Do these stats give you hope, or piss you off?
- Versus Pac-12 Opponents: Points scored: 216. Points allowed: 170.
- Versus ALL Opponents: Points scored: 309. Points allowed: 203.
Sorry, but this pisses me off. We should have 8 or 9 wins. I think Kawasaki should be allowed to get in his car and run over jonathan smith.
Link: espn.go.com/college-football/standings/_/group/9
Comments
-
So UW scores more points in scrimmages than they do against real teams. I don't see how this stat means anything.
-
Well, other teams have scrimmages too, so it means something.Dardanus said:So UW scores more points in scrimmages than they do against real teams. I don't see how this stat means anything.
-
Ok. It means we score more points in our scrimmages and keep our losses closer in point differential.Passion said:
Well, other teams have scrimmages too, so it means something.Dardanus said:So UW scores more points in scrimmages than they do against real teams. I don't see how this stat means anything.
-
As long as they help our SRS I'm happy.
-
Passion said:
Washington is the only team in the Pac-12 that has scored more points than its opponents, but still has a losing record:
- Versus Pac-12 Opponents: Points scored: 216. Points allowed: 170.
- Versus ALL Opponents: Points scored: 309. Points allowed: 203.
Sorry, but this pisses me off. We should have 8 or 9 wins. I think Kawasaki should be allowed to get in his car andrun over jonathan smith.get the fuck out of seattle
Link: espn.go.com/college-football/standings/_/group/9 -
No, their scrimmages have nothing to do with their games against us. This just reflects the huge margins of victory against Arizona and Oregon State.Passion said:
Well, other teams have scrimmages too, so it means something.Dardanus said:So UW scores more points in scrimmages than they do against real teams. I don't see how this stat means anything.
Anyways, in terms of hope and pissing me off - abundance. -
Oregon State is absolutely horrible and Arizona barely even showed up. Those two games are the reason for the point differential.
We still suck and lost to Cal, blew a 17-0 lead against ASU, and blew it every single time except USC when the game was on the line. -
This was pretty much exactly what I was going to say ... particularly the Oregon St and Arizona parts that account for the majority of our point differential.RoadDawg55 said:Oregon State is absolutely horrible and Arizona barely even showed up. Those two games are the reason for the point differential.
We still suck and lost to Cal, blew a 17-0 lead against ASU, and blew it every single time except USC when the game was on the line.
The part that pisses me off this year is that our record in close games is putrid ... which is the same as last year. In a lot of the losses, you can look to short comings from the offense whether it be the play calling from Babushka to youth on the OL and QB positions, lack of outside talent at WR, or lack of experienced leadership on offense to help guide the younger players when it comes to finishing drives or games.
Let's see what happens on Friday. While pulling out at least one of Utah and ASU would have been encouraging, one thing that does make me feel optimistic is that 2 of the 4 better performances that we've strung together on offense were the Arizona and Oregon State games. Even in the Utah and ASU losses, turnovers aside, the offense performed reasonably well with 381 yards of offense against Utah (Browning 23 of 39 for 257 and both Gaskin/Washington having decent ypc games against one of the better defenses in the conference) and 547 yards of offense against ASU (Browning 28 of 52 for 405, with a ton of drops and Gaskin once again having a strong ypc game aided by a few chunk runs).
The production is starting to be there on a consistent basis. Let's see if the added execution can be combined with finishing drives and finishing the game in the 4th quarter. That'd be a really good note to finish off the regular season on. -
Passion, when Browning has a stable of D-1 WR's and TE's, a veteren offebsive line id expect that some of those "points" you speak of will be at critical times in games vs the better conference teams like Oregon, Stanford, USC, UCLA, ASU etc...Passion said:Washington is the only team in the Pac-12 that has scored more points than its opponents, but still has a losing record:
- Versus Pac-12 Opponents: Points scored: 216. Points allowed: 170.
- Versus ALL Opponents: Points scored: 309. Points allowed: 203.
Sorry, but this pisses me off. We should have 8 or 9 wins. I think Kawasaki should be allowed to get in his car and run over jonathan smith.
Link: espn.go.com/college-football/standings/_/group/9
You, and 95% of the tards here, are taking silly stats like these out of context. How about Browning and the oline completing 3rd-down conversions, td's-fg's at critical times, not turning ball over and running football when it counts against REAL pac12 opponents. You're taking meaningless math from opponents like Utah st, Sac st, Arizona, USC, Oregon st etc...while ignoring the stats in games vs Oregon, Stanford, Utah, Cal, BSU in your conclusion. All games where Browning and a very young team struggled.
Next year those youthful mistakes will be farther and fewer in between, and those points you took out of context, will be spread out against the better competition, NOT just Sac St and OSU.
Youre a veteran Passion, I expect better from you. You sound like a gimme-gimmie new fish fan who ecpects wins out of thin air. Wins will come with experience and coaching. You panty waists expect miracles. Just fuck yourselves and hope this team gets 15 extra bowl practices. They need it.
8-9 wins this year is th e most fuctarded thing ive ever heard. Puppy said 4-6 wins this year with Browning (said it in spring). We're right on schedule. -
Defense has given us a shot in every game....save for maybe Stanford.
-
Defense gave us a shot in that game if we would have had QB play.HuskyJW said:Defense has given us a shot in every game....save for maybe Stanford.
-
Why not just end it there?Tequilla said:
This was pretty much exactly what I was going to say ... particularly the Oregon St and Arizona parts that account for the majority of our point differential.RoadDawg55 said:Oregon State is absolutely horrible and Arizona barely even showed up. Those two games are the reason for the point differential.
We still suck and lost to Cal, blew a 17-0 lead against ASU, and blew it every single time except USC when the game was on the line.
The part that pisses me off this year is that our record in close games is putrid ... which is the same as last year. In a lot of the losses, you can look to short comings from the offense whether it be the play calling from Babushka to youth on the OL and QB positions, lack of outside talent at WR, or lack of experienced leadership on offense to help guide the younger players when it comes to finishing drives or games.
Let's see what happens on Friday. While pulling out at least one of Utah and ASU would have been encouraging, one thing that does make me feel optimistic is that 2 of the 4 better performances that we've strung together on offense were the Arizona and Oregon State games. Even in the Utah and ASU losses, turnovers aside, the offense performed reasonably well with 381 yards of offense against Utah (Browning 23 of 39 for 257 and both Gaskin/Washington having decent ypc games against one of the better defenses in the conference) and 547 yards of offense against ASU (Browning 28 of 52 for 405, with a ton of drops and Gaskin once again having a strong ypc game aided by a few chunk runs).
The production is starting to be there on a consistent basis. Let's see if the added execution can be combined with finishing drives and finishing the game in the 4th quarter. That'd be a really good note to finish off the regular season on.
Jesus... -
It doesn't do anything for me
-
Good points ya'll! I won't pull Peterman's "We never look at stats" cesspool of Bull Shit lies, but to me... with this game... it never fucking does!
No matter Purple or Red (burgandy or whatever those cheese dick motherfuckers use these days), this is a fucking CIVIL WAR and if we don't win, well... stick a hot coal down my peel hole. Then I have to look at slutty Wazzu graduates cunt smiling like they just got spit roasted by a few basketball players on a weekday night. Fuck!
Cobra Commander better defend his HH God Given name and show up with the crew!
Micken's more than likely Storm Shadow, always stroking the other team and playing grabass after the game. -
Yes, that's the fucking point. We've managed to blow almost every close game we've had this year.Dardanus said:
Ok. It means we score more points in our scrimmages and keep our losses closer in point differential.Passion said:
Well, other teams have scrimmages too, so it means something.Dardanus said:So UW scores more points in scrimmages than they do against real teams. I don't see how this stat means anything.
-
Other teams with a positive point differential also enjoyed blowouts. The interesting (or depressing) stat is that we're the only team with a losing record.RoadDawg55 said:Oregon State is absolutely horrible and Arizona barely even showed up. Those two games are the reason for the point differential.
We still suck and lost to Cal, blew a 17-0 lead against ASU, and blew it every single time except USC when the game was on the line. -
And the youngest tooPassion said:
Other teams with a positive point differential also enjoyed blowouts. The interesting (or depressing) stat is that we're the only team with a losing record.RoadDawg55 said:Oregon State is absolutely horrible and Arizona barely even showed up. Those two games are the reason for the point differential.
We still suck and lost to Cal, blew a 17-0 lead against ASU, and blew it every single time except USC when the game was on the line. -
And the most pre-season predictable. You Passion, of course still live in 1990 and expect the 1991 team to come out of fall camp EVERY fucking year!!!! Ive been backhanding you on these forums, about this topic, for somewhere around 20 years, and im not that far off when it comes to your buttlickerd expectations. Fyi, I have nothing against you. I really appreciate you as an ardent husky supporter. However, when your dedication leads toward smacking down the head coach, I take exception.
Petersen is thee fucking best head coach we could ever get. It's year 2. You ought know way better.
Lets see where your buddy Lambo was in year 4 and Petersen will be in year 4. Deal?
-
For fucks sake puppy give the doog talking points a fucking rest already
-
Lambo was living off of Don James players you butthuffer. He coached the team out of two Rose Bowls (95 and 97). When the team was all his guys (1998) it was substantially worse.puppylove_sugarsteel said:And the most pre-season predictable. You Passion, of course still live in 1990 and expect the 1991 team to come out of fall camp EVERY fucking year!!!! Ive been backhanding you on these forums, about this topic, for somewhere around 20 years, and im not that far off when it comes to your buttlickerd expectations. Fyi, I have nothing against you. I really appreciate you as an ardent husky supporter. However, when your dedication leads toward smacking down the head coach, I take exception.
Petersen is thee fucking best head coach we could ever get. It's year 2. You ought know way better.
Lets see where your buddy Lambo was in year 4 and Petersen will be in year 4. Deal? -
Lambright is a really interesting case study of a coach ...
Hired to preserve continuity he coaches through a couple of probation years highlighted by a win at Miami to break a 58 game home winning streak ...
Starting in 1995 going through 1997, it's a glass half full or empty approach to whether he was succeeding or not. In '95, tied for the conference title on the full side ... on the empty side it was the 21-0 come from ahead tie against USC followed the next week by losing at home to Oregon. In '96, a season opening loss to Arizona State was the only blemish in the conference. In '97, entered November with a chance to win the conference before going on a 3 game losing streak to end the year with an unexplainable loss to Oregon at home before losing to 1-loss conference co-champions in UCLA and Washington State.
A lot of the bullet points used against Lambright were there in 1998 with another 3 game losing streak at the back end of the season combined with another disturbing trend of getting slaughtered on the road in non-conference games with the 55-7 beat down in Lincoln. Another big strike against Lambright was his record against Oregon in 6 years: 2-4.
One could argue that the lean year in '98 as well as the end of '97 was contributed by the scholarship reductions that were against the '93 and '94 classes causing some depth issues and younger players having to play than ideal when injuries hit. The recruiting classes of '96 through '98 classes contributed greatly to the 2000 Rose Bowl team.
Not that the decision to move on to Lambo wasn't the right thing to do and that the plight since has been more of the function of making average to poor hires since then leading up to Petersen (jury still out on), but if you're going through the exercise of ranking the UW coaches from Lambo to Slick to Gilby to Tyrone to Seven (depressing list to type) ... Lambo doesn't look so bad in hindsight.
It's an interesting consideration when looking at what is going on at LSU as well. There's a risk on one hand of firing a coach that has proven an ability to be successful but has had a down or underachieving year regarding what your future could look at. But on the other hand, if said coach has lost the team in the locker room (which for Lambo was at least a distinct possibility/probability from what I've heard over the years), then you have no choice but to make a change. -
NYBEGreaseKutter said:Good points ya'll! I won't pull Peterman's "We never look at stats" cesspool of Bull Shit lies, but to me... with this game... it never fucking does!
No matter Purple or Red (burgandy or whatever those cheese dick motherfuckers use these days), this is a fucking CIVIL WAR and if we don't win, well... stick a hot coal down my peel hole. Then I have to look at slutty Wazzu graduates cunt smiling like they just got spit roasted by a few basketball players on a weekday night. Fuck!
Cobra Commander better defend his HH God Given name and show up with the crew!
Micken's more than likely Storm Shadow, always stroking the other team and playing grabass after the game. -
Doog talking points? I talk, I make significant points but
im hardly a doog. Race you're skating on thin ice, a sport youre very familiar with. Best just not piss off puppy, ill be forced to run you and your comic books on outta here. -
Huh?puppylove_sugarsteel said:I talk, I make significant points but
im hardly a doog. Race you're skating on thin ice, a sport youre very familiar with. Best just not piss off puppy, ill be forced to run you and your comic books on outta here.
Self awareness for $500, Alex. -
Right now you're probably the biggest doog here. It's embarrassingpuppylove_sugarsteel said:Doog talking points? I talk, I make significant points but
im hardly a doog. Race you're skating on thin ice, a sport youre very familiar with. Best just not piss off puppy, ill be forced to run you and your comic books on outta here. -
Except you you are +91 in 2 games.Passion said:Washington is the only team in the Pac-12 that has scored more points than its opponents, but still has a losing record:
- Versus Pac-12 Opponents: Points scored: 216. Points allowed: 170.
- Versus ALL Opponents: Points scored: 309. Points allowed: 203.
Sorry, but this pisses me off. We should have 8 or 9 wins. I think Kawasaki should be allowed to get in his car and run over jonathan smith.
Link: espn.go.com/college-football/standings/_/group/9
2 games.
Shit poast.
Shit poaster. -
Beating up patsies and shitting the bed in big games is UW football. You've known this @salemcoog.salemcoog said:
Except you you are +91 in 2 games.Passion said:Washington is the only team in the Pac-12 that has scored more points than its opponents, but still has a losing record:
- Versus Pac-12 Opponents: Points scored: 216. Points allowed: 170.
- Versus ALL Opponents: Points scored: 309. Points allowed: 203.
Sorry, but this pisses me off. We should have 8 or 9 wins. I think Kawasaki should be allowed to get in his car and run over jonathan smith.
Link: espn.go.com/college-football/standings/_/group/9
2 games.
Shit poast.
Shit poaster.
Is it hard?
-
You're the king doog.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Doog talking points? I talk, I make significant points but
im hardly a doog. Race you're skating on thin ice, a sport youre very familiar with. Best just not piss off puppy, ill be forced to run you and your comic books on outta here.
HTH -
How are you run anything? God, you're a fucking idiot.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Doog talking points? I talk, I make significant points but
im hardly a doog. Race you're skating on thin ice, a sport youre very familiar with. Best just not piss off puppy, ill be forced to run you and your comic books on outta here.
![[Deleted User]](https://wf.vanillicon.com/ff1cc16fc444b5277f76f87685b26fa0_100.png)
