Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

For those who think last night was a signature win

135

Comments

  • BabsGilbyTawdTy
    BabsGilbyTawdTy Member Posts: 1,058

    Ty never really had a signature win other than Syracuse. He had signature almost wins like USC and the first half of the Oklahoma game. Fucking doogs

    Back in 2007, I think a famed ex-Dawgman sage touted Ty Willy's 24-10 victory over Boise State as such.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,574 Founders Club

    Ty never really had a signature win other than Syracuse. He had signature almost wins like USC and the first half of the Oklahoma game. Fucking doogs

    Back in 2007, I think a famed ex-Dawgman sage touted Ty Willy's 24-10 victory over Boise State as such.
    yeah probably so. Boise was coming off the Fiesta Bowl I think
  • HFNY
    HFNY Member Posts: 5,515
    I agree with you there on all parts.

    I'm still not a fan of Babushka's but Browning will start hitting those deep throws, hopefully as soon as the Oregon game. Running game also looked more physical and it's more mature with Eldrenkamp back in and Kirkland at RT (though he has plenty of room for improvement).


    HFNY said:

    It would be nice if the people who ran around crying that the sky was falling during the bye week could admit they went overboard....

    The offense still sucks and I've always said the defense is good. Last year was still a huge disappointment and I'm still pissed about the Cal game and Petersen/Smith being retarded and not running the ball more.
  • HFNY
    HFNY Member Posts: 5,515
    Yeah until further notice, this is still a 6 win team. Until the offense gets over the hump, ceiling isn't that great for 2015.

    If you were setting odds based on the last decade the smart money is still on UW sucking.

    In other words, they do until they don't. Last night was great. I'll watch it again tonight.

    But we better fucking beat Oregon.

  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,413 Standard Supporter
    HFNY said:

    I agree with you there on all parts.

    I'm still not a fan of Babushka's but Browning will start hitting those deep throws, hopefully as soon as the Oregon game. Running game also looked more physical and it's more mature with Eldrenkamp back in and Kirkland at RT (though he has plenty of room for improvement).


    HFNY said:

    It would be nice if the people who ran around crying that the sky was falling during the bye week could admit they went overboard....

    The offense still sucks and I've always said the defense is good. Last year was still a huge disappointment and I'm still pissed about the Cal game and Petersen/Smith being retarded and not running the ball more.
    OL actually looked good. Kirkland was better than McGary or James have been all year at RT and Eldrenkamp played well at LG. I agree that this game could have been a lot different if Browning hit even a couple of big throws. He missed almost every one.
  • HFNY
    HFNY Member Posts: 5,515
    That Petersen was the wrong guy only 18 games into his tenure?

    HFNY said:

    It would be nice if the people who ran around crying that the sky was falling during the bye week could admit they went overboard....

    They might still be right though
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,919
    We get it. Everybody sucks. So even the team that wins the Natty this year should have an asterisk beside it because they were the least drecky.

    Mission accomplished.
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    HFNY said:

    Yeah until further notice, this is still a 6 win team. Until the offense gets over the hump, ceiling isn't that great for 2015.

    If you were setting odds based on the last decade the smart money is still on UW sucking.

    In other words, they do until they don't. Last night was great. I'll watch it again tonight.

    But we better fucking beat Oregon.

    So why are you asking us to say we were wrong, when we were clearly right?