Husky Fan Podcast: Post USC, Pre-Oregon
About an hour and 20 minutes. Sark shit lasted until 31 minutes in. Then football talk. We wrap up USC game, question if we are turning a corner, then preview Oregon.
Some of you fucks got shoutouts.
Comments
-
-
haven't even listened yet and already know this shit will be epic
-
Ahahahaha Cowturd intro, nice one guys.
They are entertaining, but they are like a high school locker room, with inside jokes, juvenile humor, and fear of homosexuals. They also like abbreviations, most of which I have no clue what they are talking about. -
Can't wait for the ESPN 30 for 30 on Sark.
Interviewing @HeretoBeatmyChest while he's chowing down on a plate of steak and a loaded baked potato. @jecornel can't stay awake and @RoadDawg55 telling them all how they are doing it wrong and then throwing a shout out to @DerekJohnson books and the @Hardcore_Husky bored and Podcast NETWORK -
FREE PUB!
I love you to Chest. Not in a gay way. Like a manly thing. -
Referenced Colin Cowherd video below;
I had not seen this prior to it being brought up on this weeks podcast. Watching with fresh eyes given what has gone down at SC since Friday is hilarious. All the vitriol he has for Sarks detractors - how clueless they are or perhaps just axe grinders with an agenda - with hindsight he is talking about himself. About Peterman dragging the program down from the heights sark had elevated to. Cowherd's analysis and opinion couldnt be anymore wrong. What a clown. He has eyeliner on too. What a fag
https://youtu.be/bvuGn8sdgi4 -
He's not wrong. The media (him) is wrong and (he) has an agenda. What ever the fuck that is! Freakin Rollin ... down hillSpoonieLuv said:Referenced Colin Cowherd video below;
I had not seen this prior to it being brought up on this weeks podcast. Watching with fresh eyes given what has gone down at SC since Friday is hilarious. All the vitriol he has for Sarks detractors - how clueless they are or perhaps just axe grinders with an agenda - with hindsight he is talking about himself. About Peterman dragging the program down from the heights sark had elevated to. Cowherd's analysis and opinion couldnt be anymore wrong. What a clown. He has eyeliner on too. What a faghttps://youtu.be/bvuGn8sdgi4 -
Do we Friday's and Monday's video?
-
Good poad as always.
Re the last defensive series, good point on personnel. I went to look.
This is the play right after Littleton's roughing. Dissley, Virta and String.
The next play, Damion Turpin (who?), Virta and #MyTevis in the game
-
Furthermore, on #OurDissly, this is also in the last series.
@DisslyDawg makes a pretty good play, keeping a two-gap assignment on the edge and forcing the back inside. But Virta gets eaten up on a combo. Azeem probably makes the stop regardless for a 1-2 yard gain. -
From Monday:SpoonieLuv said:Referenced Colin Cowherd video below;
I had not seen this prior to it being brought up on this weeks podcast. Watching with fresh eyes given what has gone down at SC since Friday is hilarious. All the vitriol he has for Sarks detractors - how clueless they are or perhaps just axe grinders with an agenda - with hindsight he is talking about himself. About Peterman dragging the program down from the heights sark had elevated to. Cowherd's analysis and opinion couldnt be anymore wrong. What a clown. He has eyeliner on too. What a faghttps://youtu.be/bvuGn8sdgi4
http://www.am570lasports.com/media/podcast-the-herd-with-colin-cowherd-ColinCowherd/1012-colin-cowherd-hour-1-26422220/
Basically Cowherd tries to defend himself and Haden's hiring of Sark. Then Bruce Feldmen comes in and calls cowherd naive and clearly refutes all of Cowherd's points.
Edit: Well now, he then goes back to saying what he said earlier and almost appears to not have heard one thing that Feldmen said. What an asshat. -
good work bringing up the metrics @HeretoBeatmyChest. I don't think people realize if Oregon wins *that* will be an upset.
-
Colin invested in Liquor stores? After sharing his past? That is some dark shit dude.Hippopeteamus said:
From Monday:SpoonieLuv said:Referenced Colin Cowherd video below;
I had not seen this prior to it being brought up on this weeks podcast. Watching with fresh eyes given what has gone down at SC since Friday is hilarious. All the vitriol he has for Sarks detractors - how clueless they are or perhaps just axe grinders with an agenda - with hindsight he is talking about himself. About Peterman dragging the program down from the heights sark had elevated to. Cowherd's analysis and opinion couldnt be anymore wrong. What a clown. He has eyeliner on too. What a faghttps://youtu.be/bvuGn8sdgi4
http://www.am570lasports.com/media/podcast-the-herd-with-colin-cowherd-ColinCowherd/1012-colin-cowherd-hour-1-26422220/
Basically Cowherd tries to defend himself and Haden's hiring of Sark. Then Bruce Feldmen comes in and calls cowherd naive and clearly refutes all of Cowherd's points.
Edit: Well now, he then goes back to saying what he said earlier and almost appears to not have heard one thing that Feldmen said. What an asshat.
This guy has major issues. MAJOR. That is why he has a soft spot for him. Both divorced and battling "demons"
-
Yep. Colin and KJV are just like Sark.jecornel said:
Colin invested in Liquor stores? After sharing his past? That is some dark shit dude.Hippopeteamus said:
From Monday:SpoonieLuv said:Referenced Colin Cowherd video below;
I had not seen this prior to it being brought up on this weeks podcast. Watching with fresh eyes given what has gone down at SC since Friday is hilarious. All the vitriol he has for Sarks detractors - how clueless they are or perhaps just axe grinders with an agenda - with hindsight he is talking about himself. About Peterman dragging the program down from the heights sark had elevated to. Cowherd's analysis and opinion couldnt be anymore wrong. What a clown. He has eyeliner on too. What a faghttps://youtu.be/bvuGn8sdgi4
http://www.am570lasports.com/media/podcast-the-herd-with-colin-cowherd-ColinCowherd/1012-colin-cowherd-hour-1-26422220/
Basically Cowherd tries to defend himself and Haden's hiring of Sark. Then Bruce Feldmen comes in and calls cowherd naive and clearly refutes all of Cowherd's points.
Edit: Well now, he then goes back to saying what he said earlier and almost appears to not have heard one thing that Feldmen said. What an asshat.
This guy has major issues. MAJOR. That is why he has a soft spot for him. Both divorced and battling "demons" -
What was Tui thinking? Riding that drunken ship? So bizarre.
Players, coaches knew he was drunk all these years.
All these enablers are sick people..... just sick people.
-
What are the USC coaches supposed to do? They aren't in charge of Sark. Would you quit your job if your boss was a drunk?jecornel said:What was Tui thinking? Riding that drunken ship? So bizarre.
Players, coaches knew he was drunk all these years.
All these enablers are sick people..... just sick people. -
I inteded to give @BallSacked a shoutout but forgot. His consistent and steadfast call for a UW win should be its own profile in courage.
-
Thanks Chestes. I do it for the calls and message board glory, not the pub, but appreciate your ts & ps all the same.HeretoBeatmyChest said:I inteded to give @BallSacked a shoutout but forgot. His consistent and steadfast call for a UW win should be its own profile in courage.
Maybe confirmation bias but I thought SCs line play was going to be pretty mediocre without Leonard Williams and Pullard...and it is. I could see them losing the next two games, and hopefully my Bruins beat them too.
Thanks to the dawgs of war for blowing out Tureks ACL. Much appreciated for doing us that solid.
-
Thank you for the kind words in the intro, I appreciate it.
-
My bold prediction is that USC will beat Notre Dame and Utah. They will play a lot better without the Sark distraction. Then they lose to your Brooins.BallSacked said:
Thanks Chestes. I do it for the calls and message board glory, not the pub, but appreciate your ts & ps all the same.HeretoBeatmyChest said:I inteded to give @BallSacked a shoutout but forgot. His consistent and steadfast call for a UW win should be its own profile in courage.
Maybe confirmation bias but I thought SCs line play was going to be pretty mediocre without Leonard Williams and Pullard...and it is. I could see them losing the next two games, and hopefully my Bruins beat them too.
Thanks to the dawgs of war for blowing out Tureks ACL. Much appreciated for doing us that solid. -
Though I'm fully aware of @TheScript, I'll be really disappointed if #MyIrish don't break off the plunger in them. Scorch the earth, salt the fields.RoadDawg55 said:
My bold prediction is that USC will beat Notre Dame and Utah. They will play a lot better without the Sark distraction. Then they lose to your Brooins.BallSacked said:
Thanks Chestes. I do it for the calls and message board glory, not the pub, but appreciate your ts & ps all the same.HeretoBeatmyChest said:I inteded to give @BallSacked a shoutout but forgot. His consistent and steadfast call for a UW win should be its own profile in courage.
Maybe confirmation bias but I thought SCs line play was going to be pretty mediocre without Leonard Williams and Pullard...and it is. I could see them losing the next two games, and hopefully my Bruins beat them too.
Thanks to the dawgs of war for blowing out Tureks ACL. Much appreciated for doing us that solid. -
Maybe they get up for one, but not both. The emotional aspect in football is like getting hopped up on Mountain Dew. It's great for 5 minutes, then reality comes crashing in on you along with your blood sugar level.RoadDawg55 said:
My bold prediction is that USC will beat Notre Dame and Utah. They will play a lot better without the Sark distraction. Then they lose to your Brooins.BallSacked said:
Thanks Chestes. I do it for the calls and message board glory, not the pub, but appreciate your ts & ps all the same.HeretoBeatmyChest said:I inteded to give @BallSacked a shoutout but forgot. His consistent and steadfast call for a UW win should be its own profile in courage.
Maybe confirmation bias but I thought SCs line play was going to be pretty mediocre without Leonard Williams and Pullard...and it is. I could see them losing the next two games, and hopefully my Bruins beat them too.
Thanks to the dawgs of war for blowing out Tureks ACL. Much appreciated for doing us that solid.
I do not see them beating Utah, frankly, and Washington beating them was not in any way whatsoever a surprise to me.
That's how shitty Sark is, and SC teams, in general, tend to get a little too much hype relative to what's really there. -
You owe us a solid on Stanford Thirsday night. #RootingForInjuriesBallSacked said:
Thanks Chestes. I do it for the calls and message board glory, not the pub, but appreciate your ts & ps all the same.HeretoBeatmyChest said:I inteded to give @BallSacked a shoutout but forgot. His consistent and steadfast call for a UW win should be its own profile in courage.
Maybe confirmation bias but I thought SCs line play was going to be pretty mediocre without Leonard Williams and Pullard...and it is. I could see them losing the next two games, and hopefully my Bruins beat them too.
Thanks to the dawgs of war for blowing out Tureks ACL. Much appreciated for doing us that solid. -
It's October 13th and we're still concerned about league standings? This feels very awkward.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
You owe us a solid on Stanford Thirsday night. #RootingForInjuriesBallSacked said:
Thanks Chestes. I do it for the calls and message board glory, not the pub, but appreciate your ts & ps all the same.HeretoBeatmyChest said:I inteded to give @BallSacked a shoutout but forgot. His consistent and steadfast call for a UW win should be its own profile in courage.
Maybe confirmation bias but I thought SCs line play was going to be pretty mediocre without Leonard Williams and Pullard...and it is. I could see them losing the next two games, and hopefully my Bruins beat them too.
Thanks to the dawgs of war for blowing out Tureks ACL. Much appreciated for doing us that solid. -
You have to remember how much the pac-12 sucks this year.DerekJohnson said:
It's October 13th and we're still concerned about league standings? This feels very awkward.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
You owe us a solid on Stanford Thirsday night. #RootingForInjuriesBallSacked said:
Thanks Chestes. I do it for the calls and message board glory, not the pub, but appreciate your ts & ps all the same.HeretoBeatmyChest said:I inteded to give @BallSacked a shoutout but forgot. His consistent and steadfast call for a UW win should be its own profile in courage.
Maybe confirmation bias but I thought SCs line play was going to be pretty mediocre without Leonard Williams and Pullard...and it is. I could see them losing the next two games, and hopefully my Bruins beat them too.
Thanks to the dawgs of war for blowing out Tureks ACL. Much appreciated for doing us that solid.
-
Hippopeteamus said:
You have to remember how much the pac-12 sucks this year.DerekJohnson said:
It's October 13th and we're still concerned about league standings? This feels very awkward.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
You owe us a solid on Stanford Thirsday night. #RootingForInjuriesBallSacked said:
Thanks Chestes. I do it for the calls and message board glory, not the pub, but appreciate your ts & ps all the same.HeretoBeatmyChest said:I inteded to give @BallSacked a shoutout but forgot. His consistent and steadfast call for a UW win should be its own profile in courage.
Maybe confirmation bias but I thought SCs line play was going to be pretty mediocre without Leonard Williams and Pullard...and it is. I could see them losing the next two games, and hopefully my Bruins beat them too.
Thanks to the dawgs of war for blowing out Tureks ACL. Much appreciated for doing us that solid.
-
my take is that UW laid the groundwork for ND and Utah to physically punish Kessler early and often.creepycoug said:
Maybe they get up for one, but not both. The emotional aspect in football is like getting hopped up on Mountain Dew. It's great for 5 minutes, then reality comes crashing in on you along with your blood sugar level.RoadDawg55 said:
My bold prediction is that USC will beat Notre Dame and Utah. They will play a lot better without the Sark distraction. Then they lose to your Brooins.BallSacked said:
Thanks Chestes. I do it for the calls and message board glory, not the pub, but appreciate your ts & ps all the same.HeretoBeatmyChest said:I inteded to give @BallSacked a shoutout but forgot. His consistent and steadfast call for a UW win should be its own profile in courage.
Maybe confirmation bias but I thought SCs line play was going to be pretty mediocre without Leonard Williams and Pullard...and it is. I could see them losing the next two games, and hopefully my Bruins beat them too.
Thanks to the dawgs of war for blowing out Tureks ACL. Much appreciated for doing us that solid.
I do not see them beating Utah, frankly, and Washington beating them was not in any way whatsoever a surprise to me.
That's how shitty Sark is, and SC teams, in general, tend to get a little too much hype relative to what's really there. -
Notre Dame gets acreepycoug said:
Maybe they get up for one, but not both. The emotional aspect in football is like getting hopped up on Mountain Dew. It's great for 5 minutes, then reality comes crashing in on you along with your blood sugar level.RoadDawg55 said:
My bold prediction is that USC will beat Notre Dame and Utah. They will play a lot better without the Sark distraction. Then they lose to your Brooins.BallSacked said:
Thanks Chestes. I do it for the calls and message board glory, not the pub, but appreciate your ts & ps all the same.HeretoBeatmyChest said:I inteded to give @BallSacked a shoutout but forgot. His consistent and steadfast call for a UW win should be its own profile in courage.
Maybe confirmation bias but I thought SCs line play was going to be pretty mediocre without Leonard Williams and Pullard...and it is. I could see them losing the next two games, and hopefully my Bruins beat them too.
Thanks to the dawgs of war for blowing out Tureks ACL. Much appreciated for doing us that solid.
I do not see them beating Utah, frankly, and Washington beating them was not in any way whatsoever a surprise to me.
That's how shitty Sark is, and SC teams, in general, tend to get a little too much hype relative to what's really there.littlelot of undeserved hype every year. Other than the 2012 title appearance (where they were plungered) they have been a mediocre program for a long time.
Utah is a good team, but they are bound to lose a couple games. -
ND was good to very good at the start of the season. Injuries knocked them back down quite a bit.RoadDawg55 said:
Notre Dame gets acreepycoug said:
Maybe they get up for one, but not both. The emotional aspect in football is like getting hopped up on Mountain Dew. It's great for 5 minutes, then reality comes crashing in on you along with your blood sugar level.RoadDawg55 said:
My bold prediction is that USC will beat Notre Dame and Utah. They will play a lot better without the Sark distraction. Then they lose to your Brooins.BallSacked said:
Thanks Chestes. I do it for the calls and message board glory, not the pub, but appreciate your ts & ps all the same.HeretoBeatmyChest said:I inteded to give @BallSacked a shoutout but forgot. His consistent and steadfast call for a UW win should be its own profile in courage.
Maybe confirmation bias but I thought SCs line play was going to be pretty mediocre without Leonard Williams and Pullard...and it is. I could see them losing the next two games, and hopefully my Bruins beat them too.
Thanks to the dawgs of war for blowing out Tureks ACL. Much appreciated for doing us that solid.
I do not see them beating Utah, frankly, and Washington beating them was not in any way whatsoever a surprise to me.
That's how shitty Sark is, and SC teams, in general, tend to get a little too much hype relative to what's really there.littlelot of undeserved hype every year. Other than the 2012 title appearance (where they were plungered) they have been a mediocre program for a long time.
Utah is a good team, but they are bound to lose a couple games. -
He followed sark to USC... we knew it wouldn't end well... how couldn't tui know that.RoadDawg55 said:
What are the USC coaches supposed to do? They aren't in charge of Sark. Would you quit your job if your boss was a drunk?jecornel said:What was Tui thinking? Riding that drunken ship? So bizarre.
Players, coaches knew he was drunk all these years.
All these enablers are sick people..... just sick people.
