Yes, that would be great. Then we could watch Peterman continue to not run the ball with even better RBs.
"Running the ball isn't always the best way to attack a defense. It's really hard to run the ball. Maybe we could have been a little more stubborn in the run game. We still are figuring things out, but once these guys are seniors, they will have the necessary experience to best attack a defense."
I hate the cliche of needing a thumper. Bishop Sankey never needed to come out of the game and he wasn't a "thumper." Dalvin Cook on FSU isn't either. Just get some good fucking RB's. Gaskin is one.
Yes, that would be great. Then we could watch Peterman continue to not run the ball with even better RBs. Bubble screens, slow offense, and shitty clock management are the hallmarks of a winner.What's this "running game" you speak of???
Yes, that would be great. Then we could watch Peterman continue to not run the ball with even better RBs. Bubble screens, slow offense, and shitty clock management are the hallmarks of a winner.What's this "running game" you speak of??? It's the thing you're supposed to use when you have 4th and 1 at your opponent's 39 yard line.
I know it's confirmation bias, but I only remember the times Petersen has been wrong. I can think of quite a few scenarios. When has he been right in a coaching situation?