Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

What will the doogs be saying at 4-3

2

Comments

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    chuck said:

    Gotta beat ASU. Doogs will defend losing to Stanford and the Ducks. People will be jumping ship and de-doogifying themselves if we lose to ASU. Not everyone, mind you, but many.

    Doogs are fucking idiots. They will defend the coach until the bitter end.

    The HHB iron laws are never wrong.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DugtheDoog
    DugtheDoog Member Posts: 3,180
    bananasnblondes said:

    UW is 4-0 right now so you're not allowed to say anything remotely suggesting that the dawgs might not be as good as Alabama or you are a miserable loser who just wants Sark to fail so you can be right. Despite being 4-0 for the first time in over a decade, UW's onfield performance has firmly cemented them as the 4th or 5th best looking team in the Pac with a country mile between them and Oregon/Stanford/UCLA.

    It is likely that UW will lose @Stanford, Oregon, and @ASU. There is the possibility of a couple plungers in there as well. If 4-3 happens, what will be the doogs battle cry? Will the maintain their "We were expected to lose these games, what more do you want?" attitude. Will they start the"do you want Willingham back?" chant or will they simply devolve to their usual "why don't you try coaching the team" routine? If the dawgs can somehow win a few games in the coming weeks it will be interesting, and if they don't it will be interesting.

    D)all of the above


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    they would be right where LSU, Alabama, Georgia, TAMU and South Carolina would be under the same situation.;)
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    they would be right where LSU, Alabama, Georgia, TAMU and South Carolina would be under the same situation.;)

    You are a dumb fuck! Not one of those schools would lose to ASU. Bama would probably be undefeated, I think Georgia and LSU could go 2-1 as well as TAMU. Only South Carolina would without a doubt be 1-2.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 26,324 Standard Supporter
    chuck said:

    Gotta beat ASU. Doogs will defend losing to Stanford and the Ducks. People will be jumping ship and de-doogifying themselves if we lose to ASU. Not everyone, mind you, but many.

    Yeah, this.

    The more moderate Doogs will be pissed at 4-3.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tailgater
    Tailgater Member Posts: 1,389
    bananasnblondes said:

    UW is 4-0 right now so you're not allowed to say anything remotely suggesting that the dawgs might not be as good as Alabama or you are a miserable loser who just wants Sark to fail so you can be right. Despite being 4-0 for the first time in over a decade, UW's onfield performance has firmly cemented them as the 4th or 5th best looking team in the Pac with a country mile between them and Oregon/Stanford/UCLA.

    It is likely that UW will lose @Stanford, Oregon, and @ASU. There is the possibility of a couple plungers in there as well. If 4-3 happens, what will be the doogs battle cry? Will the maintain their "We were expected to lose these games, what more do you want?" attitude. Will they start the"do you want Willingham back?" chant or will they simply devolve to their usual "why don't you try coaching the team" routine? If the dawgs can somehow win a few games in the coming weeks it will be interesting, and if they don't it will be interesting.

    Never hesitate to overload your wad before wasting it on another headliner (I like '50's talk, yes I do). UW won't be favored in either of the next two games and shouldn't be. Unless he shows more (probably a lot more) than he has thus far as a head coach, who could expect Sarkisian to manufacture an upset in either? Stanford and Oregon sit unchallenged atop the mediocre Pac-12. It may or may not be doog football, but focusing on our program again is getting easier.

    ASU and the trip to Tempe is three weeks away. Anybody looking that far ahead should hold on to their wad a bit longer. For now, it's enough to say that the 2013 Huskies are improved with obvious potential to get better as the season progresses and except for Oregon should be expected to win all of their remaining home games,........ probably with more command of scoreboard results than we could have hoped for when the season began.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,948 Founders Club
    Tailgater said:

    bananasnblondes said:

    UW is 4-0 right now so you're not allowed to say anything remotely suggesting that the dawgs might not be as good as Alabama or you are a miserable loser who just wants Sark to fail so you can be right. Despite being 4-0 for the first time in over a decade, UW's onfield performance has firmly cemented them as the 4th or 5th best looking team in the Pac with a country mile between them and Oregon/Stanford/UCLA.

    It is likely that UW will lose @Stanford, Oregon, and @ASU. There is the possibility of a couple plungers in there as well. If 4-3 happens, what will be the doogs battle cry? Will the maintain their "We were expected to lose these games, what more do you want?" attitude. Will they start the"do you want Willingham back?" chant or will they simply devolve to their usual "why don't you try coaching the team" routine? If the dawgs can somehow win a few games in the coming weeks it will be interesting, and if they don't it will be interesting.

    Never hesitate to overload your wad before wasting it on another headliner (I like '50's talk, yes I do). UW won't be favored in either of the next two games and shouldn't be. Unless he shows more (probably a lot more) than he has thus far as a head coach, who could expect Sarkisian to manufacture an upset in either? Stanford and Oregon sit unchallenged atop the mediocre Pac-12. It may or may not be doog football, but focusing on our program again is getting easier.

    ASU and the trip to Tempe is three weeks away. Anybody looking that far ahead should hold on to their wad a bit longer. For now, it's enough to say that the 2013 Huskies are improved with obvious potential to get better as the season progresses and except for Oregon should be expected to win all of their remaining home games,........ probably with more command of scoreboard results than we could have hoped for when the season began.

    Expect a message from PL_SS
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Passion
    Passion Member Posts: 4,622
    edited October 2013
    Mad_Son said:

    dnc said:

    At the danger of sounding like a doog, what have you seen that establishes a cuntry mile between UW and UCLA? I'm as pro Mora as anyone anywhere, but IMO both teams have looked equally good/not yet great. What am I missing?

    Mora is in year 2. Sark is in year 5. Mora is recruiting linemen like they are baseball cards. Sark avoids linemen like the plague. Even if things have looked comparable so far, they are not actually comparable.
    Amen.

    From today's Seattle Times: Stanford and Oregon defensive lines are the best UW will see all season, Sarkisian said. “They’re really, really good,” he said of Stanford. “They’re big, they’re fast, they’re strong, they’re athletic. Don’t let them fool you — those Stanford D-linemen are athletic. You saw it last week” (with DE/OLB Trent Murphy returning an interception for a touchdown, as he did against UW last year).

    Must be nice.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,468
    "Shut the fuck up, duck"
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter