Arizona is not better than Boise or Illinois
Even then, no one win is going to "prove" anything. We beat Stanford last year, then got routed by Arizona and choked against WSU and Boise.
Comments
-
Dunno if Zona is better than BSU or Illy, but they proved last season they are way better than us.
-
So? Did you factor in sark being retarded?
-
Yes they are
-
If you can't see this is the same team as 2010, even PLSS Can't help you. Maybe we need to wait a couple more years to see if sark is actually an average coach.
-
Your_Mom said:
Dunno if Zona is better than BSU or Illy, but they proved last season they are way better than us.
They had a very good QB last year. He graduated. We played them down there last year. -
Auburndawg said:Your_Mom said:
Dunno if Zona is better than BSU or Illy, but they proved last season they are way better than us.
They had a very good QB last year. He graduated. We played them down there last year.
Their defense and running game are both better this year, both definitely better than anything the Huskies have seen so far. Huskies are currently 7 point favorites and should win the game, but it could just as likely go the other way. LIFPO -
Based on what? They have played no one.
-
-
Based on what? Arizona has one of the best RB's in the country you piece of shit. They definitely have a better running game then Boise or Illinois. Do you ever know what the fuck you are talking about?Auburndawg said:Based on what? They have played no one.
-
I' m increasingly convinced that AuburnDoog is a fantastic troll
-
Yes,Tucson is always a tough place to play. Big, aggressive, loud crowds, 2,500 ft elevation, night game etc. Understandable that all of that is worth 50 points.Auburndawg said:Your_Mom said:Dunno if Zona is better than BSU or Illy, but they proved last season they are way better than us.
They had a very good QB last year. He graduated. We played them down there last year. -
UW wins because they have better players. Huskies should win by 20 at home on talent alone, but Sark does his best to lose, so it stays close, but Huskies cover 36-28.
-
-
Has Sark's mythical great recruiting that doesn't include linemen really made UW better than AU? Who develops it better? What will iDawg say when Zona hangs 50?
-
This is what concerns me. Stupid penalties, and going for it on 4th down when we should take the 3 points. In other words, undisciplined...per usual.greenblood said:UW wins because they have better players. Huskies should win by 20 at home on talent alone, but Sark does his best to lose, so it stays close, but Huskies cover 36-28.
-
As a Duck fan, I can honestly say that this is the best Husky team I have seen in the Sark era. You have great speed and terrific tacklers on the backside of the defense.Passion said:
This is what concerns me. Stupid penalties, and going for it on 4th down when we should take the 3 points. In other words, undisciplined...per usual.greenblood said:UW wins because they have better players. Huskies should win by 20 at home on talent alone, but Sark does his best to lose, so it stays close, but Huskies cover 36-28.
On the offensive side of the ball:
You have more speed than ever
Your receivers can now catch the football
Sark has now copied an offensive strategy that hides the team's one glaring weakness which is pass blocking.
Washington football is better now than it has been in years, but don't get me wrong. Although great lipstick, it's still lipstick over a very mediocre pig, which is magnetized by the ineptitude of your head coach. This team will do better than 7-6, but when playing against better talent they will get destroyed. There will be some bleeding buttholes post-game of the Oregon, Stanford, and UCLA games. This team could go 10-3 this year, but the separation between this program and the top tier will still be huge.
10-3 with 3 plungers will feel like a Northwestern like 10-3. Nobody will really think much about it, from a national perspective. -
greenblood said:
As a Duck fan, I can honestly say that this is the best Husky team I have seen in the Sark era. You have great speed and terrific tacklers on the backside of the defense.Passion said:
This is what concerns me. Stupid penalties, and going for it on 4th down when we should take the 3 points. In other words, undisciplined...per usual.greenblood said:UW wins because they have better players. Huskies should win by 20 at home on talent alone, but Sark does his best to lose, so it stays close, but Huskies cover 36-28.
On the offensive side of the ball:
You have more speed than ever
Your receivers can now catch the football
Sark has now copied an offensive strategy that hides the team's one glaring weakness which is pass blocking.
Washington football is better now than it has been in years, but don't get me wrong. Although great lipstick, it's still lipstick over a very mediocre pig, which is magnetized by the ineptitude of your head coach. This team will do better than 7-6, but when playing against better talent they will get destroyed. There will be some bleeding buttholes post-game of the Oregon, Stanford, and UCLA games. This team could go 10-3 this year, but the separation between this program and the top tier will still be huge.
10-3 with 3 plungers will feel like a Northwestern like 10-3. Nobody will really think much about it, from a national perspective.
Doogs would never stop singing Sark's praises after that scenario. -
If Arizona is so good, how can you expect Sark to win?
I expect Sark to win and win comfortably on Saturday. If he doesn't I am going to be pissed. -
I always expect a win. That's why i hate sark, he disappoints me at least 6 times a year.Auburndawg said:If Arizona is so good, how can you expect Sark to win?
I expect Sark to win and win comfortably on Saturday. If he doesn't I am going to be pissed. -
So you don't expect Sark to beat a good team?Auburndawg said:If Arizona is so good, how can you expect Sark to win?
I expect Sark to win and win comfortably on Saturday. If he doesn't I am going to be pissed. -
Sark is an average coach almost certainly.MikeDamone said:If you can't see this is the same team as 2010, even PLSS Can't help you. Maybe we need to wait a couple more years to see if sark is actually an average coach.
Average coaches sometimes luck into good seasons. There's a decent chance this could be one of those. -
Add to those concerns that UW is mediocre up front and there is at least some plunger potential.Passion said:
This is what concerns me. Stupid penalties, and going for it on 4th down when we should take the 3 points. In other words, undisciplined...per usual.greenblood said:UW wins because they have better players. Huskies should win by 20 at home on talent alone, but Sark does his best to lose, so it stays close, but Huskies cover 36-28.
I didn't see last weekend's scrimmage, but it seemed like they experienced some regression in gap containment and open field tackling in the Illinois game. Arizona will gash the Huskies defense if they don't get that shit cleaned up pronto. -
Of course I do. Not going to win every game against good teams, but can't lose them all either. And no losses to mediocrities like Arizona.RaceBannon said:
So you don't expect Sark to beat a good team?Auburndawg said:If Arizona is so good, how can you expect Sark to win?
I expect Sark to win and win comfortably on Saturday. If he doesn't I am going to be pissed. -
I'd say there's more disappointment than that. When was the last time a Sark team really hit on all cylinders? Sarktardo frequently rears his ugly head, an at least one phase of the game has been out of phase since he took over.MikeDamone said:
I always expect a win. That's why i hate sark, he disappoints me at least 6 times a year.Auburndawg said:If Arizona is so good, how can you expect Sark to win?
I expect Sark to win and win comfortably on Saturday. If he doesn't I am going to be pissed. -
This. That is why IHAPO.greenblood said:
As a Duck fan, I can honestly say that this is the best Husky team I have seen in the Sark era. You have great speed and terrific tacklers on the backside of the defense.Passion said:
This is what concerns me. Stupid penalties, and going for it on 4th down when we should take the 3 points. In other words, undisciplined...per usual.greenblood said:UW wins because they have better players. Huskies should win by 20 at home on talent alone, but Sark does his best to lose, so it stays close, but Huskies cover 36-28.
On the offensive side of the ball:
You have more speed than ever
Your receivers can now catch the football
Sark has now copied an offensive strategy that hides the team's one glaring weakness which is pass blocking.
Washington football is better now than it has been in years, but don't get me wrong. Although great lipstick, it's still lipstick over a very mediocre pig, which is magnetized by the ineptitude of your head coach. This team will do better than 7-6, but when playing against better talent they will get destroyed. There will be some bleeding buttholes post-game of the Oregon, Stanford, and UCLA games. This team could go 10-3 this year, but the separation between this program and the top tier will still be huge.
10-3 with 3 plungers will feel like a Northwestern like 10-3. Nobody will really think much about it, from a national perspective. -
Cal last year was pretty solid...but yeah...it's more often than not.Southerndawg said:
I'd say there's more disappointment than that. When was the last time a Sark team really hit on all cylinders? Sarktardo frequently rears his ugly head, an at least one phase of the game has been out of phase since he took over.MikeDamone said:
I always expect a win. That's why i hate sark, he disappoints me at least 6 times a year.Auburndawg said:If Arizona is so good, how can you expect Sark to win?
I expect Sark to win and win comfortably on Saturday. If he doesn't I am going to be pissed. -
Chan Gailey! True?dnc said:
Sark is an average coach almost certainly.MikeDamone said:If you can't see this is the same team as 2010, even PLSS Can't help you. Maybe we need to wait a couple more years to see if sark is actually an average coach.
Average coaches sometimes luck into good seasons. There's a decent chance this could be one of those. -
greenblood said:
As a Duck fan, I can honestly say that this is the best Husky team I have seen in the Sark era. You have great speed and terrific tacklers on the backside of the defense.Passion said:
This is what concerns me. Stupid penalties, and going for it on 4th down when we should take the 3 points. In other words, undisciplined...per usual.greenblood said:UW wins because they have better players. Huskies should win by 20 at home on talent alone, but Sark does his best to lose, so it stays close, but Huskies cover 36-28.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILkkpMEzlZY -
Can we just wait until Stanford or Oregon week? I hate to see the halfbrains pressing too early and too soon.
-
You mean like since he was hired? Its cool that you think we need to wait and see if he can go 6-3 and finish third so you can get excited for next year. Year 6HeretoBeatmyChest said:Can we just wait until Stanford or Oregon week? I hate to see the halfbrains pressing too early and too soon.
