What will the doogs be saying at 4-3
It is likely that UW will lose @Stanford, Oregon, and @ASU. There is the possibility of a couple plungers in there as well. If 4-3 happens, what will be the doogs battle cry? Will the maintain their "We were expected to lose these games, what more do you want?" attitude. Will they start the"do you want Willingham back?" chant or will they simply devolve to their usual "why don't you try coaching the team" routine? If the dawgs can somehow win a few games in the coming weeks it will be interesting, and if they don't it will be interesting.
Comments
-
"Look we just played three really good teams. At 0-12 in 2008 we would have killed to have played in these big games. Sark has this program turned around. We'll win out and go 9-3 and win the bowl game to be 10-3. Sometimes you have to face adversity before you can go forward. Don James didn't go undefeated every single season like some of you guys unrealistically expect.
To expect a Rose Bowl or a National Title every season after 0-12 is just ridiculous. Some of you guys really need to let it play out. We are lucky that Sark still coaches here and should be honored he took out us out of the 0-12 hole." - Kim -
At the danger of sounding like a doog, what have you seen that establishes a cuntry mile between UW and UCLA? I'm as pro Mora as anyone anywhere, but IMO both teams have looked equally good/not yet great. What am I missing?
-
You'll hear all those excuses.bananasnblondes said:UW is 4-0 right now so you're not allowed to say anything remotely suggesting that the dawgs might not be as good as Alabama or you are a miserable loser who just wants Sark to fail so you can be right. Despite being 4-0 for the first time in over a decade, UW's onfield performance has firmly cemented them as the 4th or 5th best looking team in the Pac with a country mile between them and Oregon/Stanford/UCLA.
It is likely that UW will lose @Stanford, Oregon, and @ASU. There is the possibility of a couple plungers in there as well. If 4-3 happens, what will be the doogs battle cry? Will the maintain their "We were expected to lose these games, what more do you want?" attitude. Will they start the"do you want Willingham back?" chant or will they simply devolve to their usual "why don't you try coaching the team" routine? If the dawgs can somehow win a few games in the coming weeks it will be interesting, and if they don't it will be interesting. -
Mora is in year 2. Sark is in year 5. Mora is recruiting linemen like they are baseball cards. Sark avoids linemen like the plague. Even if things have looked comparable so far, they are not actually comparable.dnc said:At the danger of sounding like a doog, what have you seen that establishes a cuntry mile between UW and UCLA? I'm as pro Mora as anyone anywhere, but IMO both teams have looked equally good/not yet great. What am I missing?
-
Mad_Son said:
Mora is in year 2. Sark is in year 5. Mora is recruiting linemen like they are baseball cards. Sark avoids linemen like the plague. Even if things have looked comparable so far, they are not actually comparable.dnc said:At the danger of sounding like a doog, what have you seen that establishes a cuntry mile between UW and UCLA? I'm as pro Mora as anyone anywhere, but IMO both teams have looked equally good/not yet great. What am I missing?
Jake Almighty. If the question is who would I rather have as my coach it's not even a debate.
That's not the question of this thread though. The question is which team is better this season, and I think it's very close. If I'm betting who has the better year I'll take UCLA but I don't think it's anywhere near a cuntry mile.
-
I thought the question of this thread was judging Sark on the next two games =Pdnc said:Mad_Son said:
Mora is in year 2. Sark is in year 5. Mora is recruiting linemen like they are baseball cards. Sark avoids linemen like the plague. Even if things have looked comparable so far, they are not actually comparable.dnc said:At the danger of sounding like a doog, what have you seen that establishes a cuntry mile between UW and UCLA? I'm as pro Mora as anyone anywhere, but IMO both teams have looked equally good/not yet great. What am I missing?
Jake Almighty. If the question is who would I rather have as my coach it's not even a debate.
That's not the question of this thread though. The question is which team is better this season, and I think it's very close. If I'm betting who has the better year I'll take UCLA but I don't think it's anywhere near a cuntry mile.
I am just saying arguments about the two teams looking similar this season look better on Mora than Sark. I haven't watched any UCLA games to compare so I do what I can. -
Ok, that is a different thread. This thread is about the field.Mad_Son said:
I thought the question of this thread was judging Sark on the next two games =Pdnc said:Mad_Son said:
Mora is in year 2. Sark is in year 5. Mora is recruiting linemen like they are baseball cards. Sark avoids linemen like the plague. Even if things have looked comparable so far, they are not actually comparable.dnc said:At the danger of sounding like a doog, what have you seen that establishes a cuntry mile between UW and UCLA? I'm as pro Mora as anyone anywhere, but IMO both teams have looked equally good/not yet great. What am I missing?
Jake Almighty. If the question is who would I rather have as my coach it's not even a debate.
That's not the question of this thread though. The question is which team is better this season, and I think it's very close. If I'm betting who has the better year I'll take UCLA but I don't think it's anywhere near a cuntry mile.
I am just saying arguments about the two teams looking similar this season look better on Mora than Sark. I haven't watched any UCLA games to compare so I do what I can. -
Well played.Mad_Son said:
I thought the question of this thread was judging Sark on the next two games =Pdnc said:Mad_Son said:
Mora is in year 2. Sark is in year 5. Mora is recruiting linemen like they are baseball cards. Sark avoids linemen like the plague. Even if things have looked comparable so far, they are not actually comparable.dnc said:At the danger of sounding like a doog, what have you seen that establishes a cuntry mile between UW and UCLA? I'm as pro Mora as anyone anywhere, but IMO both teams have looked equally good/not yet great. What am I missing?
Jake Almighty. If the question is who would I rather have as my coach it's not even a debate.
That's not the question of this thread though. The question is which team is better this season, and I think it's very close. If I'm betting who has the better year I'll take UCLA but I don't think it's anywhere near a cuntry mile.
I am just saying arguments about the two teams looking similar this season look better on Mora than Sark. I haven't watched any UCLA games to compare so I do what I can.
Agree that any similarities between the two is better for Mora than Sark.
-
If we get to 4 and 3 they should say, "finally, the annual 3-game losing streak is over"
-
Gotta beat ASU. Doogs will defend losing to Stanford and the Ducks. People will be jumping ship and de-doogifying themselves if we lose to ASU. Not everyone, mind you, but many.
-
Doogs are fucking idiots. They will defend the coach until the bitter end.chuck said:Gotta beat ASU. Doogs will defend losing to Stanford and the Ducks. People will be jumping ship and de-doogifying themselves if we lose to ASU. Not everyone, mind you, but many.
The HHB iron laws are never wrong. -
D)all of the abovebananasnblondes said:UW is 4-0 right now so you're not allowed to say anything remotely suggesting that the dawgs might not be as good as Alabama or you are a miserable loser who just wants Sark to fail so you can be right. Despite being 4-0 for the first time in over a decade, UW's onfield performance has firmly cemented them as the 4th or 5th best looking team in the Pac with a country mile between them and Oregon/Stanford/UCLA.
It is likely that UW will lose @Stanford, Oregon, and @ASU. There is the possibility of a couple plungers in there as well. If 4-3 happens, what will be the doogs battle cry? Will the maintain their "We were expected to lose these games, what more do you want?" attitude. Will they start the"do you want Willingham back?" chant or will they simply devolve to their usual "why don't you try coaching the team" routine? If the dawgs can somehow win a few games in the coming weeks it will be interesting, and if they don't it will be interesting.
-
they would be right where LSU, Alabama, Georgia, TAMU and South Carolina would be under the same situation.;)
-
You are a dumb fuck! Not one of those schools would lose to ASU. Bama would probably be undefeated, I think Georgia and LSU could go 2-1 as well as TAMU. Only South Carolina would without a doubt be 1-2.puppylove_sugarsteel said:they would be right where LSU, Alabama, Georgia, TAMU and South Carolina would be under the same situation.;)
-
Yeah, this.chuck said:Gotta beat ASU. Doogs will defend losing to Stanford and the Ducks. People will be jumping ship and de-doogifying themselves if we lose to ASU. Not everyone, mind you, but many.
The more moderate Doogs will be pissed at 4-3. -
Simple, they'll be posting stuff like "price has proven he can't win big games, time to put in Miley Cyrus"
-
Never hesitate to overload your wad before wasting it on another headliner (I like '50's talk, yes I do). UW won't be favored in either of the next two games and shouldn't be. Unless he shows more (probably a lot more) than he has thus far as a head coach, who could expect Sarkisian to manufacture an upset in either? Stanford and Oregon sit unchallenged atop the mediocre Pac-12. It may or may not be doog football, but focusing on our program again is getting easier.bananasnblondes said:UW is 4-0 right now so you're not allowed to say anything remotely suggesting that the dawgs might not be as good as Alabama or you are a miserable loser who just wants Sark to fail so you can be right. Despite being 4-0 for the first time in over a decade, UW's onfield performance has firmly cemented them as the 4th or 5th best looking team in the Pac with a country mile between them and Oregon/Stanford/UCLA.
It is likely that UW will lose @Stanford, Oregon, and @ASU. There is the possibility of a couple plungers in there as well. If 4-3 happens, what will be the doogs battle cry? Will the maintain their "We were expected to lose these games, what more do you want?" attitude. Will they start the"do you want Willingham back?" chant or will they simply devolve to their usual "why don't you try coaching the team" routine? If the dawgs can somehow win a few games in the coming weeks it will be interesting, and if they don't it will be interesting.
ASU and the trip to Tempe is three weeks away. Anybody looking that far ahead should hold on to their wad a bit longer. For now, it's enough to say that the 2013 Huskies are improved with obvious potential to get better as the season progresses and except for Oregon should be expected to win all of their remaining home games,........ probably with more command of scoreboard results than we could have hoped for when the season began.
-
Expect a message from PL_SSTailgater said:
Never hesitate to overload your wad before wasting it on another headliner (I like '50's talk, yes I do). UW won't be favored in either of the next two games and shouldn't be. Unless he shows more (probably a lot more) than he has thus far as a head coach, who could expect Sarkisian to manufacture an upset in either? Stanford and Oregon sit unchallenged atop the mediocre Pac-12. It may or may not be doog football, but focusing on our program again is getting easier.bananasnblondes said:UW is 4-0 right now so you're not allowed to say anything remotely suggesting that the dawgs might not be as good as Alabama or you are a miserable loser who just wants Sark to fail so you can be right. Despite being 4-0 for the first time in over a decade, UW's onfield performance has firmly cemented them as the 4th or 5th best looking team in the Pac with a country mile between them and Oregon/Stanford/UCLA.
It is likely that UW will lose @Stanford, Oregon, and @ASU. There is the possibility of a couple plungers in there as well. If 4-3 happens, what will be the doogs battle cry? Will the maintain their "We were expected to lose these games, what more do you want?" attitude. Will they start the"do you want Willingham back?" chant or will they simply devolve to their usual "why don't you try coaching the team" routine? If the dawgs can somehow win a few games in the coming weeks it will be interesting, and if they don't it will be interesting.
ASU and the trip to Tempe is three weeks away. Anybody looking that far ahead should hold on to their wad a bit longer. For now, it's enough to say that the 2013 Huskies are improved with obvious potential to get better as the season progresses and except for Oregon should be expected to win all of their remaining home games,........ probably with more command of scoreboard results than we could have hoped for when the season began. -
Amen.Mad_Son said:
Mora is in year 2. Sark is in year 5. Mora is recruiting linemen like they are baseball cards. Sark avoids linemen like the plague. Even if things have looked comparable so far, they are not actually comparable.dnc said:At the danger of sounding like a doog, what have you seen that establishes a cuntry mile between UW and UCLA? I'm as pro Mora as anyone anywhere, but IMO both teams have looked equally good/not yet great. What am I missing?
From today's Seattle Times: Stanford and Oregon defensive lines are the best UW will see all season, Sarkisian said. “They’re really, really good,” he said of Stanford. “They’re big, they’re fast, they’re strong, they’re athletic. Don’t let them fool you — those Stanford D-linemen are athletic. You saw it last week” (with DE/OLB Trent Murphy returning an interception for a touchdown, as he did against UW last year).
Must be nice. -
"Shut the fuck up, duck"
-
Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Bullshit.chuck said:
The more moderate Doogs will be pissed at 4-3.
All doogs will say it is not realistic we could beat those three teams in a row.
After 0-12 and 3 consecutive bowl losses no way can we expect to beat those three tuff teams. -
The nice thing about knowing Sark sucks is that if you're wrong you're happy.
-
topdawgnc said:
disagreeFire_Marshall_Bill said:
Bullshit.chuck said:
The more moderate Doogs will be pissed at 4-3.
All doogs will say it is not realistic we could beat those three teams in a row.
After 0-12 and 3 consecutive bowl losses no way can we expect to beat those three tuff teams.
they will say that about tree and u of ho, but not assu (some will, but less than half) -
0-12 = 7-6 = 10-3. Who gives a fuck but doogs? They all mean the same thing. No conference title, no national championship. I have no interest in sniffing Woodward's jock (ref. Mad Son's ramblings) if Sark pulls a 10-3 season out of his ass. I want a real winner as HC at WA and hope USC will do for us what Woodward seems to incapable of.
-
You play to win games. You win games to win championships. If that isn't the goal, why bother? There's always Division III and whatever the Ivies are.
-
Disagree.Homebrew_Dawg said:0-12 = 7-6 = 10-3.
-
Quality poasting going on over at disney
Robert Santana · Top Commenter · Stack taker at BetOnline
Crazy to think that if Washington beats Stanford and Oregon they'll have a chance to win a national championship. I think they pull the upset this weekend and then lose to the Ducks.
Reply ·
· 4 hours ago
We're gettin' that natty!
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
