MyGaskin
Keith B. will still have Washington and will add speed-merchant McGrew in 2016. Would like to get a thumper for the 2017 class since DW will gone and Coleman will be a RS-SR.
seattletimes.com/sports/uw-husky-football/freshman-running-back-myles-gaskin-getting-comfortable-with-expanded-role-in-huskies-offense/
Comments
-
Yes, that would be great. Then we could watch Peterman continue to not run the ball with even better RBs.
-
I hate the cliche of needing a thumper. Bishop Sankey never needed to come out of the game and he wasn't a "thumper." Dalvin Cook on FSU isn't either. Just get some good fucking RB's. Gaskin is one.
-
Da-fuq?!?! Peterman will run the freaking ball!
.
.
.
.
.
at least once every 3 drives, of maybe 2 drives if our RB goes for 70+ on a run.Dardanus said:Yes, that would be great. Then we could watch Peterman continue to not run the ball with even better RBs.
-
"Running the ball isn't always the best way to attack a defense. It's really hard to run the ball. Maybe we could have been a little more stubborn in the run game. We still are figuring things out, but once these guys are seniors, they will have the necessary experience to best attack a defense."
-
FUCK!RoadDawg55 said:"Running the ball isn't always the best way to attack a defense. It's really hard to run the ball. Maybe we could have been a little more stubborn in the run game. We still are figuring things out, but once these guys are seniors, they will have the necessary experience to best attack a defense."
-
Why do you hate Johnie Kirton?RoadDawg55 said:I hate the cliche of needing a thumper. Bishop Sankey never needed to come out of the game and he wasn't a "thumper." Dalvin Cook on FSU isn't either. Just get some good fucking RB's. Gaskin is one.
-
This is where Peterman probably misses an AD who gets it.
If UW had an AD who:
A) Was straight
Cared about winning
C) Understood football
He would be pushing Peterman ... not accepting his bullshit.
It's like when I go into a conversation with an IT director. The fucker will talk me in circles, unless I go in with some asshole who speaks that geek shit. Then the IT director knows he is fucked and has to do what I am wanting.
-
Yeah, but where are you going to find a straight guy who cares about winning and knows football these days?
-
-
I actually agree with him in general. Assuming you have a competent passing game, it might be best to attack certain defenses with the pass more than the run.RoadDawg55 said:"Running the ball isn't always the best way to attack a defense. It's really hard to run the ball. Maybe we could have been a little more stubborn in the run game. We still are figuring things out, but once these guys are seniors, they will have the necessary experience to best attack a defense."
But we don't have a competent passing game. So it ends up being ridiculous.
It is one thing to realize Oregon has weaknesses in the secondary. That is what a good coach would do. But to create an entire gameplan around your non-existant passing game is asinine. And then defending it after you have seen the results of your idiocy is even worse.
