Husky Fan Podcast: Post USC, Pre-Oregon
Comments
-
Though I'm fully aware of @TheScript, I'll be really disappointed if #MyIrish don't break off the plunger in them. Scorch the earth, salt the fields.RoadDawg55 said:
My bold prediction is that USC will beat Notre Dame and Utah. They will play a lot better without the Sark distraction. Then they lose to your Brooins.BallSacked said:
Thanks Chestes. I do it for the calls and message board glory, not the pub, but appreciate your ts & ps all the same.HeretoBeatmyChest said:I inteded to give @BallSacked a shoutout but forgot. His consistent and steadfast call for a UW win should be its own profile in courage.
Maybe confirmation bias but I thought SCs line play was going to be pretty mediocre without Leonard Williams and Pullard...and it is. I could see them losing the next two games, and hopefully my Bruins beat them too.
Thanks to the dawgs of war for blowing out Tureks ACL. Much appreciated for doing us that solid. -
Maybe they get up for one, but not both. The emotional aspect in football is like getting hopped up on Mountain Dew. It's great for 5 minutes, then reality comes crashing in on you along with your blood sugar level.RoadDawg55 said:
My bold prediction is that USC will beat Notre Dame and Utah. They will play a lot better without the Sark distraction. Then they lose to your Brooins.BallSacked said:
Thanks Chestes. I do it for the calls and message board glory, not the pub, but appreciate your ts & ps all the same.HeretoBeatmyChest said:I inteded to give @BallSacked a shoutout but forgot. His consistent and steadfast call for a UW win should be its own profile in courage.
Maybe confirmation bias but I thought SCs line play was going to be pretty mediocre without Leonard Williams and Pullard...and it is. I could see them losing the next two games, and hopefully my Bruins beat them too.
Thanks to the dawgs of war for blowing out Tureks ACL. Much appreciated for doing us that solid.
I do not see them beating Utah, frankly, and Washington beating them was not in any way whatsoever a surprise to me.
That's how shitty Sark is, and SC teams, in general, tend to get a little too much hype relative to what's really there. -
You owe us a solid on Stanford Thirsday night. #RootingForInjuriesBallSacked said:
Thanks Chestes. I do it for the calls and message board glory, not the pub, but appreciate your ts & ps all the same.HeretoBeatmyChest said:I inteded to give @BallSacked a shoutout but forgot. His consistent and steadfast call for a UW win should be its own profile in courage.
Maybe confirmation bias but I thought SCs line play was going to be pretty mediocre without Leonard Williams and Pullard...and it is. I could see them losing the next two games, and hopefully my Bruins beat them too.
Thanks to the dawgs of war for blowing out Tureks ACL. Much appreciated for doing us that solid. -
It's October 13th and we're still concerned about league standings? This feels very awkward.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
You owe us a solid on Stanford Thirsday night. #RootingForInjuriesBallSacked said:
Thanks Chestes. I do it for the calls and message board glory, not the pub, but appreciate your ts & ps all the same.HeretoBeatmyChest said:I inteded to give @BallSacked a shoutout but forgot. His consistent and steadfast call for a UW win should be its own profile in courage.
Maybe confirmation bias but I thought SCs line play was going to be pretty mediocre without Leonard Williams and Pullard...and it is. I could see them losing the next two games, and hopefully my Bruins beat them too.
Thanks to the dawgs of war for blowing out Tureks ACL. Much appreciated for doing us that solid. -
You have to remember how much the pac-12 sucks this year.DerekJohnson said:
It's October 13th and we're still concerned about league standings? This feels very awkward.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
You owe us a solid on Stanford Thirsday night. #RootingForInjuriesBallSacked said:
Thanks Chestes. I do it for the calls and message board glory, not the pub, but appreciate your ts & ps all the same.HeretoBeatmyChest said:I inteded to give @BallSacked a shoutout but forgot. His consistent and steadfast call for a UW win should be its own profile in courage.
Maybe confirmation bias but I thought SCs line play was going to be pretty mediocre without Leonard Williams and Pullard...and it is. I could see them losing the next two games, and hopefully my Bruins beat them too.
Thanks to the dawgs of war for blowing out Tureks ACL. Much appreciated for doing us that solid.
-
Hippopeteamus said:
You have to remember how much the pac-12 sucks this year.DerekJohnson said:
It's October 13th and we're still concerned about league standings? This feels very awkward.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
You owe us a solid on Stanford Thirsday night. #RootingForInjuriesBallSacked said:
Thanks Chestes. I do it for the calls and message board glory, not the pub, but appreciate your ts & ps all the same.HeretoBeatmyChest said:I inteded to give @BallSacked a shoutout but forgot. His consistent and steadfast call for a UW win should be its own profile in courage.
Maybe confirmation bias but I thought SCs line play was going to be pretty mediocre without Leonard Williams and Pullard...and it is. I could see them losing the next two games, and hopefully my Bruins beat them too.
Thanks to the dawgs of war for blowing out Tureks ACL. Much appreciated for doing us that solid.
-
my take is that UW laid the groundwork for ND and Utah to physically punish Kessler early and often.creepycoug said:
Maybe they get up for one, but not both. The emotional aspect in football is like getting hopped up on Mountain Dew. It's great for 5 minutes, then reality comes crashing in on you along with your blood sugar level.RoadDawg55 said:
My bold prediction is that USC will beat Notre Dame and Utah. They will play a lot better without the Sark distraction. Then they lose to your Brooins.BallSacked said:
Thanks Chestes. I do it for the calls and message board glory, not the pub, but appreciate your ts & ps all the same.HeretoBeatmyChest said:I inteded to give @BallSacked a shoutout but forgot. His consistent and steadfast call for a UW win should be its own profile in courage.
Maybe confirmation bias but I thought SCs line play was going to be pretty mediocre without Leonard Williams and Pullard...and it is. I could see them losing the next two games, and hopefully my Bruins beat them too.
Thanks to the dawgs of war for blowing out Tureks ACL. Much appreciated for doing us that solid.
I do not see them beating Utah, frankly, and Washington beating them was not in any way whatsoever a surprise to me.
That's how shitty Sark is, and SC teams, in general, tend to get a little too much hype relative to what's really there. -
Notre Dame gets acreepycoug said:
Maybe they get up for one, but not both. The emotional aspect in football is like getting hopped up on Mountain Dew. It's great for 5 minutes, then reality comes crashing in on you along with your blood sugar level.RoadDawg55 said:
My bold prediction is that USC will beat Notre Dame and Utah. They will play a lot better without the Sark distraction. Then they lose to your Brooins.BallSacked said:
Thanks Chestes. I do it for the calls and message board glory, not the pub, but appreciate your ts & ps all the same.HeretoBeatmyChest said:I inteded to give @BallSacked a shoutout but forgot. His consistent and steadfast call for a UW win should be its own profile in courage.
Maybe confirmation bias but I thought SCs line play was going to be pretty mediocre without Leonard Williams and Pullard...and it is. I could see them losing the next two games, and hopefully my Bruins beat them too.
Thanks to the dawgs of war for blowing out Tureks ACL. Much appreciated for doing us that solid.
I do not see them beating Utah, frankly, and Washington beating them was not in any way whatsoever a surprise to me.
That's how shitty Sark is, and SC teams, in general, tend to get a little too much hype relative to what's really there.littlelot of undeserved hype every year. Other than the 2012 title appearance (where they were plungered) they have been a mediocre program for a long time.
Utah is a good team, but they are bound to lose a couple games. -
ND was good to very good at the start of the season. Injuries knocked them back down quite a bit.RoadDawg55 said:
Notre Dame gets acreepycoug said:
Maybe they get up for one, but not both. The emotional aspect in football is like getting hopped up on Mountain Dew. It's great for 5 minutes, then reality comes crashing in on you along with your blood sugar level.RoadDawg55 said:
My bold prediction is that USC will beat Notre Dame and Utah. They will play a lot better without the Sark distraction. Then they lose to your Brooins.BallSacked said:
Thanks Chestes. I do it for the calls and message board glory, not the pub, but appreciate your ts & ps all the same.HeretoBeatmyChest said:I inteded to give @BallSacked a shoutout but forgot. His consistent and steadfast call for a UW win should be its own profile in courage.
Maybe confirmation bias but I thought SCs line play was going to be pretty mediocre without Leonard Williams and Pullard...and it is. I could see them losing the next two games, and hopefully my Bruins beat them too.
Thanks to the dawgs of war for blowing out Tureks ACL. Much appreciated for doing us that solid.
I do not see them beating Utah, frankly, and Washington beating them was not in any way whatsoever a surprise to me.
That's how shitty Sark is, and SC teams, in general, tend to get a little too much hype relative to what's really there.littlelot of undeserved hype every year. Other than the 2012 title appearance (where they were plungered) they have been a mediocre program for a long time.
Utah is a good team, but they are bound to lose a couple games. -
He followed sark to USC... we knew it wouldn't end well... how couldn't tui know that.RoadDawg55 said:
What are the USC coaches supposed to do? They aren't in charge of Sark. Would you quit your job if your boss was a drunk?jecornel said:What was Tui thinking? Riding that drunken ship? So bizarre.
Players, coaches knew he was drunk all these years.
All these enablers are sick people..... just sick people.






