Pm to HuskyFanInAZ
Comments
-
Agreed his offense sucks.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Abundance.CuntWaffle said:What if the reason we are starting freshman is because Sarks recruits are that shitty?
Sark's recruiting sucks.
Pete's offense sucks....so far.
But if Sarks recruits were so bad that they got beat out by a bunch of freshman (not necessarily because they are good yet but because Sarks OL recruits are so bad) then I don't get the "we are choosing to play them". We are playing them because we would be even worse with Sarks noodle armed fags started. -
I'm hearing the NCAA allows coaches to develop inherited playersCuntWaffle said:What if the reason we are starting freshman is because Sarks recruits are that shitty?
-
Possible that some of the guys are unsalvageable dreck?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm hearing the NCAA allows coaches to develop inherited playersCuntWaffle said:What if the reason we are starting freshman is because Sarks recruits are that shitty?
-
I didn't say that a couple of weeks ago when UW didn't score a TD against Boise State.Fecal_Matter said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:
But that's not Peterman's fault because Doog logic.dnc said:
This is the exact perfect response. It's not that we (?) don't have non-Freshman, it's that we (!) have chosen to start freshman.RoadDawg55 said:If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?
Dumb. A couple of weeks ago you guys would've said it was because of Sark's shitty recruiting or development. Now everyone seems to be changing their tune.RoadDawg55 said:If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?
-
Still doesn't take away the fact that they are so terrible that even "developing" would lead to very minimal gain.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm hearing the NCAA allows coaches to develop inherited playersCuntWaffle said:What if the reason we are starting freshman is because Sarks recruits are that shitty?
-
You can't expect to win without top tier talent at every position in the 2 deeps and the practice squad.
Fuck off. -
This sounds familiarThomasFremont said:You can't expect to win without top tier talent at every position in the 2 deeps and the practice squad.
Fuck off. -
It's almost like there's a script.RaceBannon said:
This sounds familiarThomasFremont said:You can't expect to win without top tier talent at every position in the 2 deeps and the practice squad.
Fuck off. -
yep they all suck no matter what. I hate Sark as much as the next guy but this is ridiculous.Tequilla said:
Possible that some of the guys are unsalvageable dreck?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm hearing the NCAA allows coaches to develop inherited playersCuntWaffle said:What if the reason we are starting freshman is because Sarks recruits are that shitty?
-
I'm not trying to play the Seven vs Pete game ... but we've known for a while that the OL recruiting had some major misses/holes in it and that this was the year that if we were going to have some major issues with it it would be this year.dhdawg said:
yep they all suck no matter what. I hate Sark as much as the next guy but this is ridiculous.Tequilla said:
Possible that some of the guys are unsalvageable dreck?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm hearing the NCAA allows coaches to develop inherited playersCuntWaffle said:What if the reason we are starting freshman is because Sarks recruits are that shitty?
I have confidence with Strausser, but the reality is that we're starting 3 RS/True Frosh on the OL. That's not a strong testament of the talent that was inherited/remained after last year.
