I was going to stay out of this but the "truth" comment dragged me back in again.What is truth, as a noted Roman official once asked.Teachers should not be imposing their truth, be it for a God or against a God.Keep religion out, teach science and maff and the kids can figure it out. Agree to a point. But according to the dumb bitch in the is article....you could argue 3+2=4 because she believes it to be true even though you can't prove it. I just read the link description. But more to the point, doesn't it equal 4? Not according to the right.
I was going to stay out of this but the "truth" comment dragged me back in again.What is truth, as a noted Roman official once asked.Teachers should not be imposing their truth, be it for a God or against a God.Keep religion out, teach science and maff and the kids can figure it out. Agree to a point. But according to the dumb bitch in the is article....you could argue 3+2=4 because she believes it to be true even though you can't prove it. I just read the link description. But more to the point, doesn't it equal 4?
I was going to stay out of this but the "truth" comment dragged me back in again.What is truth, as a noted Roman official once asked.Teachers should not be imposing their truth, be it for a God or against a God.Keep religion out, teach science and maff and the kids can figure it out. Agree to a point. But according to the dumb bitch in the is article....you could argue 3+2=4 because she believes it to be true even though you can't prove it.
I was going to stay out of this but the "truth" comment dragged me back in again.What is truth, as a noted Roman official once asked.Teachers should not be imposing their truth, be it for a God or against a God.Keep religion out, teach science and maff and the kids can figure it out.
I was going to stay out of this but the "truth" comment dragged me back in again.What is truth, as a noted Roman official once asked.Teachers should not be imposing their truth, be it for a God or against a God.Keep religion out, teach science and maff and the kids can figure it out. Telling the kids there is no god is teaching science Many scientists believe in god and find no problem teaching science without mentioning god.Seems like you have an agenda.
I was going to stay out of this but the "truth" comment dragged me back in again.What is truth, as a noted Roman official once asked.Teachers should not be imposing their truth, be it for a God or against a God.Keep religion out, teach science and maff and the kids can figure it out. Telling the kids there is no god is teaching science
I was going to stay out of this but the "truth" comment dragged me back in again.What is truth, as a noted Roman official once asked.Teachers should not be imposing their truth, be it for a God or against a God.Keep religion out, teach science and maff and the kids can figure it out. Telling the kids there is no god is teaching science Many scientists believe in god and find no problem teaching science without mentioning god.Seems like you have an agenda. Scientists believing in god has nothing to do with science. It's feelings and emotion which scientists have just as non scientists do.
I was going to stay out of this but the "truth" comment dragged me back in again.What is truth, as a noted Roman official once asked.Teachers should not be imposing their truth, be it for a God or against a God.Keep religion out, teach science and maff and the kids can figure it out. Telling the kids there is no god is teaching science Many scientists believe in god and find no problem teaching science without mentioning god.Seems like you have an agenda. Scientists believing in god has nothing to do with science. It's feelings and emotion which scientists have just as non scientists do. that's different from saying that telling kids there is no god is science. Science says there is no proof of god.
I was going to make a comment about the god of the gaps (neil degrasse tyson has some good videos on this) but I changed my mind. It really just comes down to separation of church and state for me. Keep religion at home in the privacy of your own home, no need to bring it to school with you one way or the other.
I was going to stay out of this but the "truth" comment dragged me back in again.What is truth, as a noted Roman official once asked.Teachers should not be imposing their truth, be it for a God or against a God.Keep religion out, teach science and maff and the kids can figure it out. Telling the kids there is no god is teaching science Many scientists believe in god and find no problem teaching science without mentioning god.Seems like you have an agenda. Scientists believing in god has nothing to do with science. It's feelings and emotion which scientists have just as non scientists do. that's different from saying that telling kids there is no god is science. Science says there is no proof of god. Science also can't say with certainty there isn't.
I was going to stay out of this but the "truth" comment dragged me back in again.What is truth, as a noted Roman official once asked.Teachers should not be imposing their truth, be it for a God or against a God.Keep religion out, teach science and maff and the kids can figure it out. Telling the kids there is no god is teaching science Many scientists believe in god and find no problem teaching science without mentioning god.Seems like you have an agenda. Scientists believing in god has nothing to do with science. It's feelings and emotion which scientists have just as non scientists do. that's different from saying that telling kids there is no god is science. Science says there is no proof of god. Ok. She should have told them there is no proof of god or Santa and told them they can believe in stuff there is no proof of (like man caused climate change) if they want to be weak minded imbeciles
The KKK must be outraged. I remember when liberals used to get upset when civil rights were trampled by Government.
The KKK must be outraged.
The KKK must be outraged. I remember when liberals used to get upset when civil rights were trampled by Government. Since when is believing in a fairy tale a civil right?
Dude, I wasn't done editing my post. You shouldn't be so eager and quick to stalk me.
Dude, I wasn't done editing my post. You shouldn't be so eager and quick to stalk me. Uh huh. Edited 2 minutes after I corrected your dumbfuckery.
I was going to stay out of this but the "truth" comment dragged me back in again.What is truth, as a noted Roman official once asked.Teachers should not be imposing their truth, be it for a God or against a God.Keep religion out, teach science and maff and the kids can figure it out. Telling the kids there is no god is teaching science Many scientists believe in god and find no problem teaching science without mentioning god.Seems like you have an agenda. Scientists believing in god has nothing to do with science. It's feelings and emotion which scientists have just as non scientists do. that's different from saying that telling kids there is no god is science. Science says there is no proof of god. Science also can't say with certainty there isn't. That was implied. If you followed my argument you'd know that
Dude, I wasn't done editing my post. You shouldn't be so eager and quick to stalk me. Uh huh. Edited 2 minutes after I corrected your dumbfuckery. Have you found a job yet? Have to tell you, fixing my editing errors isn't going to pay well.
Dude, I wasn't done editing my post. You shouldn't be so eager and quick to stalk me. Uh huh. Edited 2 minutes after I corrected your dumbfuckery. Have you found a job yet? Have to tell you, fixing my editing errors isn't going to pay well. Why would I get a job when Obama will pay me to sit on my fat ass and vote Dem?