Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

In Between The Arizona and Stanford game

HFNY
HFNY Member Posts: 5,502
@DerekJohnson said this during the podcast and hit the nail on the head: "It's clear Jonathan Smith doesn't know what he's doing". Even with a back-up QB, I would've called a different game than how he did.

At what point does Kwiatkowski try to punch out Babushka a la Buddy Ryan?

Petersen has to coach up his coaches so he better be spending nearly all his time with Smith.

I can't believe they didn't let KJCS do a read-option with him keeping it at least once.

Trey Adams played better, nice to see.

@FremontTroll had the call to take UW +19. I got in at +18 and feel lucky since I was guessing Browning was going to play (I projected Stanford to win 33-20 with Browning playing).

I like how the OL looked (Eldrenkamp particularly) in the running game and thought the pass protection was decent. The sack I remember (out of 3) was Coleman Shelton getting beat, maybe it was a stunt.

I said it after the USC game and I'll say it again, this is a 6 win team. Don't know how that makes me a Doog in ThomasFremont's mind or that I agree with him that JS needs to be terminated.

Gotta beat Arizona to get to those 6 wins. Browning is going to play and Huskies will win 27-20 with an assist from the weather, making life difficult for Randall and / or Solomon.
«134

Comments

  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    HFNY said:

    @DerekJohnson said this during the podcast and hit the nail on the head: "It's clear Jonathan Smith doesn't know what he's doing". Even with a back-up QB, I would've called a different game than how he did.

    At what point does Kwiatkowski try to punch out Babushka a la Buddy Ryan?

    Petersen has to coach up his coaches so he better be spending nearly all his time with Smith.

    I can't believe they didn't let KJCS do a read-option with him keeping it at least once.

    Trey Adams played better, nice to see.

    @FremontTroll had the call to take UW +19. I got in at +18 and feel lucky since I was guessing Browning was going to play (I projected Stanford to win 33-20 with Browning playing).

    I like how the OL looked (Eldrenkamp particularly) in the running game and thought the pass protection was decent. The sack I remember (out of 3) was Coleman Shelton getting beat, maybe it was a stunt.

    I said it after the USC game and I'll say it again, this is a 6 win team. Don't know how that makes me a Doog in ThomasFremont's mind or that I agree with him that JS needs to be terminated.

    Gotta beat Arizona to get to those 6 wins. Browning is going to play and Huskies will win 27-20 with an assist from the weather, making life difficult for Randall and / or Solomon.

    That's why your a doog, dumbass.

    Also, I guessed the score better than you did.

    Aren't you glad you insisted on a prediction?

    You suck at this.
  • Houhusky
    Houhusky Member Posts: 5,537
    edited October 2015
    HFNY said:

    @DerekJohnson said this during the podcast and hit the nail on the head: "It's clear Jonathan Smith doesn't know what he's doing". Even with a back-up QB, I would've called a different game than how he did.

    At what point does Kwiatkowski try to punch out Babushka a la Buddy Ryan?

    Petersen has to coach up his coaches so he better be spending nearly all his time with Smith.

    I can't believe they didn't let KJCS do a read-option with him keeping it at least once.

    Trey Adams played better, nice to see.

    @FremontTroll had the call to take UW +19. I got in at +18 and feel lucky since I was guessing Browning was going to play (I projected Stanford to win 33-20 with Browning playing).

    I like how the OL looked (Eldrenkamp particularly) in the running game and thought the pass protection was decent. The sack I remember (out of 3) was Coleman Shelton getting beat, maybe it was a stunt.

    I said it after the USC game and I'll say it again, this is a 6 win team. Don't know how that makes me a Doog in ThomasFremont's mind or that I agree with him that JS needs to be terminated.

    Gotta beat Arizona to get to those 6 wins. Browning is going to play and Huskies will win 27-20 with an assist from the weather, making life difficult for Randall and / or Solomon.


    You're a doog because you think that the reason we have sucked is because of youth, not poor coaching and game planing. It's straight out of the doog playbook, blame the players not the coach.

    Welcome to husky football, where the sum is always less than the parts.

    Intelligent posters will note that most people predicted atleast 7-8 wins this season, but mostly due to losing so much on defense, not the offense (PetersIins wheelhouse) somehow finding a way to regress.
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,216
    Houhusky said:

    HFNY said:

    @DerekJohnson said this during the podcast and hit the nail on the head: "It's clear Jonathan Smith doesn't know what he's doing". Even with a back-up QB, I would've called a different game than how he did.

    At what point does Kwiatkowski try to punch out Babushka a la Buddy Ryan?

    Petersen has to coach up his coaches so he better be spending nearly all his time with Smith.

    I can't believe they didn't let KJCS do a read-option with him keeping it at least once.

    Trey Adams played better, nice to see.

    @FremontTroll had the call to take UW +19. I got in at +18 and feel lucky since I was guessing Browning was going to play (I projected Stanford to win 33-20 with Browning playing).

    I like how the OL looked (Eldrenkamp particularly) in the running game and thought the pass protection was decent. The sack I remember (out of 3) was Coleman Shelton getting beat, maybe it was a stunt.

    I said it after the USC game and I'll say it again, this is a 6 win team. Don't know how that makes me a Doog in ThomasFremont's mind or that I agree with him that JS needs to be terminated.

    Gotta beat Arizona to get to those 6 wins. Browning is going to play and Huskies will win 27-20 with an assist from the weather, making life difficult for Randall and / or Solomon.


    You're a doog because you think that the reason we have sucked is because of youth, not poor coaching and game planing. It's straight out of the doog playbook, blame the players not the coach.

    Welcome to husky football, where the sum is always less than the parts.

    Intelligent posters will note that most people predicted atleast 7-8 wins this season, but mostly due to losing so much on defense, not the offense (PetersIins wheelhouse) somehow finding a way to regress.
    I like to say that those that predicted good offense and poor defense this year are smart ... and those that called the opposite even though time is proving that side to be correct are doogs ... that's what I like to do.

    If you couldn't see that the offense was going to struggle with a young and inexperienced OL, a true frosh QB, and a bunch of JAGs at the WR position, then I don't know what to tell you.

    The above doesn't mean that Pete and Smith don't deserve heat or that Smith is in way over his head and should be fired (he should) ... some of you fucktards either need to learn the difference or book yourself in a Hell in a Cell match against Brock Lesner.
  • Houhusky
    Houhusky Member Posts: 5,537
    Tequilla said:

    Houhusky said:

    HFNY said:

    @DerekJohnson said this during the podcast and hit the nail on the head: "It's clear Jonathan Smith doesn't know what he's doing". Even with a back-up QB, I would've called a different game than how he did.

    At what point does Kwiatkowski try to punch out Babushka a la Buddy Ryan?

    Petersen has to coach up his coaches so he better be spending nearly all his time with Smith.

    I can't believe they didn't let KJCS do a read-option with him keeping it at least once.

    Trey Adams played better, nice to see.

    @FremontTroll had the call to take UW +19. I got in at +18 and feel lucky since I was guessing Browning was going to play (I projected Stanford to win 33-20 with Browning playing).

    I like how the OL looked (Eldrenkamp particularly) in the running game and thought the pass protection was decent. The sack I remember (out of 3) was Coleman Shelton getting beat, maybe it was a stunt.

    I said it after the USC game and I'll say it again, this is a 6 win team. Don't know how that makes me a Doog in ThomasFremont's mind or that I agree with him that JS needs to be terminated.

    Gotta beat Arizona to get to those 6 wins. Browning is going to play and Huskies will win 27-20 with an assist from the weather, making life difficult for Randall and / or Solomon.


    You're a doog because you think that the reason we have sucked is because of youth, not poor coaching and game planing. It's straight out of the doog playbook, blame the players not the coach.

    Welcome to husky football, where the sum is always less than the parts.

    Intelligent posters will note that most people predicted atleast 7-8 wins this season, but mostly due to losing so much on defense, not the offense (PetersIins wheelhouse) somehow finding a way to regress.
    I like to say that those that predicted good offense and poor defense this year are smart ... and those that called the opposite even though time is proving that side to be correct are doogs ... that's what I like to do.

    If you couldn't see that the offense was going to struggle with a young and inexperienced OL, a true frosh QB, and a bunch of JAGs at the WR position, then I don't know what to tell you.

    The above doesn't mean that Pete and Smith don't deserve heat or that Smith is in way over his head and should be fired (he should) ... some of you fucktards either need to learn the difference or book yourself in a Hell in a Cell match against Brock Lesner.
    huh?

    @HuskyInAZ semen must be in your eyes if you can't see that I never said people who thought we would have a good offense and a bad defense were smart.

    Great strawman as always though
  • Dennis_DeYoung
    Dennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    HFNY said:

    @DerekJohnson said this during the podcast and hit the nail on the head: "It's clear Jonathan Smith doesn't know what he's doing". Even with a back-up QB, I would've called a different game than how he did.

    At what point does Kwiatkowski try to punch out Babushka a la Buddy Ryan?

    Petersen has to coach up his coaches so he better be spending nearly all his time with Smith.

    I can't believe they didn't let KJCS do a read-option with him keeping it at least once.

    Trey Adams played better, nice to see.

    @FremontTroll had the call to take UW +19. I got in at +18 and feel lucky since I was guessing Browning was going to play (I projected Stanford to win 33-20 with Browning playing).

    I like how the OL looked (Eldrenkamp particularly) in the running game and thought the pass protection was decent. The sack I remember (out of 3) was Coleman Shelton getting beat, maybe it was a stunt.

    I said it after the USC game and I'll say it again, this is a 6 win team. Don't know how that makes me a Doog in ThomasFremont's mind or that I agree with him that JS needs to be terminated.

    Gotta beat Arizona to get to those 6 wins. Browning is going to play and Huskies will win 27-20 with an assist from the weather, making life difficult for Randall and / or Solomon.

    I read that whole poast in Pedro from Napoleon Dynamite's class president speech voice and it really made it enjoyable.
  • Dennis_DeYoung
    Dennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    Houhusky said:

    Tequilla said:

    Houhusky said:

    HFNY said:

    @DerekJohnson said this during the podcast and hit the nail on the head: "It's clear Jonathan Smith doesn't know what he's doing". Even with a back-up QB, I would've called a different game than how he did.

    At what point does Kwiatkowski try to punch out Babushka a la Buddy Ryan?

    Petersen has to coach up his coaches so he better be spending nearly all his time with Smith.

    I can't believe they didn't let KJCS do a read-option with him keeping it at least once.

    Trey Adams played better, nice to see.

    @FremontTroll had the call to take UW +19. I got in at +18 and feel lucky since I was guessing Browning was going to play (I projected Stanford to win 33-20 with Browning playing).

    I like how the OL looked (Eldrenkamp particularly) in the running game and thought the pass protection was decent. The sack I remember (out of 3) was Coleman Shelton getting beat, maybe it was a stunt.

    I said it after the USC game and I'll say it again, this is a 6 win team. Don't know how that makes me a Doog in ThomasFremont's mind or that I agree with him that JS needs to be terminated.

    Gotta beat Arizona to get to those 6 wins. Browning is going to play and Huskies will win 27-20 with an assist from the weather, making life difficult for Randall and / or Solomon.


    You're a doog because you think that the reason we have sucked is because of youth, not poor coaching and game planing. It's straight out of the doog playbook, blame the players not the coach.

    Welcome to husky football, where the sum is always less than the parts.

    Intelligent posters will note that most people predicted atleast 7-8 wins this season, but mostly due to losing so much on defense, not the offense (PetersIins wheelhouse) somehow finding a way to regress.
    I like to say that those that predicted good offense and poor defense this year are smart ... and those that called the opposite even though time is proving that side to be correct are doogs ... that's what I like to do.

    If you couldn't see that the offense was going to struggle with a young and inexperienced OL, a true frosh QB, and a bunch of JAGs at the WR position, then I don't know what to tell you.

    The above doesn't mean that Pete and Smith don't deserve heat or that Smith is in way over his head and should be fired (he should) ... some of you fucktards either need to learn the difference or book yourself in a Hell in a Cell match against Brock Lesner.
    huh?

    @HuskyInAZ semen must be in your eyes if you can't see that I never said people who thought we would have a good offense and a bad defense were smart.

    Great strawman as always though
    The only thing moar annoying than some shit bag poaster using a strawman argument to say something dumb is some shit-bag poaster angrily pointing it out like they are fucking logic-man.

    It's fucking embarrassing.
  • HFNY
    HFNY Member Posts: 5,502
    It isn't an either / or.

    The secondary is well coached and struggled last year due to youth but got it turned mostly turned around by season's end.

    The offense is struggling due to youth AND coaching. Problem is, I don't see Petersen firing JS during the season so unless JS suddenly morphs into a top-flight coordinator, the offense will only slowly improve the rest of the year with Browning back.

    I don't see how pointing all of this out makes anyone a Doog...it is what it is.
    Houhusky said:

    HFNY said:

    @DerekJohnson said this during the podcast and hit the nail on the head: "It's clear Jonathan Smith doesn't know what he's doing". Even with a back-up QB, I would've called a different game than how he did.

    At what point does Kwiatkowski try to punch out Babushka a la Buddy Ryan?

    Petersen has to coach up his coaches so he better be spending nearly all his time with Smith.

    I can't believe they didn't let KJCS do a read-option with him keeping it at least once.

    Trey Adams played better, nice to see.

    @FremontTroll had the call to take UW +19. I got in at +18 and feel lucky since I was guessing Browning was going to play (I projected Stanford to win 33-20 with Browning playing).

    I like how the OL looked (Eldrenkamp particularly) in the running game and thought the pass protection was decent. The sack I remember (out of 3) was Coleman Shelton getting beat, maybe it was a stunt.

    I said it after the USC game and I'll say it again, this is a 6 win team. Don't know how that makes me a Doog in ThomasFremont's mind or that I agree with him that JS needs to be terminated.

    Gotta beat Arizona to get to those 6 wins. Browning is going to play and Huskies will win 27-20 with an assist from the weather, making life difficult for Randall and / or Solomon.


    You're a doog because you think that the reason we have sucked is because of youth, not poor coaching and game planing. It's straight out of the doog playbook, blame the players not the coach.

    Welcome to husky football, where the sum is always less than the parts.

    Intelligent posters will note that most people predicted atleast 7-8 wins this season, but mostly due to losing so much on defense, not the offense (PetersIins wheelhouse) somehow finding a way to regress.
  • theknowledge
    theknowledge Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,816 Founders Club
    HFNY said:

    It isn't an either / or.

    The secondary is well coached and struggled last year due to youth but got it turned mostly turned around by season's end.

    The offense is struggling due to youth AND coaching. Problem is, I don't see Petersen firing JS during the season so unless JS suddenly morphs into a top-flight coordinator, the offense will only slowly improve the rest of the year with Browning back.

    I don't see how pointing all of this out makes anyone a Doog...it is what it is.

    Houhusky said:

    HFNY said:

    @DerekJohnson said this during the podcast and hit the nail on the head: "It's clear Jonathan Smith doesn't know what he's doing". Even with a back-up QB, I would've called a different game than how he did.

    At what point does Kwiatkowski try to punch out Babushka a la Buddy Ryan?

    Petersen has to coach up his coaches so he better be spending nearly all his time with Smith.

    I can't believe they didn't let KJCS do a read-option with him keeping it at least once.

    Trey Adams played better, nice to see.

    @FremontTroll had the call to take UW +19. I got in at +18 and feel lucky since I was guessing Browning was going to play (I projected Stanford to win 33-20 with Browning playing).

    I like how the OL looked (Eldrenkamp particularly) in the running game and thought the pass protection was decent. The sack I remember (out of 3) was Coleman Shelton getting beat, maybe it was a stunt.

    I said it after the USC game and I'll say it again, this is a 6 win team. Don't know how that makes me a Doog in ThomasFremont's mind or that I agree with him that JS needs to be terminated.

    Gotta beat Arizona to get to those 6 wins. Browning is going to play and Huskies will win 27-20 with an assist from the weather, making life difficult for Randall and / or Solomon.


    You're a doog because you think that the reason we have sucked is because of youth, not poor coaching and game planing. It's straight out of the doog playbook, blame the players not the coach.

    Welcome to husky football, where the sum is always less than the parts.

    Intelligent posters will note that most people predicted atleast 7-8 wins this season, but mostly due to losing so much on defense, not the offense (PetersIins wheelhouse) somehow finding a way to regress.
    This. Smith SUCKS, we are young, the defense is decent and Peterman may or may not be the guy. This isn't hard, we watch this shit every Saturday.
  • priapism
    priapism Member Posts: 2,376
    The OL isn't playing as bad as I thought they would be, which is a small +, but every other position on the offense appears to be regressing. The WRs look like shit...worst group of hands since 2008. These POS O coaches need to get the QB-WR timing down and balls caught! How many 1-8 yard passes did Carta-Samuels underthrow?
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,762
    Smith should have been fired last year or never hired at all.

    That's all on Pete dude.