid).
Comments
-
1) Will Kent Love stick with us or flip to USC? flip. Bark 4 sark
2) Do we really have a shot at Juarez or is he more of a Reuben Foster that we'll lose to 'Bama and great Southern coffee? no shot. You don't turn down Saban(god)
3) Who is this OG Hellbus that was committed to Stanford and now we may land him? nope. He'll test the watrers and re-up with 'Furd.
4) Any news on the WRs? We need a WR that's at least 6 feet in this class. no news. Not a bumper crop year for WR.
5) Any videos to any of them working out with their shirts off? (I kid, I kid). no you're not
-
1) Probably stick unless we somehow pull in David Long or Byron Murphy, then he might reconsider.
2) Actually think we have an actual shot here, his parents want him to stay in LA but UW seems to be his clear favorite for schools outside LA based on his twitter.
3) Solid player who wasn't on the radar cause of his Stanford commit, definitely worth adding to the class now that we have an extra slot (thanks Dwayne).
4) McKinley and Crawford are high 4* guys we're after but I don't think we land either. Notre Dame seems a lock for McKinley and Crawford seems to love Michigan. I think our best bet is flipping Chris Taylor-Yamanoha from Louisville when he visits in a couple weeks. He isn't as good as the first 2 but still better than Aaron Fuller by a wide margin, and is 6'2 as well.
5)
https://youtu.be/18sqT7P8tDA?t=2m24s
-
HFNY said:
Haven't been all that tuned in (what's new?) for this month so hoping to get some free info on here:
1) Will Kent Love stick with us or flip to USC? Stick
2) Do we really have a shot at Juarez or is he more of a Reuben Foster that we'll lose to 'Bama and great Southern coffee?
19%. Sounds like it's us or UCLA. Rashard Lawrence is this year's foster. DT from Louisiana. We may or may not get a UW hat on the table. Free pub!
3) Who is this OG Hellbus that was committed to Stanford and now we may land him? Likely lands at UW. Speculation that a current o lineman will retire, freeing a spot.
4) Any news on the WRs? We need a WR that's at least 6 feet in this class.
Some hyphen kid. Not getting McKinley.
5) Any videos to any of them working out with their shirts off? (I kid, I kid). -
Kent Love should stick ... USC is a mess in my mind and going there is going on a ship that is treading water whereas we're definitely on the rise. Regardless of whether we get Long or not, you can't have enough guys that can play pass defense with the way football is trending, particularly in the PAC.
I honestly do think that we have a shot at Mique Juarez for a couple of reasons. First, as I mentioned with USC being a bit of a mess defensively, I think similar things with UCLA. I'm sure I'm in the minority, but I'm not convinced that Mora is at UCLA next year. He looked a little checked out during the game against Nebraska and I could see him trying to get into the NFL ... particularly before the luster of his mediocrity becomes painfully obvious at UCLA. I do think that he wants one last shot at proving that his lack of NFL success was a fluke. Second, I think Juarez is the kind of kid that can come in and not only be a legit contributor right away, he seems smart enough to know that if he's going to be in school 3 or 4 years tops, he wants to go to a school that is in a position to be competing at the national level. I know for some on this board, they may not see that out of Washington right now, but it's really right there. I think a kid like Juarez sees this. I'm going to doog and say that we land him ... but I definitely think it's a far greater shot than probably some others who don't think we can land this type of kid think.
If Stanford wanted a OL, then he's probably pretty good. I don't need to go look at too much tape to figure that out. I'm sure that we'll always be in the market to take a good OL. Perhaps @Dennis_DeYoung can point you in the direction of an OL in this class that we currently have a verbal from that this kid could be a small upgrade over.
I personally think that we need 2 more WRs in this class ... both bigger types. McKinley is probably more of a coin flip between ND and UW at this point. If he heads to ND, he's probably just one of the guys right away. At UW, he may step right in and be one of our better players. This will be a real interesting area to watch over the next month as ditching Pease could pay some fairly significant dividends. -
Oh Tommie, there you go again. You know, it's ok to admit you were wrong....better that than being an idiot by sticking to PETERSEN SUCKS!!!!1@!!@1 simply because you said it earlier in the year.ThomasFremont said:
1) Will Kent Love stick with us or flip to USC? flip. Bark 4 sark
2) Do we really have a shot at Juarez or is he more of a Reuben Foster that we'll lose to 'Bama and great Southern coffee? no shot. You don't turn down Saban(god)
3) Who is this OG Hellbus that was committed to Stanford and now we may land him? nope. He'll test the watrers and re-up with 'Furd.
4) Any news on the WRs? We need a WR that's at least 6 feet in this class. no news. Not a bumper crop year for WR.
5) Any videos to any of them working out with their shirts off? (I kid, I kid). no you're not -
Thanks for that.
I wonder what happened with Steffon McKnight. He was a midrange 4 star at one point but then dropped a star down to 86 and doesn't seem to have scheduled any visits. Grades?Tequilla said:Kent Love should stick ... USC is a mess in my mind and going there is going on a ship that is treading water whereas we're definitely on the rise. Regardless of whether we get Long or not, you can't have enough guys that can play pass defense with the way football is trending, particularly in the PAC.
I honestly do think that we have a shot at Mique Juarez for a couple of reasons. First, as I mentioned with USC being a bit of a mess defensively, I think similar things with UCLA. I'm sure I'm in the minority, but I'm not convinced that Mora is at UCLA next year. He looked a little checked out during the game against Nebraska and I could see him trying to get into the NFL ... particularly before the luster of his mediocrity becomes painfully obvious at UCLA. I do think that he wants one last shot at proving that his lack of NFL success was a fluke. Second, I think Juarez is the kind of kid that can come in and not only be a legit contributor right away, he seems smart enough to know that if he's going to be in school 3 or 4 years tops, he wants to go to a school that is in a position to be competing at the national level. I know for some on this board, they may not see that out of Washington right now, but it's really right there. I think a kid like Juarez sees this. I'm going to doog and say that we land him ... but I definitely think it's a far greater shot than probably some others who don't think we can land this type of kid think.
If Stanford wanted a OL, then he's probably pretty good. I don't need to go look at too much tape to figure that out. I'm sure that we'll always be in the market to take a good OL. Perhaps @Dennis_DeYoung can point you in the direction of an OL in this class that we currently have a verbal from that this kid could be a small upgrade over.
I personally think that we need 2 more WRs in this class ... both bigger types. McKinley is probably more of a coin flip between ND and UW at this point. If he heads to ND, he's probably just one of the guys right away. At UW, he may step right in and be one of our better players. This will be a real interesting area to watch over the next month as ditching Pease could pay some fairly significant dividends. -
I was just wondering the same thing. He seemed high profile early in the year and named UW as his favorite... and then kinda fell off the face of the earth. No one has reported anything on him, no visits, twitter isn't giving off clues... could be grades.HFNY said:Thanks for that.
I wonder what happened with Steffon McKnight. He was a midrange 4 star at one point but then dropped a star down to 86 and doesn't seem to have scheduled any visits. Grades?
He's scrawny as hell and doesn't wow on tape though, so it's not like we're missing out on something great if he doesn't get his shit together.
-
When they don't even set up OVs it is always grades.HFNY said:Thanks for that.
I wonder what happened with Steffon McKnight. He was a midrange 4 star at one point but then dropped a star down to 86 and doesn't seem to have scheduled any visits. Grades?Tequilla said:Kent Love should stick ... USC is a mess in my mind and going there is going on a ship that is treading water whereas we're definitely on the rise. Regardless of whether we get Long or not, you can't have enough guys that can play pass defense with the way football is trending, particularly in the PAC.
I honestly do think that we have a shot at Mique Juarez for a couple of reasons. First, as I mentioned with USC being a bit of a mess defensively, I think similar things with UCLA. I'm sure I'm in the minority, but I'm not convinced that Mora is at UCLA next year. He looked a little checked out during the game against Nebraska and I could see him trying to get into the NFL ... particularly before the luster of his mediocrity becomes painfully obvious at UCLA. I do think that he wants one last shot at proving that his lack of NFL success was a fluke. Second, I think Juarez is the kind of kid that can come in and not only be a legit contributor right away, he seems smart enough to know that if he's going to be in school 3 or 4 years tops, he wants to go to a school that is in a position to be competing at the national level. I know for some on this board, they may not see that out of Washington right now, but it's really right there. I think a kid like Juarez sees this. I'm going to doog and say that we land him ... but I definitely think it's a far greater shot than probably some others who don't think we can land this type of kid think.
If Stanford wanted a OL, then he's probably pretty good. I don't need to go look at too much tape to figure that out. I'm sure that we'll always be in the market to take a good OL. Perhaps @Dennis_DeYoung can point you in the direction of an OL in this class that we currently have a verbal from that this kid could be a small upgrade over.
I personally think that we need 2 more WRs in this class ... both bigger types. McKinley is probably more of a coin flip between ND and UW at this point. If he heads to ND, he's probably just one of the guys right away. At UW, he may step right in and be one of our better players. This will be a real interesting area to watch over the next month as ditching Pease could pay some fairly significant dividends. -
What was I wrong about???HFNY said:Oh Tommie, there you go again. You know, it's ok to admit you were wrong....better that than being an idiot by sticking to PETERSEN SUCKS!!!!1@!!@1 simply because you said it earlier in the year.
ThomasFremont said:1) Will Kent Love stick with us or flip to USC? flip. Bark 4 sark
2) Do we really have a shot at Juarez or is he more of a Reuben Foster that we'll lose to 'Bama and great Southern coffee? no shot. You don't turn down Saban(god)
3) Who is this OG Hellbus that was committed to Stanford and now we may land him? nope. He'll test the watrers and re-up with 'Furd.
4) Any news on the WRs? We need a WR that's at least 6 feet in this class. no news. Not a bumper crop year for WR.
5) Any videos to any of them working out with their shirts off? (I kid, I kid). no you're not
Petersen DOES suck.
Or did 7-6 give you wood like Sark used to. -
It is amazing how often the old - play a batch of shitty teams at the end of the season - trick works.ThomasFremont said:
What was I wrong about???HFNY said:Oh Tommie, there you go again. You know, it's ok to admit you were wrong....better that than being an idiot by sticking to PETERSEN SUCKS!!!!1@!!@1 simply because you said it earlier in the year.
ThomasFremont said:1) Will Kent Love stick with us or flip to USC? flip. Bark 4 sark
2) Do we really have a shot at Juarez or is he more of a Reuben Foster that we'll lose to 'Bama and great Southern coffee? no shot. You don't turn down Saban(god)
3) Who is this OG Hellbus that was committed to Stanford and now we may land him? nope. He'll test the watrers and re-up with 'Furd.
4) Any news on the WRs? We need a WR that's at least 6 feet in this class. no news. Not a bumper crop year for WR.
5) Any videos to any of them working out with their shirts off? (I kid, I kid). no you're not
Petersen DOES suck.
Or did 7-6 give you wood like Sark used to. -
Wait, I thought winning games in November was speshul.RaceBannon said:
It is amazing how often the old - play a batch of shitty teams at the end of the season - trick works.ThomasFremont said:
What was I wrong about???HFNY said:Oh Tommie, there you go again. You know, it's ok to admit you were wrong....better that than being an idiot by sticking to PETERSEN SUCKS!!!!1@!!@1 simply because you said it earlier in the year.
ThomasFremont said:1) Will Kent Love stick with us or flip to USC? flip. Bark 4 sark
2) Do we really have a shot at Juarez or is he more of a Reuben Foster that we'll lose to 'Bama and great Southern coffee? no shot. You don't turn down Saban(god)
3) Who is this OG Hellbus that was committed to Stanford and now we may land him? nope. He'll test the watrers and re-up with 'Furd.
4) Any news on the WRs? We need a WR that's at least 6 feet in this class. no news. Not a bumper crop year for WR.
5) Any videos to any of them working out with their shirts off? (I kid, I kid). no you're not
Petersen DOES suck.
Or did 7-6 give you wood like Sark used to. -
Only if we* haven't tripped over our* dicks in September.pawz said:
Wait, I thought winning games in November was speshul.RaceBannon said:
It is amazing how often the old - play a batch of shitty teams at the end of the season - trick works.ThomasFremont said:
What was I wrong about???HFNY said:Oh Tommie, there you go again. You know, it's ok to admit you were wrong....better that than being an idiot by sticking to PETERSEN SUCKS!!!!1@!!@1 simply because you said it earlier in the year.
ThomasFremont said:1) Will Kent Love stick with us or flip to USC? flip. Bark 4 sark
2) Do we really have a shot at Juarez or is he more of a Reuben Foster that we'll lose to 'Bama and great Southern coffee? no shot. You don't turn down Saban(god)
3) Who is this OG Hellbus that was committed to Stanford and now we may land him? nope. He'll test the watrers and re-up with 'Furd.
4) Any news on the WRs? We need a WR that's at least 6 feet in this class. no news. Not a bumper crop year for WR.
5) Any videos to any of them working out with their shirts off? (I kid, I kid). no you're not
Petersen DOES suck.
Or did 7-6 give you wood like Sark used to. -
In your valiant attempt to remove bias from the discussion you've also eliminated any context or nuance.ThomasFremont said:
What was I wrong about???HFNY said:Oh Tommie, there you go again. You know, it's ok to admit you were wrong....better that than being an idiot by sticking to PETERSEN SUCKS!!!!1@!!@1 simply because you said it earlier in the year.
ThomasFremont said:1) Will Kent Love stick with us or flip to USC? flip. Bark 4 sark
2) Do we really have a shot at Juarez or is he more of a Reuben Foster that we'll lose to 'Bama and great Southern coffee? no shot. You don't turn down Saban(god)
3) Who is this OG Hellbus that was committed to Stanford and now we may land him? nope. He'll test the watrers and re-up with 'Furd.
4) Any news on the WRs? We need a WR that's at least 6 feet in this class. no news. Not a bumper crop year for WR.
5) Any videos to any of them working out with their shirts off? (I kid, I kid). no you're not
Petersen DOES suck.
Or did 7-6 give you wood like Sark used to.
HTH. -
Struggling against Southern Miss for 3+ qtrs is always special.RaceBannon said:
It is amazing how often the old - play a batch of shitty teams at the end of the season - trick works.ThomasFremont said:
What was I wrong about???HFNY said:Oh Tommie, there you go again. You know, it's ok to admit you were wrong....better that than being an idiot by sticking to PETERSEN SUCKS!!!!1@!!@1 simply because you said it earlier in the year.
ThomasFremont said:1) Will Kent Love stick with us or flip to USC? flip. Bark 4 sark
2) Do we really have a shot at Juarez or is he more of a Reuben Foster that we'll lose to 'Bama and great Southern coffee? no shot. You don't turn down Saban(god)
3) Who is this OG Hellbus that was committed to Stanford and now we may land him? nope. He'll test the watrers and re-up with 'Furd.
4) Any news on the WRs? We need a WR that's at least 6 feet in this class. no news. Not a bumper crop year for WR.
5) Any videos to any of them working out with their shirts off? (I kid, I kid). no you're not
Petersen DOES suck.
Or did 7-6 give you wood like Sark used to. -
No context or nuance changes an 8-10 conference record.FremontTroll said:
In your valiant attempt to remove bias from the discussion you've also eliminated any context or nuance.ThomasFremont said:
What was I wrong about???HFNY said:Oh Tommie, there you go again. You know, it's ok to admit you were wrong....better that than being an idiot by sticking to PETERSEN SUCKS!!!!1@!!@1 simply because you said it earlier in the year.
ThomasFremont said:1) Will Kent Love stick with us or flip to USC? flip. Bark 4 sark
2) Do we really have a shot at Juarez or is he more of a Reuben Foster that we'll lose to 'Bama and great Southern coffee? no shot. You don't turn down Saban(god)
3) Who is this OG Hellbus that was committed to Stanford and now we may land him? nope. He'll test the watrers and re-up with 'Furd.
4) Any news on the WRs? We need a WR that's at least 6 feet in this class. no news. Not a bumper crop year for WR.
5) Any videos to any of them working out with their shirts off? (I kid, I kid). no you're not
Petersen DOES suck.
Or did 7-6 give you wood like Sark used to.
HTH.
Fuck off. -
Praise Allah this thread saved me $10.95. I'll pay it forward in some way. Any ideas?
-
Looks like some of you hate facts.
-
So do you based on going 1 outta 5 in your answers to HFNY's questions.ThomasFremont said:Looks like some of you hate facts.
-
No, we just hate fags.ThomasFremont said:Looks like some of you hate facts.
-
WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH!!!FremontTroll said:
So do you based on going 1 outta 5 in your answers to HFNY's questions.ThomasFremont said:Looks like some of you hate facts.
I don't know or care about this TBS pedo shit.
That's the joke.
Try to keep up. -
Opponents' W/L record, excluding conf. champ. games and bowl games....RaceBannon said:
It is amazing how often the old - play a batch of shitty teams at the end of the season - trick works.ThomasFremont said:
What was I wrong about???HFNY said:Oh Tommie, there you go again. You know, it's ok to admit you were wrong....better that than being an idiot by sticking to PETERSEN SUCKS!!!!1@!!@1 simply because you said it earlier in the year.
ThomasFremont said:1) Will Kent Love stick with us or flip to USC? flip. Bark 4 sark
2) Do we really have a shot at Juarez or is he more of a Reuben Foster that we'll lose to 'Bama and great Southern coffee? no shot. You don't turn down Saban(god)
3) Who is this OG Hellbus that was committed to Stanford and now we may land him? nope. He'll test the watrers and re-up with 'Furd.
4) Any news on the WRs? We need a WR that's at least 6 feet in this class. no news. Not a bumper crop year for WR.
5) Any videos to any of them working out with their shirts off? (I kid, I kid). no you're not
Petersen DOES suck.
Or did 7-6 give you wood like Sark used to.
- First 6 games of the season: 40-31
- Last 6 games of the season: 40-32 -
Yeah no shit we noticed. Thanks for stopping by it was fun!ThomasFremont said:
WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH!!!FremontTroll said:
So do you based on going 1 outta 5 in your answers to HFNY's questions.ThomasFremont said:Looks like some of you hate facts.
I don't know or care about this TBS pedo shit.
That's the joke.
Try to keep up. -
We?FremontTroll said:
Yeah no shit we noticed. Thanks for stopping by it was fun!ThomasFremont said:
WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH!!!FremontTroll said:
So do you based on going 1 outta 5 in your answers to HFNY's questions.ThomasFremont said:Looks like some of you hate facts.
I don't know or care about this TBS pedo shit.
That's the joke.
Try to keep up. -
Oregon State, Washington State and Southern Miss have caused the annual breakout of hey we were 6-6 but we don't suck bullshit. WSU and So Miss have good records but are shitty teams.HuskyInAZ said:
Opponents' W/L record, excluding conf. champ. games and bowl games....RaceBannon said:
It is amazing how often the old - play a batch of shitty teams at the end of the season - trick works.ThomasFremont said:
What was I wrong about???HFNY said:Oh Tommie, there you go again. You know, it's ok to admit you were wrong....better that than being an idiot by sticking to PETERSEN SUCKS!!!!1@!!@1 simply because you said it earlier in the year.
ThomasFremont said:1) Will Kent Love stick with us or flip to USC? flip. Bark 4 sark
2) Do we really have a shot at Juarez or is he more of a Reuben Foster that we'll lose to 'Bama and great Southern coffee? no shot. You don't turn down Saban(god)
3) Who is this OG Hellbus that was committed to Stanford and now we may land him? nope. He'll test the watrers and re-up with 'Furd.
4) Any news on the WRs? We need a WR that's at least 6 feet in this class. no news. Not a bumper crop year for WR.
5) Any videos to any of them working out with their shirts off? (I kid, I kid). no you're not
Petersen DOES suck.
Or did 7-6 give you wood like Sark used to.
- First 6 games of the season: 40-31
- Last 6 games of the season: 40-32
We lost to every decent team we played and a couple shitty ones like Cal and ASU
But this 4-5 was better than last years 4-5 and Sark's run of going 5-4
If you're a doog and you are -
You sound upset. Why don't you take some time away from the computer.ThomasFremont said:
We?FremontTroll said:
Yeah no shit we noticed. Thanks for stopping by it was fun!ThomasFremont said:
WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH!!!FremontTroll said:
So do you based on going 1 outta 5 in your answers to HFNY's questions.ThomasFremont said:Looks like some of you hate facts.
I don't know or care about this TBS pedo shit.
That's the joke.
Try to keep up. -
huh?bananasnblondes said:
You sound upset. Why don't you take some time away from the computer.ThomasFremont said:
We?FremontTroll said:
Yeah no shit we noticed. Thanks for stopping by it was fun!ThomasFremont said:
WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH!!!FremontTroll said:
So do you based on going 1 outta 5 in your answers to HFNY's questions.ThomasFremont said:Looks like some of you hate facts.
I don't know or care about this TBS pedo shit.
That's the joke.
Try to keep up. -
I just swept up leaves off the back patio and gained some perspective. Petersen has done worse than Sark and all of this mythical great recruiting still looks like a bunch of skinny losers to this grizzled scribe.
That's the genesis of the whole SEC bit. You can't look at LSU and think UW belongs on the same field with them, let alone Bama.
If that isn't the goal then shut the fucking program down -
Yeah, me and the rest of the football team, duh.ThomasFremont said:
We?FremontTroll said:
Yeah no shit we noticed. Thanks for stopping by it was fun!ThomasFremont said:
WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH!!!FremontTroll said:
So do you based on going 1 outta 5 in your answers to HFNY's questions.ThomasFremont said:Looks like some of you hate facts.
I don't know or care about this TBS pedo shit.
That's the joke.
Try to keep up. -
Awesome'd for image of grizzled scribe sweeping leaves and gaining perspective.RaceBannon said:I just swept up leaves off the back patio and gained some perspective. Petersen has done worse than Sark and all of this mythical great recruiting still looks like a bunch of skinny losers to this grizzled scribe.
That's the genesis of the whole SEC bit. You can't look at LSU and think UW belongs on the same field with them, let alone Bama.
If that isn't the goal then shut the fucking program down -
The bigger point is that Tommie was leading the Petersen-Sucks-Fire-Him-ASAP crowd after the tough Oregon loss. Then he got louder after Magna Carta had to start the Stanford game, a team that is the best in the Pac-12.
But football, particularly the college game, can be a roller-coaster, especially considering that some key positions had true freshmen and other young guys starting. The old adage of you're never as good as you think you are and you're never as bad as you think you are definitely applied this year.
Again, I think some people would respect Tommie more if he admits he went overboard rather than clinging to the PETERSEN SUCKS!!!1!!@!!!!1!!!11!!!!! life-raft simply because he said it multiple times a few months ago.
As for 2016, UW has a great shot at being a 9 win regular season team next year...maybe even 10 wins if the chips fall right and the team avoids injury which would mean a 6-3 or 7-2 in-conference record which would be the best Pac-10 record since Skippy Neuheisel's 2001 campaign of 6-2.RaceBannon said:
Oregon State, Washington State and Southern Miss have caused the annual breakout of hey we were 6-6 but we don't suck bullshit. WSU and So Miss have good records but are shitty teams.HuskyInAZ said:
Opponents' W/L record, excluding conf. champ. games and bowl games....RaceBannon said:
It is amazing how often the old - play a batch of shitty teams at the end of the season - trick works.ThomasFremont said:
What was I wrong about???HFNY said:Oh Tommie, there you go again. You know, it's ok to admit you were wrong....better that than being an idiot by sticking to PETERSEN SUCKS!!!!1@!!@1 simply because you said it earlier in the year.
ThomasFremont said:1) Will Kent Love stick with us or flip to USC? flip. Bark 4 sark
2) Do we really have a shot at Juarez or is he more of a Reuben Foster that we'll lose to 'Bama and great Southern coffee? no shot. You don't turn down Saban(god)
3) Who is this OG Hellbus that was committed to Stanford and now we may land him? nope. He'll test the watrers and re-up with 'Furd.
4) Any news on the WRs? We need a WR that's at least 6 feet in this class. no news. Not a bumper crop year for WR.
5) Any videos to any of them working out with their shirts off? (I kid, I kid). no you're not
Petersen DOES suck.
Or did 7-6 give you wood like Sark used to.
- First 6 games of the season: 40-31
- Last 6 games of the season: 40-32
We lost to every decent team we played and a couple shitty ones like Cal and ASU
But this 4-5 was better than last years 4-5 and Sark's run of going 5-4
If you're a doog and you are
